More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

article

AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment

Authors:

Diane M. Strong,

Beverly K. Kahn,

Richard Y. WangAuthors Info & Claims

Information and Management, Volume 40, Issue 2

Pages 133 - 146

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00043-5

Published: 01 December 2002 Publication History

Abstract

Information quality (IQ) is critical in organizations. Yet, despite a decade of active research and practice, the field lacks comprehensive methodologies for its assessment and improvement. Here, we develop such a methodology, which we call AIM quality (AIMQ) to form a basis for IQ assessment and benchmarking. The methodology is illustrated through its application to five major organizations. The methodology encompasses a model of IQ, a questionnaire to measure IQ, and analysis techniques for interpreting the IQ measures. We develop and validate the questionnaire and use it to collect data on the status of organizational IQ. These data are used to assess and benchmark IQ for four quadrants of the model. These analysis techniques are applied to analyze the gap between an organization and best practices. They are also applied to analyze gaps between IS professionals and information consumers. The results of the techniques are useful for determining the best area for IQ improvement activities.

References

[1]

{1} S.L. Ahire, D.Y. Golhar, M.A. Waller, Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs, Decision Sciences 27 (1), 1996, pp. 23-51.

[2]

{2} J.L. Arbuckle, Amos Users' Guide, Version 3.6, SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago, IL, 1997.

[3]

{3} J.E. Bailey, S.W. Pearson, Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction, Management Science 29 (5), 1983, pp. 530-545.

Digital Library

[4]

{4} D.P. Ballou, H.L. Pazer, Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems, Management Science 31 (2), 1985, pp. 150-162.

Digital Library

[5]

{5} D.P. Ballou, H.L. Pazer, Designing information systems to optimize the accuracy-timeliness trade off, Information Systems Research 6 (1), 1995, pp. 51-72.

Digital Library

[6]

{6} D.P. Ballou, G,K. Tayi, Methodology for allocating resources for data quality enhancement, Communications of the ACM 32 (3), 1989, pp. 320-329.

Digital Library

[7]

{7} D.P. Ballou, R.Y. Wang, H. Pazer, G.K. Tayi, Modeling information manufacturing systems to determine information product quality, Management Science 44 (4), 1998, pp. 462-484.

Digital Library

[8]

{8} S.M. Brown, Preparing data for the data warehouse, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 291-298.

[9]

{9} I. Chengalur-Smith, L.L. Pipino, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1998.

[10]

{10} P. Cykana, A. Paul, M. Stern, DoD guidelines on data quality management, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1996, pp. 154-171.

[11]

{11} W.H. Delone, E.R. McLean, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information systems research 3 (1), 1992, pp. 60-95.

[12]

{12} C.P. Firth, R.Y. Wang, Data Quality Systems: Evaluation and Implementation, Cambridge Market Intelligence Ltd., London, 1996.

[13]

{13} E. Gardyn, A Data Quality Handbook For A Data Warehouse, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 267-290.

[14]

{14} D.L. Goodhue, Understanding user evaluations of information systems, Management Science 41 (12), 1995, pp. 1827-1844.

Digital Library

[15]

{15} K. Huang, Y. Lee, R. Wang, Quality Information and Knowledge, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.

Digital Library

[16]

{16} M. Jarke, Y. Vassiliou, Data warehouse quality: a review of the DWQ project, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 299-313.

[17]

{17} B.K. Kahn, D.M. Strong, Product and service performance model for information quality: an update, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1998, pp. 102-115.

[18]

{18} B.K. Kahn, D.M. Strong, R.Y. Wang. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance, Communications of the ACM 45 (4ve), April 2002, pp. 184-192.

Digital Library

[19]

{19} B. Klein, D. Rossin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 2000.

[20]

{20} R. Kovac, Y.W. Lee, L.L. Pipino, Total Data Quality Management: the case of IRI, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 63-79.

[21]

{21} Y.W. Lee, G.K. Tayi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

[22]

{22} S. Madnick, R.Y. Wang, Introduction to Total Data Quality Management (TDQM) Research Program, No. TDQM-92-01, Total Data Quality Management Program, MIT Sloan School of Management, Sloan, 1992.

[23]

{23} V.V. Mandke, M.K. Nayar, Information integrity-a structure for its definition, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 314-338.

[24]

{24} A Matsumura, N. Shouraboura, Competing with Quality Information, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1996, pp. 72-86.

[25]

{25} D.M. Meyen, M.J. Willshire, A data quality engineering framework, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 95-116.

[26]

{26} G.C. Moore, I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information Systems Research 2 (3), 1991, pp. 192-222.

Digital Library

[27]

{27} K. Orr, Data quality and systems theory, Communications of the ACM 41 (2), 1998, pp. 66-71.

Digital Library

[28]

{28} J.M. Pearson, C.S. McCahon, R.T. Hightower, Total Quality Management: are information systems managers ready? Information and Management 29 (5), 1995, pp. 251-263.

Digital Library

[29]

{29} T.C. Redman, Data Quality: Management and Technology, Bantam Books, New York, NY, 1992.

Digital Library

[30]

{30} C.A. Reeves, D.E. Bednar, Defining quality: alternatives and implications, AMR 19 (3), 1994, pp. 419-445.

[31]

{31} J. Saraph, G. Benson, R. Schroeder, An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management, Decision Sciences 20 (4), 1989, pp. 810-829.

[32]

{32} G. Schusell, Data quality the top problem, DW for Data Warehousing Management, Digital Consulting Institute (DCI), October 1997, p. S5.

[33]

{33} M.J. Spendolini, The Benchmarking Book, AMACOM, New York, NY, 1992.

[34]

{34} D.M. Strong, IT process designs for improving information quality and reducing exception handling: a simulation experiment, Information and Management 31 (5), 1997, pp. 251-263.

Digital Library

[35]

{35} D.M. Strong, B.K. Kahn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Total Data Quality Management Program, Cambridge, MA, 1997, 372 pp.

[36]

{36} D.M. Strong, Y.W. Lee, R.Y. Wang, Data quality in context, Communications of the ACM 40 (5), 1997, pp. 103-110.

Digital Library

[37]

{37} Y. Wand, R.Y. Wang, Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations, Communications of the ACM 39 (11), 1996, pp. 86-95.

Digital Library

[38]

{38} R.Y. Wang (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Total Data Quality Management Program, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

[39]

{39} R.Y. Wang, D.M. Strong, Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers, Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (4), 1996, pp. 5-34.

Digital Library

[40]

{40} M. Zairi, Benchmarking for Best Practice, Butterworths, Oxford, 1996.

[41]

{41} R. Zmud, Concepts, theories and techniques: an empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information, Decision Sciences 9 (2), 1978, pp. 187-195.

Cited By

Zheng YHe Y(2024)The Audience Perception to AI Voicebot News: An Experimental AnalysisProceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology10.1145/3678726.3678764(302-308)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678726.3678764
Bodendorf FFranke J(2024)What is the business value of your data? A multi-perspective empirical study on monetary valuation factors and methods for data governanceData & Knowledge Engineering10.1016/j.datak.2023.102242149:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.datak.2023.102242
Zhang SZhang YLi JNi ZLiu Z(2024)Heart or mind? The impact of congruence on the persuasiveness of cognitive versus affective appeals in debunking messages on social media during public health crisesComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108136154:COnline publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108136
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment
1. Information systems
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. System management
        Quality assurance

Recommendations

Assessing information quality by six sigma method
DASFAA'12: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications

Information is the most critical resource of any organization. However, its value to the organization is dependent on its quality. In order to manage information quality, the foremost requirement is the ability of the organization to evaluate the ...
Data quality assessment: The Hybrid Approach

Various techniques have been proposed to enable organisations to assess the current quality level of their data. Unfortunately, organisations have many different requirements related to data quality (DQ) assessment. For example, some organisations may ...
Methodology for Data and Information Quality Assessment in the Context of Emergency Situational Awareness

Situation Assessment (SA) approaches aim to provide powerful resources to support decision makers in enhancing their Situational Awareness (SAW). The process of SA in emergency response systems is of utmost importance once the information acquired and ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information and Management

Information and Management Volume 40, Issue 2

December 2002

71 pages

ISSN:0378-7206

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2002

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

188
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zheng YHe Y(2024)The Audience Perception to AI Voicebot News: An Experimental AnalysisProceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology10.1145/3678726.3678764(302-308)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678726.3678764
Bodendorf FFranke J(2024)What is the business value of your data? A multi-perspective empirical study on monetary valuation factors and methods for data governanceData & Knowledge Engineering10.1016/j.datak.2023.102242149:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.datak.2023.102242
Zhang SZhang YLi JNi ZLiu Z(2024)Heart or mind? The impact of congruence on the persuasiveness of cognitive versus affective appeals in debunking messages on social media during public health crisesComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108136154:COnline publication date: 25-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108136
Schmid SHartwig KCieslinski RReuter C(2024)Digital Resilience in Dealing with Misinformation on Social Media during COVID-19Information Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10347-526:2(477-499)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10796-022-10347-5
Lin YWang W(2024)Enhancing students’ online collaborative PBL learning performance in the context of coauthoring-based technologies: A case of wiki technologiesEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11907-129:2(2303-2328)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-023-11907-1
Wais BRinderle-Ma S(2024)Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Decision Rules and Decision Mining Algorithms Beyond AccuracyAdvanced Information Systems Engineering10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_24(403-419)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_24
Liu CGuo YHsu J(2023)Creating and Validating an Information Quality Scale for E-Commerce PlatformsJournal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations10.4018/JECO.32735021:1(1-28)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/JECO.327350
Chen GXiao SZhang CZhao H(2023)A Theory-Driven Deep Learning Method for Voice Chat–Based Customer Response PredictionInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2022.119634:4(1513-1532)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/isre.2022.1196
Moás PLopes C(2023)Automatic Quality Assessment of Wikipedia Articles—A Systematic Literature ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/362528656:4(1-37)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3625286
Simard VRönnqvist MLebel LLehoux N(2023)A Method to Classify Data Quality for Decision Making Under UncertaintyJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/359253415:2(1-27)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3592534
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents