More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

The design of virtual audiences

Authors:

Willem-Paul Brinkman,

M. Birna van Riemsdijk,

Mark NeerincxAuthors Info & Claims

Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 55, Issue PB

Pages 680 - 694

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.008

Published: 01 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Expressive virtual audiences are used in scientific research, psychotherapy, and training. To create an expressive virtual audience, developers need to know how specific audience behaviors are associated with certain characteristics of an audience, such as attitude, and how well people can recognize these characteristics. To examine this, four studies were conducted on a virtual audience and its behavioral models: (I) a perception study of a virtual audience showed that people (n = 24) could perceive changes in some of the mood, personality, and attitude parameters of the virtual audience; (II) a design experiment whereby individuals (n = 24) constructed 23 different audience scenarios indicated that the understanding of audience styles was consistent across individuals, and the clustering of similar settings of the virtual audience parameters revealed five distinct generic audience styles; (III) a perception validation study of these five audience styles showed that people (n = 100) could differentiate between some of the styles, and the audience's attentiveness was the most dominating audience characteristic that people perceived; (IV) the examination of the behavioral model of the virtual audience identified several typical audience behaviors for each style. We anticipate that future developers can use these findings to create distinct virtual audiences with recognizable behaviors. Consistency exists across individuals on how audiences behave in various situations.Five generic audience styles exist among 21 different audience scenarios.People can distinguish some generic styles of a virtual audience.Attentiveness is a dominating characteristic of an audience that people can perceive.Specific audience behaviors were identified that made up these five audience styles.

References

[1]

P.L. Anderson, M. Price, S.M. Edwards, M.A. Obasaju, S.K. Schmertz, E. Zimand, Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81 (2013) 751-760.

[2]

L. Aymerich-Franch, R.F. Kizilcec, J.N. Bailenson, The relationship between virtual self similarity and social anxiety, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8 (2014) 944.

[3]

N.U. Bautista, W.J. Boone, Exploring the impact of TeachME¿ Lab virtual classroom teaching simulation on early childhood education majors' self-efficacy beliefs, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26 (2015) 237-262.

[4]

E. Bevacqua, E. Sevin, S.J. Hyniewska, C. Pelachaud, A¿listener model: introducing personality traits, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 6 (2012) 27-38.

[5]

F. Biocca, C. Harms, Defining and measuring social presence: contribution to the networked minds theory and measure, in: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on presence, Citeseer, 2002, pp. 1-36.

[6]

J. Bissonnette, F. Dubé, M.D. Provencher, M.T. Moreno Sala, Virtual reality exposure training for musicians: its effect on performance anxiety and quality, Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 30 (2015) 169-177. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ /26395619

[7]

J. Broekens, C. Qu, W.-P. Brinkman, Dynamic facial expression of emotion made easy, 2012. http://www.joostbroekens.com/

[8]

M. Chollet, M. Ochs, C. Pelachaud, From non-verbal signals sequence mining to bayesian networks for interpersonal attitudes expression, in: Proceeding of the 14th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 120-133.

[9]

M. Chollet, G. Sratou, A. Shapiro, An interactive virtual audience platform for public speaking training, in: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, 2014, pp. 1657-1658.

Digital Library

[10]

P. Engeldrum, Psychometric scaling: A toolkit for imaging systems development, Imcotek Press, 2000.

[11]

J.A. Hall, Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.

[12]

D. Hartanto, W.-P. Brinkman, I.L. Kampmann, N. Morina, P.G.M. Emmelkamp, M.A. Neerincx, Design and implementation of home-based virtual reality exposure therapy system with a virtual ecoach, in: Proceeding of the 15th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Vol. 9238, Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 287-291.

[13]

R.G. Heimberg, R.E. Becker, Cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia: Basic mechanisms and clinical strategies, Guilford Publications, 2002.

[14]

S.F. Hofmann, M.W. Otto, Cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder: Evidence-based and disorder-specific treatment techniques, Routledge, 2008.

[15]

C. Hu, M.A. Walker, M. Neff, J.E.F. Tree, Storytelling agents with personality and adaptivity, in: Proceeding of the 15th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Vol. 9238, Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 181-193.

[16]

N. Kang, Posture corpus for the behavior generator, 2013 Data set.

[17]

N. Kang, W.-P. Brinkman, B. Van Riemsdijk, M.A. Neerincx, An expressive virtual audience with flexible behavioral styles, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 4 (2013) 326-340.

[18]

O. Kelly, K. Matheson, A. Martinez, Z. Merali, H. Anisman, Psychosocial stress evoked by a virtual audience: relation to neuroendocrine activity, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (2007) 655-662.

[19]

C. Kirschbaum, K.-M. Pirke, D.H. Hellhammer, The "Trier Social Stress Test"- A tool for investigating psychobialogical stress responses in a laboratory setting, Neuropsychobiology, 28 (1993) 76-81.

[20]

Y. Ling, H.T. Nefs, N. Morina, I. Heynderickx, W.-P. Brinkman, A¿meta-analysis on the relationship between self-reported presence and anxiety in virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, PLoS One, 9 (2014) e96144.

[21]

A. Mehrabian, Pleasure-arousal-dominance: a general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament, Current Psychology, 14 (1996) 261-292.

[22]

N. Morina, W.-P. Brinkman, D. Hartanto, I.L. Kampmann, P.M.G. Emmelkamp, Social interactions in virtual reality exposure therapy: a proof-of-concept pilot study, Technology and Health Care: Official Journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 23 (2015) 581-589.

[23]

D.P. Pertaub, M. Slater, C. Barker, An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 11 (2002) 68-78.

Digital Library

[24]

L.A. Pervin, D. Cervone, O.P. John, Personality: Theory and research, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

[25]

S. Poeschl, N. Doering, Designing virtual audiences for fear of public speaking training - an observation study on realistic nonverbal behavior, in: Annual review of cybertherapy and telemedicine, Interactive Media Institute and IOS Press, 2012, pp. 218-222.

[26]

S. Poeschl, N. Doering, The German VR Simulation Realism Scale-psychometric construction for virtual reality applications with virtual humans, Studies in Health Technology And Informatics, 191 (2013) 33-37.

[27]

M. Powers, P. Emmelkamp, Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22 (2008) 561-569.

[28]

R. Rajae-Joordens, J. Engel, Paired comparisons in visual perception studies using small sample sizes, Displays, 26 (2005) 1-7.

[29]

M. Slater, Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364 (2009) 3549-3557.

[30]

M. Slater, D.-P. Pertaub, C. Barker, D.M. Clark, An experimental study on fear of public speaking using a virtual environment, Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 9 (2006) 627-633.

[31]

S.E. Taylor, T.E. Seeman, N.I. Eisenberger, T.A. Kozanian, A.N. Moore, W.G. Moons, Effects of a supportive or an unsupportive audience on biological and psychological responses to stress, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (2010) 47-56.

[32]

D. Thalmann, S.R. Musse, Crowd simulation, Springer London, London, 2013.

[33]

L.L. Thurstone, A¿law of comparative judgement, Psychological Review, 34 (1927) 273-286.

[34]

A.-D. Tudor, S. Poeschl, N. Doering, What do audiences do when they sit and listen?, in: Annual review of cybertherapy and telemedicine, IOS press, 2013, pp. 120-124.

[35]

M. Wallergard, P. Jonsson, K. Osterberg, G. Johansson, B. Karlson, A¿virtual reality version of the Trier Social Stress Test: a pilot study, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20 (2011) 325-336.

Digital Library

[36]

Z. Wang, J. Lee, S. Marsella, Towards more comprehensive listening behavior: beyond the bobble head, in: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Vol. 6895, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 216-227.

[37]

J. Xu, J. Broekens, K. Hindriks, Bodily mood expression: recognize moods from functional behaviors of humanoid robots, in: proceedings of 5th international conference on social robots (ICSR), Springer International Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2013, pp. 511-520.

[38]

Y. Xu, C. Pelachaud, S. Marsella, Compound gesture generation: a model based on ideational units, in: Proceeding of the 14th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 477-491.

[39]

C. Zanbaka, A. Ulinski, P. Goolkasian, L.F. Hodges, Social responses to virtual humans: implications for future interface design, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, 2007, pp. 1561-1570.

Digital Library

Cited By

Ristorcelli MD'Ambra APergandi JCasanova ROchs M(2024)Impact of the Nonverbal Behavior of Virtual Audience on Users' Perception of Social AttitudesProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3656650.3656687(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656650.3656687
Lugrin JTopel JGlémarec YLugrin BLatoschik MLugrin BLatoschik Mvon Mammen SKopp SPécune FPelachaud C(2023)Posture Parameters for Personality-Enhanced Virtual AudiencesProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3570945.3607311(1-4)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3570945.3607311
Ppali SLalioti VBranch BAng CThomas AWohl BCovaci A(2022)Keep the VRhythm goingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501922(1-19)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501922
Show More Cited By

The design of virtual audiences
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Engaging theatre audiences before the play: the design of playful interactive storytelling experiences
Inputs-Outputs '13: Proceedings of the 2013 Inputs-Outputs Conference: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Engagement in HCI and Performance

In this paper I present Mobile Stories, a design-led project that explored ways of playfully motivating and engaging theatre audiences in their journey before the premiere of a theatrical play. The project used the art of storytelling and mobile ...
Investigating the Impact of a Virtual Audience's Gender and Attitudes on a Human Speaker
ICMI '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Public speaking anxiety is a common social phobia in the general population, particularly among young adults. This social skill is essential for professional integration. However, few solutions have been developed to train people in public speaking. The ...
CAVRN: An Exploration and Evaluation of a Collective Audience Virtual Reality Nexus Experience
UIST '19: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

The virtual reality ecosystem has gained momentum in the gaming, entertainment, and enterprise markets, but is hampered by limitations in concurrent user count, throughput, and accessibility to mass audiences. Based on our analysis of the current state ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior

Computers in Human Behavior Volume 55, Issue PB

February 2016

645 pages

ISSN:0747-5632

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Elsevier Ltd.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2016

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ristorcelli MD'Ambra APergandi JCasanova ROchs M(2024)Impact of the Nonverbal Behavior of Virtual Audience on Users' Perception of Social AttitudesProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3656650.3656687(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656650.3656687
Lugrin JTopel JGlémarec YLugrin BLatoschik MLugrin BLatoschik Mvon Mammen SKopp SPécune FPelachaud C(2023)Posture Parameters for Personality-Enhanced Virtual AudiencesProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3570945.3607311(1-4)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3570945.3607311
Ppali SLalioti VBranch BAng CThomas AWohl BCovaci A(2022)Keep the VRhythm goingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501922(1-19)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501922
Ehret JBönsch AAspöck LRöhr CBaumann SGrice MFels JKuhlen T(2021)Do Prosody and Embodiment Influence the Perceived Naturalness of Conversational Agents’ Speech?ACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/348658018:4(1-15)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3486580
Barreda-Ángeles MAleix-Guillaume SPereda-Baños A(2020)Users’ psychophysiological, vocal, and self-reported responses to the apparent attitude of a virtual audience in stereoscopic 360°-videoVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-019-00400-124:2(289-302)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-019-00400-1
Glemarec YBosser ABuche CLugrin JLandeck MLatoschik MChollet M(2019)A Scalability Benchmark for a Virtual Audience Perception Model in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3359996.3364784(1-1)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3359996.3364784
Lugrin JBosser ALatoschik MChollet MGlémarec YLugrin BBrewster SFitzpatrick GCox AKostakos V(2019)Towards Narrative-Driven Atmosphere for Virtual ClassroomsExtended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290607.3313067(1-6)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290607.3313067
Lugrin JCharles FHabel MMatthews JDudaczy HOberdörfer SWittmann ASeufert CPorteous JGrafe SLatoschik MAndre EKoenig SDastani MSukthankar G(2018)Benchmark Framework for Virtual Students' BehavioursProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3238133(2236-2238)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3237383.3238133
Chollet MScherer S(2017)Perception of Virtual AudiencesIEEE Computer Graphics and Applications10.1109/MCG.2017.327146537:4(50-59)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MCG.2017.3271465
Kothgassner OFelnhofer AHlavacs HBeutl LPalme RKryspin-Exner IGlenk L(2016)Salivary cortisol and cardiovascular reactivity to a public speaking task in a virtual and real-life environmentComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.08162:C(124-135)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.081

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents