More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Feelings of presence and perceived social support in social virtual reality platforms

Authors:

Vincent van Brakel,

Miguel Barreda-Ángeles,

Tilo HartmannAuthors Info & Claims

Volume 139, Issue C

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107523

Published: 01 February 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Social virtual reality (social VR) platforms are gaining popularity among users. Previous qualitative research suggests that feelings of presence can make these platforms an attractive environment to obtain social support from others. Building on these exploratory insights, we carried out a quantitative study to illuminate how different types of presence in social VR platforms facilitate social support. The results of a large survey conducted among users (N = 1231) show that feelings of social presence and self-presence are predictors of perceived social support and that this perception of social support is positively associated with users' subjective well-being. Perceived social support is greater for women than for men, and it differs across platforms, although with small effect sizes. These results underline the role of presence in the perception of computer-mediated social support, suggesting that the affordances of social VR make it a particularly well-suited medium for facilitating beneficial interactions among users.

Highlights

•

Feelings of social presence and self-presence predict perceived social support in social VR platforms.

•

Perceived social support in social VR platforms has an indirect association with subjective well-being.

•

Perceived social support in social VR platforms is greater for women than for men.

•

The results suggest that social interactions in immersive media may involve benefits for users' well-being.

References

[1]

D. Acena, G. Freeman, “In My safe space”: Social support for LGBTQ users in social virtual reality, Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vols. 1–6, 2021,.

Digital Library

[2]

L.A. Baccon, E. Chiarovano, H.G. MacDougall, Virtual reality for teletherapy: Avatars may combine the benefits of face-to-face communication with the anonymity of online text-based communication, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 22 (2) (2019) 158–165,.

[3]

J. Bailenson, Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do, W. W. Norton & Company, 2018.

[4]

A. Bandura, Social cognitive theory in cultural context, Applied Psychology 51 (2) (2002) 269–290,.

[5]

S. Bangay, L. Preston, An investigation into factors influencing immersion in interactive virtual reality environments, in: G. Riva, B.K. Wiederhold, E. Molinari (Eds.), Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience, Ios Press, 1998, pp. 43–51,.

Digital Library

[6]

J.A. Bargh, K.L. Schwader, S.E. Hailey, R.L. Dyer, E.J. Boothby, Automaticity in social-cognitive processes, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (12) (2012) 593–605,.

[7]

M. Barreda-Ángeles, T. Hartmann, Psychological benefits of using social virtual reality platforms during the covid-19 pandemic: The role of social and spatial presence, Computers in Human Behavior 127 (2022),.

Digital Library

[8]

M. Barreda-Ángeles, S. Aleix-Guillaume, A. Pereda-Banos, An “empathy machine” or a “just-for-the-fun-of-it” machine? Effects of immersion in nonfiction 360-video stories on empathy and enjoyment, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 23 (10) (2020) 683–688,.

[9]

T. Basu, The metaverse has a groping effectm already, 2021, MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/12/16/1042516/the-metaverse-has-a-groping-problem/.

[10]

F. Biocca, C. Harms, J.K. Burgoon, Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 (5) (2003) 456–480,.

Digital Library

[11]

L. Blackwell, N. Ellison, N. Elliott-Deflo, R. Schwartz, Harassment in social virtual reality: Challenges for platform governance, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3 (2019) 1–25,. CSCW).

Digital Library

[12]

Z. Bohdanowicz, J. Kowalski, D. Cnotkowski, P. Kobyliński, C. Biele, Reactions to immersive virtual reality experiences across Generations X, Y, and Z, in: Proceedings of ACHI 2020: The thirteenth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions, 2020.

[13]

D. Brown, August 30th). What is the ‘metaverse’? Facebook says it's the future of the internet. Big tech companies claim a virtual reality universe is imminent, but it's unclear what that means, 2021, The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/08/30/what-is-the-metaverse/.

[14]

M. Burke, R.E. Kraut, The relationship between facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21 (4) (2016) 265–281,.

Digital Library

[15]

A. Carpenter, K. Greene, Social penetration theory, in: C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, S.R. Wilson, J.P. Dillard, J. Caughlin, D. Solomon (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, Wiley, 2016, pp. 1–3.

[16]

C.T. Carr, D.Y. Wohn, R.A. Hayes, As social support: Relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media, Computers in Human Behavior 62 (2016) 385–393,.

Digital Library

[17]

S. Casale, G. Fiovaranti, S. Caplan, Online disinhibition: Precursors and outcomes, Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 27 (4) (2015) 170–177,.

[18]

N. Christenfeld, W. Gerin, W. Linden, M. Sanders, J. Mathur, J.D. Deich, et al., Social support effects on cardiovascular reactivity: Is a stranger as effective as a friend?, Psychosomatic Medicine 59 (4) (1997) 388–398.

[19]

J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, 1988.

[20]

J. Colvin, L. Chenoweth, M. Bold, C. Harding, Caregivers of older adults: Advantages and disadvantages of internet-based social support, Family Relations 53 (1) (2004) 49–57,.

[21]

J.J. Cummings, J.N. Bailenson, How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence, Media Psychology 19 (2) (2016) 272–309,.

[22]

P. Dai, N. Wang, L. Kong, X. Dong, L. Tian, A large number of online friends and a high frequency of social interaction compensate for each Other's shortage in regard to perceived social support, Current Psychology (2021),.

[23]

I. Devoldre, M.H. Davis, L.L. Verhofstadt, A. Buysse, Empathy and social support provision in couples: Social support and the need to study the underlying processes, Journal of Psychology 144 (3) (2010) 259–284,.

[24]

E. Diener, Introduction—the science of well-being: Reviews and theoretical articles by Ed Diener, in: E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being. The collected works of Ed Diener, Springer, 2009, pp. 1–10.

[25]

E. Diener, R.A. Emmons, R.J. Larsen, S. Griffin, The satisfaction with life scale, Journal of Personality Assessment 49 (1) (1985) 71–75,.

[26]

T. Dienlin, P.K. Masur, S. Trepte, Reinforcement or displacement? The reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS communication and their effects on loneliness and life satisfaction, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (2) (2017) 71–87,.

Digital Library

[27]

A. Felnhofer, O.D. Kothgassner, L. Beutl, H. Hlavacs, I. Kryspin-Exner, Is virtual reality made for men only? Exploring gender differences in the sense of presence, Proceedings of the International Society on presence research (2012) 103–112.

[28]

J. Fox, B. McEwan, Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale, Communication Monographs 84 (3) (2017) 298–318,.

[29]

G. Freeman, D. Acena, Hugging from a distance: Building interpersonal relationships in social virtual reality, ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences (2021) 84–95,.

Digital Library

[30]

G. Freeman, D. Acena, N.J. McNeese, K. Schulenberg, Working together apart through embodiment: Engaging in everyday collaborative activities in social Virtual Reality, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (2022) 1–25,.

Digital Library

[31]

G. Freeman, D. Maloney, Body, avatar, and me: The presentation and perception of self in social virtual reality, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4 (CSCW3) (2021) 1–27,.

Digital Library

[32]

G. Freeman, D. Maloney, D. Acena, C. Barwulor, (Re)discovering the physical body online: Strategies and challenges to approach non-cisgender identity in social Virtual Reality, Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vols. 1–15, 2022,.

Digital Library

[33]

G. Freeman, S. Zamanifard, D. Maloney, D. Acena, Disturbing the peace: Experiencing and mitigating emerging harassment in social virtual reality, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (CSCW1) (2022) 1–30,.

Digital Library

[34]

A.M. Gavgani, K.V. Nesbitt, K.L. Blackmore, E. Nalivaiko, Profiling subjective symptoms and autonomic changes associated with cybersickness, Autonomic Neuroscience 203 (2017) 41–50,.

[35]

J. Gilmour, T. Machin, C. Brownlow, C. Jeffries, Facebook-based social support and health: A systematic review, Psychology of Popular Media 9 (3) (2020) 328–346,.

[36]

M.E.J. Gleason, M. Iida, Social support, M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, J.A. Simpson, J.F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3, American Psychological Association, 2015, pp. 351–370,. Interpersonal relations.

[37]

A. Haans, W.A. IJsselsteijn, Embodiment and telepresence: Toward a comprehensive theoretical framework, Interacting with Computers 24 (4) (2012) 211–218,.

Digital Library

[38]

T. Hartmann, M. Hofer, I know it is not real (and that matters): Media awareness vs. presence in a parallel processing account of the VR experience, Frontiers in Virtual Reality 3 (2022),.

[39]

T. Hartmann, W. Wirth, H. Schramm, C. Klimmt, P. Vorderer, A. Gysbers, et al., The spatial presence experience scale (SPES), Journal of Media Psychology 28 (1) (2016) 1–15,.

[40]

A.F. Hayes, Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium, Communication Monographs 76 (4) (2009) 408–420,.

[41]

J. Henseler, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1) (2015) 115–135,.

[42]

S.E. Hobfoll, S.B. Shoham, C. Ritter, Women's satisfaction with social support and their receipt of aid, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (2) (1991) 332–341,.

[43]

S. Hrastinski, The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses, Information & Management 45 (7) (2008) 499–506,.

Digital Library

[44]

IMARC Group, Virtual reality headset market: Global industry trends, share, size, growth, opportunity and forecast 2021-2026, 2021, https://www.imarcgroup.com/virtual-reality-headset-market.

[45]

S.M. Jones, G.D. Bodie, Supportive communication, C.R. Berger (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, Vol. 6, De Gruyter Mouton, 2014, pp. 371–394.

[46]

K. Kilteni, R. Groten, M. Slater, The sense of embodiment in virtual reality, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21 (4) (2012) 373–387,.

Digital Library

[47]

H. Kim, Enacted social support on social media and subjective well-being, International Journal of Communication 8 (2014) 2340–2342.

[48]

N. Kock, G. Lynn, Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13 (7) (2012) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2152644.

[49]

R. Kraut, M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukophadhyay, W. Scherlis, Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?, American Psychologist 53 (9) (1998) 1017–1031,.

[50]

B. Lakey, E. Orehek, Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health, Psychological Review 118 (3) (2011) 482–495,.

[51]

J.-P. Laurenceau, L.F. Barrett, P.R. Pietromonaco, Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (5) (1998) 1238–1251,.

[52]

K.M. Lee, Presence, explicated, Communication Theory 14 (1) (2004) 27–50,.

[53]

J. Lewandowski, B.D. Rosenberg, M. Jordan Parks, J.T. Siegel, The effect of informal social support: Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication, Computers in Human Behavior 27 (5) (2011) 1806–1814,.

Digital Library

[54]

X. Li, W. Chen, P. Popiel, What happens on facebook stays on facebook? The implications of facebook interaction for perceived, receiving, and giving social support, Computers in Human Behavior 51 (2015) 106–113,.

Digital Library

[55]

E. Litt, S. Zhao, R. Kraut, M. Burke, What are meaningful social interactions in today's media landscape? A cross-cultural survey, Social Media+ Society 6 (3) (2020),.

[56]

Q. Liu, A. Steed, Social virtual reality platform comparison and evaluation using a guided group walkthrough method, Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021) 52,.

[57]

D. Liu, K.B. Wright, B. Hu, A meta-analysis of Social Network Site use and social support, Computers & Education 127 (2018) 201–213,.

[58]

G. Makransky, L. Lilleholt, A. Aaby, Development and validation of the multimodal presence scale for virtual reality environments: A confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approach, Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017) 276–285,.

Digital Library

[59]

D. Maloney, G. Freeman, Falling asleep together: What makes activities in social virtual reality meaningful to users, Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (2020) 510–521,.

Digital Library

[60]

D. Maloney, G. Freeman, A. Robb, A virtual space for all: Exploring children's experience in social Virtual Reality, Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (2020) 472–483,.

Digital Library

[61]

D. Maloney, G. Freeman, A. Robb, Stay connected in an immersive world: Why teenagers engage in social virtual reality, Proceedings of ACM Interaction Design and Children ‘21 (2021) 69–79,.

Digital Library

[62]

D. Maloney, G. Freeman, D.Y. Wohn, Talking without a voice”: Understanding non-verbal communication in social virtual reality, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4 (CSCW2) (2020),. 175:1-175:25.

Digital Library

[63]

D. Maloney, S. Zamanifard, G. Freeman, Anonymity vs. Familiarity: Self-disclosure and privacy in social virtual reality, 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology 1–9 (2020),.

Digital Library

[64]

A.M. Manago, T. Taylor, P.M. Greenfield, Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being, Developmental Psychology 48 (2) (2012) 369–380,.

[65]

K.M. Marcoulides, K.-H. Yuan, New ways to evaluate goodness of fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 24 (1) (2017) 148–153,.

[66]

D. Meshi, M.E. Ellithorpe, Problematic social media use and social support received in real-life versus on social media: Associations with depression, anxiety and social isolation, Addictive Behaviors 119 (2021),.

[67]

P.K.H. Mo, N.S. Coulson, Exploring the communication of social support within virtual communities: A content analysis of messages posted to an online HIV/AIDS support group, CyberPsychology and Behavior 11 (3) (2008) 371–374,.

[68]

F. Moustafa, A. Steed, A longitudinal study of small group interaction in social virtual reality, Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (2018) 1–10,.

Digital Library

[69]

C.S. Oh, J.N. Bailenson, G.F. Welch, A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 114 (2018),.

[70]

H.J. Oh, E. Ozkaya, R. LaRose, How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction, Computers in Human Behavior 30 (2014) 69–78,.

Digital Library

[71]

T. Oshio, H. Kimura, T. Nishizaki, T. Omori, Association between the use of social networking sites, perceived social support, and life satisfaction: Evidence from a population-based survey in Japan, PLoS One 15 (12) (2020),.

[72]

D. Paez, G. Delfino, S. Vargas-Salfate, J.H. Liu, H. Gil de Zúñiga, S. Khan, et al., A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use on subjective well-being, Media Psychology 23 (5) (2020) 676–710,.

[73]

U. Pfeil, R. Arjan, P. Zaphiris, Age differences in online social networking – a study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace, Computers in Human Behavior 25 (3) (2009) 643–654,.

Digital Library

[74]

S.A. Rains, K.B. Wright, Social support and computer-mediated communication: A state-of-the-art review and agenda for future research, Annals of the International Communication Association 40 (1) (2016) 175–211,.

[75]

H.T. Reis, P. Franks, The role of intimacy and social support in health outcomes: Two processes or one?, Personal Relationships 1 (2) (1994) 185–197,.

[76]

Y. Rosseel, lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling, Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2012) 1–36,.

[77]

B. Rozzell, C.W. Piercy, C.T. Carr, S. King, B.L. Lane, M. Tornes, …., K.B. Wright, Notification pending: Online social support from close and nonclose relational ties via Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior 38 (2014) 272–280,.

Digital Library

[78]

J. Short, E. Williams, B. Christie, The social psychology of telecommunications, John Wiley & Sons, 1976.

[79]

R. Skarbez, Brooks Jr., F. P., M.C. Whitton, A survey of presence and related concepts, ACM Computing Surveys 50 (6) (2017),. 96:1-96:39.

Digital Library

[80]

M. Slater, M.V. Sanchez-Vives, Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016) 74,.

[81]

M.A. Stefanone, K.H. Kwon, D. Lackaff, Exploring the relationship between perceptions of social capital and enacted support online, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (2012) 451–466,.

Digital Library

[82]

J. Suler, The online disinhibition effect, CyberPsychology and Behavior 7 (3) (2004) 321–326,.

[83]

P. Sykownik, L. Graf, C. Zils, M. Masuch, The most social platform ever? A survey about activities & motives of social VR users, in: 2021 IEEE virtual reality and 3D user interfaces, VR), 2021, pp. 546–554,.

[84]

P. Sykownik, D. Maloney, G. Freeman, M. Masuch, Something personal from the Metaverse: Goals, topics, and contextual factors of self-disclosure in commercial social VR, in: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2022, pp. 1–17,.

Digital Library

[85]

S.E. Taylor, Social support: A review, in: H.S. Friedman (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of health psychology, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 189–214.

[86]

S. Tehseen, T. Ramayah, S. Sajilan, Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods, Journal of Management Sciences 4 (2) (2017) 142–168,.

[87]

P.A. Thoits, Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health, Journal of Health and Social Behavior 52 (2) (2011) 145–161,.

[88]

S. Tifferet, Gender differences in social support on social network sites: A meta-analysis, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23 (4) (2020) 199–209,.

[89]

S. Trepte, T. Dienlin, L. Reinecke, Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study, Media Psychology 18 (1) (2015) 74–105,.

[90]

S. Trepte, L. Reinecke, K. Juechems, The social side of gaming: How playing online computer games creates online and offline social support, Computers in Human Behavior 28 (3) (2012) 832–839,.

Digital Library

[91]

S. Trepte, M. Scharkow, Friends and lifesavers: How social capital and social support received in media environments contribute to well-being, in: L. Reinecke, M.B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects, Routledge, 2016, pp. 304–316.

[92]

S. Utz, J. Breuer, The relationship between use of social network sites, online social support, and well-being, Journal of Media Psychology 29 (3) (2017) 115–125,.

[93]

J. Vitak, N.B. Ellison, ‘There's a network out there you might as well tap’: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook, New Media & Society 15 (2) (2013) 243–259,.

[94]

J.B. Walther, S. Boyd, Attraction to computer-mediated social support, in: C.A. Lin, D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses, Hampton Press, 2002, pp. 153–188.

[95]

W. Wirth, T. Hartmann, S. Böcking, P. Vorderer, C. Klimmt, H. Schramm, et al., A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences, Media Psychology 9 (3) (2007) 493–525,.

[96]

K.-H. Yuan, W. Chan, G.A. Marcoulides, P.M. Bentler, Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 23 (3) (2016) 319–330,.

[97]

S. Zamanifard, G. Freeman, The togetherness that we crave”: Experiencing Social VR in long distance relationships, in: Conference companion publication of the 2019 on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, 2019, pp. 438–442,.

Digital Library

[98]

G.D. Zimet, N.W. Dahlem, S.G. Zimet, G.K. Farley, The multidimensional scale of perceived social support, Journal of Personality Assessment 52 (1) (1988) 30–41,.

Cited By

Schulenberg KFreeman GLi LKnijnenburg B(2024)Does Who You Are or Appear to Be Matter?: Understanding Identity-Based Harassment in Social VR Through the Lens of (Mis)Perceived Identity RevelationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869238:CSCW2(1-40)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686923
Liu Z(2024)The Effect of Online Comment Language Style on Consumers45 willingness to pay: The Evidence from NLP and ExperimentProceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy10.1145/3672919.3673010(511-515)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672919.3673010
Cummings JShore Ingber A(2024)Distinguishing social virtual realityComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108427161:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108427
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Feelings of presence and perceived social support in social virtual reality platforms
1. Applied computing

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

The Role of Sense of Presence and Irritation in the Context of Mobile Social Network Sites

While mobile social network sites (SNSs) function as a platform for social and self-communication that leads to sense of others and oneself, users may feel irritation derived from social interaction and technical frustration in using mobile SNSs. ...
Facebook friends, subjective well-being, social support, and personality

Offline social capital in the form of interpersonal networks is known to be associated with subjective well-being (SWB). In two studies run in the US (N = 153) and Germany (N = 187), we initially investigated whether the size of an individual's Facebook ...
“In My Safe Space”: Social Support for LGBTQ Users in Social Virtual Reality
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Virtual Reality (VR) has long been an important research focus in HCI since the 1960s. In the past five years, we have seen a more pronounced rise of VR, especially social VR. In particular, social VR is becoming increasingly popular within the LGBTQ ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior

Computers in Human Behavior Volume 139, Issue C

Feb 2023

740 pages

ISSN:0747-5632

Issue’s Table of Contents

The Author(s).

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2023

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Schulenberg KFreeman GLi LKnijnenburg B(2024)Does Who You Are or Appear to Be Matter?: Understanding Identity-Based Harassment in Social VR Through the Lens of (Mis)Perceived Identity RevelationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869238:CSCW2(1-40)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686923
Liu Z(2024)The Effect of Online Comment Language Style on Consumers45 willingness to pay: The Evidence from NLP and ExperimentProceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy10.1145/3672919.3673010(511-515)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672919.3673010
Cummings JShore Ingber A(2024)Distinguishing social virtual realityComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108427161:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108427
Schulenberg KLi LLancaster CZytko DFreeman G(2023)"We Don't Want a Bird Cage, We Want Guardrails": Understanding & Designing for Preventing Interpersonal Harm in Social VR through the Lens of ConsentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101727:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610172
Fang SYatani K(2023)Towards Understanding Sense of Inclusion in Social VR OnboardingExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585751(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585751

View Options

View options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents