[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

An image fusion framework using morphology and sparse representation

Published: 01 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Image fusion is the process which aims to integrate the relevant and complementary information from a set of images into a single comprehensive image. Sparse representation (SR) is a powerful technique used in a wide variety of applications like denoising, compression and fusion. Building a compact and informative dictionary is the principal challenge in these applications. Hence, we propose a supervised classification based learning technique for the fusion algorithm. As an initial step, each patch of the training data set is pre-classified based on their gradient dominant direction. Then, a dictionary is learned using K-SVD algorithm. With this universal dictionary, sparse coefficients are estimated using greedy OMP algorithm to represent the given set of source images in the dominant direction. Finally, the Euclidean norm is used as a distance measure to reconstruct the fused image. Experimental results on different types of source images demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm with conventional methods in terms of visual and quantitative evaluations.

References

[1]
http://home.ustc.edu.cn/~liuyu1/. Accessed Oct 2016
[2]
http://www.med.harvard.edu/AANLIB/home.html. Accessed Oct 2016
[3]
http://decsai.ugr.es/cvg/CG/base.htm. Accessed Oct 2016
[4]
Aharon M, Elad M, Bruckstein A (2006) K-SVD: an algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 54(11):4311---4322
[5]
Aishwarya N, Asnath Victy Phamila Y, Amutha R (2013) Multi-focus image fusion using multi-structure top hat transform and image variance. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing: 686---689
[6]
Bai X, Zhang Y, Zhou F, Xue B (2015) Quad tree-based multi-focus image fusion using a weighted focus-measure. Inf Fusion 22:105---118
[7]
Bruckstein AM, Donoho DL, Elad M (2007) From sparse solutions of systems of equations to sparse modeling of signals and images. SIAM Rev 51(1):34---81
[8]
Chen Y, Blum R (2009) A new automated quality assessment algorithm for image fusion. Image Vis Comput 27(10):1421---1432
[9]
Dong L, Yang Q, Wu H, Xiao H, Xu M (2015) High quality multi-spectral and panchromatic image fusion technologies based on curvelet transform. Neurocomputing 159:268---274
[10]
Elad M, Figueiredo M, Ma Y (2010) On the role of sparse and redundant representations in image processing. Proc IEEE 98(6):972---982
[11]
Goshtasby A, Nikolov S (2007) Image fusion: advances in the state of the art, Guest editorial. Inf Fusion 8:114---118
[12]
Huang W, Jing ZL (2007) Evaluation of focus measures in multi-focus image fusion. Pattern Recogn Lett 28(4):493---500
[13]
James AP, Dasarathy B (2014) Medical image fusion: a survey of the state of the art. Inf. Fusion 19:14---19
[14]
Kim M, Han DK, Ko H (2016) Joint patch clustering-based dictionary learning for multimodal image fusion. Inf Fusion 27:198---214
[15]
Li S, Yang B, Hu J (2011) Performance comparison of different multi-resolution transforms for image fusion. Inf Fusion 12(2):74---84
[16]
Li S, Kang X, Hu J (2013) Image fusion with guided filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(7):2864---2875
[17]
Liu Y, Wang Z (2015) Simultaneous image fusion and denoising with adaptive sparse representation. IET Image Process 9(5):347---357
[18]
Liu Y, Liu S, Wang Z (2015) A general framework for image fusion based on multi-scale transform and sparse representation. Inf Fusion 24:147---164
[19]
Nejati M, Samavi S, Shirani S (2015) Multi-focus image fusion using dictionary-based sparse representation. Inf Fusion 25:72---84
[20]
Phamila YAV, Amutha R (2014) Discrete Cosine Transform based fusion of multi-focus images for visual sensor networks. Signal Process 95:161---170
[21]
Piella G, Heijmans H (2003) A new quality metric for image fusion. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Image Processing: 173---176
[22]
Qu G, Zhang D, Yan P (2002) Information measure for performance of image fusion. Electron Lett 38(7):313---315
[23]
Qu X-B, Yan J-W, Xiao H-Z, Zhu Z-Q (2008) Image fusion based on spatial frequency motivated pulse coupled neural networks in non subsampled countourlet transform domain. Acta Automat Sin 34:1508---1514
[24]
Rama Bai M (2010) A new approach for border extraction using morphological methods. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2:3832---3837
[25]
Sollie P (2003) Morphological principles and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
[26]
Tian J, Chen L, Ma L, Yu W (2011) Multi-focus image fusion using a bilateral gradient-based sharpness criterion. Opt Commun 284(1):80---87
[27]
Xydeas C, Petrovic V (2000) Objective image fusion performance measure. Electron Lett 36(4):308---309
[28]
Yang B, Li S (2010) Multifocus image fusion and restoration with sparse representation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(4):884---892
[29]
Yang B, Li S (2012) Pixel-level image fusion with simultaneous orthogonal matching pursuit. Inf Fusion 13(1):10---19
[30]
Yang C, Zhang J, Wang X, Liu X (2008) A novel similarity based quality metric for image fusion. Inf Fusion 9(2):156---160
[31]
Yin H, Li S (2011) Multimodal image fusion with joint sparsity model. Opt Eng 50(6):067007
[32]
Yin H, Li Y, Chai Y, Liu Z, Zhu Z (2016) A novel sparse-representation-based multi-focusimage fusion approach. Neurocomputing 216:216---229
[33]
Yu N, Qiu T, Bi F, Wang A (2011) Image feature extraction and fusion based on joint sparse representation. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 5(5):1074---1082
[34]
Zhang Q, Guo B (2009) Multi-focus image fusion using the nonsubsampled contourlet transform. Signal Process 89(7):1334---1346
[35]
Zhu S (2011) Edge Detection Based on Multi-structure Elements Morphology and Image Fusion. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering, 406---411

Index Terms

  1. An image fusion framework using morphology and sparse representation
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Multimedia Tools and Applications
          Multimedia Tools and Applications  Volume 77, Issue 8
          Apr 2018
          1145 pages

          Publisher

          Kluwer Academic Publishers

          United States

          Publication History

          Published: 01 April 2018

          Author Tags

          1. Euclidean norm
          2. Image fusion
          3. K-SVD
          4. OMP
          5. Sparse representation
          6. Supervised learning

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 0
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          View options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media