[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1007/11880172_17guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Utility for communicability by profit and cost of agreement

Published: 30 September 2006 Publication History

Abstract

The inflection of words based on agreement, such as number, gender and case, is considered to contribute to clarify the dependency between words in a sentence. Our purpose in this study is to investigate the efficiency of word inflections with HPSG (Head–driven Phrase Structure Grammar), which is able to deal with these features directly. Using a notion of utility, we measure the efficiency of a grammar in terms of the balance between the number of semantic structures of a sentence, and the cost of agreement according to the number of unification processes. In our experiments, we showed how these were balanced in two different corpora. One, WSJ (Wall Street Journal), includes long and complicated sentences, while the other corpus, ATIS (Air Travel Information System) does shorter colloquial sentences. In the both corpora, agreement is surely important to reduce ambiguity. However, the importance of agreement in the ATIS corpus became salient as personal pronouns were so often employed in it, compared with the WSJ corpus.

References

[1]
J. Anward. Word Classes / Parts of Speech: Overview. In Keith Brown, editor, The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 13, pp. 628-629. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, NL, second edition, 2006.
[2]
M. Barlow and C.A. Ferguson, editors. Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions. CSLI, Stanford, CA, 1988.
[3]
B.J. Blake. Case. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[4]
T. Briscoe. Grammatical acquisition and linguistic selection. In Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[5]
T. Gunji. Japanese Phrase Structure Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.
[6]
R. Jackendoff. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press, 2002.
[7]
G. Jäger. Evolutionary Game Theory and Typology: a Case Study. In Proceedings of the 14th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 108-117, 2003.
[8]
S. Kirby. Learning, Bottlenecks and the Evolution of Recursive Syntax. In Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[9]
T. Makino, K. Torisawa, and J. Tsujii. Lilfes-Pactical Programming Language For Typed Feature Structures. In Natural Language Pacific Rim Symposium '97, 1997.
[10]
Y. Miyao and J. Tsujii. Probabilistic Disambiguation Models for Wide-Coverage HPSG parsing. In ACL-2005, 2005.
[11]
I. Sag, T. Wasow, and E. Bender. Syntactic Theory-A Formal Introduction. Second Edition. CSLI PUBLICATIONS, 2003.
[12]
L. Steels and J.D Beule. A (very) Brief Introduction to Fluid Construction Grammar. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Scalable Natural Language (ScaNaLu06), to appear.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
EELC'06: Proceedings of the Third international conference on Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication: symbol Grounding and Beyond
September 2006
237 pages
ISBN:3540457690
  • Editors:
  • Paul Vogt,
  • Yuuya Sugita,
  • Elio Tuci,
  • Chrystopher Nehaniv

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 30 September 2006

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media