[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_43guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

On Dimensions of Plausibility for Narrative Information Access to Digital Libraries

Published: 20 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Designing keyword-based access paths is a common practice in digital libraries. They are easy to use and accepted by users and come with moderate costs for content providers. However, users usually have to break down the search into pieces if they search for stories of interest that are more complex than searching for a few keywords. After searching for every piece one by one, information must then be reassembled manually. In previous work we recommended narrative information access, i.e., users can precisely state their information needs as graph patterns called narratives. Then a system takes a narrative and searches for evidence for each of its parts. If the whole query, i.e., every part, can be bound against data, the narrative is considered plausible and, thus, the query is answered. But is it as easy as that? In this work we perform case studies to analyze the process of making a given narrative plausible. Therefore, we summarize conceptual problems and challenges to face. Moreover, we contribute a set of dimensions that must be considered when realizing narrative information access in digital libraries.

References

[2]
Auer S, Bizer C, Kobilarov G, Lehmann J, Cyganiak R, Ives Z, et al. Aberer K et al. DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data The Semantic Web 2007 Heidelberg Springer 722-735
[3]
Azzarello, M.Y., Vleet, E.S.V.: Marine birds and plastic pollution. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 37(2/3), 295–303 (1987). http://www.jstor.org/stable/24824704
[4]
Bank, W.: Forest area (% of land area). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.ZS. Accessed 25 May 2022
[5]
Blakeskee, S.: The CRAAP test. LOEX Quart. 31, 4(2004). https://commons.emich.edu/loexquarterly/vol31/iss3/4
[6]
Blatz, J., et al.: Confidence estimation for machine translation. In: COLING 2004: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 315–321. COLING, Geneva, Switzerland, 23–27 August 2004. https://aclanthology.org/C04-1046
[7]
Carroll JJ, Bizer C, Hayes PJ, and Stickler P Named graphs J. Web Semant. 2005 3 4 247-267
[8]
Chapman A et al. Dataset search: a survey VLDB J. 2019 29 1 251-272
[9]
Clark, J.R., et al.: Marine microplastic debris: a targeted plan for understanding and quantifying interactions with marine life. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14(6), 317–324 (2016). http://www.jstor.org/stable/44001167
[10]
Elbassuoni, S., Blanco, R.: Keyword search over RDF graphs. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 237–242. CIKM 2011. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2011).
[11]
Fu, Y., Schneider, J.: Towards knowledge maintenance in scientific digital libraries with the keystone framework. In: Huang, R., Wu, D., Marchionini, G., He, D., Cunningham, S.J., Hansen, P. (eds.) JCDL 2020: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, Virtual Event, China, 1–5 August 2020, pp. 217–226. ACM (2020).
[12]
Gandrabur S, Foster GF, and Lapalme G Confidence estimation for NLP applications ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process. 2006 3 3 1-29
[13]
Group, W.W.: PROV-overview. an overview of the PROV family of documents (2013). https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/
[14]
Guo Z, Schlichtkrull M, and Vlachos A A survey on automated fact-checking Trans. Assoc. Comp Linguist. (TACL) 2022 10 178-206
[15]
Han, S., Zou, L., Yu, J.X., Zhao, D.: Keyword search on RDF graphs - a query graph assembly approach. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 227–236. CIKM 2017. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2017).
[16]
Haslhofer, B., Isaac, A.: data.europeana.eu: the Europeana linked open data pilot. In: Baker, T., Hillmann, D.I., Isaac, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DC 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands, 21–23 September 2011, pp. 94–104. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2011). http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3625
[17]
Jambeck JR et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean Science 2015 347 6223 768-771
[18]
Jaradeh, M.Y., et al.: Open research knowledge graph: Next generation infrastructure for semantic scholarly knowledge. In: Kejriwal, M., Szekely, P.A., Troncy, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2019, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA, 19–21 November 2019, pp. 243–246. ACM (2019).
[19]
Jin Q et al. Biomedical question answering: a survey of approaches and challenges ACM Comput. Surv. 2022 55 2 1-36
[20]
Khot, T., Sabharwal, A., Clark, P.: Answering complex questions using open information extraction. In: Barzilay, R., Kan, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2017, Vancouver, Canada, 30 July – 4 August, Volume 2: Short Papers, pp. 311–316. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017).
[21]
Kilicoglu H, Shin D, Fiszman M, Rosemblat G, and Rindflesch TC SemMedDB: a PubMed-scale repository of biomedical semantic predications Bioinformatics 2012 28 23 3158-3160
[22]
Kroll H, Kalo J-C, Nagel D, Mennicke S, and Balke W-T Hall M, Merčun T, Risse T, and Duchateau F Context-compatible information fusion for scientific knowledge graphs Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge 2020 Cham Springer 33-47
[23]
Kroll H, Nagel D, and Balke W-T Dobbie G, Frank U, Kappel G, Liddle SW, and Mayr HC Modeling narrative structures in logical overlays on top of knowledge repositories Conceptual Modeling 2020 Cham Springer 250-260
[24]
Kroll, H., Nagel, D., Kunz, M., Balke, W.: Demonstrating narrative bindings: linking discourses to knowledge repositories. In: Campos, R., Jorge, A.M., Jatowt, A., Bhatia, S., Finlayson, M.A. (eds.) Proceedings of Text2Story - Fourth Workshop on Narrative Extraction From Texts held in conjunction with the 43rd European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2021), Lucca, Italy, 1 April 2021 (online event due to COVID-19 outbreak). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2860, pp. 57–63. CEUR-WS.org (2021). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2860/paper7.pdf
[25]
Kroll H, Pirklbauer J, Kalo J-C, Kunz M, Ruthmann J, and Balke W-T Ke H-R, Lee CS, and Sugiyama K Narrative query graphs for entity-interaction-aware document retrieval Towards Open and Trustworthy Digital Societies 2021 Cham Springer 80-95
[26]
Kroll, H., Plötzky, F., Pirklbauer, J., Balke, W.: What a publication tells you - benefits of narrative information access in digital libraries. CoRR (Accepted to JCDL2022) abs/2205.00718 (2022).
[27]
Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D.: PROV-O: The PROV Ontology (2013). https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
[28]
NASA: Global Temperature | Vital Signs - NASA Climate Change. https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/. Accessed 25 May 2022
[29]
Nickerson RS Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1998 2 2 175-220
[30]
Rhodes CJ Plastic pollution and potential solutions Sci. Prog. 2018 101 207-260
[31]
Ritchie, H., Roser, M.: Forests and deforestation. Our World in Data (2021). https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation
[32]
Uscinski JE and Butler RW The epistemology of fact checking Crit. Rev. 2013 25 2 162-180
[33]
Weikum G, Dong XL, Razniewski S, and Suchanek FM Machine knowledge: creation and curation of comprehensive knowledge bases Found. Trends Databases 2021 10 2–4 108-490
[34]
Williams A and Rangel-Buitrago N Marine litter: solutions for a major environmental problem J. Coast. Res. 2019 35 3 648-663
[35]
Zhao, C., Xiong, C., Qian, X., Boyd-Graber, J.L.: Complex factoid question answering with a free-text knowledge graph. In: Huang, Y., King, I., Liu, T., van Steen, M. (eds.) WWW 2020: The Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan, 20–24 April 2020, pp. 1205–1216. ACM/IW3C2 (2020).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enriching Simple Keyword Queries for Domain-Aware Narrative RetrievalProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries10.1109/JCDL57899.2023.00029(143-154)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries: 26th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2022, Padua, Italy, September 20–23, 2022, Proceedings
Sep 2022
564 pages
ISBN:978-3-031-16801-7
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 20 September 2022

Author Tags

  1. Narrative information access
  2. Plausibility
  3. Dimensions

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enriching Simple Keyword Queries for Domain-Aware Narrative RetrievalProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries10.1109/JCDL57899.2023.00029(143-154)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media