[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_7guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

An Empirical Study of Enterprise Conceptual Modeling

Published: 10 November 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Business analysts, business architects, and solution consultants use a variety of practices and methods in their quest to understand business. The resulting work products could end up being transitioned into the formal world of software requirement definitions or as recommendations for all kinds of business activities. We describe an empirical study about the nature of these methods, diagrams, and home-grown conceptual models as reflected in real practice at IBM. We identify the models as artifacts of "enterprise conceptual modeling". We study important features of these models, suggest practical classifications, and discuss their usage. Our survey shows that the "enterprise conceptual modeling" arena presents a variety of descriptive models, each used by a relatively small group of colleagues. Together they form a "long tail" that extends from "drawings" on one end to "standards" on the other.

References

[1]
Ambler, S.W.: Agilists Write Documentation! Dr. Dobb's (2008), modeling and documentation survey, http://www.ddj.com/architect/211201940
[2]
Argote, L., Ingram, P.: Knowledge transfer A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82(1), 150-169
[3]
Bandara, W., Tan, H.W., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M.: Bibliography of process modeling: An Emerging research field. (2007), http://eprints.qut.edu.au/8754/
[4]
Chang, S., Kesari, M., Seddon, P.: A content-analytic study of the advantages and disadvantages of process modeling. In: Burn, J., Standing, C., Love, P. (eds.) ACIS 2003 (2003)
[5]
Chock, S., Marriot, K.: Automatic generation of intelligent diagram editors. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10(3), 244-276 (2003)
[6]
Costagliola, G., Deufemia, V., Polese, G.: A framework for modeling and implementing visual notations with applications to software engineering. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 13(4), 431-487 (2004)
[7]
Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering 58, 358-380 (2006)
[8]
Goodman, L.A., Kruskal, W.H.: Measures of association for cross classifications. Part I. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 49, 732-764 (1954)
[9]
Gorla, N., Pu, H.-C., Rom, W.: Evaluation of process tools in systems analysis. Information and Software Technology 37(2), 119-126 (1995)
[10]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_transfer
[11]
Kilov, H.: Using RM-ODP to bridge communication gaps between stakeholders Workshop on ODP for Enterprise Computing in the proceedings of WODPEC 2004 (2004), http://www.lcc.uma.es/~av/wodpec2004/
[12]
Kaindl, H., Brinkkemper, S., Bubenko, J.A., Farbey, B., Greenspan, S.J., Heitmeyer, C.L., Leite, J.C.S.P., Myopolous, M.N.R.J., Siddiqui, J.: Requirements engineering and technology transfer: obstacles, incentives and improvement agenda. Requirements Engineering 7, 113-123 (2002)
[13]
Kung, C.H., Solvberg, A.: Activity modelling and behaviour modelling. In: Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A. (eds.) Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice, IFIP, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 145-171 (1986)
[14]
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York
[15]
Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55, 243-276 (2005)
[16]
Persson, A., Stirna, J.: Why Enterprise Modelling? An Explorative Study into Current Practice. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 465-468. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
[17]
Sedera, W., Gable, G., Rosemann, M., Smyth, R.: A success model for business process modeling: findings from a multiple case study. In: Liang, T.P., Zheng, Z. (eds.) 8th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2004), Shanghai (2004)
[18]
Sheskin, D.J.: Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 2nd edn. Chapman&Hall/CRC, Boca Raton ISBN 1-58488-133-X
[19]
Siau, K.: Informational and computational equivalence in comparing information modelling methods. Journal Of Database Management 15(1), 73-86 (2004)
[20]
Wand, Y., Weber, R.A.: Research commentary: information systems and conceptual modeling--a research agenda. Information Systems Research 13(4), 363-376 (2002)
[21]
White, S.A.: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 1.0. Business Process Management Initiative, BPMI.org (May 2004)
[22]
Wyssusek, B., Zaha, J.M.: Towards a pragmatic perspective on requirements for conceptual modeling methods. In: EMMSAD 2007, held in conjunction with the 19th Conference on Advanced Information Systems (CAiSE 2007), Trondheim, Norway, pp. 17-26 (2007)

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)Former Students' Perception of Improvement Potential of Conceptual Modeling in PracticeProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling - Volume 821710.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_32(395-402)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2013
  • (2010)InkusProceedings of the Seventh Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling Symposium10.5555/1923363.1923389(143-150)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2010
  1. An Empirical Study of Enterprise Conceptual Modeling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    ER '09: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling
    November 2009
    514 pages
    ISBN:9783642048395
    • Editors:
    • Alberto H. Laender,
    • Silvana Castano,
    • Umeshwar Dayal,
    • Fabio Casati,
    • José Palazzo Oliveira

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 10 November 2009

    Author Tags

    1. Business analysis
    2. Conceptual modeling
    3. Modeling techniques

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2013)Former Students' Perception of Improvement Potential of Conceptual Modeling in PracticeProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling - Volume 821710.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_32(395-402)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2013
    • (2010)InkusProceedings of the Seventh Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling Symposium10.5555/1923363.1923389(143-150)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2010

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media