[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

The voting analytic hierarchy process method for discriminating among efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis

Published: 01 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Making optimal use of available resources has always been of interest to humankind, and different approaches have been used in an attempt to make maximum use of existing resources. Limitations of capital, manpower, energy, etc., have led managers to seek ways for optimally using such resources. In fact, being informed of the performance of the units under the supervision of a manager is the most important task with regard to making sensible decisions for managing them. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) suggests an appropriate method for evaluating the efficiency of homogeneous units with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. DEA models classify decision making units (DMUs) into efficient and inefficient ones. However, in most cases, managers and researchers are interested in ranking the units and selecting the best DMU. Various scientific models have been proposed by researchers for ranking DMUs. Each of these models has some weakness(es), which makes it difficult to select the appropriate ranking model. This paper presents a method for ranking efficient DMUs by the voting analytic hierarchy process (VAHP). The paper reviews some ranking models in DEA and discusses their strengths and weaknesses. Then, we provide the method for ranking efficient DMUs by VAHP. Finally we give an example to illustrate our approach and then the new method is employed to rank efficient units in a real world problem.

References

[1]
A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. v39 i10. 1261-1264.
[2]
An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal. v38. 14-21.
[3]
Memoire sur les Elections au Scrutin. Histoire de l'Acad. Royale Sci., Paris.
[4]
Voting procedures. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K. (Eds.), Handbook of social choice and welfare, Vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 173-236.
[5]
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. v2. 429-444.
[6]
A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Science. v36 i11. 1302-1310.
[7]
An effective total ranking model for a ranked voting system. Omega. v33. 491-496.
[8]
A selection method for a preferential election. Applied Mathematics and Computation. v163. 107-116.
[9]
Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research. v90. 461-472.
[10]
A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note. European Journal of Operational Research. v97. 600-604.
[11]
A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set. European Journal of Operational Research. v181. 331-337.
[12]
Modified MAJ model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation. v174. 1054-1059.
[13]
A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights. Applied Mathematics and Computation. v166. 265-281.
[14]
Supplier selection and management system considering relationships in supply chain management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. v48. 307-318.
[15]
A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation. v184. 638-648.
[16]
Ranking of DMUs on the DEA frontier with common weights. Computers and Operations Research. v35 i5. 1624-1637.
[17]
The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics. v97 i3. 308-317.
[18]
Preference aggregation and DEA: An analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates. European Journal of Operational Research. v197. 714-721.
[19]
A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection systems for different types of cooperative customer/supplier. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. v20. 70-84.
[20]
A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in DEA. Computational Optimization and Applications. v14. 261-266.
[21]
An analytic approach to supplier selection. Journal of Purchasing Supply Management. v1. 27-32.
[22]
Navidi, N. (2010). Ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis (DEA) by means of MADM methods. MSc thesis, Isfahan University of Technology.
[23]
The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. v146 i1. 155-166.
[24]
Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management. v25 i2. 31-36.
[25]
A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data. European Journal of Operational Research. v151. 233-237.
[26]
Application of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. v10. 5-9.
[27]
The analytic hierarchy. 1980. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[28]
Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In: Silkman, R.H. (Ed.), Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. pp. 73-105.
[29]
Soltanifar, M. (2011a). Ranking of different common set of weights models using a voting model and its application in determining efficient DMUs. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, in press.
[30]
Soltanifar, M. (2011b). Introducing an interval efficiency for each candidate in ranked voting data using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Society Systems Science, in press.
[31]
Ranking of different ranking models using a voting model and its application in determining efficient candidates. International Journal of Society Systems Science. v2 i4. 375-389.
[32]
DEA nonparametric ranking test and index measurement: Slack-adjusted DEA and an application to Japanese agriculture cooperatives. Omega. v27. 315-326.
[33]
An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega. v29. 171-182.
[34]
Duality classification and slacks in data envelopment analysis. The Annals of Operation Research. v66. 109-138.
[35]
A slack-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. v143. 32-41.
[36]
Discriminating DEA efficient candidates by considering their least relative total scores. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. v206. 209-215.
[37]
Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development program: A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. Journal of Operations Research Society. v51. 916-930.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Hybrid DEA-BWM-KEMIRA approach for multiple attribute decision-making: a weighted analysis perspectiveSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-024-09933-328:20(12061-12079)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Voting-KEmeny Median Indicator Ranks Accordance method for determining criteria priority and weights in solving multi-attribute decision-making problemsSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-022-07807-027:10(6613-6628)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2019)Short CommunicationComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.01761:3(897-901)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2019
  • Show More Cited By
  1. The voting analytic hierarchy process method for discriminating among efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Computers and Industrial Engineering
        Computers and Industrial Engineering  Volume 60, Issue 4
        May, 2011
        410 pages

        Publisher

        Pergamon Press, Inc.

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 01 May 2011

        Author Tags

        1. Data envelopment analysis
        2. Ranking
        3. Voting analytic hierarchy process

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Hybrid DEA-BWM-KEMIRA approach for multiple attribute decision-making: a weighted analysis perspectiveSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-024-09933-328:20(12061-12079)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
        • (2023)Voting-KEmeny Median Indicator Ranks Accordance method for determining criteria priority and weights in solving multi-attribute decision-making problemsSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-022-07807-027:10(6613-6628)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
        • (2019)Short CommunicationComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.01761:3(897-901)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2019
        • (2018)REDSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-015-1860-921:5(1271-1290)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2018

        View Options

        View options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media