[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Sharing unwanted sexual experiences online: : A cross-platform analysis of disclosures before, during and after the #MeToo movement

Published: 01 July 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Online disclosure of sexual violence victimisation is a relatively new phenomenon. While prior research has mainly relied on analysis of Twitter data from the #MeToo period, this study compares such disclosures across platforms over two years. Using machine learning, 2927 disclosures were identified for quantitative content analysis and multiple correspondence analysis. Online platforms differed in timing of the posts, information shared, information density, co-occurrence of information and the length of the disclosure message. Most disclosures were found on the platform Twitter, and during the #MeToo movement. These posts differ from disclosures on other platforms and outside the viral movement. Regarding the content, across all platforms and periods, clustering was found around offender-oriented information, making the offender an explicit part of the experience. This study shows that an exclusive focus on online disclosures on Twitter and during viral movements gives a biased and incomplete picture of what online disclosure of sexual victimisation entails. Our cross-platform analysis over time allows for more universal statements about the content and context of online disclosures of sexual victimisation.

Highlights

2927 disclosures were analysed using qualitative content and multiple correspondence analysis.
Most disclosures were found on Twitter and during #MeToo.
Content differed across platforms and period before, during and after #MeToo.
Large numbers of disclosure messages contain no information that is generally known to victims.
Clustering was found around offender-oriented information.

References

[1]
C.E. Ahrens, Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape, American Journal of Community Psychology 38 (3–4) (2006) 263–274,.
[2]
N. Andalibi, A. Forte, Announcing pregnancy loss on Facebook: A decision-making framework for stigmatized disclosures on identified social network sites. [Conference session], CHI 18 (1–14) (2018),. April 21-26 2018, Montréal, Canada.
[3]
N. Andalibi, O.L. Haimson, M. De Choudury, A. Forte, Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity [Conference session], San Jose, CA, United States CHI’16 (2016) 3906,. May 7–12.
[4]
N. Andalibi, O.L. Haimson, M. De Choudury, A. Forte, Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25 (5) (2018) 1–35,.
[5]
M. Anderson, S. Toor, How social media users have discussed sexual harassment since #MeToo went viral, 2018.
[6]
K.W. Bogen, K.K. Bleiweiss, N.R. Leach, L.M. Orchowski, #MeToo: Disclosure and response to sexual victimisation on Twitter, Journal of Interpersonal Violence (2019) 1–32,.
[7]
K.W. Bogen, K.K. Bleiweiss, L.M. Orchowski, Sexual violence is #NotOkay: Social reactions to disclosures of sexual victimisation on Twitter, Psychology of Violence 9 (1) (2018) 127–137,.
[8]
K.W. Bogen, C. Millman, F. Huntington, L.M. Orchowski, A qualitative analysis of disclosing sexual victimization by #NotOkay during the 2016 presidential election, Violence and Gender 5 (3) (2018) 174–181,.
[9]
S.N. Canan, M.A. Levand, A feminist perspective on sexual assault. [E-book], in: P.A. Schewe, W.T. O'Donohue (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention, Springer Publishing, 2019, pp. 3–16,.
[10]
CBS News, More than 12M “Me Too” Facebook posts, comments, reactions in 24 hours, 2017.
[11]
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Internet; toegang, gebruik en faciliteiten; 2012– 2019, 2018.
[12]
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Integratie en samenleven 2022, 2022.
[13]
K. Dindia, ‘Going into and coming out of the closet’: The dialectics of stigma disclosure, in: B.M. Montgomery, L.A. Baxter (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998, pp. 83–107.
[14]
N.B. Ellison, d. boyd, Sociality through social network sites, in: W.H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013, pp. 151–172.
[15]
Eurostat, Households - level of internet access, 2021.
[16]
H.E. Fawcett, L. Shrestha, Blogging about sexual assault: A thematic analysis, Journal of Forensic Practice 18 (1) (2016) 39–51,.
[17]
L.F. Fornari, K.N. Sakata-So, E.Y. Egry, R.M.G.S. da Fonseca, Gender and generation perspectives in the narratives of sexually abused women in childhood, Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 26 (e3078) (2018),.
[18]
A. Fung, E. Ma, Satellite modernity: Four modes of televisual imagination in the disjunctive socio-mediascape of Guangzhou, in: S.H. Donald, M. Keane, H. Yin (Eds.), Media in China: Consumption, content and crisis , Routledge, London, 2002, pp. 80–90.
[19]
M. Gibbs, J. Meese, M. Arnold, B. Nansen, M. Carter, #Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular, Information, Communication & Society 18 (3) (2015) 255–268,.
[20]
M. Gorissen, C.J.W. Van den Berg, C.C.J.H. Bijleveld, S. Ruiter, T. Berenblum, Online disclosure of sexual victimisation: A systematic review. Trauma, violence, & abuse, Advance online publication, 2021,.
[21]
C. Harrington, Neo-liberal subjectivity, self-branding and ‘my rape story’ YouTube videos, Critical Sociology 45 (7–8) (2019) 1181–1194,.
[22]
H. Jenkins, Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide, NYU Press, 2006, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qffwr.
[23]
G. Kalra, D. Bhugra, Sexual violence against women: Understanding cross- cultural intersections, Indian Journal of Psychiatry 55 (3) (2013) 244–249,.
[24]
L. Kelly, Continuum of sexual violence, in: J. Hanmer, M. Maynard (Eds.), Women, violence and social control, Macmillan Press Ltd, London, 1987, pp. 46–60.
[25]
T. Lokot, #IAmNotAfraidToSayIt: Stories of sexual violence as everyday political speech on Facebook, Information, Communication & Society 21 (6) (2018) 802–817,.
[26]
H. Lowenstein-Barkai, #Me(n)Too? Online social support toward male and female survivors of sexual victimisation, Journal of Interpersonal Violence (2020) 1–23,.
[27]
D. Mahata, J.R. Talburt, V. Kumar Singh, From chirps to whistles: Discovering event-specific informative content from Twitter, in: Proceedings of the ACM web science conference, 2015,.
[28]
K. Mendes, J. Keller, J. Ringrose, Digitized narratives of sexual violence: Making sexual violence felt and known through digital disclosures, New Media & Society 21 (6) (2019) 1290–1310,.
[29]
A. Milano, [@Alyssa_Milano], If you’ve been sexually harassed or assaulted write ‘me too’ as a reply to this tweet [Tweet] Twitter, 2017.
[30]
R. Moors, R. Webber, The dance of disclosure: Online self-disclosure of sexual assault, Qualitative Social Work 12 (6) (2012) 799–815,.
[31]
M.D. Myers, F.B. Tan, Beyond models of national culture in information systems research, Journal of Global Information Management 10 (1) (2002) 24–32.
[32]
T. O'Neill, ‘Today I speak’: Exploring how victim‐survivors use Reddit, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 7 (1) (2018) 44–59,.
[33]
J.E. Palmer, E.R. Fissel, J. Hoxmeier, E. Williams, #MeToo for whom? Sexual assault disclosures before and after #MeToo, American Journal of Criminal Justice 46 (5) (2021) 68–106,.
[34]
S. Petronio, Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 2002.
[35]
K.T. Schneider, N.J. Carpenter, Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: Incidents, coping responses, and social reactions, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: International Journal 39 (1) (2020) 87–100,.
[36]
Slegers, S. (n.d.). Wat zijn in 2018 De beste tijdstippen om te posten op social media? https://www.coosto.com/nl/blogs/wat-zijn-2018-de-beste-tij dstippen-om-te posten- op-social-media.
[37]
T. Spry, In absence of word and body: Hegemonic implications of 'victim' and 'survivor' in women's narratives of sexual violence, Women and Language 13 (2) (1995) 27–35.
[38]
Statista, 30 March). The most spoken languages worldwide 2021 , 2021.
[39]
H. Tsukayama, Twitter is officially doubling the character limit to 280. Washington Post, 2017.
[40]
C.J.W. Van den Berg, M. Gorissen, Slachtoffers van seksueel geweld en seksueel grensoverschrijdend gedrag onder de radar; onderzoek naar de achtergronden en effecten van viral justice en e-shaming door slachtoffers van seksueel geweld en seksueel grensoverschrijdend gedrag, 2020.
[41]
R. Webber, J. Wilmot, Somazone report: Social media and help seeking by young people on sexual assault, 2012.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 144, Issue C
Jul 2023
339 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2023

Author Tags

  1. MeToo
  2. Social media
  3. Online disclosure
  4. Sexual violence
  5. Victim
  6. Twitter
  7. Facebook

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media