[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Legal document assembly system for introducing law students with legal drafting

Published: 16 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method for introducing law students to the writing of legal documents. The method uses a machine-readable representation of the legal knowledge to support document assembly and to help the students to understand how the assembly is performed. The knowledge base consists of enacted legislation, document templates, and assembly instructions. We propose a system called LEDAS (LEgal Document Assembly System) for the interactive assembly of legal documents. It guides users through the assembly process and provides explanations of the interconnection between input data and claims stated in the document. The system acts as a platform for practicing drafting skills and has great potential as an education tool. It allows teachers to configure the system for the assembly of some particular type of legal document and then enables students to draft the documents by investigating which information is relevant for these documents and how the input data shape the final document. The generated legal document is complemented by a graphical representation of legal arguments expressed in the document. The system is based on existing legal standards to facilitate its introduction in the legal domain. Applicability of the system in the education of future lawyers is positively evaluated by the group of law students and their TA.

References

[1]
AbacusNext (2022) Document automation software: generation & assembly. https://www.hotdocs.com/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[2]
Afterpattern (2022) Afterpattern: build a better way to practice law. https://afterpattern.com/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[3]
Allee T and Elsig M Are the contents of international treaties copied and pasted? Evidence from preferential trade agreements Int Stud Quart 2019 63 3 603-613
[4]
Almende B V (2022) vis.js: A dynamic, browser based visualization library. http://visjs.org/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[5]
Marković M, Gostojić S (2016) Configuration tool for the legal document assembly system. Available at: https://github.com/legal-informatics/knowledge-based-document-assembly/tree/master/src/legal/documentassembly/cli. Accessed 5 June 2022
[6]
Marković M, Gostojić S (2020) A knowledge-based document assembly method to support semantic interoperability of enterprise information systems. Enterprise Information Systems.
[7]
Marković M, Gostojić S (2022) The legal document assembly system. Available at: https://github.com/legal-informatics/document-assembly-webapp. Accessed 5 June 2022
[8]
Apache (2022) The Apache FOP Project. https://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[9]
Ashley KD Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals Artif Intell Law 2009 17 4 321-370
[10]
Barbosa D, Mendelzon A, Keenleyside J, Lyons K (2002) ToXgene: a template-based data generator for XML. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pp. 616–616.
[11]
Barnett D Triage in the trenches of the legal writing course: the theory and methodology of analytical critique Univ Toledo Law Rev 2006 38 651-704
[12]
Bassiliades N, Antoniou G, Vlahavas I (2004) DR-DEVICE: a defeasible logic system for the Semantic Web. In: international workshop on principles and practice of semantic web reasoning (pp. 134–148). Springer, Berlin.
[13]
Branting LK, Lester J, and Callaway C Automating judicial document drafting: a discourse-based approach Artif Intell Law 1998 6 2–4 111-149
[14]
Branting L K, Lester J C (1996) A framework for self-explaining legal documents. In Tilburg University, the Netherlands.
[15]
Branting L K, Callaway C B, Mott B W, Lester J C (1999) Integrating discourse and domain knowledge for document drafting. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp 214–220.
[16]
Canick S Infusing technology skills into the law school curriculum Cap UL Rev 2014 42 663
[17]
Ceci M and Gangemi A An OWL ontology library representing judicial interpretations Semantic Web 2016 7 3 229-253
[18]
ClauseBase (2022) Contract Drafting Software. https://www.clausebase.com/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[19]
Draftomat (2022) Welcome to Draftomat. https://www.draftomat.app/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[20]
Eclipse (2022) Eclipse Jersey. https://eclipse-ee4j.github.io/jersey/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[21]
Google (2022) Angular. https://angular.io/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[22]
Henley BK Avoid malpractice traps with practice management software Ohio Lawyer 2001 15 6 26-30
[23]
Keene SL Are we there yet: aligning the expectations and realities of gaining competency in legal writing Duquesne Law Rev 2015 53 1 99-132
[24]
Kontopoulos E, Bassiliades N, and Antoniou G Visualizing Semantic Web proofs of defeasible logic in the DR-DEVICE system Knowl-Based Syst 2011 24 3 406-419
[25]
Lauritsen M, Gordon T F (2009) Toward a general theory of document modeling. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, pp. 202–211.
[26]
Lauritsen M (1993) Knowing documents. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp. 184–191.
[27]
The Law on Road Traffic Safety (2009) Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 41/2009
[28]
Legito (2022) Document Automation—Legito. Available at: https://www.legito.com/US/en/document-automation (accessed 5 June 2022)
[29]
Mellinkoff D The language of the law 1963 Boston Little, Brown & Company
[30]
OASIS (2021) OASIS LegalRuleML TC. https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/legalruleml. Accessed 5 June 2022
[31]
Outlaw (2022) Draft—Outlaw. https://getoutlaw.com/platform/draft/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[32]
Palmirani M, Vitali F (2011) Akoma-Ntoso for legal documents. In Legislative XML for the semantic Web (pp. 75–100). Springer, Dordrecht.
[33]
Passera S, Haapio H, Curtotti M (2014) Making the meaning of contracts visible–Automating contract visualization. In: Transparency. Proceedings of the 17th international legal informatics symposium IRIS (pp. 443–450).
[34]
Petro N Document automation: using technology to improve your practice Gpsolo 2015 32 5 56-63
[35]
Pollman T The sincerest form of flattery: examples and model-based learning in the classroom J Leg Educ 2014 64 2 298-333
[36]
PrimeTek (2021) PrimeNG. https://www.primefaces.org/primeng/. Accessed 5 June 2022
[37]
[38]
The Criminal Code (2005) Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 85/2005
[39]
The Criminal Procedure Code (2011) Official gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 72/2011
[40]
The Law on Organization of Courts (2008) Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 116/2008
[41]
Winek KM Writing like a lawyer: how law student involvement affects self-reported gains in writing skills in law school J Leg Educ 2021 69 2 568-598
[42]
Woodpecker (2022) Legal document automation. https://www.woodpeckerweb.com/. Accessed 5 June 2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Artificial Intelligence and Law
Artificial Intelligence and Law  Volume 31, Issue 4
Dec 2023
209 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 16 November 2022
Accepted: 23 October 2022

Author Tags

  1. Legal education
  2. Legal documents
  3. Document assembly
  4. Document drafting
  5. Knowledge representation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media