[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: correlates of perceived innovation attributes

Published: 01 January 2003 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we investigate how perceived attributes of computer technology influence its rate of adoption in the workplace. In order to achieve this, the diffusion of innovation literature was reviewed looking for a set of common attributes that could be responsible for the largest rate of adoption. The literature suggests that Rogers' five attributes of innovation namely, relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability explain up to 87% of the innovation rate of adoption. About 1200 knowledge workers in 56 public and private medium and large organizations across Saudi Arabia of different managerial levels and spanning a wide spectrum of industries and services have participated in this study. The findings highlight the role and direction of these factors toward computer technology adoption in developing countries. This should help decision makers in this part of the world cultivate the positively correlating factors to enhance computer technology adoption while trying to reduce the effects of the negative factors. We contend that the findings are also valuable for practitioners from western cultures in applying computer-based information systems solutions to developing countries.

References

[1]
{1} A.H. Abdul-Gader and K.H. Al-Angari, Information technology assimilation in the government sector: An empirical study, KACST, project AR-11-025, 1995.]]
[2]
{2} D.A. Adams, R.R. Nelson and P.A. Todd, Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: A replication, MIS Quarterly16(2) (1992), 227-247.]]
[3]
{3} R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies, Decision Sciences28(3) (1997), 557-582.]]
[4]
{4} S.S. Al-Gahtani, The applicability of the TAM model outside North America: An empirical test in the Arab world, BITWorld2001 conference, Cairo, 4-6 June 2001.]]
[5]
{5} S.S. Al-Gahtani and M. King, Attitudes, Satisfaction, and Usage: Factors Contributing to Each in the Acceptance of Information Technology, Behaviour & Information Technology18(4) (1999), 277-297.]]
[6]
{6} M.A. Al-Khaldi and R.S. Wallace, The influence of attitudes on personal computer utilization among knowledge workers: the case of Saudi Arabia, Information & Management36 (1999), 185-204.]]
[7]
{7} H.S. Atiyyah, Determinants of computer system effectiveness in Saudi Arabian public organizations, International Studies of Management and Organizations19(2) (1989), 85-103.]]
[8]
{8} P. Attewell and J. Rule, Computing and Organizations: What we Know and What we Don't Know, Communications of the ACM27 (1984), 1184-1192.]]
[9]
{9} J.C. Brancheau and J.C. Wetherbe, The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of EUC, Information Systems Research1(2) (1990), 115-143.]]
[10]
{10} R. Brislin, The Wording and Translation of Research Instruments, in: Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research, W. Lonner and J. Berry, eds, Beverly Hills, Sage, 1986.]]
[11]
{11} R.B. Cash, F.W. McFarlan, J.L. McKenny and L.M. Applegate, Corporate Information systems Management, (3rd ed.), Homewwod, Irwin, 1992.]]
[12]
{12} R.B. Cooper and R.W. Zmud, Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach, Management Science36 (1990), 123-139.]]
[13]
{13} R.B. Cunigham and Y.K. Sarayrah, The Human Factor in Technology Transfer, International Journal of Public Administration 17(8) (1994), 1419-1436.]]
[14]
{14} F.D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly13(3) (1989), 319-340.]]
[15]
{15} F.D. Davis, User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies38 (1993), 475-487.]]
[16]
{16} F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science35 (1989), 982-1003.]]
[17]
{17} R. Harris and R. Davison, Anxiety and Involvement: Cultural Dimensions of Attitudes Toward Computers in Developing Societies, Journal of Global Information Management7(1) (1999), 26-38.]]
[18]
{18} R. Hirschheim, The Effect of a Priori Views on the Social Implications of Computing: The Case of Office Automation, ACM Computing Surveys18(12) (1986), 165-195.]]
[19]
{19} M. Igbaria, User Acceptance of Microcomputer Technology: An Empirical Test, OMEGA Int. J. of Management Science21(1) (1993), 73-90.]]
[20]
{20} M. Igbaria, N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg and A.L. Cavaye, Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural equation Model, MIS Quarterly22(3) (1997), 279-305.]]
[21]
{21} J.M. Ivancevich, H.A. Napier and J.C. Wetherbe, Occupational stress, attitudes, and health problems in the information systems professional, Communications of the ACM26 (1983), 800-806.]]
[22]
{22} M. Keil, P.M. Beranek and B.R. Konsynski, Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations, Decision Support Systems13 (1995), 75-91.]]
[23]
{23} H.P. Lu and D.H. Gustafson, An Empirical Study of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Computerized Support System Use Over Time, Int. J. of Information Management14 (1994), 317-329.]]
[24]
{24} G.C. Moore and I. Benbasat, Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research2(3) (1991), 192-222.]]
[25]
{25} D.L. Nelson, Individual Adjustment to Information-Driven Technologies: A Critical Review, MIS Quarterly14(1) (1990), 78-98.]]
[26]
{26} P. Newsted, S. Huff and M. Munro, Survey Instruments in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly (December 1998), 553-554.]]
[27]
{27} R.S. Nickerson, Why Interactive Computer Systems Are Sometimes Not Used by People Who Might Benefit from Them, Int. J. of Man-Machine studies15 (1981), 469-483.]]
[28]
{28} J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.]]
[29]
{29} M. Odedra and S. Kluzer, Bibliography for Information Technology in Developing Countries, Information Technology for Development3(4) (1988), 297-356.]]
[30]
{30} Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Information Technology Outlook, 2000, URL: www.oecd.org/dsti/sti_ict.html.]]
[31]
{31} M.B. Prescott and S.A. Conger, Information Technology Innovations: A Classification by IT Locus of Impact and Research Approach, DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems26(2&3) (1995), 20-41.]]
[32]
{32} E.M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, (3rd & 4th ed.), The free press, New York, 1983 & 1995.]]
[33]
{33} G. Rose and D. Straub, Predicting General IT Use: Applying TAM to the Arabic World, Journal of Global Information Management6 (1998), 39-46.]]
[34]
{34} C.V. Slyke, H. Lou and J. Day, The Impact of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on Intention to Use Groupware, Information Resource Management Journal15(1) (2002), 5-12, (forthcoming).]]
[35]
{35} D. Straub, M. Limayem and E. Karahanna, Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing, Management Science41(8) (1995), 1328-1342.]]
[36]
{36} D. Straub, L. Karen and C.E. Hill, Transfer of Information Technology to the Arab World: A Test of Cultural Influence Modeling, Journal of Global Information Management9(4) (2001), 6-28.]]
[37]
{37} B. Tabachinck and L. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper and Raw, New York, 1983.]]
[38]
{38} R.L. Thompson and G. Rose, Information Technology Adoption and Use, Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada (ASAC) Annual Conference, 1994, pp. 16-26.]]
[39]
{39} R.L. Thompson, C.A. Higgins and J.M. Howell, Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization, MIS Quarterly15(1) (1991), 125-143.]]
[40]
{40} G. Torkzadeh and I.E. Angulo, The concepts and correlates of computer anxiety, Behaviour & Information Technology11(2) (1992), 99-108.]]
[41]
{41} L.G. Tornatzky and K.J. Klein, Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management29(1) (1982), 28-45.]]
[42]
{42} U. Yavas, M. Luqmani and Z.A. Quraeshi, Facilitating the adoption of information technology in a developing country, Information & Management23 (1992), 75-82.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Innovation Attributes of F2F Computer-Assisted Cooperative Learning in Teaching Reading SkillsInternational Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies10.4018/IJWLTT.20220501.oa417:3(1-17)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2021
  • (2020)User's Segmentation on Continued Knowledge Management System Use in the Public SectorJournal of Organizational and End User Computing10.4018/JOEUC.202001010232:1(19-40)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Sociotechnical Factors in the Endorsement of Governmental E-TransactionsJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.201907010327:3(38-64)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Technology for Development
Information Technology for Development  Volume 10, Issue 1
January 2003
69 pages

Publisher

Routledge

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2003

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Innovation Attributes of F2F Computer-Assisted Cooperative Learning in Teaching Reading SkillsInternational Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies10.4018/IJWLTT.20220501.oa417:3(1-17)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2021
  • (2020)User's Segmentation on Continued Knowledge Management System Use in the Public SectorJournal of Organizational and End User Computing10.4018/JOEUC.202001010232:1(19-40)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Sociotechnical Factors in the Endorsement of Governmental E-TransactionsJournal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.201907010327:3(38-64)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • (2018)A cross-country model of contextual factors impacting cloud computing adoption at universities in sub-Saharan AfricaInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-017-9739-120:6(1381-1404)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
  • (2015)SMEs' adoption of e-commerce using social media in a Saudi Arabian contextInternational Journal of Business Information Systems10.1504/IJBIS.2015.06942919:2(159-179)Online publication date: 1-May-2015
  • (2014)Adoption of e-book among college studentsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.05641:C(471-477)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014
  • (2012)Developing an Instrument for E-Public Services' Acceptance Using Confirmatory Factor AnalysisJournal of Organizational and End User Computing10.4018/joeuc.201207010224:3(18-44)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012
  • (2011)The Value of TAM Antecedents in Global IS Development and ResearchJournal of Organizational and End User Computing10.4018/joeuc.201101010223:1(18-37)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011
  • (2009)One laptop per childCommunications of the ACM10.1145/1516046.151606352:6(66-73)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009
  • (2008)Implications of researcher assumptions about perceived relative advantage and compatibilityACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/1364636.136464239:2(50-65)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2008
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media