[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
review-article

Social networking site use and relationship quality: : A double edged sword

Published: 01 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Given the increasing dependency on social networking sites in modern society, gaining a clearer and more nuanced understanding of whether and how use of this medium is related to relationship quality is of unprecedented importance. The current study reports the first meta-analytic investigation of this research literature, integrating results from 53 independent datasets and 13,873 participants. The data provide evidence for both beneficial and damaging associations, with ones' own or perceived partners’ relational commitment, trust, and uncertainty most consistently explaining these relationships. With respect to positive associations, greater security was related to greater engagement of online positive relationship focused behaviors, such as uploading dyadic photos and having a visible and accurate relationship status. With respect to negative associations, lower security was associated with a greater propensity to pursue alternatives online, and for greater social networking site intrusion. Specific individual and relationship characteristics also influenced the magnitude of certain associations. Taken together, these data indicate that although the landscape of modern relationships has been substantially altered by the introduction of social networking sites, traditional relationship theories of investment and relational maintenance remain highly relevant to understanding which interpersonal behaviors are associated with specific relationship outcomes. This identification of a modern online translation of traditional relationship theories not only has important theoretical implications, but at a practical level can be used to inform the guidance provided to couples seeking to preserve or strengthen their relationships.

Highlights

First meta-analysis comprising 53 independent datasets and 13,873 participants.
Both positive and negative associations identified for overall relationship quality.
Relational security most consistently associated with social networking site use.
Only public positive relationship focused behaviours linked to relationship quality.
Distinct individual and relationship variables important in explaining findings.

References

[1]
I.S. Abbasi, Falling prey to online romantic alternatives: Evaluating social media alternative partners in committed versus dating relationships, Social Science Computer Review 37 (6) (2019) 723–733,.
[2]
I.S. Abbasi, Social media and committed relationships: What factors make our romantic relationship vulnerable?, Social Science Computer Review 37 (3) (2019) 425–434,.
[3]
I.S. Abbasi, M. Drouin, B.T. McDaniel, J.L. Dibble, The protective influence of relationship commitment on the effects of Facebook addiction on marital disaffection, American Journal of Family Therapy 47 (2) (2019) 120–136,.
[4]
I.S. Abbasi, N.G. Alghamdi, When flirting turns into infidelity: The Facebook dilemma, American Journal of Family Therapy 45 (1) (2017) 1–14,.
[5]
H. Aguinis, R.K. Gottfredson, H. Joo, Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers, Organizational Research Methods 16 (2) (2013) 270–301,.
[6]
G. Andrews, M.R. Crawford, M.D. Holder, The contribution of romantic relationships to well-being, in: K.M. Hughes (Ed.), Romantic relationships: Perceptions, social influences and gender differences, Nova Science Publishers, 2017, pp. 127–151.
[7]
A. Aron, E.N. Aron, D. Smollan, Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (4) (1992) 596–612,.
[8]
M. Assink, C.J. Wibbelink, Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial, The Quantitative Methods for Psychology 12 (2016) 154–174,.
[9]
C.R. Berger, J.J. Bradac, Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relationships, Edward Arnold, 1982.
[10]
C.R. Berger, R.J. Calabrese, Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication, Human Communication Research 1 (2) (1975) 99–112,.
[11]
J.L. Bevan, Social networking site password sharing and account monitoring as online surveillance, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21 (12) (2018) 797–802,.
[12]
D.M. Boyd, N.B. Ellison, Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1) (2007) 210–230,.
[13]
H. Braiker, H. Kelley, Conflict in the development of close relationships, in: R. Burgess, T. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships, Academic Press, 1979, pp. 135–167.
[14]
N. Brody, L.E. LeFebvre, K.G. Blackburn, Social networking site behaviors across the relational lifespan: Measurement and association with relationship escalation and de-escalation, Social Media + Society, 2016,. Online publication.
[15]
D.J. Canary, L. Stafford, Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage, Communication Monographs 59 (3) (1992) 243–267,.
[16]
D.J. Canary, L. Stafford, B.A. Semic, A panel study of the associations between maintenance strategies and relational characteristics, Journal of Marriage and Family 64 (2) (2002) 395–406,.
[17]
D.J. Canary, Y.O. Yum, Relationship maintenance strategies, in: C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, S.R. Wilson, J.P. Dillard, J. Caughlin, D. Solomon (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, 2015,.
[18]
C.J. Carpenter, E.L. Spottswood, Exploring romantic relationships on social networking sites using the self-expansion model, Computers in Human Behavior 29 (4) (2013) 1531–1537,.
[19]
R.B. Clayton, The third wheel: The impact of Twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17 (7) (2014) 425–430,.
[20]
R.B. Clayton, A. Nagurney, J.R. Smith, Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame?, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16 (10) (2013) 717–720,.
[21]
J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Academic Press, 1977.
[22]
A. Cole, M.T. Leonard, P. McAuslan, Social media and couples: What are the important factors for understanding relationship satisfaction?, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21 (9) (2018) 582–586,.
[23]
R.D. Cook, S. Weisberg, Residuals and influence in regression, Chapman and Hall, 1982.
[24]
L.L. Couch, J.M. Adams, W.H. Jones, The assessment of trust orientation, Journal of Personality Assessment 67 (2) (1996) 305–323,.
[25]
S.M. Coyne, L.M. Padilla-Walker, A.M. Fraser, K. Fellows, R.D. Day, “Media time= family time” positive media use in families with adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Research 29 (5) (2014) 663–688,.
[26]
M. Dainton, Relationship maintenance on Facebook: Development of a measure, relationship to general maintenance, and relationship satisfaction, College Student Journal 47 (1) (2013) 113–121.
[27]
M. Dainton, A.K. Goodboy, D. Borzea, Z.W. Goldman, The dyadic effects of relationship uncertainty on negative relational maintenance, Communication Reports 30 (3) (2017) 170–181,.
[28]
M.J. Darvell, S.P. Walsh, K.M. White, Facebook tells me so: Applying the theory of planned behavior to understand partner-monitoring behavior on Facebook, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14 (12) (2011) 717–722,.
[29]
S. Demirtas-Zorbaz, D. Genctanırım, A. Kurt, An overview of young adults' opinions into cyber relation: Turkey sample, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 186 (2015) 91–94,.
[30]
J.L. Dibble, M. Drouin, Using modern technology to keep in touch with back burners: An investment model analysis, Computers in Human Behavior 34 (2014) 96–100,.
[31]
J.L. Dibble, N.M. Punyanunt-Carter, M. Drouin, Maintaining relationship alternatives electronically: Positive relationship maintenance in back burner relationships, Communication Research Reports 35 (3) (2018) 200–209,.
[32]
E. Diener, M.Y. Chan, Happy people live longer: Subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity, Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being 3 (1) (2011) 1–43,.
[33]
M.J. Downes, M.L. Brennan, H.C. Williams, R.S. Dean, Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS), BMJ Open 6 (12) (2016),. Article e011458.
[34]
M. Drouin, D.A. Miller, J.L. Dibble, Ignore your partners' current Facebook friends; Beware the ones they add!, Computers in Human Behavior 35 (2014) 483–488,.
[35]
K.N. Duerksen, E.M. Woodin, Technological intimate partner violence: Exploring technology-related perpetration factors and overlap with in-person intimate partner violence, Computers in Human Behavior 98 (2019) 223–231,.
[36]
P.J. Easterbrook, R. Gopalan, J.A. Berlin, D.R. Matthews, Publication bias in clinical research, The Lancet 337 (8746) (1991) 867–872,.
[37]
M. Egger, G.D. Smith, M. Schneider, C. Minder, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test, British Medical Journal 315 (7109) (1997) 629–634,.
[38]
N.B. Ellison, C. Steinfield, C. Lampe, The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (4) (2007) 1143–1168,.
[39]
R.A. Elphinston, P. Noller, Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14 (11) (2011) 631–635,.
[40]
L.F. Emery, A. Muise, E. Alpert, B. Le, Do we look happy? Perceptions of romantic relationship quality on Facebook, Personal Relationships 22 (1) (2015) 1–7,.
[41]
L.F. Emery, A. Muise, E.L. Dix, B. Le, Can you tell that I'm in a relationship? Attachment and relationship visibility on Facebook, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40 (11) (2014) 1466–1479,.
[42]
S.R. Farooqi, The construct of relationship quality, Journal of Relationships Research 5 (2014),. Article e2.
[43]
E.J. Finkel, J.A. Simpson, P.W. Eastwick, The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles, Annual Review of Psychology 68 (2017) 383–411,.
[44]
G.J. Fletcher, J.A. Simpson, G. Thomas, The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (3) (2000) 340–354,.
[45]
J. Fox, The dark side of social networking sites in romantic relationships, in: B.K. Wiederhold, G. Riva, P. Cipresso (Eds.), The psychology of social networking: Communication, presence, identity, and relationships in online communities, De Gruyter Open, 2016, pp. 78–89,.
[46]
J. Fox, K.M. Warber, Social networking sites in romantic relationships: Attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17 (1) (2014) 3–7,.
[47]
A.M. Galovan, M. Drouin, B.T. McDaniel, Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being, Computers in Human Behavior 79 (2018) 19–29,.
[48]
M. Gómez-López, C. Viejo, R. Ortega-Ruiz, Well-being and romantic relationships: A systematic review in adolescence and emerging adulthood, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (13) (2019) 2415,.
[49]
G.C. Gonzaga, M.G. Haselton, J. Smurda, M. sian Davies, J.C. Poore, Love, desire, and the suppression of thoughts of romantic alternatives, Evolution and Human Behavior 29 (2) (2008) 119–126,.
[50]
J.A. González-Rivera, I. Hernández-Gato, Conflicts in romantic relationships over Facebook use: Validation and psychometric study, Behavioral Sciences 9 (2) (2019),. Article e18.
[51]
A. Goswami, S. Dutta, Gender differences in technology usage—a literature review, Open Journal of Business and Management 4 (1) (2015) 51–59,.
[52]
D. Halpern, J.E. Katz, C. Carril, The online ideal persona vs. the jealousy effect: Two explanations of why selfies are associated with lower-quality romantic relationships, Telematics and Informatics 34 (1) (2017) 114–123,.
[53]
R. Hammond, H.T.G. Chou, Using Facebook: Good for friendship but not so good for intimate relationships, in: G. Riva, B.K. Wiederhold, P. Cipresso (Eds.), The psychology of social networking, De Gruyter Open, 2016, pp. 41–51.
[54]
M.M. Hand, D. Thomas, W.C. Buboltz, E.D. Deemer, M. Buyanjargal, Facebook and romantic relationships: Intimacy and couple satisfaction associated with online social network use, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16 (1) (2013) 8–13,.
[55]
M. Harrer, P. Cuijpers, T.A. Furukawa, D.D. Ebert, Doing meta-analysis in R: A hands-on guide, Protect Lab (2019),.
[56]
C. Imperato, T. Mancini, Couples in trouble because of social networks? A systematic review, Psicologia Sociale, 2019,. Article e2.
[57]
F. Iqbal, H. Jami, Translation and validation of Facebook jealousy scale for Pakistani Facebook users, Journal of Behavioural Sciences 27 (1) (2017) Article e1.
[58]
D.J. Johnson, C.E. Rusbult, Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (6) (1989) 967–980.
[59]
A.N. Joinson, Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook [paper presentation], in: SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy, 2008, April,.
[60]
J. Kansky, What's love got to do with it?: Romantic relationships and well-being, in: E.S. Oishi, L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being, DEF Publishers, 2018.
[61]
A.M. Kaplan, M. Haenlein, Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media, Business Horizons 53 (1) (2010) 59–68,.
[62]
K. Kayser, The Marital Disaffection Scale: An inventory for assessing emotional estrangement in marriage, American Journal of Family Therapy 24 (1) (1996) 83–88,.
[63]
H.H. Kelley, Personal relationships: Their structures and processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.
[64]
H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J.H. Harvey, T.L. Huston, G. Levinger, D.R. Peterson, Close relationships, W.H. Freeman, 1983.
[66]
L.K. Knobloch, The dark side of relational uncertainty: Obstacle or opportunity?, in: B.H. Spitzberg, W.R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007, pp. 31–59.
[67]
L.K. Knobloch, Uncertainty reduction theory, in: C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, J.P. Caughlin (Eds.), International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, Wiley, 2016,.
[68]
L.K. Knobloch, K.L. Satterlee, Relational uncertainty: Theory and application, in: T.D. Afifi, W.A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications, Routledge, 2009, pp. 106–127.
[69]
L.K. Knobloch, D.H. Solomon, Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty, Communication Studies 50 (4) (1999) 261–278,.
[70]
L.K. Knobloch, D.H. Solomon, Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships, Human Communication Research 28 (2) (2002) 243–257,.
[71]
H. Krasnova, O. Abramova, I. Notter, A. Baumann, Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among “Generation Y” users [Paper presentation], in: Twenty-Forth European conference on information systems, Istanbul, Turkey, 2016, June 15.
[72]
H. Krasnova, N.F. Veltri, N. Eling, P. Buxmann, Why men and women continue to use social networking sites: The role of gender differences, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 26 (4) (2017) 261–284,.
[73]
K.L. Krueger, A.L. Forest, Communicating commitment: A relationship-protection account of dyadic displays on social media, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication, 2020,.
[74]
B.L. Lane, C.W. Piercy, C.T. Carr, Making it Facebook official: The warranting value of online relationship status disclosures on relational characteristics, Computers in Human Behavior 56 (2016) 1–8,.
[75]
A.M. Ledbetter, Online communication attitude similarity in romantic dyads: Predicting couples' frequency of e-mail, instant messaging, and social networking site communication, Communication Quarterly 62 (2) (2014) 233–252,.
[76]
O. de Lenne, L. Wittevronghel, L. Vandenbosch, S. Eggermont, Romantic relationship commitment and the threat of alternatives on social media, Personal Relationships 26 (4) (2019) 680–693,.
[77]
A.B. Love, M.D. Holder, Can romantic relationship quality mediate the relation between psychopathy and subjective well-being?, Journal of Happiness Studies 17 (6) (2016) 2407–2429,.
[78]
J.E. Lydon, G.M. Fitzsimons, L. Naidoo, Devaluation versus enhancement of attractive alternatives: A critical test using the calibration paradigm, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (3) (2003) 349–359,.
[79]
M. Madden, K. Zickuhr, 65% of online adults use social networking sites, Pew Research Center: Internet and Technology, 2011, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/08/26/65-of-online-adults-use-social-networking-sites/.
[80]
T.C. Marshall, K. Bejanyan, G. Di Castro, R.A. Lee, Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook‐related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships, Personal Relationships 20 (1) (2013) 1–22,.
[81]
M.A. Martin, S. Roberts, Jackknife-after-bootstrap regression influence diagnostics, Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 22 (2) (2010) 257–269,.
[82]
B.T. McDaniel, M. Drouin, J.D. Cravens, Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction, Computers in Human Behavior 66 (2017) 88–95,.
[83]
B.T. McDaniel, S.M. Coyne, “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being, Psychology of Popular Media Culture 5 (1) (2016) 85–98,.
[84]
A. Mirsu-Paun, J.A. Oliver, How much does love really hurt? A meta-analysis of the association between romantic relationship quality, breakups and mental health outcomes in adolescents and young adults, Journal of Relationships Research 8 (2017),. Article e5.
[85]
M. Moeyaert, M. Ugille, S. Natasha Beretvas, J. Ferron, R. Bunuan, W. Van den Noortgate, Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: A comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2017) 559–572,.
[86]
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement, Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (2009) 264–269.
[87]
K. Moore, J.C. McElroy, The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret, Computers in Human Behavior 28 (1) (2012) 267–274,.
[88]
M.M. Morry, T. Reich, M. Kito, How do I see you relative to myself? Relationship quality as a predictor of self-and partner-enhancement within cross-sex friendships, dating relationships, and marriages, The Journal of Social Psychology 150 (4) (2010) 369–392,.
[89]
N. Moyano, M.D.M. Sánchez-Fuentes, A. Chiriboga, J. Flórez-Donado, Factors associated with Facebook jealousy in three Spanish-speaking countries, Sexual and Relationship Therapy 32 (3–4) (2017) 309–322,.
[90]
A. Muise, E. Christofides, S. Desmarais, “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook, Personal Relationships 21 (1) (2014) 35–50,.
[91]
N. Muscanell, R. Guadagno, Social networking and romantic relationships: A review of jealousy and related emotions, in: G. Riva, B.K. Wiederhold, P. Cipresso (Eds.), The psychology of social networking, De Gruyter Open, 2016, pp. 41–51.
[92]
A. Nadkarni, S.G. Hofmann, Why do people use Facebook?, Personality and Individual Differences 52 (3) (2012) 243–249,.
[93]
S. Nongpong, P. Charoensukmongkol, I don't care much as long as I am also on Facebook: Impacts of social media use of both partners on romantic relationship problems, The Family Journal 24 (4) (2016) 351–358,.
[94]
B.G. Ogolsky, J.R. Bowers, A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30 (3) (2013) 343–367,.
[95]
R.G. Orwin, A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis, Journal of Educational Statistics 8 (2) (1983) 157–159.
[96]
L.M. Papp, J. Danielewicz, C. Cayemberg, “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners' Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15 (2) (2012) 85–90,.
[97]
D.A. Pastor, R.A. Lazowski, On the multilevel nature of meta-analysis: A tutorial, comparison of software programs, and discussion of analytic choices, Multivariate Behavioral Research 53 (2018) 74–89,.
[98]
M.Á. Pertegal, A. Oliva, A. Rodríguez-Meirinhos, Development and validation of the scale of motives for using social networking sites (SMU-SNS) for adolescents and youths, PloS One 14 (12) (2019),. Article e0225781.
[99]
R.A. Peterson, S.P. Brown, On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (1) (2005) 175–181,.
[100]
P. Prokop, N. Morvayová, P. Fedor, With or without you: Does partner satisfaction and partner-directed violence influence the presence of a partner on women's Facebook cover profile photographs?, Anales De Psicología/Annals of Psychology 32 (2) (2016) 307–312,.
[101]
C.M. Proulx, H.M. Helms, C. Buehler, Marital quality and personal well‐being: A meta‐analysis, Journal of Marriage and Family 69 (3) (2007) 576–593,.
[102]
J.A. Roberts, M.E. David, My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners, Computers in Human Behavior 54 (2016) 134–141,.
[103]
R. Rosenthal, The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results, Psychological Bulletin 86 (3) (1979) 638–641,.
[104]
C.E. Rusbult, Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16 (2) (1980) 172–186,.
[105]
C.E. Rusbult, J.M. Martz, C.R. Agnew, The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size, Personal Relationships 5 (4) (1998) 357–387,.
[106]
H.M. Rus, J. Tiemensma, “It's complicated.” A systematic review of associations between social network site use and romantic relationships, Computers in Human Behavior 75 (2017) 684–703,.
[107]
A. Sabiniewicz, B. Borkowska, K. Serafińska, P. Sorokowski, Is love related to selfies? Romantic selfie posting behavior and love levels among women and men, Personality and Individual Differences 111 (2017) 297–300,.
[108]
L.R. Saslow, A. Muise, E.A. Impett, M. Dubin, Can you see how happy we are? Facebook images and relationship satisfaction, Social Psychological and Personality Science 4 (4) (2013) 411–418,.
[109]
G. Seidman, The Big 5 and relationship maintenance on Facebook, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36 (6) (2019) 1785–1806,.
[110]
G. Seidman, M. Langlais, A. Havens, Romantic relationship-oriented Facebook activities and the satisfaction of belonging needs, Psychology of Popular Media Culture 8 (1) (2019) 52–62,. 8(1).
[111]
L. Sels, J. Cabrieto, E. Butler, H. Reis, E. Ceulemans, P. Kuppens, The occurrence and correlates of emotional interdependence in romantic relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 119 (1) (2020) 136–158,.
[112]
D.H. Solomon, J.A. Theiss, Relational turbulence: What doesn't kill us makes us stronger, in: W.R. Cupach, B.H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships II, Routledge, 2011, pp. 197–216.
[113]
L. Stafford, D.J. Canary, Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8 (2) (1991) 217–242,.
[114]
M.L.N. Steers, C.S. Øverup, J.A. Brunson, L.K. Acitelli, Love online: How relationship awareness on Facebook relates to relationship quality among college students, Psychology of Popular Media Culture 5 (3) (2016) 203–216,.
[115]
M.C. Stewart, M. Dainton, A.K. Goodboy, Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction, Communication Reports 27 (1) (2014) 13–26,.
[116]
J.W. Thibaut, H.H. Kelly, The social psychology of groups, John Wiley, 1959.
[117]
S.T. Tong, D.K. Westerman, Relational and masspersonal maintenance: Romantic partners' use of social network websites [Paper presentation], in: 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Koala, HI, USA, 2016, January 5-8,.
[118]
S. Valenzuela, D. Halpern, J.E. Katz, Social network sites, marriage well-being and divorce: Survey and state-level evidence from the United States, Computers in Human Behavior 36 (2014) 94–101,.
[119]
P.M. Valkenburg, J. Peter, Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (4) (2007) 1169–1182,.
[120]
W. Van den Noortgate, J.A. López-López, F. Marín-Martínez, J. Sánchez-Meca, Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: A multilevel approach, Behavior Research Methods 47 (2015) 1274–1294,.
[121]
W. Viechtbauer, Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package, Journal of Statistical Software 36 (2010) 1–48,.
[122]
W. Viechtbauer, M.W.L. Cheung, Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta‐analysis, Research Synthesis Methods 1 (2) (2010) 112–125,.
[123]
A. Vossler, Internet infidelity 10 years on: A critical review of the literature, The Family Journal 24 (4) (2016) 359–366,.
[124]
J.B. Walther, Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction, Communication Research 23 (1) (1996) 3–43,.
[125]
J.B. Walther, B. Van Der Heide, A. Ramirez, J.K. Burgoon, J. Peña, Interpersonal and hyperpersonal dimensions of computer-mediated communication, in: S.S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology, John Wiley and Sons, 2015, pp. 3–22,.
[126]
A.R. West, Relationship commitment and monitoring alternatives using Facebook in unmarried romantic relationships, [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. Texas ScholarWorks, 2013, https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/21578.
[127]
M.A. Whisman, The association between depression and marital dissatisfaction, in: S.R.H. Beach (Ed.), Marital and family processes in depression: A scientific foundation for clinical practice, American Psychological Association, 2001, pp. 3–24,.
[128]
J.R. Williams, The use of online social networking sites to nurture and cultivate bonding social capital: A systematic review of the literature from 1997 to 2018, New Media & Society 21 (11–12) (2019) 2710–2729,.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Social networking site use and relationship quality: A double edged sword
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Computers in Human Behavior
      Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 123, Issue C
      Oct 2021
      201 pages

      Publisher

      Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

      Netherlands

      Publication History

      Published: 01 October 2021

      Author Tags

      1. Relationship quality
      2. Romantic relationships
      3. Social networking sites

      Qualifiers

      • Review-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media