[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Creating shared design thinking process for collaborative design

Published: 01 January 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Shared understanding about both the design content and the design process has significant meaning for collaborative design, which influences the quality of final products. Existing approaches have difficulties in supporting designers to structure and share their design thinking while they are performing practical tasks. In this paper we propose Shared Design Thinking Process Model (S-DTPM) to support collaborative design, which is based on co-evolutionary design theory and existing design rationale frameworks. Two principles for S-DTPM have been considered. The elements and representation schema of S-DTPM have been discussed in detail. Based on S-DTPM, a prototype system has been developed for supporting collaborative thinking and capturing shared design rationale. An example, collaborative design is taken to validate the proposed model. S-DTPM can help designers to create shared understanding about the design as well as record shared design thinking process for future use such as design review, design change and redesign.

References

[1]
Representing design rationale to support innovative design reuse: a minimalist approach. Automation in Construction. v10 i6. 663-674.
[2]
Capturing design rationale. Computer-Aided Design. v41. 173-186.
[3]
Brézillon PJ. Explaining for developing a shared context in collaborative design. In: Proceedings of 13th International conference on computer supported cooperative work in design, Santiago, Chile; 2009.
[4]
Capturing decisions and rationale from collaborative design. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (Eds.), Design computing and cognition'08, Springer, Netherlands.
[5]
Developmental trajectories in design thinking: an examination of criteria. Design Studies. v31. 74-91.
[6]
An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration. Design Studies. v23. 187-210.
[7]
Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. Wiley, Chichester.
[8]
Collaborative design: managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives. Interacting with Computers. v18. 1-20.
[9]
The integration of lightweight representation and annotation for collaborative design representation. Research in Engineering Design. v20. 185-200.
[10]
The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Design Studies. v26. 445-461.
[11]
Study of mental iteration in different design situations. Design studies 27. 25-55.
[12]
Standardized data exchange of CAD models with design intent. Computer-Aided Design. v40. 760-777.
[13]
Kleinsmann M. Understanding collaborative design. PhD. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2006.
[14]
Kunz W, Rittel HWJ. Issues as elements of information systems. Working paper 131. Center for Planning and Development Research, Berkeley; 1970.
[15]
Design rationale systems: understanding the issues. IEEE Expert. v12. 78-85.
[16]
What's in design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction. v6. 251-280.
[17]
Liu JH, Sun ZY. Representing design intents for design thinking process modeling, In: International conference on advanced design and manufacture. Sanya (China): Springer; 2008.
[18]
Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction. v6. 201-250.
[19]
Model of co-evolutionary design. Engineering with Computers. v16. 195-208.
[20]
Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design. v14. 47-63.
[21]
PHI: a conceptual foundation for design hypermedia. Design Studies. v12. 30-41.
[22]
A survey of design rationale systems: approaches, representation, capture and retrieval. Engineering with Computers 16. 209-235.
[23]
Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design. Computer-Aided Design. v41. 136-146.
[24]
Computer supported collaborative design : retrospective and perspective. Computers in Industry. v59. 855-862.
[25]
Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication. AI-EDAM. v11. 141-154.
[26]
Song S, Dong A, Agogino AM. Time variation of design 'story telling' in engineering design teams, In: Proceedings of International conference on engineering design ICED03, Stockholm, Sweden; 2003.
[27]
The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies. v19. 249-271.
[28]
Collaborative conceptual design- state of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design. v34. 981-996.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Design Thinking Versus Design Sprint: A Comparative StudyDesign, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy and Theory10.1007/978-3-030-23570-3_22(291-306)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
  • (2018)A journey from Island of knowledge to mutual understanding in global business meetingsAI & Society10.1007/s00146-014-0558-330:4(477-491)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Journal of Network and Computer Applications  Volume 35, Issue 1
January, 2012
518 pages

Publisher

Academic Press Ltd.

United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2012

Author Tags

  1. Collaborative design
  2. Collaborative design thinking process
  3. S-DTPM
  4. Shared understanding

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Design Thinking Versus Design Sprint: A Comparative StudyDesign, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy and Theory10.1007/978-3-030-23570-3_22(291-306)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
  • (2018)A journey from Island of knowledge to mutual understanding in global business meetingsAI & Society10.1007/s00146-014-0558-330:4(477-491)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2018

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media