[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

An ontological approach for reliable data integration in the industrial domain

Published: 01 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Ontologies are structural components of modern information systems. The taxonomy, the core of an ontology, is a delicate balance between adequacy considerations, minimal commitments and implementation concerns. However, ontological taxonomies can be quite restrictive and entities that are commonly used in production and services might not find room in a official or de facto standard or ontological system. This mismatch between the company's view and the ontological constraints can limit or even jeoparize the adoption of modern formal ontologies in industry. We study the roots of this problem and individuate a general set of principles to relate the ontology and those non-ontological entities that are yet important for the core business of the company. We then introduce a theoretically sound and formally robust approach to expand a given ontology with new dependency relations, which make available information regarding the non-ontological entities without affecting the consistency of the overall information system.

References

[1]
N.A. Anjum, J. Harding, R. Young, K. Case, Mediation of foundation ontology based knowledge sources, Computers in Industry, 63 (2012) 433-442.
[2]
N. Asher, A. Lascarides, Logics of Conversation. Studies in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
[3]
F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P. Patel-Schneider, The Description Logic Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
[4]
R. Batres, M. West, D. Leal, D. Price, K. Masaki, Y. Shimada, T. Fuchino, Y. Naka, An upper ontology based on ISO 15926, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 31 (2007) 519-534.
[5]
L. Bellatreche, N.X. Dung, G. Pierra, D. Hondjack, Contribution of ontology-based data modeling to automatic integration of electronic catalogues within engineering databases, Computers in Industry, 57 (2006) 711-724.
[6]
S. Borgo, M. Carrara, P. Garbacz, P.E. Vermaas, A formalization of functions as operations on flows, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 11 (2011) 031007-1-031007-14.
[7]
S. Borgo, P. Leitão, Foundations for a Core Ontology of Manufacturing, in: Ontologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems, vol. 14 of Integrated Series in Information Systems, Springer, 2007, pp. 751-776.
[8]
S. Borgo, C. Masolo, Foundational choices in dolce, in: Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer Verlag, Dordrecht, 2009, pp. 361-381.
[9]
S. Borgo, L. Vieu, Artifacts in formal ontology, in: Handbook of the Philosophy of the Technological Sciences. Technology and Engineering Sciences, vol. 9, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2009, pp. 273-307.
[10]
V. Chulvi, R. Vidal, B-cube, behavioural modelling of technical artefacts, Computers in Industry, 64 (2013) 68-79.
[11]
J. Conesa, A. Olivé, A method for pruning ontologies in the development of conceptual schemas of information systems, in: Journal on Data Semantics V, volume 3870 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 64-90.
[12]
Printed Circuits Handbook, in: Printed Circuits Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008.
[13]
F. Correia, Ontological dependence, Philosophy Compass, 3 (2008) 1013-1032.
[14]
V. Ebrahimipour, K. Rezaie, S. Shokravi, An ontology approach to support FMEA studies, Expert Systems with Applications, 37 (2010) 671-677.
[15]
J. Euzenat, P. Shvaiko, Ontology Matching, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (DE), 2007.
[16]
K. Fine, Ontological dependence, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95, 1994, pp. 269-290.
[17]
G. Flouris, D. Manakanatas, H. Kondylakis, D. Plexousakis, G. Antoniou, Ontology change: classification and survey, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 23 (2008) 117-152.
[18]
E. Folmer, P. Oude Luttighuis, J. Hillegersberg, Do semantic standards lack quality? A survey among 34 semantic standards, Electronic Markets, 21 (2011) 99-111.
[19]
V. Fortineau, T. Paviot, S. Lamouri, Improving the interoperability of industrial information systems with description logic-based models - the state of the art, Computers in Industry, 64 (2013) 363-375.
[20]
P. Garbacz, S. Borgo, M. Carrara, P.E. Vermaas, Two ontology-driven formalisations of functions and their comparison, Journal of Engineering Design, 22 (2011) 733-764.
[21]
D.M. Giménez, M. Vegetti, H.P. Leone, G.P. Henning, Product ontology: Defining product-related concepts for logistics planning activities, Computers in Industry, 59 (2008) 231-241.
[22]
T.R. Gruber, Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43 (1995) 907-928.
[23]
T. Grubic, I.-S. Fan, Supply chain ontology: review, analysis and synthesis, Computers in Industry, 61 (2010) 776-786.
[24]
N. Guarino, C. Welty, Towards a methodology for ontology-based model engineering, in: ECOOP-2000 Workshop on Model Engineering Cannes, 2000.
[25]
N. Guarino, C. Welty, An overview on ontoclean, in: Handbook on Ontologies, Springer Verlag, 2009, pp. 201-220.
[26]
ISO 15926-2, ISO-15926:2003 Integration of Lifecycle Data for Process Plant Including Oil and Gas Production Facilities: Part 2 - Data Model, International Organization for Standardization, 2003.
[27]
C.M. Keet, A. Artale, Representing and reasoning over a taxonomy of part-whole relations, Applied Ontology, 3 (2008) 91-110.
[28]
B.C. Kim, H. Teijgeler, D. Mun, S. Han, Integration of distributed plant lifecycle data using ISO 15926 and web services, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 38 (2011) 2309-2318.
[29]
J. Kim, M.J. Pratt, R.G. Iyer, R.D. Sriram, Standardized data exchange of {CAD} models with design intent, Computer-Aided Design, 40 (2008) 760-777.
[30]
C. Masolo, S. Borgo, A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, A. Oltramari, L. Schneider, The wonderweb library of foundational ontologies. Deliverable 17, EU WonderWeb Project, 2002. http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/deliverables.shtml
[31]
N.T. Nguyen, A method for ontology conflict resolution and integration on relation level, Cybernetics and Systems, 38 (2007) 781-797.
[32]
N.F. Noy, Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches, SIGMOD Record, 33 (2004) 65-70.
[33]
F.S. Parreiras, S. Staab, S. Schenk, A. Winter, Model driven specification of ontology translations, in: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 5231, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008, pp. 484-497.
[34]
A. Poggi, D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, Linking data to ontologies, Journal of Data Semantics, X (2008) 133-173.
[35]
G. Priest, TOWARDS NON-BEING, the Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality, Oxford University Press, New York (USA), 2005.
[36]
W.V.O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1953.
[37]
W.V.O. Quine, Quantifiers and propositional attitudes, The Journal of Philosophy, 53 (1956) 177-187.
[38]
S. Ram, J. Park, Semantic conflict resolution ontology (scrol): an ontology for detecting and resolving data and schema-level semantic conflicts, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16 (2004 February) 189-202.
[39]
A. Rector, Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in description logics and related formalisms including owl, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture, ACM Press, New York, 2003, pp. 121-128.
[40]
P. Simons, Parts: a Study in Ontology, Clarendon Press, Oxford, Oxford, 1987.
[41]
S.K. Semy, M.K. Pulvermacher, L.J. Obrst, Toward the Use of an Upper Ontology for U.S. Government and U.S. Military Domains: An Evaluation. Technical Report Technical Report MTR 04B0000063, The MITRE Corporation, 2004.
[42]
S. Staab, R. Studer, Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer Verlag, Berlin (DE), 2009.
[43]
V.C. Storey, R. Chiang, G.L. Chen, Ontology creation: extraction of domain knowledge from web documents, Springer-Verlag, 2005.
[44]
A.L. Thomasson, Methods of categorization, in: Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS04), IOS Press, Turin, 2004, pp. 3-16.
[45]
L. Vieu, M. Aurnague, Part-of relations, functionality and dependence, in: volume 20 of Human Cognitive Processing, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 307-336.
[46]
J. Völker, D. Vrandečić, Y. Sure, A. Hotho, Aeon - an approach to the automatic evaluation of ontologies, Applied Ontology, 3 (2008) 41-62.
[47]
R. Volz, R. Studer, A. Maedche, B. Lauser, Pruning-based identification of domain ontologies, Universal Computer Science, 9 (2003) 520-529.
[48]
D.C. Wimalasuriya, D. Dou, Using multiple ontologies in information extraction., in: CIKM '09: Proceeding of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 235-244.
[49]
C. Zanni-Merk, D. Cavallucci, F. Rousselot, Use of formal ontologies as a foundation for inventive design studies, Computers in Industry, 62 (2011) 323-336.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Industry
Computers in Industry  Volume 65, Issue 9
December 2014
99 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2014

Author Tags

  1. Design data
  2. Formal ontology
  3. Information integration
  4. Product data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media