[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Establishing the Usability of a Virtual Training System for Assembly Operations within the Automotive Industry

Published: 01 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual training systems deliver training within a virtual environment VE using virtual reality VR or augmented reality AR technologies. However, to be fully accepted as a valid tool for training within the automotive industry, evidence is required on the ability of these systems to deliver effective and efficient training to the relevant users. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness and efficiency of the first prototype of the virtual training system VTS developed within the VISTRA Virtual Simulation and Training of Assembly and Service Processes in Digital Factories project FP7-ICT-285176, using real end users from the OPEL automotive plant in Rüsselsheim, Germany. Two separate and independent studies were employed that used objective and subjective methods of investigation to establish performance and usability measures. The objective results show that virtual training was effective in reducing error during task performance when compared to traditional training. The subjective results concluded that the opinions of the participants were mainly positive concerning the overall use of the VTS for assembly operation training; however, a number of issues were highlighted and reported to the developers for further advancement of the system.

References

[1]
Baines, C. A., &Lawson, G. 2012. Virtual preparation to training for automotive assembly operations MEng dissertation, University of Nottingham.
[2]
Bergamasco, M., Bardy, B., &Gopher, D. 2012. Skill training in multimodal virtual environments. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor Francis Group. Boca Raton, London, New York.
[3]
Boud, A. C., Baber, C., &Steiner, S. J. 2000. Virtual reality: A tool for assembly ? Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, Volume 9 Issue 5, pp.486-496.
[4]
Brough, J. E., Schwartz, M., Gupta, S. K., Anand, D. K., Kavetsky, R., &Pettersen, R. 2007. Towards the development of a virtual environment-based training system for mechanical assembly operations. Virtual Reality, Volume 11, pp.189-206.
[5]
Compeau, D. R., &Higgins, C. A. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, Volume 19 Issue 2, pp.189-211.
[6]
DeLone, W. H., &Mclean, R. E. 2002. Information systems success revisited. Proceeding of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences pp. pp.238-248. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
[7]
<familyNamePrefix>De</familyNamePrefix>Moraes, R. M., &dos Santos Machado, L. 2005. Continuous evaluation in training systems based on virtual reality. Proceedings of Global Congress on Engineering and Technology Education GCETE'2005.
[8]
Edwards, G. W., Barfield, W., &Nussbaum, M. A. 2004. The use of force feedback and auditory cues for performance of an assembly task in an immersive virtual environment. Virtual Reality, Volume 7, pp.112-119.
[9]
ElMaraghy, W., ElMaraghy, H., Tomiyama, T., &Monostori, L. 2012. Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Volume 61 Issue 2, pp.793-814.
[10]
Eseryel, D. 2002. Approaches to evaluation of training: Theory and practice. Educational Technology & Society, Volume 5 Issue 2, pp.93-98.
[11]
Fernandes, K. J., Raja, V. H., &Eyre, J. 2003. Immersive learning system for manufacturing industries. Computers in Industry, Volume 51 Issue 1, pp.31-40.
[12]
Gallagher, A. G., Lederman, A. B., McGlade, K., Satava, R. M., &Smith, C. D. 2004. Discriminative validity of the minimally invasive surgical trainer in virtual reality MIST VR using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surgical Endoscopy, Volume 18, pp.660-665.
[13]
Gallagher, A. G., Ritter, E. M., Champion, H., Higgins, G., Fried, M. P., Moses, G., Smith, C. D., &Satava, R. M. 2005. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Annals of Surgery, Volume 241 Issue 2, pp.364.
[14]
Garbaya, S., &Zaldivar-Colado, U. 2007. The affect of contact force sensations on user performance in virtual assembly tasks. Virtual Reality, Volume 11 Issue 4, pp.287-299.
[15]
Gavish, N., Gutierrez Seco, T., Webel, S., Rodriguez, J., Peveri, M., &Bockholt, U. 2011. Transfer of skills evaluation for assembly and maintenance training. BIO Web of Conferences.
[16]
Haque, S., &Srinivasan, S. 2006. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Volume 10 Issue 1, pp.51-58.
[17]
Hermawati, S., &Lawson, G. 2013. User-centred design of virtual training for automotive industries. In M.Anderson, Ed., Contemporary ergonomics and human factors pp. pp.257-273. London: Taylor and Francis.
[18]
Hu, S. J., Ko, J., Weyand, L., ElMaraghy, H. A., Lien, T. K., Koren, Y., .. . &Shpitalni, M. 2011. Assembly system design and operations for product variety. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, Volume 60, pp.715-733.
[19]
Huegel, J. C., Celik, O., Israr, A., &O'Malley, M. K. 2009. Expertise-based performance measures in a virtual training environment. Presence, Volume 18 Issue 6, pp.449-467.
[20]
International Organization for Standardization. 2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Pt. 210. Human-centred design for interactive systems, ISO 9241-210.
[21]
Jia, D., Bhatti, A., &Nahavandi, S. 2009. Design and evaluation of a haptically enable virtual environment for object assembly training. IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and Games pp.75 - 80, November 7-8, 2009, Lecco.
[22]
Jou, M., &Wang, J. 2013. Investigation of effects of virtual reality environments on learning performance of technical skills. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 29 Issue 2, pp.433-438.
[23]
Mantovani, G. F., &Castelnuovo, G. 2003. Sense of presence in virtual training: Enhancing skills acquisition and transfer of knowledge through learning experience in virtual environments. In G.Riva, F.Davide, &W. A.IJsselsteijn. Ed., Being there: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments pp. pp.167-179. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
[24]
Michalos, G., Makris, S., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., &Chryssolouris, G. 2010. Automotive assembly technologies review: Challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Volume 2, pp.81-91.
[25]
Mujber, T. S., Szecsi, T., &Hashmi, M. S. J. 2004. Virtual reality applications in manufacturing process simulation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 155, pp.1834-1838.
[26]
Neale, H., &Nichols, S. 2001. Theme-based content analysis: A flexible method for virtual environment evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 55 Issue 2, pp.167-189.
[27]
Nielsen, J. 1994. Heuristic evaluation. Usability Inspection Methods, Volume 17 Issue 1, pp.25-62.
[28]
Patel, L. 2010. ASTD state of the industry report 2010. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.
[29]
Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., &Piccolo, R. 2009. Using simulation based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, Volume 8, pp.559-573.
[30]
Salem, W., &Kissner, H. 2007. Best practice in virtual reality based training. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interactive Mobile and Computer Aided Learning IMCL, Amman.
[31]
Stork, A., Gorecky, D., Stahl, C., &Loskyll, M. 2012. Enabling virtual assembly training in and beyond the automotive industry. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Virtual System and Multimedia.
[32]
Toma, M. I., Gîrbacia, F., &Antonya, C. 2012. A comparative evaluation of human interaction for design and assembly of 3D CAD models in desktop and immersive environments. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Volume 6 Issue 3, pp.179-193.
[33]
Vo, D. M., Vance, J. M., &Marasinghe, M. G. 2009. Assessment of haptics-based interaction for assembly tasks in virtual reality. Third Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems pp. pp.494-499.
[34]
Webel, S., Bockholt, U., Engelke, T., Gavish, N., Olbrich, M., &Preusche, C. 2012. Augmented reality training platform for assembly and maintenance skills. Robotics and Autonomous Systems.
[35]
Xia, P. M., Lopes, A. M., Restivo, M. T., &Yao, Y. 2012. A new type haptics-based virtual environment system for assembly training of complex products. International Journal for Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Volume 58, pp.379-396.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)REVEAL: REal and Virtual Environments Augmentation Lab @ BathExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3648658(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Watch This! Observational Learning in VR Promotes Better Far Transfer than Active Learning for a Fine Psychomotor TaskProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642550(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)A Virtual Reality Training System for Automotive Engines Assembly and DisassemblyIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.333047117(754-764)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Establishing the Usability of a Virtual Training System for Assembly Operations within the Automotive Industry

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing
      Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing  Volume 26, Issue 6
      November 2016
      115 pages
      ISSN:1090-8471
      EISSN:1520-6564
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

      United Kingdom

      Publication History

      Published: 01 November 2016

      Author Tags

      1. Effectiveness
      2. Efficiency
      3. Usability
      4. Virtual environments
      5. Virtual reality
      6. Virtual training

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)REVEAL: REal and Virtual Environments Augmentation Lab @ BathExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3648658(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Watch This! Observational Learning in VR Promotes Better Far Transfer than Active Learning for a Fine Psychomotor TaskProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642550(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)A Virtual Reality Training System for Automotive Engines Assembly and DisassemblyIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.333047117(754-764)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
      • (2024)New-user experience evaluation in a semi-immersive and haptic-enabled virtual reality system for assembly operationsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103312190:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Implementation of Augmented Reality in Smart Engineering Manufacturing: Literature ReviewMobile Networks and Applications10.1007/s11036-023-02121-x29:1(119-132)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
      • (2021)A VR training system for learning and skills development for construction workersVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-020-00470-625:2(523-538)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
      • (2020)Forming a cognitive automation strategy for Operator 4.0 in complex assemblyComputers and Industrial Engineering10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.011139:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2020
      • (2019)Training Virtual Environment for Teaching Simulation and Control of Pneumatic SystemsAugmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics10.1007/978-3-030-25965-5_8(91-104)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2019
      • (2018)Virtual reality training for assembly of hybrid medical devicesMultimedia Tools and Applications10.5555/3288443.328849077:23(30651-30682)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
      • (2018)An Analysis of Language Impact on Augmented Reality Order Picking TrainingProceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference10.1145/3197768.3201570(351-357)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2018
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media