[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-319-92037-5_28guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Privacy at Home: An Inquiry into Sensors and Robots for the Stay at Home Elderly

Published: 15 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The elderly in the future will use smart house technology, sensors, and robots to stay at home longer. Privacy at home for these elderly is important. In this exploratory paper, we examine different understandings of privacy and use Palen and Dourish’s framework to look at the negotiation of privacy along boundaries between a human at home, the robot, and its sensors. We select three dilemmas: turning sensors on and off, the robot seeing through walls, and machine learning. We discuss these dilemmas and also discuss ways the robot can help make the elderly more aware of privacy issues and to build trust.

References

[1]
Altman, I.: The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding (1975)
[2]
Amirabdollahian, F., op den Akker, R., Bedaf, S., Bormann, R., Draper, H., Evers, V., Gelderblom, G., Gutierrez Ruiz, C., Hewson, D., Hu, N., Iacono, I., Koay, K., Krose, B., Marti, P., Michel, H., Prevot-Huille, H., Reiser, U., Saunders, J., Sorell, T., Dautenhahn, K.: Accompany: Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNG Years - Multidimensional Aspects of Human-System Interactions. In: 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), pp. 570–577. IEEE (2013)
[3]
Ashton, K.: That “Internet of Things” thing. RFID J., May/June (2009). http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/4986. Accessed 9 May 2018
[4]
Atzori L, Iera A, and Morabito G The Internet of Things: a survey Comput. Netw. 2010 54 15 2787-2805
[5]
Bellotti V and Sellen A de Michelis G, Simone C, and Schmidt K Design for privacy in ubiquitous computing environments Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1993 Dordrecht Springer 77-92
[6]
Busch M, Hochleitner C, Lorenz M, Schulz T, Tscheligi M, and Wittstock E Huth M, Asokan N, Čapkun S, Flechais I, and Coles-Kemp L All in: targeting trustworthiness for special needs user groups in the Internet of Things Trust and Trustworthy Computing 2013 Heidelberg Springer 223-231
[7]
Busch, M., Lorenz, M., Tscheligi, M., Hochleitner, C., Schulz, T.: Being there for real - presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational - NordiCHI 2014, pp. 117–126. ACM Press, New York (2014)
[8]
Butler, D.J., Huang, J., Roesner, F., Cakmak, M.: The privacy-utility tradeoff for remotely teleoperated robots. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2015, pp. 27–34. ACM, New York (2015)
[9]
Caine, K., Šabanović, S., Carter, M.: The effect of monitoring by cameras and robots on the privacy enhancing behaviors of older adults. In: 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 343–350 (2012)
[10]
Calo, R.: Robots and privacy. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1599189, Social Science Research Network, Rochester (2010)
[11]
Calo, R.: The drone as privacy catalyst. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2340753, Social Science Research Network, Rochester (2011)
[12]
Crabtree A, Tolmie P, and Knight W Repacking ‘Privacy’ for a networked world Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 2017 26 453-488
[13]
Draper H and Sorell T Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study Ethics Inf. Technol. 2017 19 1 49-68
[14]
Ess, C., Fossheim, H.: Personal data: changing selves, changing privacies. In: Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2013, pp. 40–55. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2013)
[15]
Estes, A.C.: Don’t Buy Anyone an Echo. Gizmodo (2017)
[16]
Eyssel, F., Wullenkord, R., Nitsch, V.: The role of self-disclosure in human-robot interaction. In: 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 922–927 (2017)
[17]
Feil-Seifer D, Skinner K, and Matarić MJ Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics Interact. Stud. 2007 8 3 423-439
[18]
Fosch Villaronga E and Roig A European regulatory framework for person carrier robots Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2017 33 4 502-520
[19]
Fritsch L, Groven A-K, and Schulz T Wichert R, Van Laerhoven K, and Gelissen J On the Internet of Things, trust is relative Constructing Ambient Intelligence 2012 Heidelberg Springer 267-273
[20]
Goonawardene N, Toh XP, and Tan H-P Zhou J and Salvendy G Sensor-driven detection of social isolation in community-dwelling elderly Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services and Contexts 2017 Cham Springer 378-392
[21]
Holone, H., Herstad, J.: Negotiating privacy boundaries in social applications for accessibility mapping. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI 2010, pp. 217–225. ACM, New York (2010)
[22]
Hubers A et al. Tapus A, André E, Martin JC, Ferland F, Ammi M, et al. Using video manipulation to protect privacy in remote presence systems Social Robotics 2015 Cham Springer 245-254
[23]
Hubers, A., Andrulis, E., Smart, W.D., Scott, L., Stirrat, T., Tran, D., Zhang, R., Sowell, R., Grimm, C.: Video manipulation techniques for the protection of privacy in remote presence systems. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, HRI 2015 Extended Abstracts, pp. 59–60. ACM, New York (2015)
[24]
Kahn PH Jr, Ishiguro H, Friedman B, Kanda T, Freier NG, Severson RL, and Miller J What is a human? Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction Interact. Stud. 2007 8 3 363-390
[25]
Kanda T and Ishiguro H Human-Robot Interaction in Social Robotics 2012 New York CRC Press
[26]
Kido, S., Miyasaka, T., Tanaka, T., Shimizu, T., Saga, T.: Fall detection in toilet rooms using thermal imaging sensors. In: IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), pp. 83–88 (2009)
[27]
Langheinrich M Abowd GD, Brumitt B, and Shafer S Privacy by design — principles of privacy-aware ubiquitous systems Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing 2001 Heidelberg Springer 273-291
[28]
Lee, M.K., Tang, K.P., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S.: Understanding users’ perception of privacy in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2011, pp. 181–182. ACM, New York (2011)
[29]
Leister Wolfgang, Schulz Trenton, Lie Arne, Grythe Knut, and Balasingham Ilangko Quality of Service, Adaptation, and Security Provisioning in Wireless Patient Monitoring Systems Biomedical Engineering, Trends in Electronics, Communications and Software 2011
[30]
National Public Radio, and Edison Research: The Smart Audio Report: Fall-Winter 2017, p. 31. National Public Radio (2017)
[31]
Nissenbaum H Privacy as contextual integrity Wash. Law Rev. 2004 79 1 119-157
[32]
Pagallo U Robots in the cloud with privacy: a new threat to data protection? Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2013 29 5 501-508
[33]
Palen, L., Dourish, P.: Unpacking “Privacy” for a networked world. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2003, pp. 129–136. ACM, New York (2003)
[34]
Percival, C.: Some Thoughts on Spectre and Meltdown (2018). http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2018-01-17-some-thoughts-on-spectre-and-meltdown.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
[35]
Petronio SS Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure 2002 Albany State University of New York Press
[36]
Pyo, Y., Hasegawa, T., Tanaka, M., Tsuji, T., Morooka, K., Kurazume, R.: Measurement and estimation of indoor human behavior of everyday life based on floor sensing with minimal invasion of privacy, pp. 2170–2176. IEEE (2013)
[37]
Robot: American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, Boston (2011)
[38]
Rueben, M., Bernieri, F.J., Grimm, C.M., Smart, W.D.: Evaluation of physical marker interfaces for protecting visual privacy from mobile robots. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 787–794 (2016)
[39]
Rueben, M., Bernieri, F.J., Grimm, C.M., Smart, W.D.: Framing effects on privacy concerns about a home telepresence robot. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2017, pp. 435–444. ACM, New York (2017)
[40]
Schafer B and Edwards L “I Spy, with My Little Sensor”: fair data handling practices for robots between privacy, copyright and security Connect. Sci. 2017 29 3 200-209
[41]
Schulz T Zaphiris P and Ioannou A Creating universal designed and trustworthy objects for the Internet of Things Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Technology-Rich Environments for Learning and Collaboration 2014 Cham Springer 206-214
[42]
Schulz, T., Fuglerud, K.S., Arfwedson, H., Busch, M.: A case study for universal design in the Internet of Things. In: Caltenco, H., Hedvall, P.-O., Larsson, A., Rassmus-Gröhn, K., Rydeman, B. (eds.) Universal Design 2014: Three Days of Creativity and Diversity, pp. 45–54. IOS Press (2014)
[43]
Schulz, T., Herstad, J.: Walking away from the robot: negotiating privacy with a robot. In: Proceedings of the 31st International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2017), Sunderland, UK (2017). (in publication)
[44]
Syrdal, D.S., Walters, M.L., Otero, N., Koay, K.L., Dautenhahn, K.: He knows when you are sleeping-privacy and the personal robot companion. In: Proceedings of Workshop Human Implications of Human-robot Interaction, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007), pp. 28–33 (2007)
[45]
Tømmer, M., Kjelgård, K.G., Lande, T.S.: Body coupled wideband monopole antenna. In: Loughborough Antennas Propagation Conference (LAPC), pp. 1–5 (2016)
[46]
Warren SD and Brandeis LD The right to privacy Harv. Law Rev. 1890 4 5 193-220
[47]
Westin A Privacy and Freedom 1967 New York Atheneum
[48]
Young JE, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, and Igarashi T Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2009 1 1 95

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Understanding Perceived Utility and Comfort of In-Home General-Purpose Sensing through Progressive ExposureProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374328:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Privacy Horizons: A Survey on HCI & HRIComputational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2024 Workshops10.1007/978-3-031-65318-6_8(113-125)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Co-Learning around Social Robots with School Pupils and University Students – Focus on Data Privacy ConsiderationsProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623816(115-123)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Privacy at Home: An Inquiry into Sensors and Robots for the Stay at Home Elderly
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications in Health, Assistance, and Entertainment: 4th International Conference, ITAP 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15–20, 2018, Proceedings, Part II
      Jul 2018
      579 pages
      ISBN:978-3-319-92036-8
      DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-92037-5

      Publisher

      Springer-Verlag

      Berlin, Heidelberg

      Publication History

      Published: 15 July 2018

      Author Tags

      1. Robot
      2. Human-robot interaction
      3. Privacy
      4. Trust
      5. Elderly
      6. Home

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Understanding Perceived Utility and Comfort of In-Home General-Purpose Sensing through Progressive ExposureProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374328:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Exploring the Privacy Horizons: A Survey on HCI & HRIComputational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2024 Workshops10.1007/978-3-031-65318-6_8(113-125)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2023)Co-Learning around Social Robots with School Pupils and University Students – Focus on Data Privacy ConsiderationsProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623816(115-123)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
      • (2023)Privacy vs. Awareness: Relieving the Tension between Older Adults and Adult Children When Sharing In-home Activity DataProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36102027:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Robocamp at HomeProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576976(331-340)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
      • (2022)Healthcare Professionals´ Attitudes towards the Organization of Care Services and the Adoption of Welfare Robots in Norway2022 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO)10.1109/ARSO54254.2022.9802979(1-8)Online publication date: 28-May-2022

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media