[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Research on site selection of emergency material reserve based on set pair analysis and TOPSIS integration method: a case study of Hebei Province, China

Published: 28 December 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Emergency material reserve is a key link in emergency management, and its site selection is scientific and rational, which directly affects the efficiency of emergency response, disaster rescue and social stability. To solve this site selection problem, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model named maximizing deviation G1 set pair analysis technique for order preferences by similarity to an ideal solution (MGSPA-TOPSIS) is proposed in this paper. First, the evaluation criteria system is constructed. Then, we use maximizing deviation and order relation analysis (G1) to assign subjective and objective weights, and use game theory to determine the final weights. Finally, this paper uses the combination of set pair analysis (SPA) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to sort, and takes 11 prefecture-level cities in Hebei Province as the research object. The final research results show that Shijiazhuang is the most suitable city for building emergency material reserve in Hebei Province. In the process of sensitivity analysis, the number of traffic practitioners is confirmed as the most important criteria, and by adjusting its value range to [0.1449, 0.2782], it is found that the change of the value of this criteria will not affect the stability of the model ranking. In addition, through large-scale experiments, the incidence of rank reversal in MGSPA-TOPSIS model remains below 20%. It is significantly lower than TOPSIS, preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) and the set pair analysis technique for order preferences by similarity to an ideal solution (SPA-TOPSIS) decision model. The stability and robustness of MGSPA-TOPSIS model are further verified.

References

[1]
Gan Q Optimizing emergency logistics centre locations: a multi-objective robust model Economics 2024 18 20220121
[2]
Yang JL, Hou HP, Ju YJ, Gu SL, Qian ZQ, and Wang X The mechanism of distribution effectiveness of territory emergency public storage materials Sustainability 2020 12 21 8940
[3]
Eshghi AA, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Ebrahimnejad S, and Ghezavati VR Multi-objective robust mathematical modeling of emergency relief in disaster under uncertainty Sci Iranica 2022 29 5 2670-2695
[4]
Li LY, Bai X, and Xia HS Study on the optimization of site selection for emergency supply reserve warehouses based on multi-attribute weighted intelligent gray target decision-making evaluation model Appl Sci-basel 2024 14 19 8734
[5]
Weber A Theory of the Location of Industries 1929 USA University of Chicago Press
[6]
Hakimi SL Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph Oper Res 1964 12 3 379-517
[7]
Liu J, Jiang DX, Guo L, Nan J, Cao WK, and Wang P Emergency material location-allocation planning using a risk-based integration methodology for river chemical spills Environ Sci Pollut Res 2020 27 15 17949-17962
[8]
Kai W Study on factors influencing coal emergency reserve center siting decision and countermeasures: evidence from China J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2023 45 5 9029-9052
[9]
Feng ZX, Li GT, Wang WJ, Zhang LT, Xiang WP, He X, Zhang MQ, and Wei N Emergency logistics centers site selection by multi-criteria decision-making and gis Int J Disaster risk Reduct 2023 96 103921
[10]
Hadipour V, Vafaie F, and Kerle N An indicator-based approach to assess social vulnerability of coastal areas to sea-level rise and flooding: A case study of bandar abbas city, iran Ocean Coastal Manag 2020 188 105077
[11]
Sun YM Establishment of the emergency material reserve mechanism for public health emergencies and optimization of the management of various functional departments Front Public Health 2023 10 1092375
[12]
Wu Z, Liu CJ, Yao ZY, and Zhang Y Research on optimizing the location and layout of national emergency material reserve Sustainability 2022 14 23 15922
[13]
Wang HZ, Zhou JQ, and Zhou L A lattice boltzmann method-like algorithm for the maximal covering location problem on the complex network: application to location of railway emergency-rescue spot Mathematics 2024 12 2 218
[14]
Ge JW, Li X, Wu ZL, Sun YR, and Kanrak M The distribution of emergency logistics centers under the covid-19 lockdown: the case of yangtze river delta area Sustainability 2022 14 17 10594
[15]
Liu JK, Li YQ, Li Y, Chen ZB, Lian XT, and Zhang YY Location optimization of emergency medical facilities for public health emergencies in megacities based on genetic algorithm Eng Constr Archit Manag 2023 30 8 3330-3356
[16]
Pang XN, Yang WG, Miao W, Zhou H, and Min R Study on site selection evaluation of emergency material storage based on improved topsis Kybernetes 2024
[17]
Sari DP, Wicaksono PA, Handayani NU, and Siahaan YE Integrating ahp, cluster analysis, and fuzzy topsis to evaluate emergency warehouse locations of mount merapi eruption victims Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2020 10 5 1839-1845
[18]
Liu KN Gis-based mcdm framework combined with coupled multi-hazard assessment for site selection of post-earthquake emergency medical service facilities in wenchuan, china Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2022 73 102873
[19]
Yesilcayir N, Ayvazoglu G, Celik S, and Peker I Transit warehouse location selection by if ahp-topsis integrated methods for disaster logistics: a case study of turkey Res Transp Bus Manag 2024 57 101232
[20]
Eelagh MD and Abbaspour RA A location-allocation optimization model for post-earthquake emergency shelters using network-based multi-criteria decision-making Decision Anal J 2024 10 100430
[21]
Geng SQ, Hou HP, and Zhou Z A hybrid approach of vikor and bi-objective decision model for emergency shelter location-allocation to respond to earthquakes Mathematics 2021 9 16 1897
[22]
Nyimbili PH and Erden T A hybrid approach integrating entropy-ahp and gis for suitability assessment of urban emergency facilities ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 2020 9 7 419
[23]
Li S, Wu Z, Tang JF, Wang S, and Wang PF Research on urban country parks based on emergency medical facilities for public health emergencies-a case study of guangzhou, china Environ Sci Pollut Res 2023 30 33 81019-81037
[24]
Wigati SS, Sopha BM, Asih AMS, and Sutanta H Geographic information system based suitable temporary shelter location for mount merapi eruption Sustainability 2023 15 3 2073
[25]
Guo YF and Matsuda T Study on the multi-criteria location decision of wide-area distribution centers in pre-disaster: case of an earthquake in the kanto district of japan Asian Transp Stud 2023 9 100107
[26]
Fang R and Liao HC Emergency material reserve location selection by a time-series-based evidential reasoning approach under bounded rationality Qual Quant 2021 55 1397-1417
[27]
Xu Y, Li Y, Zheng LJ, Cui L, Li S, Li W, and Cai YP Site selection of wind farms using gis and multi-criteria decision making method in wafangdian, China Energy 2020 207 118222
[28]
Ismail MM, Abdelhady HR, and Emad M Multi-criteria decision-making techniques: a comprehensive review of methodologies and applications Int J Comput Inf 2024 2 27-38
[29]
Büyüközkan G and Uztürk D Enhancing disaster management through effective warehouse location selection using linguistic decision making: An integrated approach Proc Eng 2014 84 223-232
[30]
Saha A, Pamucar D, Gorcun OF, and Mishra AR Warehouse site selection for the automotive industry using a fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making approach Expert Syst Appl 2023 211 118497
[31]
Kumar K and Garg H Connection number of set pair analysis based topsis method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making Appl Intell 2018 48 8 2112-2119
[32]
Zhao KQ Set Pair Analysis and Its Preliminary Application 2000 Hangzhou Zhejiang Science and Technology Press
[33]
Yuan JH and Luo XG Regional energy security performance evaluation in china using mtgs and spa-topsis Sci Total Environ 2019 696 133817
[34]
Nyimbili PH, Erden T, and Mwanaumo EM A dematel-based approach of multi-criteria evaluation for urban fire and emergency facilities Front Environ Econ 2023 2 1198541
[35]
de Albuquerque NLB, de Silva LBL, Alencar MH, and de Almeida AT A multicriteria decision model to improve emergency preparedness: locating-allocating urban shelters against floods Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2024 111 104695
[36]
Fei LG, Liu XY, and Zhang CP An evidential linguistic electre method for selection of emergency shelter sites Artif Intell Rev 2024 57 4 81
[37]
Mete MO and Biyik MY Disaster management with cloud-based geographic information systems: site selection of landfill areas after kahramanmaraş, türkıye earthquake sequence Environ Earth Sci 2024 83 11 358
[38]
Erden C, Ateş Ç, and Esen S Distribution center location selection in humanitarian logistics using hybrid bwm-aras: a case study in türkıye J Homel Secur Emerg Manage 2023 83 11 358
[39]
Shah AI and Pan ND Flood susceptibility assessment of Jhelum river basin: A comparative study of Topsis, Vikor and Edas methods Geosyst Geoenviron 2024 3 4 100304
[40]
Islam MR, Aziz MT, Alauddin M, Kader Z, and Islam MR Site suitability assessment for solar power plants in bangladesh: a gis-based analytical hierarchy process (ahp) and multi-criteria decision analysis (mcda) approach Renew Energy 2023 220 119595
[41]
Li MK, Yang CZ, Zhang L, and Fan R Research on sustainable development strategy of energy internet system in Xiongan new area of China based on pest-swot-anp model Sustainability 2024 16 15 6395
[42]
Mutambik I The sustainability of smart cities: improving evaluation by combining mcda and promethee Land 2024 13 9 1471
[43]
Alinezhad A and Khalili J Critic method New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM) 2019 277 199-203
[44]
Qian CJ, Zhang MJ, Chen YT, and Wang R A quantitative judgement method for safety admittance of facilities in chemical industrial parks based on g1-variation coefficient method Proc Eng 2014 84 223-232
[45]
Linstone HA and Turoff M The Delphi Method 1975 Reading, MA Addison-Wesley
[46]
Wang YM Using the method of maximizing deviation to make decision for multiindices J Syst Eng Electron 1997 8 3 21-26
[47]
Cao FF, Xu XF, Zhang CL, and Kong WB Evaluation of urban flood resilience and its space-time evolution: A case study of Zhejiang Province, China Ecol Ind 2023 154 110643
[48]
Liu D, Feng JP, Li H, Fu Q, Li M, Faiz MA, Ali S, Li TX, and Khan MI Spatiotemporal variation analysis of regional flood disaster resilience capability using an improved projection pursuit model based on the wind-driven optimization algorithm J Clean Prod 2019 241 118406
[49]
Gao J, Wang C, Wang ZW, Lin J, Zhang RK, Wu X, Xu GY, and Wang ZF Site selection decision for biomass cogeneration projects from a sustainable perspective: a case study of china Energy 2024 286 129518
[50]
Dağıstanlı HA and Kurtay KG Facility location selection for ammunition depots based on gis and pythagorean fuzzy waspas J Opera Intell 2024 2 1 36-49
[51]
Shahrabi-Farahani S, Hafezalkotob A, Mohammaditabar D, and Khalili-Damghani K Selection of sustainable industrial livestock site using the r-number gis-mcdm method: a case study of iran Environ Sustain Ind 2024 22 100362
[52]
Cao M.J, Zhang X.Q (2024) Site selection and optimization of suburban large warehouse. In: Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Big Data and Edge Computing for Decision Making (BDEDM 2024), pp. 12–14. EAI, Ningbo, People’s Republic of China.
[53]
Guleria A and Bajaj RK A robust decision making approach for hydrogen power plant site selection utilizing (r, s)-norm pythagorean fuzzy information measures based on vikor and topsis method Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020 45 38 18802-18816
[54]
Di Grazia S and Tina GM Optimal site selection for floating photovoltaic systems based on geographic information systems (gis) and multi-criteria decision analysis (mcda): a case study Int J Sustain Energy 2024 43 1 2167999
[55]
Badi I, Pamučar D, and Steviçv Muhammad L. J Wind farm site selection using bwm-ahp-marcos method: a case study of libya Sci African 2023 19 01511
[56]
Di Matteo U, Pezzimenti PM, and Astiaso Garcia D Methodological proposal for optimal location of emergency operation centers through multi-criteria approach Sustainability 2016 8 1 50
[57]
Ju WY, Wu J, Kang QC, Jiang JC, and Xing ZX Fire risk assessment of subway stations based on combination weighting of game theory and topsis method Sustainability 2022 14 7275
[58]
Yang BH, Zhao JS, and Zhao HD A robust method for avoiding rank reversal in the topsis Comput Ind Eng 2022 174 108776
[59]
Hwang CL and Yoon K Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications 1981 Berlin Heidelberg Springer
[60]
Işik Ö, Çalik A, and Shabir M A consolidated mcdm framework for overall performance assessment of listed insurance companies based on ranking strategies Comput Econ 2024
[61]
Çalik A, Onifade ST, and Alola AA Evaluating supply resilience performance of an automotive industry during operational shocks: A pythagorean fuzzy ahp-vikor-based approach Systems 2023 11 396

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image The Journal of Supercomputing
The Journal of Supercomputing  Volume 81, Issue 1
Jan 2025
10308 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 28 December 2024
Accepted: 06 December 2024

Author Tags

  1. Emergency material reserve
  2. Site selection
  3. MGSPA-TOPSIS
  4. Rank reversal
  5. Hybrid weighting method

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media