More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Low-power and lossy networks under mobility

Authors:

Afonso Oliveira,

Teresa VazãoAuthors Info & Claims

Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, Volume 107, Issue P2

Pages 339 - 352

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.03.018

Published: 09 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

With the creation of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks (ROLL) group, work centered on the Internet of Things (IoT) has been emerging. A routing protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) named the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) has been created recently, though it still has some issues, including its lack of responsiveness to mobility. This article surveys proposed mobility extensions to the RPL and analyzes how the mechanisms introduced affect the requirements for LLNs.

References

[1]

Contiki: the open source operating system for the internet of things, (http://www.contiki-os.org/). Online; accessed 11-January-2016.

[2]

The cooja network simulator, (http://www.contiki-os.org/). Online; accessed 11-January-2016.

[3]

Ieee standard for local and metropolitan area networks-part 15.4: low-rate wireless personal area networks (lr-wpans), IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2006) (2011) 1-314.

[4]

N. Accettura, L. Grieco, G. Boggia, P. Camarda, Performance analysis of the RPL routing protocol, 2011.

[5]

A. Brandt, J. Buron, G. Porcu, Home automation routing requirements in low-power and lossy networks, 2010, (RFC 5826 (Informational)), pp. 1-17.

[6]

Z. Cao, G. Lu, S-AODV: sink routing table over AODV routing protocol for 6lowpan, IEEE, 2010.

Digital Library

[7]

I. Chakeres, C. Perkins, Dynamic manet on-demand (dymo) routing, draft-ietf-manet-dymo-14 (work in progress)(2008).

[8]

C. Cobarzan, J. Montavont, T. Noel, Analysis and performance evaluation of rpl under mobility, 2014.

[9]

S. Deering, R. Hinden, RFC 2460 Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification, Internet Engineering Task Force, 1998.

[10]

M. Dohler, T. Watteyne, T. Winter, D. Barthel, Routing requirements for urban low-power and lossy networks, 2009, (RFC 5548 (Informational)).

[11]

R. Draves, J. Padhye, B. Zill, Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks, SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 34 (2004) 133-144.

Digital Library

[12]

H. Fotouhi, D. Moreira, M. Alves, MRPL: boosting mobility in the internet of things, Ad Hoc Netw., 26 (2015) 17-35.

Digital Library

[13]

H. Fotouhi, M. Zúñiga, M. Alves, A. Koubâa, P. Marrón, Smart-hop: a reliable handoff mechanism for mobile wireless sensor networks, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.

[14]

O. Gaddour, A. Koubaa, R. Rangarajan, O. Cheikhrouhou, E. Tovar, M. Abid, Co-RPL: RPL routing for mobile low power wireless sensor networks using corona mechanism, 2014.

[15]

O. Gaddour, A. Koubâa, {RPL} in a nutshell: a survey, Comput. Netw., 56 (2012) 3163-3178.

Digital Library

[16]

C. Gomez, A. Boix, J. Paradells, Impact of LQI-based routing metrics on the performance of a one-to-one routing protocol for ieee 802.15.4 multihop networks, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw., 2010 (2010) 6:1-6:20.

Digital Library

[17]

W.R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks, IEEE, 2000.

[18]

K.-S. Hong, L. Choi, Dag-based multipath routing for mobile sensor networks, 2011.

[19]

K. Kim, G. Montenegro, S. Park, I. Chakeres, C. Perkins, Dynamic MANET on-demand for 6LoWPAN (dymo-low) routing, 2007.

[20]

K. Kim, S.D. Park, G. Montenegro, S. Yoo, N. Kushalnagar, 6LoWPAN ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing (load), Netw. WG Internet Draft, 19 (2007).

[21]

K. Kim, S. Yoo, J. Park, S.D. Park, J. Lee, Hierarchical routing over 6LoWPAN (hilow), 2007.

[22]

J. Ko, A. Terzis, S. Dawson-Haggerty, D. Culler, J. Hui, P. Levis, Connecting low-power and lossy networks to the internet, Commun. Mag., IEEE, 49 (2011) 96-101.

[23]

I. Korbi, M. Ben Brahim, C. Adjih, L. Saidane, Mobility enhanced RPL for wireless sensor networks, 2012.

[24]

N. Kushalnagar, G. Montenegro, C. Schumacher, IPv6 over low-power wireless personal area networks (6LoWPANs): overview, assumptions, problem statement, and goals, 2007, (RFC 4919 (Informational)).

[25]

K. Lee, R. Sudhaakar, L. Dai, S. Addepalli, M. Gerla, RPL under mobility, 2012.

[26]

P. Levis, T. Clausen, J. Hui, O. Gnawali, J. Ko, The Trickle algorithm, 2011, (RFC 6206 (Proposed Standard)).

[27]

M. Maleki, K. Dantu, M. Pedram, Power-aware source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2002.

[28]

J. Martocci, P.D. Mil, N. Riou, W. Vermeylen, Building automation routing requirements in low-power and lossy networks, 2010, (RFC 5867 (Informational)).

[29]

C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das, Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing, 2003, (RFC 3561 (Experimental)).

[30]

K. Pister, P. Thubert, S. Dwars, T. Phinney, Industrial routing requirements in low-power and lossy networks, 2009, (RFC 5673 (Informational)).

[31]

R.C. Shah, J.M. Rabaey, Energy aware routing for low energy ad hoc sensor networks, IEEE, 2002.

[32]

Z. Sheng, S. Yang, Y. Yu, A. Vasilakos, J. McCann, K. Leung, A survey on the IEFT protocol suite for the internet of things: standards, challenges, and opportunities, Wirel. Commun., IEEE, 20 (2013) 91-98.

[33]

J.P. Singh, N. Bambos, B. Srinivasan, D. Clawin, Wireless LAN performance under varied stress conditions in vehicular traffic scenarios, IEEE, 2002.

[34]

S. Singh, M. Woo, C.S. Raghavendra, Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks, ACM, 1998.

[35]

J. Tripathi, J. de Oliveira, J. Vasseur, A performance evaluation study of RPL: routing protocol for low power and lossy networks, 2010.

[36]

N. Tsiftes, J. Eriksson, A. Dunkels, Low-power wireless IPv6 routing with contikirpl, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2010.

[37]

T. Watteyne, A. Molinaro, M.G. Richichi, M. Dohler, From MANET to IEFT roll standardization: a paradigm shift in wsn routing protocols, Commun. Surv. Tut., IEEE, 13 (2011) 688-707.

[38]

T. Winter, P. Thubert, A. Brandt, J. Hui, R. Kelsey, P. Levis, K. Pister, R. Struik, J. Vasseur, R. Alexander, RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks, 2012, (RFC 6550).

[39]

W. Xie, M. Goyal, H. Hosseini, J. Martocci, Y. Bashir, E. Baccelli, A. Durresi, A performance analysis of point-to-point routing along a directed acyclic graph in low power and lossy networks, 2010.

[40]

M. Younis, M. Youssef, K. Arisha, Energy-aware routing in cluster-based sensor networks, IEEE, 2002.

Cited By

Garg SMehrotra DPandey HPandey S(2022)Static to dynamic transition of RPL protocol from IoT to IoV in static and mobile environmentsCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-022-03689-x26:1(847-862)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10586-022-03689-x
Eloudrhiri Hassani ASahel ABadri A(2021)IRH-OF: A New Objective Function for RPL Routing Protocol in IoT ApplicationsWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-021-08230-8119:1(673-689)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11277-021-08230-8
Fatemifar SJavidan R(2021)A new load balancing clustering method for the RPL protocolTelecommunications Systems10.1007/s11235-021-00760-777:2(297-315)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11235-021-00760-7
Show More Cited By

Low-power and lossy networks under mobility
1. General and reference
  1. Cross-computing tools and techniques
2. Networks
  1. Network protocols
    1. Network layer protocols
  2. Network types

Recommendations

Proactive versus reactive routing in low power and lossy networks: Performance analysis and scalability improvements

In this paper, the classical debate on suitability of proactive versus reactive routing approaches is revisited, however in the context of their application in Low-Power Lossy Networks (LLNs) as opposed to pure Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). We argue ...
Mobility-Based Routing in Opportunistic Networks

In Opportunistic Networks OppNets nodes are only intermittently connected. A complete path from the sender node to the receiver does not exist. Mobile objects exploit direct contact for message transmission without relying on an existing end to end ...
Performance of RPL under various mobility models in IoT

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a system used primarily for communication where various devices are connected for the collection, analysis, and execution of the task required. The main challenge with an IoT device is that they are resource-constrained. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking

Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking Volume 107, Issue P2

October 2016

209 pages

ISSN:1389-1286

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 09 October 2016

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Garg SMehrotra DPandey HPandey S(2022)Static to dynamic transition of RPL protocol from IoT to IoV in static and mobile environmentsCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-022-03689-x26:1(847-862)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10586-022-03689-x
Eloudrhiri Hassani ASahel ABadri A(2021)IRH-OF: A New Objective Function for RPL Routing Protocol in IoT ApplicationsWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-021-08230-8119:1(673-689)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11277-021-08230-8
Fatemifar SJavidan R(2021)A new load balancing clustering method for the RPL protocolTelecommunications Systems10.1007/s11235-021-00760-777:2(297-315)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11235-021-00760-7
Verma ARanga V(2021)The impact of copycat attack on RPL based 6LoWPAN networks in Internet of ThingsComputing10.1007/s00607-020-00862-1103:7(1479-1500)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00607-020-00862-1
Verma ARanga V(2020)Mitigation of DIS flooding attacks in RPL‐based 6LoWPAN networksTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies10.1002/ett.380231:2Online publication date: 16-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1002/ett.3802
Santos BRettore PVieira LLoureiro A(2019)Dribble: A learn-based timer scheme selector for mobility management in IoT2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)10.1109/WCNC.2019.8885891(1-6)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/WCNC.2019.8885891
Bouaziz MRachedi ABelghith ABerbineau MAl-Ahmadi S(2019)EMA-RPLFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2019.02.04297:C(247-258)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.042
Bouaziz MRachedi ABelghith A(2019)EKF-MRPLFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2017.12.01593:C(822-832)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.future.2017.12.015
Ancillotti EVallati CBruno RMingozzi E(2017)A reinforcement learning-based link quality estimation strategy for RPL and its impact on topology managementComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2017.08.005112:C(1-13)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.comcom.2017.08.005

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents