[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-11440-3_14guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Comparing RNA structures with biologically relevant operations cannot be done without strong combinatorial restrictions

Published: 10 February 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Arc-annotated sequences are useful for representing structural information of RNAs and have been extensively used for comparing RNA structures in both terms of sequence and structural similarities. Among the many paradigms referring to arc-annotated sequences and RNA structures comparison (see [2] for more details), the most important one is the general edit distance. The problem of computing an edit distance between two non-crossing arc-annotated sequences was introduced in [5]. The introduced model uses edit operations that involve either single letters or pairs of letters (never considered separately) and is solvable in polynomial-time [12].
To account for other possible RNA structural evolutionary events, new edit operations, allowing to consider either silmutaneously or separately letters of a pair were introduced in [9]; unfortunately at the cost of computational tractability. It has been proved that comparing two RNA secondary structures using a full set of biologically relevant edit operations is NP-complete. Nevertheless, in [8], the authors have used a strong combinatorial restriction in order to compare two RNA stem-loops with a full set of biologically relevant edit operations; which have allowed them to design a polynomial-time and space algorithm for comparing general secondary RNA structures.
In this paper we will prove theoretically that comparing two RNA structures using a full set of biologically relevant edit operations cannot be done without strong combinatorial restrictions.

References

[1]
Alber, J., Gramm, J., Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Computing the similarity of two sequences with nested arc annotations. Theoretical Computer Science 312(2-3), 337-358 (2004)
[2]
Blin, G., Denise, A., Dulucq, S., Herrbach, C., Touzet, H.: Alignment of RNA structures. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (2008) (to appear)
[3]
Blin, G., Fertin, G., Herry, G., Vialette, S.: Comparing RNA structures: Towards an intermediate model between the edit and the lapcs problems. In: Sagot, M.- F., Walter, M.E.M.T. (eds.) BSB 2007. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 4643, pp. 101-112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
[4]
Blin, G., Fertin, G., Rusu, I., Sinoquet, C.: Extending the hardness of RNA secondary structure comparison. In: Chen, B., Paterson, M., Zhang, G. (eds.) ESCAPE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4614, pp. 140-151. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
[5]
Evans, P.: Algorithms and Complexity for Annotated Sequences Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Victoria (1999)
[6]
Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. W.H. Freeman, New York (1979)
[7]
Gramm, J., Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Pattern matching for arc-annotated sequences. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2(1), 44-65 (2006) (to appear)
[8]
Guignon, V., Chauve, C., Hamel, S.: An edit distance between RNA stem-loops. In: Consens, M.P., Navarro, G. (eds.) SPIRE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3772, pp. 335-347. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
[9]
Jiang, T., Lin, G., Ma, B., Zhang, K.: A general edit distance between RNA structures. Journal of Computational Biology 9(2), 371-388 (2002)
[10]
Jiang, T., Lin, G., Ma, B., Zhang, K.: The longest common subsequence problem for arc-annotated sequences. Journal of Dicrete Algorithms, 257-270 (2004)
[11]
Lin, G., Chen, Z.-Z., jiang, T., Wen, J.: The longest common subsequence problem for sequences with nested arc annotations. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 65, 465-480 (2002)
[12]
Zhang, K., Shasha, D.: Simple fast algorithms for the editing distance between trees and related problems. SIAM Journal of Computing 18(6), 1245-1262 (1989)

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)The longest common subsequence problem with crossing-free arc-annotated sequencesProceedings of the 19th international conference on String Processing and Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-642-34109-0_14(130-142)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2012
  1. Comparing RNA structures with biologically relevant operations cannot be done without strong combinatorial restrictions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      WALCOM'10: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Algorithms and Computation
      February 2010
      304 pages
      ISBN:3642114393
      • Editors:
      • Md. Saidur Rahman,
      • Satoshi Fujita

      Sponsors

      • Therap Services
      • escenic

      Publisher

      Springer-Verlag

      Berlin, Heidelberg

      Publication History

      Published: 10 February 2010

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2012)The longest common subsequence problem with crossing-free arc-annotated sequencesProceedings of the 19th international conference on String Processing and Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-642-34109-0_14(130-142)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2012

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media