[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

An approach to conference selection and evaluation: advice to avoid "predatory" conferences

Published: 01 February 2019 Publication History

Abstract

With an ever increasing number of academic conferences being offered and a growing concern regarding the appearance of "predatory conferencing", the optimal use of one's "conference time" has become complicated. It is particularly important for medical students and residents, due to both limited time and resources, to choose conferences to achieve the most benefit for their academic careers, however little information is available to provide guidance. We gathered current practices and perceptions from a wide number of faculty and residents to provide insights into their decision making process for conference evaluation and selection. We surveyed using an online program (SurveyMonkey®) 150 faculty members and medical residents at University of Calgary requesting them to rank factors, which may be useful in their conference selection. We also evaluated both faculty and resident's knowledge of and exposure to presumed "predatory" science. Responses were anonymized and collated. The most important factors in selecting a conference(s) for residents is being focused on their area of interest, having an opportunity to present work, having well known respected plenary speakers, networking potential and being recommended by colleagues. Residents placed more importance on cost, location and time of year of the conference than faculty. Faculty placed more emphasis on networking potential, sponsoring organization, obtaining continuing professional development credits and the likelihood that cutting edge research will be presented. Most faculty (71%) had received correspondence from presumed "predatory" publishers or conferences, however only 56% of residents had ever either heard of or had education about "predatory science". Experienced faculty need to provide advice and mentorship to trainees on conference value. In the absence of any formal tool for assessing conference quality their proactive guidance remains critical for medical students and residents. There is a significant lack of awareness and education for both trainees and some faculty around "predatory" publications and conferencing making them particularly vulnerable to misusing time and resources. Improved knowledge, education and new metrics are required to safeguard the academic community in this new era of "predatory academia".

References

[1]
Asadi, A. (2018). Invitation to speak at a conference: The tempting technique adopted by predatory conferences' organizers. Science and Engineering Ethics.
[2]
Beall, J. (2016). Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(10), 1511-1513.
[3]
CLocate. (2018) CLocate-Conference and Exhibitions Search [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.clocate.com/. Cited 1 July 2018.
[4]
Drife, J. O. (2008). Are international medical conferences an outdated luxury the planet can't afford? No. BMJ, 336(7659), 1467.
[5]
Green, M. (2008). Are international medical conferences an outdated luxury the planet can't afford? Yes. BMJ, 336(7659), 1466.
[6]
Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Are medical conferences useful? And for whom? JAMA, 307(12), 1257-1258.
[7]
Johal, J., Ward, R., Gielecki, J., Walocha, J., Natsis, K., Tubbs, R. S., et al. (2017). Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research. Clinical Anatomy, 30(6), 767-773.
[8]
Lewinski, A. A., & Oermann, M. H. (2018). Characteristics of e-mail solicitations from predatory nursing journals and publishers. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 49(4), 171-177.
[9]
Memon, A. R. (2017). Predatory journals spamming for publications: What should researchers do? Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1617-1639.
[10]
Mercier, E., Tardif, P. A., Moore, L., Le Sage, N., & Cameron, P. A. (2018). Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 94(1108), 104-108.
[11]
Moher, D., & Srivastava, A. (2015). You are invited to submit. BMC Medicine, 13, 180.
[12]
Mostafa, M. (2017). How to identify predatory conferences: The think. Check. Attend checklist. Editage Insights; [Internet] [cited June 29, 2018]. Available from: https://www.editage.com/insights/how-toidentify-predatory-conferences-the-thinkcheckattend-checklist.
[13]
Neves, J., Lavis, J. N., & Ranson, M. K. (2012). A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them? Health Research Policy and Systems, 10, 26.
[14]
Pearson, G. S. (2017). Avoiding predatory journals with "Think. Check. Submit". Journal American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 23(4), 239-240.
[15]
Ruben, A. (2016). Dubious conferences put the 'pose' in 'symposium': Science. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/11/dubious-conferences-put-pose-symposium. Updated 30 June 2018.
[16]
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., et al. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 28.
[17]
Sorooshian, S. (2017). Conference wolves in sheep's clothing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(6), 1805-1806.
[18]
Think Check Attend. (2018). Creative Commons Attribution License; [Internet]. [cited June 29, 2018]. Available from: https://thinkchecksubmit.org/.
[19]
Think Check Submit: Choose the right journal for your research. (2018). Creative Commons Attribution License; [Internet]. [cited June 29, 2018]. Available from: https://thinkchecksubmit.org/.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Scientometrics
Scientometrics  Volume 118, Issue 2
February 2019
325 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2019

Author Tags

  1. Conference selection
  2. Continuing professional development
  3. Medical education
  4. Predatory conferences

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media