The Vicious Cycle of Magical Thinking:: How IT Governance Counteracts Digital Transformation
Authors: 
Susanna Hammelev Jörgensen, Tomas Lindroth, Johan Magnusson, Malin Tinjan, Jacob Torell, Robert ÅhlénAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 381 - 396
Abstract
Digital transformation is associated with a fundamental change in the operating models of organizations and industries alike. At the same time, previous research highlights that existing governance practices may act as a deterrent to digital transformation. In this study, we explore how the IT governance of a large university counteracts necessary digital transformation in higher education over time. We show how the adoption of an industry-standard IT governance framework, through a series of generative mechanisms, leads to a vicious cycle that restricts digital transformation into mere computerization, thereby successfully counteracting digital transformation. In other words, the IT governance framework increasingly protects the organization from the organizational change brought on by new digital opportunities. This is discussed in relation to the literature on IT governance and digital transformation with the intent of contributing with a critical perspective on the widespread adoption and use of standard IT governance framework.
References
[1]
Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D, and Marante CA A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change J. Manag. Stud. 2021 58 1159-1197
[2]
Magnusson J, Khisro J, Björses M, and Ivarsson A Closeness and distance: configurational practices for digital ambidexterity in the public sector Transform. Gov. People Process Policy. 2021 15 420-441
[3]
Vial G Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019 28 118-144
[4]
Warner KSR and Wäger M Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal Long Range Plann. 2019 52 326-349
[5]
Rof A, Bikfalvi A, and Marquès P Digital transformation for business model innovation in higher education: overcoming the tensions Sustainability-Basel 2020 12 4980
[6]
Bond M, Marín VI, Dolch C, Bedenlier S, and Zawacki-Richter O Digital transformation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2018 15 1 1-20
[7]
Santos H, Batista J, and Marques RP Digital transformation in higher education: the use of communication technologies by students Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019 164 123-130
[8]
Shahbaz S, Ashraf MZ, Zakar R, Fischer F, and Zakar MZ Psychosocial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on university students: understanding apprehensions through a phenomenographic approach PLoS ONE 2021 16
[9]
Wingard J The College Devaluation Crisis: Market Disruption, Diminishing ROI, and an Alternative Future of Learning 2022 Stanford Stanford Business Books
[10]
Weill, P., Woodham, R.: Don’t just lead, govern: implementing effective it governance. SSRN Electron. J. (2002).
[11]
Magnusson J, Khisro J, Melin U, et al. Viale Pereira G et al. A pathology of public sector IT governance: how IT governance configuration counteracts ambidexterity Electronic Government 2020 Cham Springer 29-41
[12]
Gregory, R.W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., Ruch, T.J.: IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Q. 42, 1225–1253 (2018).
[13]
Wiener M, Mähring M, Remus U, Saunders C, and Cram WA Moving IS project control research into the digital era: the “why” of control and the concept of control purpose Inf. Syst. Res. 2019 30 1387-1401
[14]
Magnusson J, Päivärinta T, and Koutsikouri D Digital ambidexterity in the public sector: empirical evidence of a bias in balancing practices Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 2020 15 59-79
[15]
Pucciarelli F and Kaplan A Competition and strategy in higher education: managing complexity and uncertainty Bus. Horiz. 2016 59 311-320
[16]
Posselt T, Abdelkafi N, Fischer L, and Tangour C Opportunities and challenges of higher education institutions in Europe: an analysis from a business model perspective High. Educ. Q. 2019 73 100-115
[17]
Jackson NC Managing for competency with innovation change in higher education: examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation Bus. Horiz. 2019 62 761-772
[18]
Mohamed Hashim MA, Tlemsani I, and Matthews R Higher education strategy in digital transformation Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021 27 3171-3195
[19]
Abad-Segura E, González-Zamar M-D, Infante-Moro JC, and García GR Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: global research trends Sustainability-Basel. 2020 12 2107
[20]
Tømte CE, Fossland T, Aamodt PO, and Degn L Digitalisation in higher education: mapping institutional approaches for teaching and learning Qual. High. Educ. 2019 25 98-114
[21]
Bygstad B, Øvrelid E, Ludvigsen S, and Dæhlen M From dual digitalization to digital learning space: exploring the digital transformation of higher education Comput Educ. 2022 182
[22]
Treve M What COVID-19 has introduced into education: challenges facing Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) High. Educ. Pedag. 2021 6 212-227
[23]
Frick NRJ, Mirbabaie M, Stieglitz S, and Salomon J Maneuvering through the stormy seas of digital transformation: the impact of empowering leadership on the AI readiness of enterprises J. Decis. Syst. 2021 30 1-24
[24]
Chanias S, Myers MD, and Hess T Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: the case of a financial services provider J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019 28 17-33
[25]
Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, and Greenwood R Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective Inform. Organ.-UK 2018 28 52-61
[26]
Smith P and Beretta M The Gordian knot of practicing digital transformation: coping with emergent paradoxes in ambidextrous organizing structures* J. Prod. Innov. Manag 2021 38 166-191
[27]
Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: It governance on one page. SSRN Electron. J. (2004).
[28]
Boonstra A, Eseryel UY, and van Offenbeek MAG Stakeholders’ enactment of competing logics in IT governance: polarization, compromise or synthesis? Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2017 27 1-20
[29]
Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., Jensen, T.B.: Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol22/iss1/6/. Accessed 04 Nov 2022
[30]
Matt C, Hess T, and Benlian A Digital transformation strategies Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2015 57 5 339-343
[31]
Bharadwaj A, Sawy OAE, Pavlou PA, and Venkatraman N Toward a next generation of insights MIS Q. 2013 37 471-482
[32]
Drnevich, P.L., Croson, D.C.: Information technology and business-level strategy: toward an integrated theoretical perspective. MIS Q. 37, 483–509 (2013).
[33]
Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., Wiesböck, F.: Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Q. Exec. 19 (2016)
[34]
Khisro J, Lindroth T, and Magnusson J Mechanisms of constraint: a clinical inquiry of digital infrastructuring in municipalities Transform. Gov. People Process Policy. 2021 16 81-96
[35]
Masuch M Vicious circles in organizations Admin. Sci. Q. 1985 30 14
[36]
Bygstad B, Munkvold BE, and Volkoff O Identifying generative mechanisms through affordances: a framework for critical realist data analysis J. Inform. Technol. 2016 31 83-96
[37]
Smith WK and Lewis MW Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing Acad. Manag. Rev. 2011 36 381-403
[38]
Cuganesan S Identity paradoxes: how senior managers and employees negotiate similarity and distinctiveness tensions over time Organ. Stud. 2017 38 489-511
[39]
Wimelius H, Mathiassen L, Holmström J, and Keil M A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation Inform. Syst. J. 2021 31 198-225
[40]
Schein, E.H.: Clinical inquiry/research. In: Reason, P., Bradbury, H. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. (2008).
[41]
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis, pp. 57–71 (2012).
[42]
Blom B and Morén S Analysis of generative mechanisms J. Crit. Realism. 2011 10 60-79
[43]
Meyer JW and Rowan B Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony Am. J. Sociol. 1977 83 340-363
[44]
Henfridsson O and Bygstad B The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution MIS Q. 2013 37 907-931
[45]
Currie WL, Gozman DP, and Seddon JJM Dialectic tensions in the financial markets: a longitudinal study of pre- and post-crisis regulatory technology J. Inf. Technol. 2018 33 304-325
[46]
Sordi JOD, de Paulo WL, Jorge CFB, da Silveira DB, Dias JA, and de Lima MS Overcompliance and reluctance to make decisions: exploring warning systems in support of public managers Gov. Inf. Q. 2021 38
[47]
Cram, W.A., Brohman, K., Gallupe, R.B.: Information systems control: a review and framework for emerging information systems processes. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 216–266 (2016).
[48]
Remus U, Wiener M, Saunders C, and Mähring M The impact of control styles and control modes on individual-level outcomes: a first test of the integrated IS project control theory Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2020 29 1-19
[49]
Zimmermann A, Raisch S, and Cardinal LB Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: a configurational perspective on ambidexterity J. Manag. Stud. 2018 55 739-769
[50]
Gregory RW, Keil M, Muntermann J, and Mähring M Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs Inf. Syst. Res. 2015 26 57-80
[51]
Lacombe, I., Jarboui, A.: Governance and management of digital transformation projects: an exploratory approach in the financial sector. Int. J. Innov. Sci. (2022).
[52]
Janowski T Digital government evolution: from transformation to contextualization Gov. Inf. Q. 2015 32 221-236
[53]
Janssen M and van der Voort H Adaptive governance: towards a stable, accountable and responsive government Gov. Inf. Q. 2016 33 1-5
[54]
Mergel I, Edelmann N, and Haug N Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews Gov. Inf. Q. 2019 36
[55]
Demartini CG, Benussi L, Gatteschi V, and Renga F Education and digital transformation: the “Riconnessioni” project IEEE Access 2020 8 186233-186256
[56]
Giang, N.T.H., Hai, P.T.T., Tu, N.T.T., Tan, P.X.: Exploring the readiness for digital transformation in a higher education institution towards industrial revolution 4.0. Int. J. Eng. Pedag. IJEP. 11, 4–24 (2021).
[57]
Rodríguez-Abitia G and Bribiesca-Correa G Assessing digital transformation in universities Futur. Internet 2021 13 52
[58]
Bannister F The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2007 73 171-188
[59]
Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, and Lyytinen K Research commentary —the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research Inf. Syst. Res. 2010 21 724-735
Recommendations
Effective information technology (IT) governance mechanisms: An IT outsourcing perspective
Effective IT governance will ensure alignment between IT and business goals. Organizations with ineffective IT governance will suffer due to poor performance of IT resources such as inaccurate information quality, inefficient operating costs, runaway IT ...
Creating Better Governance of Offshore Services
Given the extensive history that companies now have with offshore outsourcing and the critical role that it continues to play, it is vital that we synthesize the many lessons learned and formalize them into a workable and flexible governance model. A ...
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the changing role of the CIO and IT function
The focus of this study is on the changing role of the Chief Information Officer (CIO). At a time when there is an increasing focus on corporate governance and enterprise risk management, the competencies required of CIOs are evolving causing a shift to ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Sep 2023
473 pages
ISBN:978-3-031-41137-3
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0
© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2023.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Berlin, Heidelberg
Publication History
Published: 05 September 2023
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025