[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_39guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Mobile Phone Usability Questionnaire (MPUQ) and Automated Usability Evaluation

Published: 14 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The mobile phone has become one of the most popular products amongst today's consumers. The Mobile Phone Usability Questionnaire (MPUQ) was developed to provide an effective subjective usability measurement tool, tailored specifically to the mobile phone. Progress is being made in the HCI research community towards automating some aspects of the usability evaluation process. Given that this effort is gaining traction, a tool for measurement of subjective usability, such as MPUQ, may serve as a complement to automated evaluation methods by providing user-centered values and emotional aspects of the product. Furthermore, experimental comparison of MPUQ assessments and automated usability analysis may enable researchers to determine whether automated usability tools generate metrics that correlate with user impressions of usability.

References

[1]
Vnnen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Ruuska, S.: Designing Mobile Phones and Communicators for Consumers' Needs at Nokia. In: Bergman, E. (ed.) Information Appliances and Beyond: Interaction Design for Consumer Products, pp. 169-204. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000).
[2]
Sacher, H., Loudon, G.: Uncovering the new wireless interaction paradigm. ACM Interactions Magazine 9(1), 17-23 (2002).
[3]
Ketola, P.: Integrating Usability with Concurrent Engineering in Mobile Phone Development. Tampereen yliopisto (2002).
[4]
PrintOnDemand. Popularity of Mobile Devices Growing (2003), http://www. printondemand.com/MT/archives/002021.html (cited February 5, 2003).
[5]
Ivory, M.Y., Hearst, M.A.: The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 33(4), 470-516 (2001).
[6]
John, B.E., et al.: Predictive human performance modeling made easy. In: The Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2004, ACM, New York (2004).
[7]
Kirakowski, J.: Questionnaires in Usability Engineering: A List of Frequently Asked Questions {HTML} (2003) (cited November 26, 2003).
[8]
Annett, J.: Target Paper. Subjective rating scales: science or art? Ergonomics 45(14), 966- 987 (2002).
[9]
Baber, C.: Subjective evaluation of usability. Ergonomics 45(14), 1021-1025 (2002).
[10]
Keinonen, T.: One-dimensional usability - Influence of usability on consumers' product preference, University of Art and Design Helsinki, UIAH A21 (1998).
[11]
Caplan, S.H.: Making Usability a Kodak Product Differentiator. In: Wiklund, M. (ed.) Usability in Practice: How Companies Develop User-Friendly Products, pp. 21-58. Academic Press, Boston (1994).
[12]
Logan, R.J.: Behavioral and emotional usability; Thomson Consumer Electronics. In: Wiklund, M. (ed.) Usability in practice: How companies develop user friendly products, pp. 59-82. Academic press, Boston (1994).
[13]
Hofmeester, G.H., Kemp, J.A.M., Blankendaal, A.C.M.: Sensuality in product design: a structured approach. In: CHI 1996 Conference (1996).
[14]
Jordan, P.W.: Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29(1), 25- 33 (1998).

Cited By

View all
  • (2013)PresiShareProceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/2491568.2491591(103-108)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2013
  1. Mobile Phone Usability Questionnaire (MPUQ) and Automated Usability Evaluation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part I: New Trends
    July 2009
    897 pages
    ISBN:9783642025730
    • Editor:
    • Julie A. Jacko

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 14 July 2009

    Author Tags

    1. Usability
    2. automating usability
    3. mobile user interface
    4. questionnaire
    5. subjective measurement

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2013)PresiShareProceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/2491568.2491591(103-108)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2013

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media