[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

The commuting local Hamiltonian problem on locally expanding graphs is approximable in $$\mathsf{{NP}}$$NP

Published: 01 January 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The local Hamiltonian problem is famously complete for the class $$\mathsf{{QMA}}$$QMA, the quantum analogue of $$\mathsf{{NP}}$$NP. The complexity of its semiclassical version, in which the terms of the Hamiltonian are required to commute (the $$\mathsf{{CLH}}$$CLH problem), has attracted considerable attention recently due to its intriguing nature, as well as in relation to growing interest in the $$\mathsf{{qPCP}}$$qPCP conjecture. We show here that if the underlying bipartite interaction graph of the $$\mathsf{{CLH}}$$CLH instance is a good locally expanding graph, namely the expansion of any constant-size set is $$\varepsilon $$ -close to optimal, then approximating its ground energy to within additive factor $$O(\varepsilon )$$O( ) lies in $$\mathsf{{NP}}$$NP. The proof holds for $$k$$k-local Hamiltonians for any constant $$k$$k and any constant dimensionality of particles $$d$$d. We also show that the approximation problem of $$\mathsf{{CLH}}$$CLH on such good local expanders is $$\mathsf{{NP}}$$NP-hard. This implies that too good local expansion of the interaction graph constitutes an obstacle against quantum hardness of the approximation problem, though it retains its classical hardness. The result highlights new difficulties in trying to mimic classical proofs (in particular, Dinur's $$\mathsf{{PCP}}$$PCP proof) in an attempt to prove the quantum $$\mathsf{{PCP}}$$PCP conjecture. A related result was discovered recently independently by Brandão and Harrow, for $$2$$2-local general Hamiltonians, bounding the quantum hardness of the approximation problem on good expanders, though no $$\mathsf{{NP}}$$NP hardness is known in that case.

References

[1]
Aaronson, S.: The quantum $${\sf PCP}$$PCP manifesto (2006). http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=139
[2]
Aharonov, D., Arad, I., Landau, Z., Vazirani, U.: The Detectability Lemma and Quantum Gap Amplification. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 417426 (2009)
[3]
Aharonov, D., Arad, I., Vidick, T.: The Quantum $${\sf PCP}$$PCP Conjecture Guest column: the quantum PCP conjecture. SIGACT News 44(2), 47---79 (2013)
[4]
Aharonov, D., Eldar, L.: On the complexity of commuting local Hamiltonians, and tight conditions for topological order in such systems. In: IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 334---343 (2011)
[5]
Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z., Lloyd, S., Regev, O.: Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation. SIAM J. Comput. 37(1), 166---194 (2007). Conference version in Proc. 45th FOCS, pp. 42---51 (2004)
[6]
Aharonov, D., Gottesman, D., Irani, S., Kempe, J.: The power of quantum systems on a line Comm. Math. Phys. 287(1), 41---65 (2009)
[7]
Aharonov, D., Naveh, T.: Quantum NP--A Survey arXiv:quant-ph/0210077
[8]
Arad, I.: A note about a partial no-go theorem for quantum $${\sf PCP}$$PCP. Quantum Inf. Comput. 11, 1019 (2011)
[9]
Arora, S., Lund, C., Motwani, R., Sudan, M., Szegedy, M.: Proof verification and intractability of Approximation problems. J. ACM 45(3), 501---555 (1998)
[10]
Arora, S., Safra, S.: Probabilistic checking of proofs: a new characterization of $${\sf NP}$$NP. J. ACM 45(1), 70---122 (1998)
[11]
Arora, S., Barak, B., Steurer, D.: Subexponential algorithms for unique games and related problems. In: FOCS, pp. 563---572 (2010)
[12]
Arora, S., Khot, S., Kolla, A., Steurer, D., Tulsiani, M., Vishnoi, N.K.: Unique games on expanding constraint graphs are easy. In: STOC, pp. 21---28 (2008)
[13]
Brandão, F., Harrow, A.: Approximation Guarantees for the Quantum Local Hamiltonian Problem and Limitations for Quantum $${\sf PCP}$$PCPs Pre-Print
[14]
Bravyi, S.: Efficient algorithm for a quantum analogue of 2-SAT (2006). arXiv:quant-ph/0602108v1
[15]
Bravyi, S., Vyalyi, M.: Commutative version of the k-local Hamiltonian problem and common eigenspace problem. Quantum Inf. Comput. 5(3), 187---215 (2005)
[16]
Bravyi, S., DiVincenzo, D.P., Loss, D., Terhal, B.M.: Simulation of many-body Hamiltonians using perturbation theory with bounded-strength interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 070503 (2008)
[17]
Capalbo, M.R., Reingold, O., Vadhan, S., Wigderson, A.: Randomness conductors and constant-degree lossless expanders. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 659---668 (2002)
[18]
Dinur, I.: The $${\sf PCP}$$PCP theorem by gap amplification. In: STOC, pp. 241---250 (2006)
[19]
Dinur, I., Kaufman, T.: Locally Testable Codes and Expanders Pre-Print
[20]
Freedman, M.H., Hastings, M.B.: Quantum systems on non-k-hyperfinite complexes: a generalization of classical statistical mechanics on expander graphs. arXiv: 1301.1363
[21]
Gharibian, S., Kempe, J.: Approximation algorithms for QMA complete problems. SIAM J. Comput. 41(4), 1028---1050 (2012)
[22]
Gharibian, S., Kempe, J.: Hardness of approximation for quantum problems. In: ICALP (1), pp. 387---398 (2012)
[23]
Gottesman, D., Irani, S.: The quantum and classical complexity of translationally invariant tiling and Hamiltonian problems. In: 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS '09, pp. 95---104 (2009)
[24]
Håstad, J.: Some optimal inapproximability results. J. ACM 48, 798---859 (2001)
[25]
Hastings, M.B.: Trivial low energy states for commuting Hamiltonians, and the quantum $${\sf PCP}$$PCP conjecture. Quantum Inf. Comput. 13(5---6), 393---429 (2013)
[26]
Khot, S.: On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 25 (2002)
[27]
Kitaev, A.Yu., Shen, A.H., Vyalyi, M.N.: Classical and Quantum Computation, vol. 47, Graduate Studies in Mathematics. AMS (2002)
[28]
Kitaev, AYu.: Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303(1), 2---30 (2003)
[29]
Kempe, J., Kitaev, A., Regev, O.: The complexity of the local Hamiltonian problem. SIAM J. Comput. 35(5), 1070---1097 (2006). Conference version in Proc. 24th FSTTCS, p. 372---383 (2004)
[30]
Levin, Michael A., Wen, Xiao-Gang: String-net condensation: a physical mechanism for topological phases. Phys. Rev. B71, 045110 (2005)
[31]
Oliveira, R., Terhal, B.M.: The complexity of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice. Quant. Inf. Comput. 8(10), 900---924 (2008)
[32]
Osborne, T.: Hamiltonian complexity. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 022001 (2012)
[33]
Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)
[34]
Raghavendra, P., Steurer, D.: Graph expansion and the unique games conjecture. In: Proceedings of the 42nd ACM symposium on Theory of computing, STOC, pp. 755---764 (2010)
[35]
Raghavendra, P., Steurer, D., Tulsiani, M.: Reductions between expansion problems. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 64---73 (2012)
[36]
Schuch, N.: Complexity of commuting Hamiltonians on a square lattice of qubits. Quantum Inf. Comput. 11, 901 (2011)
[37]
Schuch, N., Verstraete, F.: Computational complexity of interacting electrons and fundamental limitations of density functional theory. Nat. Phys. 5, 732---735 (2009)
[38]
Sipser, M., Spielman, D.: Expander codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 42(6), 1710---1722 (1996)
[39]
Trevisan, L.: Approximation algorithms for unique games. In: 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 197---205 (2005)

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)NLTS Hamiltonians from Good Quantum CodesProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585114(1090-1096)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
  • (2021)Total functions in QMAQuantum Information Processing10.1007/s11128-020-02959-020:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2015)Quantum Hamiltonian ComplexityFoundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science10.1561/040000006610:3(159-282)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
  1. The commuting local Hamiltonian problem on locally expanding graphs is approximable in $$\mathsf{{NP}}$$NP

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Quantum Information Processing
    Quantum Information Processing  Volume 14, Issue 1
    January 2015
    410 pages

    Publisher

    Kluwer Academic Publishers

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 January 2015

    Author Tags

    1. Approximation
    2. Commuting local Hamiltonian
    3. Local Hamiltonian
    4. PCP
    5. Quantum PCP

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)NLTS Hamiltonians from Good Quantum CodesProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585114(1090-1096)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
    • (2021)Total functions in QMAQuantum Information Processing10.1007/s11128-020-02959-020:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2015)Quantum Hamiltonian ComplexityFoundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science10.1561/040000006610:3(159-282)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015

    View Options

    View options

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media