[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Dog nose-print recognition based on the shape and spatial features of scales

Published: 15 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This study proposes a novel method for dog identification using nose-print recognition, with applications in controlling stray dogs, locating lost pets, and pet insurance verification. Nose prints offer a unique and safer means of recognition than implanted chips. Accurate positioning of the dog's nose print (DNP) region and comparing its features can enhance recognition accuracy. The two-stage segmentation method effectively segments dog nostrils and nose boundaries in the DNP image. It combines brightness and texture enhancement with the U-Net model to generate a dog nose-print mask (DNPMask) and extracts scale-like features using a genetic algorithm. Experiments comparing one-stage and two-stage segmentation methods demonstrate the latter's superiority, with higher recall, precision, accuracy, and F1 score values. The DNPMask method achieves an average recognition rate of 94.93%, 97.10%, and 97.10% for Top1, Top2, and Top3, respectively, significantly improving dog recognition accuracy. However, its performance may be affected by poor-quality images.
Nevertheless, the proposed dog recognition method effectively identifies most dog identities and holds promise for real-life applications, enhancing overall accuracy. The research findings provide a valuable reference for developing dog recognition systems and offer new ideas and directions for related research fields. The improved performance of dog nose-print recognition based on scale-like shape and spatial features (DNPISSFS) supports its superiority over Texture Feature-based Dog Noseprint Image Matching (TFDNPIM), suggesting enhanced dog recognition capabilities with broader implications in animal tracking, pet management, and wildlife conservation. Further analysis and experimentation on a larger dataset will ascertain the method's generalizability and robustness, addressing potential challenges and limitations for future research and practical implementation in various domains. The source code and trained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/Chuen-HorngLin/Texture-Feature-based-Dog-Noseprint-Image-Matching.

References

[1]
H.B. Bae, D. Pak, S. Lee, Dog nose-print identification using deep neural networks, IEEE Access (2021) 49141–49153.
[2]
D. Blanc, V. Racine, A. Khalil, M. Deloche, J.A. Broyelle, I. Hammouamri, E. Sinitambirivoutin, M. Fiammante, E. Verdier, T. Besson, A. Sadate, M. Lederlin, F. Laurent, G. Chassagnon, G. Ferretti, Y. Diascorn, P.Y. Brillet, L. Cassagnes, C. Caramella, A. Loubet, N. Abassebay, P. Cuingnet, M. Ohana, J. Behr, A. Ginzac, H. Veyssiere, X. Durando, I. Bousaïd, N. Lassau, J. Brehant, Artificial intelligence solution to classify pulmonary nodules on CT, Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 101 (12) (2020) 803–810.
[3]
M.V. Caya, E.D. Arturo, C.Q. Bautista, Dog identification system using noseprint biometrics, 2021 IEEE 13th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management, Manila, Philippines, 28-30 Nov. 2021, 2021.
[4]
Y.K. Chan, C.C. Chang, Image matching using run-length feature, Pattern Recognition Letters 22 (5) (2001) 447–455.
[5]
Y.K. Chan, D.C. Huang, K.C. Liu, R.T. Chen, X. Jiang, An automatic indirect immunofluorescence cell segmentation system, Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2014 (2014) 1–13.
[6]
W.L. Chen, Nose pattern based dog identification with double-input VGG16 model, Master’s Thesis of National Chung Hsing University (2020) 1–43.
[7]
Y.H. Cheng, Iris Identification system based on YoloV3 and CNN, Master’s Thesis of National Chung Hsing University, 2020.
[8]
Y.C. Chi, Scaly pattern segmentation of dog nose print, Master’s Thesis of National Chung Hsing University (2019) 1–56.
[9]
S. Cho, J. Paeng, T. Kim, C. Kim, J.S. Kim, H. Kim, J. Kwon, Dog noseprint identification algorithm, 2021 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Jeju Island, Korea (South), 13-16 Jan. 2021, 2021.
[10]
H.I. Choi, M.Y. Kim, H.Y. Yoon, S. Lee, S.S. Choi, C.Y. Han, …., S.H. Kwon, Study on the viability of canine nose pattern as a unique biometric marker, Animals 11 (12) (2021) 3372.
[11]
H.I. Choi, Y. Lee, H. Shin, S. Lee, S.S. Choi, C.Y. Han, S.H. Kwon, The formation and invariance of canine nose pattern of beagle dogs from early puppy to young adult periods, Animals 11 (9) (2021) 2664.
[12]
R.A. Fisher, The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals of Eugenics 7 (2) (1936) 179–188.
[13]
D.E. Goldberg, J.H. Holland, Genetic algorithms and machine learning, Machine Learing 3 (1998) 95–99.
[14]
A. Hyvärinen, E. Oja, Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications, Neural Networks 13 (4–5) (2000) 411–430.
[15]
M.K. Hu, Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 8 (2) (1962) 179–187.
[16]
A.M. Johnston, D.S. Edwards, Welfare implications of identification of cattle by ear tags, Veterinary Record 138 (25) (1996) 612–614.
[17]
D.H. Jang, K.S. Kwon, J.K. Kim, K.Y. Yang, J.B. Kim, Dog identification method based on muzzle pattern image, Applied Sciences 10 (24) (2020) 8994.
[18]
S. Kumar, A. Pandey, K.S.R. Satwik, S. Kumar, S.K. Singh, A.K. Singh, A. Mohan, Deep learning framework for recognition of cattle using muzzle point image pattern, Measurement 116 (2018) 1–17.
[19]
S. Kumar, S.K. Singh, Monitoring of pet animal in smart cities using animal biometrics, Future Generation Computer Systems 83 (2018) 553–563.
[20]
S. Kumar, S.K. Singh, Biometric Recognition for Pet Animal, Journal of Software Engineering and Applications 7 (5) (2014) 470–482.
[21]
Y. Kortli, M. Jridi, A.A. Falou, M. Atri, Face Recognition Systems: A Survey. Sensors 20 (2) (2020) 342.
[22]
Y.H. Lai, Texture feature based dog nostril image segmentation, Master’s Thesis of National Chung Hsing University (2020) 1–46.
[23]
J. Landt, The history of RFID, IEEE Potentials 24 (4) (2005) 8–11.
[24]
B. Li, Z. Wang, N. Wu, Dog noseprint matching with dual global descriptor based on contrastive learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2022) Retrieved from arXiv:2206.00580.
[25]
Li, W. C. (2021). Combining multiple neural network technology for pigeon iris recognition. Master’s Thesis of National Chung Hsing University.
[26]
S. Liu, Y. Li, J. Zhou, J. Hu, N. Chen, Y. Shang, …., T. Li, Segmenting nailfold capillaries using an improved U-net network, Microvascular Research 130 (2020).
[27]
J. Long, E. Shelhamer, T. Darrell, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015, pp. 3431–3440.
[28]
Meadows, L. B. (2005). Pet identification system and method. [S.l.]: Google Patents, jan. 18 2005. US Patent 6, 845,3 82.
[29]
U.T. Nguyen, A. Bhuiyan, L.A. Park, K. Ramamohanarao, An effective retinal blood vessel segmentation method using multi-scale line detection, Pattern Recognition 46 (3) (2013) 703–715.
[30]
A. Noviyanto, A.M. Arymurthy, Beef cattle identification based on muzzle pattern using a matching refinement technique in the SIFT method, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 99 (2013) 77–84.
[31]
N. Otsu, A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms, IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9 (1) (1979) 62–66.
[32]
S.M. Pizer, E.P. Amburn, J.D. Austin, R. Cromartie, A. Geselowitz, T.H. Greer, J.B. Zimmerman, …., K. Zuiderveld, Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 39 (3) (1987) 355–368.
[33]
C. Poynton, Digital video and HD: Algorithms and Interfaces, Second edition, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers is an imprint of Elsevier 225 Wyman Street, Waltham MA 02451 USA, 2012.
[34]
J. Redmon, A. Farhadi, Yolov3: An incremental improvement, Retrieved from (2018) arXiv:1804.02767.
[35]
A.M. Reza, Realization of the contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) for real-time image enhancement, Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image and Video Technology 38 (1) (2004) 35–44.
[36]
O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2015) 234–241.
[37]
Shlens, J. (2014). A tutorial on principal component analysis. Retrieved from arXiv:1404.1100.
[38]
S.C. Yang, Texture features based dog nose print image matching, Master’s Thesis of National Chung Hsing University, 2021.
[39]
Yang, Y. T., & Chin, J. (2021). Report finds 6.19 percent rise in stray dog population. Taiwan News, Aug 21, 2021 (pp. 3), Available online: https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2021/08/21/2003762978 (accessed on March 19, 2023).
[40]
J. Yao, Complete Gabor transformation for signal representation, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2 (2) (1993) 152–159.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal  Volume 240, Issue C
Apr 2024
1601 pages

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 15 April 2024

Author Tags

  1. Image contrast
  2. Dog nostril
  3. Dog nose-print mask
  4. Segmentation
  5. Scale-like
  6. Dog recognition

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media