Strengthening Large‐Scale Agile Teams: : The Interplay of High‐Quality Relationships, Psychological Safety, and Learning From Failures
Abstract
Agile methods have become a standard practice within software industry, with organizations increasingly adopting large‐scale agile (LSA) frameworks. However, as these frameworks are implemented across multiple teams and organizational functions, new challenges emerge, particularly in maintaining alignment, coherence, and collaboration across teams. One crucial element in addressing these challenges is fostering of a culture of continuous learning and psychological safety, with the objective of optimizing team performance and ensuring project success. Despite the importance of this topic, there is a significant gap in existing literature regarding antecedents of psychological safety and its impact on team learning and performance in LSA environments. This study aims to investigate impact of high‐quality relationships and psychological safety on learning from failures and, consequently, on team performance in LSA context. An online survey of 167 software professionals in Sweden was conducted to test a conceptual model that is developed based on existing literature. The hypotheses were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results demonstrate strong positive correlation between the presence of high‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and capacity to learn from failures and team performance. Specifically, the formation of high‐quality relationships has been demonstrated to significantly enhance psychological safety, which in turn facilitates learning from failures and leads to improved team performance. These findings offer valuable insights for both practitioners and researchers, highlighting the importance of cultivating relational dynamics and a psychologically safe environment in LSA projects. Furthermore, the study offers guidance for future research, regarding the scalability and generalizability of these findings.
Graphical Abstract
This study addresses a gap in the literature regarding antecedents of psychological safety and its impact on team learning and performance in LSA environments. An online survey of 167 software professionals in Sweden was conducted to test a conceptual model using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The findings demonstrate that high‐quality relationships significantly enhance psychological safety, facilitating learning from failures and improving team performance. These insights emphasize the importance of relational dynamics and psychological safety in LSA projects.
References
[1]
Agile‐Report, “16th State of Agile Report,” accessed March 14, 2023, https://digital.ai/resource‐center/analyst‐reports/state‐of‐agile‐report/.
[2]
H. Edison, X. Wang, and K. Conboy, “Comparing Methods for Large‐Scale Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48 (2021): 2709–2731.
[3]
M. O. Ahmad, “Psychological Safety, Leadership and Non‐Technical Debt in Large‐Scale Agile Software Development,” in 2023 18th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS) (Warsaw, Poland: IEEE, 2023): 327–334.
[4]
M. O. Ahmad, “Beyond Technical Debt Unravelling Organisational Debt Concept,” in 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, (2024), https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3635913.
[5]
M. O. Ahmad, "5G Secure Solution Development and Security Master Role," in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, (2024): 629–633.
[6]
M. O. Ahmad, H. Ghanbari, and T. Gustavsson, "Team Performance and Large Scale Agile Software Development," arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07878, (2022).
[7]
M. O. Ahmad and T. Gustavsson, “"The Pandora's box of Social, Process, and People Debts in Software Engineering," (In English),” Journal of Software 36 (2024): e2516, https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2516.
[8]
L. Argote, D. Gruenfeld, and C. Naquin, “Group Learning in Organizations,” in Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, ed. M. E. Turner (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001).
[9]
P. M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Printed in USA: Broadway Business, 2006).
[10]
A. Edmondson, “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams (In English),” Administrative Science Quarterly 44, no. 2 (1999): 350–383, https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999.
[11]
M. D. Cannon and A. C. Edmondson, “Failing to Learn and Learning to Fail (Intelligently): How Great Organizations put Failure to Work to Innovate and Improve,” Long Range Planning 38, no. 3 (2005): 299–319.
[12]
A. L. Tucker and A. C. Edmondson, “Why Hospitals don't Learn From Failures: Organizational and Psychological Dynamics That Inhibit System Change,” California Management Review 45, no. 2 (2003): 55–72.
[13]
A. Alami, M. Zahedi, and O. Krancher, “Antecedents of Psychological Safety in Agile Software Development Teams,” Information and Software Technology 162 (2023): 107267.
[14]
M. P. Buvik and A. Tkalich, "Psychological Safety in Agile Software Development Teams: Work Design Antecedents and Performance Consequences," arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.15034, (2021).
[15]
S. Faraj and A. Yan, “Boundary Work in Knowledge Teams,” Journal of Applied Psychology 94, no. 3 (2009): 604–617.
[16]
P. Lenberg and R. Feldt, "Psychological Safety and Norm Clarity in Software Engineering Teams," (in English), 2018 IEEE/ACM 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (Chase) [Online]. Available: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000449617900017. (2018): 79–86.
[17]
P. Hennel and C. Rosenkranz, “Investigating the “Socio” in Socio‐Technical Development: The Case for Psychological Safety in Agile Information Systems Development (in English),” Project Management Journal 52, no. 1 (2021): 11–30.
[18]
S. Thorgren and E. Caiman, “The Role of Psychological Safety in Implementing Agile Methods Across Cultures,” Research‐Technology Management 62, no. 2 (2019): 31–39.
[19]
A. Alami and O. Krancher, “How Scrum Adds Value to Achieving Software Quality?,” Empirical Software Engineering 27, no. 7 (2022): 165.
[20]
A. Alami, M. Zahedi, and O. Krancher, “The Role of Psychological Safety in Promoting Software Quality in Agile Teams,” Empirical Software Engineering 29, no. 5 (2024): 1–50.
[21]
A. Carmeli and J. H. Gittell, “High‐Quality Relationships, Psychological Safety, and Learning From Failures in Work Organizations, (In English),” Journal of Organizational Behavior 30, no. 6 (2009): 709–729, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.565.
[22]
A. Newman, R. Donohue, and N. Eva, “Psychological Safety: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Human Resource Management Review 27, no. 3 (2017): 521–535.
[23]
N. Bienefeld and G. Grote, “Speaking up in ad hoc Multiteam Systems: Individual‐Level Effects of Psychological Safety, Status, and Leadership Within and Across Teams,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23, no. 6 (2014): 930–945.
[24]
S. Dekker, A. Oates, and J. Rafferty, Restorative Just Culture in Practice: Implementation and Evaluation (New York: CRC Press, 2022).
[25]
L. Barros, C. Tam, and J. Varajao, “Agile Software Development Projects–Unveiling the Human‐Related Critical Success Factors,” Information and Software Technology 170 (2024): 107432.
[26]
M. L. Frazier, S. Fainshmidt, R. L. Klinger, A. Pezeshkan, and V. Vracheva, “Psychological Safety: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Extension,” Personnel Psychology 70, no. 1 (2017): 113–165, https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183.
[27]
P. L. Torres and H. Cornide‐Reyes, “Team Performance Assessment and Improvement in an Agile Methodology Framework,” in 2022 XVLIII Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI) (Armenia, Colombia: IEEE, 2022): 1–10.
[28]
E. Chapman, “Success Through Failure: How We got Agile to Work on a Distributed International Team,” (2014).
[29]
C. Schmidt, T. Kude, A. Heinzl, and S. Mithas, "How Agile Practices Influence the Performance of Software Development Teams: The Role of Shared Mental Models and Backup," (2014).
[30]
T. Dingsøyr and Y. Lindsjørn, “Team Performance in Agile Development Teams: Findings From 18 Focus Groups,” in Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming: 14th International Conference, XP 2013, Vienna, Austria, June 3–7, 2013. Proceedings 14, 2013 (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013), 46–60.
[31]
B. Winter, Agile Performance Improvement: The new Synergy of Agile and Human Performance Technology (Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2015).
[32]
W. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity (San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass, 2006).
[33]
A. C. Edmondson, R. M. Kramer, and K. S. Cook, “Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group‐Level Lens,” Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches 12, no. 2004 (2004): 239–272.
[34]
A. Carmeli, D. Brueller, and J. E. Dutton, “Learning Behaviours in the Workplace: The Role of High‐Quality Interpersonal Relationships and Psychological Safety, (In English),” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 26, no. 1 (2009): 81–98, https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.932.
[35]
J. E. Dutton, “Breathing Life Into Organizational Studies,” Journal of Management Inquiry 12, no. 1 (2003): 5–19.
[36]
J. E. Dutton and B. R. Ragins, Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (New York: Psychology Press, 2017).
[37]
J. H. Gittell, “Relational Coordination: Coordinating Work Through Relationships of Shared Goals, Shared Knowledge and Mutual Respect,” Relational Perspectives in Organizational Studies: A Research Companion (2006): 74–94.
[38]
J. H. Gittell, “A Theory of Relational Coordination,” in Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a new Discipline, eds. K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, and R. E. ve Quinn (San Francisco: Berrett‐Koehler Publishers, 2003): 279–295.
[39]
W. A. Kahn, “Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work,” Academy of Management Journal 33, no. 4 (1990): 692–724.
[40]
W. A. Kahn, “Meaningful Connections: Positive Relationships and Aattachments at Work,” in Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation, eds. J. E. Dutton and B. R. Ragins (New York: Psychology Press, 2007, ch. 10), 189–206.
[41]
P. R. Haunschild and B. N. Sullivan, “Learning From Complexity: Effects of Prior Accidents and Incidents on airlines' Learning,” Administrative Science Quarterly 47, no. 4 (2002): 609–643.
[42]
L. Z. Schlosser and J. H. Kahn, “Dyadic Perspectives on Advisor‐Advisee Relationships in Counseling Psychology Doctoral Programs,” Journal of Counseling Psychology 54, no. 2 (2007): 211–217.
[43]
C. Argyris and D. A. Schön, “Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective,” Reis 77, no. 77/78 (1997): 345–348.
[44]
P. Baumard and W. H. Starbuck, “Learning From Failures: Why It may Not Happen,” Long Range Planning 38, no. 3 (2005): 281–298.
[45]
D. L. Cooke and T. R. Rohleder, “Learning From Incidents: From Normal Accidents to High Reliability,” System Dynamics Review 22, no. 3 (2006): 213–239.
[46]
K. Mellahi and A. Wilkinson, “Organizational Failure: A Critique of Recent Research and a Proposed Integrative Framework,” International Journal of Management Reviews 5, no. 1 (2004): 21–41.
[47]
T. Dingsoyr, T. E. Faegri, T. Dyba, B. Haugset, and Y. Lindsjorn, “Team Performance in Software Development Research Results Versus Agile Principles,” IEEE Software 33, no. 4 (2016): 106–110, https://doi.org/10.1109/Ms.2016.100.
[48]
L. Argote, P. Ingram, J. M. Levine, and R. L. Moreland, “Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning From the Experience of Others,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, no. 1 (2000): 1–8.
[49]
M. Zellmer‐Bruhn and C. Gibson, “Multinational Organization Context: Implications for Team Learning and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 49, no. 3 (2006): 501–518.
[50]
A. C. Edmondson and Z. Lei, “Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1, no. 1 (2014): 23–43.
[51]
P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.‐Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 5 (2003): 879–903.
[52]
W. Reinartz, M. Haenlein, and J. Henseler, “An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance‐Based and Variance‐Based SEM,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 26, no. 4 (2009): 332–344.
[53]
J. F. Hair, Jr., L. M. Matthews, R. L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS‐SEM or CB‐SEM: Updated Guidelines on Which Method to use,” International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis 1, no. 2 (2017): 107–123.
[54]
C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research 18, no. 1 (1981): 39–50.
[55]
J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance‐Based Structural Equation Modeling,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (2015): 115–135.
[56]
J. F. Hair, Jr., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS‐SEM) (Printed in the United States of America: Sage Publications, 2021).
[57]
M. R. Ab Hamid, W. Sami, and M. M. Sidek, “Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker Criterion Versus HTMT Criterion,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 890, no. 1 IOP Publishing (2017): 012163.
[58]
A. Carmeli, D. Brueller, and J. E. Dutton, “Learning Behaviours in the Workplace: The Role of High‐Quality Interpersonal Relationships and Psychological Safety,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research 26, no. 1 (2009): 81–98.
Index Terms
- Strengthening Large‐Scale Agile Teams: The Interplay of High‐Quality Relationships, Psychological Safety, and Learning From Failures
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Antecedents of psychological safety in agile software development teams
Abstract Context:Psychological safety continues to inspire researchers’ curiosity in various fields of study. It has been shown to enhance teams’ performance, efficiency, and learning, among other corollaries. Researchers are ...
Highlights- Researchers explore psychological safety impacts, expanding current knowledge.
- ...
Agile software development projects–Unveiling the human-related critical success factors
Highlights- We examine the human factors that contribute to agile software development success.
- Team capability has a strong effect on the success of agile software development.
- Customer involvement has a strong effect on the success of agile ...
Abstract ContextInvestment in information technology is associated with better business performance when its implementation is successful, but it has high costs in case of failure, especially for large software development projects, which typically have ...
Identifying and Categorizing Challenges in Large-Scale Agile Software Development Projects: Insights from Two Swedish Companies
We conducted a case study to examine the challenges encountered in large-scale agile development (LSAD) within two Swedish software companies. While agile methodologies have proven successful in small and medium-sized projects, their implementation in ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Software: Evolution and Process published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 16 January 2025
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025