More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: : An exploratory observation study

Authors:

Mariek M.P. Vanden Abeele,

Andrew T. Hendrickson,

Monique M.H. Pollmann,

Rich LingAuthors Info & Claims

Volume 100, Issue C

Pages 35 - 47

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.004

Published: 01 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This study examines the occurrence, frequency and duration of co-present phone use, also known as ‘phubbing’ behavior, during a dyadic conversation and its association with perceived conversation intimacy and distraction. Phubbing was measured by covertly observing students having a 10-min dyadic conversation (N = 100 dyads). Afterwards, participants were approached and asked to complete measures of how intimate they perceived the last 10 min of their conversation, and how distracted they perceived themselves and their conversation partners. Results reveal that phubbing occurred in 62 of the 100 observed conversations. In 30% of these 62 conversations, the phone screen was shared. When phone use occurred, the average frequency was 3.16 times per dyad (SD = 2.5), for a median duration of 99 seconds (SD = 225.2). Relatively few participants could correctly recall the occurrence of phone use during the past 10 min of their conversation. Inconsistent findings were found for the association between phubbing behavior and perceived distraction. The partner's phone use (but not one's own phone use), however, was associated with lower conversation intimacy.

Highlights

•

100 student dyads were covertly observed in a student restaurant.

•

In 62 dyads, at least one person used a phone during the conversation.

•

In 30% of conversations in which phones were used, screens were shared.

•

Recall of phone use was poor – both of oneself and of the partner.

•

If the partner used a phone, persons perceived less intimacy in the conversation.

References

[1]

J. Aagaard, Digital akrasia: A qualitative study of phubbing, AI & Society (2019) 1–2.

[2]

M. Abels, M.M.P. Vanden Abeele, T. van Telgen, H. van Meijl, Nod, nod, ignore: An exploratory observational study on the relation between parental mobile media use and parental responsiveness towards young children, in: E.M. Luef, M.M. Marin (Eds.), The talking species: Perspectives on the evolutionary, neuronal, and cultural foundations of language, Uni Press Verlag, Graz, 2018, available from https://www.unipress-graz.com/buecher/the-talking-species.

[3]

R.F. Adler, R. Benbunan-Fich, Self-interruptions in discretionary multitasking, Computers In Human Behavior 29 (4) (2013) 1441–1449.

Digital Library

[4]

Y. Al‐Saggaf, S.B. O'Donnell, Phubbing: Perceptions, reasons behind, predictors, and impacts, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 1 (2019) 132–140.

[5]

I. Altman, D.A. Taylor, Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, USA, 1973.

[6]

M. Argyle, M. Cook, Gaze and mutual gaze, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.

[7]

J.B. Bayer, S.W. Campbell, R. Ling, Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness, Communication Theory 26 (2) (2016) 128–149,.

[8]

J.K. Burgoon, Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 12 (1–2) (1993) 30–48.

[9]

J.K. Burgoon, Nonverbal signals, in: Handbook of interpersonal communication, 2, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994, pp. 229–285.

[10]

V. Chotpitayasunondh, K.M. Douglas, How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone, Computers in Human Behavior 63 (2016) 9–18.

Digital Library

[11]

V. Chotpitayasunondh, K.M. Douglas, The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48 (6) (2018) 304–316,.

[12]

M.E. David, J.A. Roberts, Phubbed and alone: Phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 2 (2) (2017) 155–163.

[13]

T. Deng, S. Kanthawala, J. Meng, W. Peng, A. Kononova, Q. Hao, et al., Measuring smartphone usage and task switching with log tracking and self-reports, Mobile Media & Communication 7 (1) (2019) 3–23.

[14]

C.J. Descutner, M.H. Thelen, Development and validation of a fear-of-intimacy scale, Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 3 (2) (1991) 218.

[15]

J. Finkel, D.J. Kruger, Is cell phone use socially contagious?, Human Ethology Bulletin 27 (1–2) (2012) 15–17.

[16]

D.K. Forgays, I. Hyman, J. Schreiber, Texting everywhere for everything: Gender and age differences in cell phone etiquette and use, Computers in Human Behavior 31 (2014) 314–321,.

Digital Library

[17]

K.J. Gergen, The challenge of absent presence, in: J.E. Katz, M.A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002, pp. 227–241.

[18]

A.L. Gonzales, Y. Wu, Public cellphone use does not activate negative responses in Others…Unless they hate cellphones, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21 (5) (2016) 384–398,.

Digital Library

[19]

K. Greene, V.J. Derlega, A. Mathews, Self-disclosure in personal relationships, in: A. Vangelisti, D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, pp. 409–427.

[20]

N. Guéguen, A. Martin, S. Meineri, J. Simon, Using mimicry to elicit answers to intimate questions in survey research, Field Methods 25 (1) (2013) 47–57.

[21]

A.H. Hales, M. Dvir, E.D. Wesselmann, D.J. Kruger, C. Finkenauer, Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs, The Journal of Social Psychology 158 (4) (2018) 460–473.

[22]

J.A. Hall, N.K. Baym, K.M. Miltner, Put down that phone and talk to me: Understanding the roles of mobile phone norm adherence and similarity in relationships, Mobile Media & Communication 2 (2) (2014) 134–153,.

[23]

D. Halpern, J.E. Katz, Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks, Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017) 386–394.

Digital Library

[24]

C. Harms, F. Biocca, Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds measure of social presence, in: M. Alcaniz, B. Rey (Eds.), Seventh Annual International Workshop: Presence, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 2004.

[25]

A.D. Hendrickson, L. De Marez, M. Martens, M. Van Meer, G. Muller, T. Paisa, M.M.P. Vanden Abeele, How do people use their smartphone? A data scientific approach to describe and identify user-related, system-related and context-related patterns in use, in: Paper presented at the 69th annual conference of the international communication association., 2019.

[26]

A.T. Hendrickson, A. Perfors, Cross-situational learning in a Zipfian environment, Cognition 189 (2019) 11–22.

[27]

A. Hiniker, K. Sobel, H. Suh, Y.-C. Sung, C.P. Lee, J.A. Kientz, Texting while parenting: How adults use mobile phones while caring for children at the playground, in: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, 2015, pp. 727–736.

[28]

L. Humphreys, Cellphones in public places: Social interactions in a wireless era, New Media & Society 7 (6) (2005) 810–833.

[29]

H. Jeffreys, Theory of probability, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1961.

[30]

T. Kadylak, T.W. Makki, J. Francis, S.R. Cotten, R. Rikard, Y.J. Sah, Disrupted copresence: Older adults' views on mobile phone use during face-to-face interactions, Mobile Media & Communication 6 (3) (2018) 331–349.

[31]

L. Kelly, A.E. Miller-Ott, R.L. Duran, Sports scores and intimate moments: An expectancy violations theory approach to partner cell phone behaviors in adult romantic relationships, Western Journal of Communication 81 (5) (2017) 619–640,.

[32]

H. Krasnova, O. Abramova, I. Notter, A. Baumann, Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among "generation y" users, in: Paper presented at the Twenty-fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), İstanbul, Turkey, 2016.

[33]

D.J. Kruger, A. Duan, D. Juhasz, C.V. Phaneuf, V. Sreenivasa, C.M. Saunders, S.L. Misevich, Cell phone use latency in a midwestern USA university population, Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 2 (1) (2017) 56–59.

[34]

D.J. Kruger, M. Falbo, C. Gazoul, E. Cole, N. Nader, S. Blanchard, C. Saunders, Counting blue (tooth) cars: Assessing cellphone use among vehicle drivers in the midwestern USA, Human Ethology Bulletin 33 (2) (2018) 48–57.

[35]

D.J. Kruger, D. Juhasz, C. Saunders, S. Misevich, A. Duan, A. Heyblom, et al., Factors predicting observed cellphone use in a Midwestern USA university campus area, Human Ethology Bulletin 33 (2) (2018) 5–12.

[36]

S.J. Lynn, Three theories of self-disclosure exchange, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14 (5) (1978) 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90043-4.

[37]

B.T. McDaniel, S.M. Coyne, “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being, Psychology of Popular Media Culture 5 (1) (2016) 85–98.

[38]

B.T. McDaniel, M. Drouin, Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being, Computers in Human Behavior 99 (2019) 1–8.

Digital Library

[39]

A.E. Miller-Ott, L. Kelly, Competing discourses and meaning making in talk about romantic partners' cell-phone contact with non-present others, Communication Studies 67 (1) (2015) 58–76,.

[40]

A.E. Miller-Ott, L. Kelly, The presence of cell phones in romantic partner face-to-face interactions: An expectancy violation theory approach, Southern Communication Journal 80 (4) (2015) 253–270,.

[41]

A.E. Miller-Ott, L. Kelly, A politeness theory analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends, Communication Studies 68 (2) (2017) 190–207,.

[42]

R.S. Miller, H.M. Lefcourt, The assessment of social intimacy, Journal of Personality Assessment 46 (5) (1982) 514–518.

[43]

S. Misra, L. Cheng, J. Genevie, M. Yuan, The iPhone Effect, Environment and Behavior 48 (2) (2014) 275–298,.

[44]

T.K. Naab, V. Karnowski, D. Schlütz, Reporting mobile social media use: How survey and experience sampling measures differ, Communication Methods and Measures (2018) 1–22.

[45]

T. Nakamura, The action of looking at a mobile phone display as nonverbal behavior/communication: A theoretical perspective, Computers in Human Behavior 43 (2015) 68–75,.

Digital Library

[46]

N. Nielsen, The nielsen total audience report: QI 2018, 2018, Retrieved from www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2018/q1-2018-total-audience-report.html.

[47]

A. Oulasvirta, T. Rattenbury, L. Ma, E. Raita, Habits make smartphone use more pervasive, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16 (1) (2011) 105–114,.

Digital Library

[48]

A.K. Przybylski, N. Weinstein, Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30 (3) (2012) 237–246,.

[49]

J.S. Radesky, C.J. Kistin, B. Zuckerman, K. Nitzberg, J. Gross, M. Kaplan-Sanoff, …., M. Silverstein, Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants, Pediatrics 133 (4) (2014) e843–849,.

[50]

L. Rainie, K. Zickuhr, Americans' views on mobile etiquette, 26, Pew Research Center, 2015, pp. 948–958.

[51]

J.A. Roberts, M.E. David, My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners, Computers in Human Behavior 54 (2016) 134–141.

Digital Library

[52]

J.A. Roberts, M.E. David, Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement, Computers in Human Behavior 75 (2017) 206–217.

[53]

H. Sacks, E.A. Schegloff, G. Jefferson, A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language 50 (1974) 696–735.

[54]

D.D. Salvucci, N.A. Taatgen, Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking, Psychological Review 115 (1) (2008) 101–130.

[55]

N. Schwarz, D. Oyserman, Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction, American Journal of Evaluation 22 (2) (2001) 127–160.

[56]

S. Turkle, Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other, Basic books, New York, 2011.

Digital Library

[57]

M.M.P. Vanden Abeele, The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda, in: R. Ling, G. Goggin, L. Fortunati, S.S. Lim, Y. Li (Eds.), Handbook of mobile communication, Culture, and Information, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2019.

[58]

M.M.P. Vanden Abeele, M.L. Antheunis, A.P. Schouten, The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality, Computers in Human Behavior 62 (2016) 562–569.

Digital Library

[59]

M.M.P. Vanden Abeele, K. Beullens, K. Roe, Measuring mobile phone use: Gender, age and real usage level in relation to the accuracy and validity of self-reported mobile phone use, Mobile Media & Communication 1 (2) (2013) 213–236.

[60]

M.M.P. Vanden Abeele, M. Postma-Nilsenova, More than just gaze: An experimental vignette study examining how phone-gazing and newspaper-gazing and phubbing-while-speaking and phubbing-while-listening compare in their effect on affiliation, Communication Research Report 35 (4) (2018) 303–313,.

[61]

E.J. Wagenmakers, R. Wetzels, D. Borsboom, H.L. Van Der Maas, Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2011) 426–432.

[62]

A. Weilenmann, C. Larsson, Local use and sharing of mobile phones, in: B. Brown, N. Green, R. Harper (Eds.), Wireless world: Social and interactional aspects of the mobile age, Springer London, London, 2002, pp. 92–107.

[63]

D.G. Williams, Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship, Sex Roles 12 (5–6) (1985) 587–600.

[64]

K.D. Williams, Ostracism, Annual Review of Psychology 58 (1) (2007) 425–452,.

[65]

M. Winnick, R. Zolna, Putting a finger on our phone obsession; Mobile touches: A study on humans and their tech, Dscout, 2016.

[66]

G.K. Zipf, Human behavior and the principle of least effort, Addison-Wesley, Madison Park, CA, USA, 1949.

Cited By

Pohl H(2024)Body-Based Augmented Reality Feedback During ConversationsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36764918:MHCI(1-22)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676491
Reiter TSakel SScharbert JTer Horst JBack MVan Zalk MBühner MSchoedel R(2024)Investigating Phubbing in Everyday Life: Challenges & Lessons for Future ResearchExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651009(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651009
Yin LFeng JHou WWang PYin Y(2024)Smartphone's on, humanness's offComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108378160:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108378
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Partner phubbing: Why using your phone during interactions with your partner can be detrimental for your relationship
Abstract
Previous research showed that phone use during co-present interactions with one's partner (partner phubbing) is negatively related to relationship satisfaction. In two cross-sectional surveys (N = 507 and N = 386) we confirmed this ...
Highlights
- Partner phone use in interactions is negatively related to relationship satisfaction.
Digital akrasia: a qualitative study of phubbing
Abstract
The present article focuses on the issue of ignoring conversational partners in favor of one’s phone, or what has also become known as phubbing. Prior research has shown that this behavior is associated with a host of negative interpersonal ...
Perceived partner phubbing predicts lower relationship quality but partners’ enacted phubbing does not
Abstract
Perceptions of partner phubbing can be detrimental for romantic relationship functioning. However, research does not typically focus on couple members' reports of their own phubbing behavior and how this relates to relationship ...
Highlights
- We analyzed a dyadic diary study to examine the effects of perceived and enacted phubbing on relationship quality.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior

Computers in Human Behavior Volume 100, Issue C

Nov 2019

392 pages

ISSN:0747-5632

Issue’s Table of Contents

Elsevier Ltd.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2019

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Pohl H(2024)Body-Based Augmented Reality Feedback During ConversationsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36764918:MHCI(1-22)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676491
Reiter TSakel SScharbert JTer Horst JBack MVan Zalk MBühner MSchoedel R(2024)Investigating Phubbing in Everyday Life: Challenges & Lessons for Future ResearchExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651009(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651009
Yin LFeng JHou WWang PYin Y(2024)Smartphone's on, humanness's offComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108378160:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108378
Xie YLiang CZhou PZhu J(2024)When should chatbots express humor? Exploring different influence mechanisms of humor on service satisfactionComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108238156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108238
Wang XZhao K(2023)Partner Phubbing and Marital SatisfactionSocial Science Computer Review10.1177/0894439321107223141:4(1126-1139)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1177/08944393211072231
Avgustis I(2023)Respecifying Phubbing: Video-Based Analysis of Smartphone Use in Co-Present InteractionsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581052(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581052
Köse D(2023)Can cat videos harm your relationships? Hedonic and utilitarian content as technological antecedents of phubbingComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107964149:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107964
Stevic AMatthes J(2023)Co-present smartphone use, friendship satisfaction, and social isolationComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107960149:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107960
Mosley MParker M(2023)The phubbing problemComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107953149:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107953
Kılıçarslan SParmaksız İ(2023)The mediator role of effective communication skills on the relationship between phubbing tendencies and marriage satisfaction in married individualsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107863147:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107863
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents