[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Threat impact analysis to air traffic control systems through flight delay modeling

Published: 01 December 2021 Publication History

Highlights

Modeling the air traffic control system from the perspectives of air and ground.
A clear metric to assess the magnitude of the threat impact.
Analysis can be done separately or simultaneously at different levels.
Path rerouting, path selection, and speed change enhance the reality of the model.

Abstract

Air traffic control (ATC) systems increasingly rely on communication, navigation, and other emerging digital technologies, making them more susceptible to external threats. To better analyze the different impacts, this paper proposes a new flight delay model that models the ATC system from two perspectives. In the air delay, we view the problem as an optimal path choice with a set of capacity constraints and consider the speed change, rerouting, and pathfinding. In the ground delay, the concept of cellular automata is extended to model the flight queue at each airport. Last, the system dynamics of delays are considered, and the two stages of modeling are combined using flight delay as an indicator to achieve an intuitive description of the impact on the system threat. Compared to the current state of the art, the model is shown to be a simple way to analyze the impact of different sophisticated threats. It also helps aviation system planners better understand the impact of different threats so that effective measures can be taken to improve system performance.

References

[1]
S. Belkoura, J.M. Peña, M. Zanin, Generation and recovery of airborne delays in air transport, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 69 (2016) 436–450.
[2]
A. Bolonkin, G.B. Gilyard, Estimated benefits of variable-geometry wing camber control for transport aircraft, Citeseer. (1999).
[3]
Y.u. Chen, J. Wang, F. Jin, Robustness of China’s air transport network from 1975 to 2017, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 539 (2020) 122876,.
[4]
Dillingham, G. L., Wilshusen, G. C., & Barkakati, N. (2015). Air traffic control: FAA needs a more comprehensive approach to address cybersecurity as agency transitions to NextGen.
[5]
W. Ding, Y.u. Zhang, M. Hansen, Downstream impact of flight rerouting, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 88 (2018) 176–186.
[6]
H. Erkan, N.K. Erkip, Ö. Şafak, Collaborative decision making for air traffic management: A generic mathematical program for the rescheduling problem, Computers & Industrial Engineering 137 (2019) 106016,.
[7]
FAA, (2016). The Future of the NAS. Retrieved February 10, 2020 from https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/media/futureofthenas.pdf.
[8]
P. Fleurquin, J.J. Ramasco, V.M. Eguiluz, Systemic delay propagation in the US airport network, Scientific reports 3 (2013) 1159.
[10]
D. García-Heredia, A. Alonso-Ayuso, E. Molina, A Combinatorial model to optimize air traffic flow management problems, Computers & Operations Research 112 (2019) 104768,.
[11]
A. Greenberg, Next-Gen Air Traffic Control Vulnerable To Hackers Spoofing Planes Out Of Thin Air, Forbes Com (2012).
[12]
C.W. Gregory, B. Nabajyoti, L.D. Gerald, Information Security: FAA Needs to Address Weaknesses in Air Traffic Control Systems, Information Management. (2015).
[13]
S. Hedayati, V. Sadeghi-Firoozabadi, M. Bagheri, M. Heidari, N.N. Sze, Evaluating differences in cognitive functions and personality traits among air traffic controllers with and without error history, Safety Science 139 (2021) 105208,.
[14]
M. Janić, Reprint of “Modelling the resilience, friability and costs of an air transport network affected by a large-scale disruptive event”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 81 (2015) 77–92.
[15]
M. Janić, Modeling the resilience of an airline cargo transport network affected by a large scale disruptive event, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 77 (2019) 425–448.
[16]
N. Kafle, B.o. Zou, Modeling flight delay propagation: A new analytical-econometric approach, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 93 (2016) 520–542.
[17]
O. Lordan, J.M. Sallan, P. Simo, Study of the topology and robustness of airline route networks from the complex network approach: A survey and research agenda, Journal of Transport Geography 37 (2014) 112–120.
[18]
O. Lordan, J.M. Sallan, P. Simo, D. Gonzalez-Prieto, Robustness of the air transport network, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 68 (2014) 155–163.
[19]
A. Volpe Lovato, C. Hora Fontes, M. Embiruçu, R. Kalid, A fuzzy modeling approach to optimize control and decision making in conflict management in air traffic control, Computers & Industrial Engineering 115 (2018) 167–189.
[20]
M.S. Mahmoud, M.M. Hamdan, U.A. Baroudi, Modeling and control of cyber-physical systems subject to cyber attacks: A survey of recent advances and challenges, Neurocomputing 338 (2019) 101–115.
[21]
K.M. Malone, Dynamic queueing systems : Behavior and approximations for individual queues and for networks, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995.
[22]
T.-P. Nguyen, Y.-K. Lin, Reliability assessment of a stochastic air transport network with late arrivals, Computers & Industrial Engineering 151 (2021) 106956,.
[23]
U.S.G.A. Office, Air Traffic Control: FAA Needs a More Comprehensive Approach to Address Cybersecurity As Agency Transitions to NextGen, International Journal of Applied Radiation & Isotopes 26 (2015) 313–314.
[24]
J.V. Pérez–Rodríguez, J.M. Pérez–Sánchez, E. Gómez–Déniz, Modelling the asymmetric probabilistic delay of aircraft arrival, Journal of Air Transport Management 62 (2017) 90–98.
[25]
N. Pyrgiotis, K.M. Malone, A. Odoni, Modelling delay propagation within an airport network, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 27 (2013) 60–75.
[26]
Repantis, K. (2014). Why Hasn't Commercial Air Travel Gotten Any Faster Since the 1960s? https://alum.mit.edu/slice/why-hasnt-commercial-air-travel-gotten-any-faster-1960s.
[27]
Roy, S., & Sridhar, B. (2016). Cyber-threat assessment for the air traffic management system: A network controls approach. In 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (pp. 4354).
[28]
J. Skorupski, The simulation-fuzzy method of assessing the risk of air traffic accidents using the fuzzy risk matrix, Safety science 88 (2016) 76–87.
[29]
X. Sun, S. Wandelt, Network similarity analysis of air navigation route systems, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 70 (2014) 416–434.
[30]
X. Sun, S. Wandelt, F. Linke, Temporal evolution analysis of the European air transportation system: Air navigation route network and airport network, Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 3 (2) (2015) 153–168.
[31]
A. Tamimi, A. Hahn, S. Roy, Cyber Threat Impact Analysis to Air Traffic Flows Through Dynamic Queue Networks, ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems 4 (3) (2020) 1–22.
[32]
A. Turner, Ghost in the Machine. Air Traffic, Management. (2012).
[33]
J.H. Williams, T.L. Signore, National Airspace System Security Cyber Architecture, Journal of Air Traffic Control 53 (2011) 37–42.
[34]
C.-L. Wu, K. Law, Modelling the delay propagation effects of multiple resource connections in an airline network using a Bayesian network model, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 122 (2019) 62–77.
[35]
Wu, Q., Hu, M., Ma, X., Wang, Y., Cong, W., Delahaye, D. (2018). Modeling flight delay propagation in airport and Airspace Network. In 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (pp. 3556–3561). IEEE.
[36]
H. Yun-xiang, Z. Jian-wei, H. Xiao-qiong, Study of the optimization model for traffic flow, Computers & Industrial Engineering 136 (2019) 429–435.
[37]
M. Zanin, S. Belkoura, Y. Zhu, Network analysis of chinese air transport delay propagation, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 30 (2) (2017) 491–499.

Index Terms

  1. Threat impact analysis to air traffic control systems through flight delay modeling
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Computers and Industrial Engineering
        Computers and Industrial Engineering  Volume 162, Issue C
        Dec 2021
        1557 pages

        Publisher

        Pergamon Press, Inc.

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 01 December 2021

        Author Tags

        1. Air traffic control system
        2. Cyber-physical system
        3. Flight delays
        4. Analytical model
        5. Threat impact analysis

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media