[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Quantile regression network-based cross-domain prediction model for rolling bearing remaining useful life

Published: 18 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Transfer learning improves remaining useful life (RUL) prediction accuracy across domains by aligning data distributions for different operating conditions. However, the uncertainty caused by the complex working conditions and stochastic degradation process of rolling bearings is not considered, leading to poor credibility of the prediction results and affecting the development of the predictive maintenance strategy. In response to this problem, the paper proposes a deep subdomain adaptation time-quantile regression network (DSATQRN) model to compress rolling bearing uncertainty intervals of RUL across prediction. The model uses deep subdomain adaptation to align the feature distribution and introduces temporal correlation to construct a temporal quantile regression network to obtain interval prediction results. Finally, the uncertainty in the prediction results is quantified by kernel density estimation. The model was experimented with using the open XJTU-SY Bearing Datasets and IEEE PHM 2012 Challenge Datasets. It verifies the performance of the proposed model from three aspects: point prediction accuracy, interval prediction suitability, and probabilistic prediction overall performance. The experimental results show that the average interval coverage of the proposed model on the two datasets is 91.25% and 90.43%, and the average prediction interval width is 16.65% and 13.69%, respectively. It is demonstrated that the cross-domain prediction results of the DSATQRN possess high prediction accuracy and narrow prediction interval, and the model has good robustness and reliability.

Graphical Abstract

Display Omitted

Highlights

A cross-domain probability prediction model is built for rolling bearings.
The model compresses the uncertainty interval of RUL cross-domain prediction.
The model improves the reliability of the prediction results.
The model is end-to-end without manual feature extraction.

References

[1]
J. Lee, E. Lapira, S. Yang, et al., Predictive manufacturing system-Trends of next-generation production systems[J], IFAC Proc. Vol. 46 (7) (2013) 150–156,.
[2]
A. Canito, M. Fernandes, J. Mourinho, et al., Flexible architecture for data-driven predictive maintenance with support for offline and online machine learning techniques[C], IECON 2021–47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–7,.
[3]
J. Lee, F. Wu, W. Zhao, et al., Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications[J], Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 42 (1-2) (2014) 314–334,.
[4]
Y. Qian, R. Yan, R.X. Gao, A multi-time scale approach to remaining useful life prediction in rolling bearing[J], Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 83 (2017) 549–567,.
[5]
S. Marble, B.P. Morton, Predicting the remaining life of propulsion system bearings[C], 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE, 2006, p. 8,.
[6]
F. Li, W. Hu, Q. Meng, et al., A new damage-mechanics-based model for rolling contact fatigue analysis of cylindrical roller bearing[J], Tribol. Int. 120 (2018) 105–114,.
[7]
W.K. Yu, T.A. Harris, A new stress-based fatigue life model for ball bearings[J], Tribology Trans. 44 (1) (2001) 11–18,.
[8]
Y. Lei, N. Li, L. Guo, et al., Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction[J], Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 104 (2018) 799–834,.
[9]
Y. Song, S. Gao, Y. Li, et al., Distributed attention-based temporal convolutional network for remaining useful life prediction[J], IEEE Internet Things J. 8 (12) (2020) 9594–9602,.
[10]
M. Ma, Z. Mao, Deep-convolution-based LSTM network for remaining useful life prediction[J], IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 17 (3) (2020) 1658–1667,.
[11]
C. Zhang, P. Lim, A.K. Qin, et al., Multiobjective deep belief networks ensemble for remaining useful life estimation in prognostics[J], IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 28 (10) (2016) 2306–2318,.
[12]
W. Mao, J. He, M.J. Zuo, Predicting remaining useful life of rolling bearings based on deep feature representation and transfer learning[J], IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 69 (4) (2019) 1594–1608,.
[13]
J. Zhu, N. Chen, C. Shen, A new data-driven transferable remaining useful life prediction approach for bearing under different working conditions[J], Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 139 (2020),.
[14]
H. Cheng, X. Kong, G. Chen, et al., Transferable convolutional neural network based remaining useful life prediction of bearing under multiple failure behaviors[J], Measurement 168 (2021),.
[15]
Y. Ding, M. Jia, Q. Miao, et al., Remaining useful life estimation using deep metric transfer learning for kernel regression[J], Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 212 (2021),.
[16]
J. Zhu, N. Chen, C. Shen, A new data-driven transferable remaining useful life prediction approach for bearing under different working conditions[J], Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 139 (2020),.
[17]
X. Li, W. Zhang, H. Ma, et al., Degradation alignment in remaining useful life prediction using deep cycle-consistent learning[J], IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 33 (10) (2021) 5480–5491,.
[18]
P. Ding, X. Zhao, H. Shao, et al., Machinery cross domain degradation prognostics considering compound domain shifts[J], Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 239 (2023),.
[19]
Z. Wang, Y. Ta, W. Cai, et al., Research on a remaining useful life prediction method for degradation angle identification two-stage degradation process[J], Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 184 (2023),.
[20]
C. Chen, J. Shi, N. Lu, et al., Data-driven predictive maintenance strategy considering the uncertainty in remaining useful life prediction[J], Neurocomputing 494 (2022) 79–88,.
[21]
P. Ding, M. Jia, Y. Ding, et al., Machinery Probabilistic Few-Shot Prognostics Considering Prediction Uncertainty[J], IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. (2023),.
[22]
L. Cao, H. Zhang, Z. Meng, et al., A parallel GRU with dual-stage attention mechanism model integrating uncertainty quantification for probabilistic RUL prediction of wind turbine bearings[J], Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 235 (2023),.
[23]
D. She, M. Jia, A BiGRU method for remaining useful life prediction of machinery[J], Measurement 167 (2021),.
[24]
D. Liu, X. Duan, S. Wang, et al., A reliability estimation method based on signal feature extraction and artificial neural network supported Wiener process with random effects[J], Appl. Soft Comput. 136 (2023),.
[25]
C. Chen, J. Shi, M. Shen, et al., A Predictive Maintenance Strategy Using Deep Learning Quantile Regression and Kernel Density Estimation for Failure Prediction[J], IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72 (2023) 1–12,.
[26]
M. Rana, S. Sethuvenkatraman, M. Goldsworthy, A data-driven approach based on quantile regression forest to forecast cooling load for commercial buildings[J], Sustain. Cities Soc. 76 (2022),.
[27]
J. Hu, Q. Luo, J. Tang, et al., Conformalized temporal convolutional quantile regression networks for wind power interval forecasting[J], Energy 248 (2022),.
[28]
X. Qin, D. Yin, X. Dong, et al., Passenger Flow Prediction of Scenic Spots in Jilin Province Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Improved Quantile Regression Long Short-Term Memory Network[J], ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 11 (10) (2022) 509,.
[29]
C. Tan, F. Sun, T. Kong, et al., A survey on deep transfer learning[C], (//) Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2018: 27th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Rhodes, Greece, October 4-7, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 27, Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 270–279,. (//).
[30]
A. Gretton, K.M. Borgwardt, M.J. Rasch, et al., A kernel two-sample test[J], J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13 (1) (2012) 723–773. 〈https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume13/gretton12a/gretton12a.pdf?ref=https://githubhelp.com〉.
[31]
Y. Zhu, F. Zhuang, J. Wang, et al., Deep subdomain adaptation network for image classification[J], IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 32 (4) (2020) 1713–1722,.
[32]
Y. Ding, M. Jia, Y. Cao, Remaining useful life estimation under multiple operating conditions via deep subdomain adaptation[J], IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70 (2021) 1–11,.
[33]
K. Wang, H. Wang, S. Li, Renewable quantile regression for streaming datasets[J], Knowl. -Based Syst. 235 (2022),.
[34]
L. Chen, Y. Zhou, Quantile regression in big data: A divide and conquer based strategy[J], Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 144 (2020),.
[35]
D.C. Howell, Median absolute deviation[J], Wiley StatsRef: Stat. Ref. Online (2014),.
[36]
M. Wahbah, B. Mohandes, T.H.M. EL-Fouly, et al., Unbiased cross-validation kernel density estimation for wind and PV probabilistic modelling[J], Energy Convers. Manag. 266 (2022),.
[37]
C. Pan, J. Tan, D. Feng, Prediction intervals estimation of solar generation based on gated recurrent unit and kernel density estimation[J], Neurocomputing 453 (2021) 552–562,.
[38]
Y. He, H. Li, Probability density forecasting of wind power using quantile regression neural network and kernel density estimation[J], Energy Convers. Manag. 164 (2018) 374–384,.
[39]
Y. Chen, G. Peng, Z. Zhu, et al., A novel deep learning method based on attention mechanism for bearing remaining useful life prediction[J], Appl. Soft Comput. 86 (2020),.
[40]
Z. Zhang, H. Qin, Y. Liu, et al., Wind speed forecasting based on quantile regression minimal gated memory network and kernel density estimation[J], Energy Convers. Manag. 196 (2019) 1395–1409,.
[41]
X. Li, W. Zhang, Q. Ding, Deep learning-based remaining useful life estimation of bearings using multi-scale feature extraction[J], Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 182 (2019) 208–221,.
[42]
P. Nectoux, R. Gouriveau, K. Medjaher, et al., PRONOSTIA: An experimental platform for bearings accelerated degradation tests[C], IEEE Int. Conf. Progn. Health Manag., PHM'12. IEEE Cat. Number.: CPF12PHM-CDR (2012) 1–8. 〈https://hal.science/hal-00719503/〉.
[43]
H. Quan, D. Srinivasan, A. Khosravi, Short-term load and wind power forecasting using neural network-based prediction intervals[J], IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25 (2) (2013) 303–315,.
[44]
Y. Liu, L. Ye, H. Qin, et al., Middle and long-term runoff probabilistic forecasting based on gaussian mixture regression[J], Water Resour. Manag. 33 (2019) 1785–1799,.
[45]
B. Wang, Y. Lei, N. Li, et al., A hybrid prognostics approach for estimating remaining useful life of rolling element bearings[J], IEEE Trans. Reliab. 69 (1) (2018) 401–412,.
[46]
J. Wen, H. Gao, S. Li, et al., Fault diagnosis of ball bearings using synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms and SVM[C], 2015 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6,.
[47]
R. Keys, Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing[J], IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. 29 (6) (1981) 1153–1160,.
[48]
X. Glorot, Y. Bengio, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks[C], Proc. Thirteen. Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Stat. JMLR Workshop Conf. Proc. (2010) 249–256. 〈http://proceedings.mlr.press/v9/glorot10a〉.
[49]
P. Nectoux, R. Gouriveau, K. Medjaher, et al., PRONOSTIA: An experimental platform for bearings accelerated degradation tests[C], IEEE Int. Conf. Progn. Health Manag., PHM'12. IEEE Cat. Number.: CPF12PHM-CDR (2012) 1–8. 〈https://hal.science/hal-00719503〉.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied Soft Computing
Applied Soft Computing  Volume 159, Issue C
Jul 2024
1025 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 18 July 2024

Author Tags

  1. ACL
  2. ASC
  3. CRPS
  4. CV
  5. DSAN
  6. KED
  7. LMMD
  8. LSTM
  9. MAD
  10. MAE
  11. MISE
  12. MMD
  13. PDF
  14. PICP
  15. PINAW
  16. QR
  17. RMSE
  18. RUL
  19. SWT
  20. TFR

Author Tags

  1. Rolling bearing
  2. Remaining useful life
  3. Uncertainty quantification
  4. Time series prediction
  5. Domain adaptation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media