[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

A mathematical framework for sequential passenger and baggage screening to enhance aviation security

Published: 01 August 2009 Publication History

Abstract

To enhance security at both national and global levels, airport security screening systems must be designed with high efficiency and effectiveness, which are affected by both screening technologies and operational procedures for utilizing those technologies. The operational efficiency and aviation security can be enhanced if an effective passenger prescreening system is integrated into the baggage screening system. In this paper, passenger information is incorporated into a two-level checked-baggage screening system to determine the screening strategy for different subsets of passengers. By deploying a passenger prescreening system, this paper considers selectively applying baggage screening procedures for 100% screening. Since new image-based screening technologies differ widely in cost and accuracy, a comprehensive mathematical framework is developed in this paper for selecting technology or combination of technologies for efficient 100% baggage screening. The objective is to determine the optimal combination of technologies and the setting of threshold values for these screening technologies as well. Probability and optimization techniques are used to quantify and evaluate the risk and cost-effectiveness of various device deployment configurations, which are captured by using a system life-cycle cost model. Numerical analysis for all possible system arrangements is demonstrated.

References

[1]
CAPPS II: The foundation of aviation security?. Risk Analysis. v24 i4. 909-916.
[2]
Safe at home? An experiment in domestic airline security. Operations Research. v49 i2. 181-195.
[3]
Rethinking checked-baggage screening. Policy Study No. 297. Research Foundation, Los Angeles.
[4]
Designing optimal aviation baggage screening strategies using simulated annealing. Computers & Operations Research. v31. 1753-1767.
[5]
On determining specifications and selection of alternative technologies for airport baggage screening. Risk Analysis. v27 i5. 1299-1310.
[6]
Feng, Q., & Sahin, H. (2007). Selection of alternative technologies for airport checked-baggage-security systems. In Proceedings of the 2007 industrial engineering research conference, Nashville, TN.
[7]
Designing airport checked-baggage-screening strategies considering system capability and reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. v94 i2. 618-627.
[8]
Fuller, S. K. & Petersen S. R. (1995). Life-cycle costing manual for the federal energy management program. U.S. Department of Commerce.
[9]
On the determination of single sampling attribute plans based upon a linear cost model and a prior distribution. Technometrics. v13 i3. 483-498.
[10]
A cost-benefit analysis of alternative device configurations for aviation-checked baggage security screening. Risk Analysis. v26 i2. 297-310.
[11]
A detection theoretic approach to modeling aviation security problems using the Knapsack problem. IIE Transactions. v33. 747-759.
[12]
Addressing the dependency problem in access security system architecture design. Risk Analysis. v16 i6. 801-812.
[13]
Probability models for access security system architectures. Journal of the Operational Research Society. v48 i3. 255-263.
[14]
Bayesian reliability analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[15]
Integer programming models and analysis for a multilevel passenger screening problem. IIE Transactions. v39. 73-81.
[16]
A sequential stochastic security system design problem for aviation security. Transportation Science. v41 i2. 182-194.
[17]
Simms, A. E. (1997). A stochastic approach to modeling aviation security problems using the Knapsack problem. Master of Science Thesis. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
[18]
Transportation Security Administration (TSA). (2006). Recommended security guidelines for airport planning, design and construction. Available from http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/airport_security_design_guidelines.pdf. Accessed 20.07.07.
[19]
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2006). Aviation security: TSA oversight of checked baggage screening procedures could be strengthened. Report Number GAO-06-869. Available from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06869.pdf. Accessed 20.07.07.
[20]
Analyzing the cost of screening selectee and non-selectee baggage. Risk Analysis. v23 i5. 897-908.

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Passenger Profiling and Screening for Aviation Security in the Presence of Strategic AttackersDecision Analysis10.1287/deca.1120.025810:1(63-81)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers and Industrial Engineering
Computers and Industrial Engineering  Volume 57, Issue 1
August, 2009
445 pages

Publisher

Pergamon Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 August 2009

Author Tags

  1. Aviation security risk analysis
  2. Checked-baggage screening
  3. Passenger prescreening
  4. Selective screening
  5. System life-cycle cost
  6. Threshold values

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Passenger Profiling and Screening for Aviation Security in the Presence of Strategic AttackersDecision Analysis10.1287/deca.1120.025810:1(63-81)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2013

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media