[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior based on a cognitive model of social comparison theory

Published: 01 December 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Modeling crowd behavior is an important challenge for cognitive modelers. Models of crowd behavior facilitate analysis and prediction of human group behavior, where people are close geographically or logically, and are affected by each other's presence and actions. Existing models of crowd behavior, in a variety of fields, leave many open challenges. In particular, psychology models often offer only qualitative description, and do not easily permit algorithmic replication, while computer science models are often not tied to cognitive theory and often focus only on a specific phenomenon (e.g., flocking, bi-directional pedestrian movement), and thus must be switched depending on the goals of the simulation. We propose a novel model of crowd behavior, based on Festinger's Social Comparison Theory (SCT), a social psychology theory known and expanded since the early 1950's. We propose a concrete algorithmic framework for SCT, and evaluate its implementations in several pedestrian movement phenomena such as creation of lanes in bidirectional movement and movement in groups with and without obstacle. Compared to popular models from the literature, the SCT model was shown to provide improved results. We also evaluate the SCT model on general pedestrian movement, and validate the model against human pedestrian behavior. The results show that SCT generates behavior more in-tune with human crowd behavior then existing non-cognitive models.

References

[1]
Allport FH (1924) Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
[2]
Balch T (1998) Behavioral diversity in learning robot teams. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.
[3]
Berk R (1974) A gaming approach to crowd behavior. Am Sociol Rev.
[4]
Blue VJ, Adler JL (2000) Cellular automata microsimulation of bidirectional pedestrian flows. Trans Res Rec 135-141.
[5]
Blumer HG (1939) Collective behavior. Princ Sociol.
[6]
Braun A, Musse SR, de Oliveira LPL, Bodmann BEJ (2003) Modeling individual behaviors in crowd simulation. CASA.
[7]
Braun A, Musse SR, de Oliveira LPL, Bodmann BEJ (2003) Modeling individual behaviors in crowd simulation. In: Computer animation and social agents, pp 143-148.
[8]
Carley K, Newell A (1994) The nature of the social agent. J Math Sociol.
[9]
Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP (2003) Experimental research of pedestrian walking behavior. Transp Res Rec 20-30.
[10]
Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relat 117-140.
[11]
Fridman N (2007) Modeling crowd behavior based on social comparison theory. Master's thesis, Bar Ilan University.
[12]
Fridman N, Kaminka GA (2009) Comparing human and synthetic group behaviors: A model based on social psychology. In: International conference on cognitive modeling (ICCM-09).
[13]
Fridman N, Kaminka GA (2011) Towards a computational model of social comparison: Some implications for the cognitive architecture. Cogn Systems Res.
[14]
Goethals GR, Darley JM (1977) Social comparison theory: an attributional approach. In: Social comparison processes: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Hemisphere, Washington, DC.
[15]
Goethals GR, Klein WMP (2000) Interpreting and inventing social reality: attributional and constructive elements in social comparison. In: Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. Plenum, New York.
[16]
Helbing D (1993) Boltzmann-like and Boltzmann-Fokker-Planck equations as a foundation of behavioral models. Physica A 196:546-573.
[17]
Helbing D (2001) Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev Mod Phys 73.
[18]
Helbing D, Farkas IJ, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487- 490.
[19]
Helbing D, Molnar P (1997) Self-organization phenomena in pedestrian crowds. In: Schweitzer F (ed) Self-organization of complex structures: from individual to collective dynamics. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 569-577.
[20]
Helbing D, Molnar P, Farkas IJ, Bolay K (2001) Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B 28:361-384.
[21]
Henderson LF (1971) The statistics of crowd fluids. Nature 229:381-383.
[22]
Henderson LF (1974) On the fluid mechanics of human crowd motion. Transp Res 8:505-515.
[23]
Hornstein HA, Fisch E, Holmes M (1968) Influence of a model's feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers' helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol.
[24]
Kretz T (2007) Pedestrian traffic: simulation and experiments. PhD thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
[25]
Le Bon G (1895) The crowd: a study of the popular mind. Dunwoody, Ga., N.S. Berg, 1968 edition.
[26]
Milgram S, Bickman L, Berkowitz L (1969) Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. J Pers Soc Psychol 13(2):79-82.
[27]
Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
[28]
Pelechano N, Allbeck JM, Badler NI (2008) Virtual crowds: methods, simulation, and control. Morgan and Claypool.
[29]
Pelechano N, Stocker C, Allbeck J, Badler N (2008) Being a part of the crowd: towards validating vr crowds using presence. In: Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS).
[30]
Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH-87). ACM Press, New York, pp 25-34.
[31]
Reynolds CW (1999) Steering behavior for autonomous character. In: Proceedings of the game developers conference, pp 763-782.
[32]
Rymill SJ, Dodgson NA (2005) A psychologically-based simulation of human behaviour. In: Theory and practice of computer graphics, pp 35-42.
[33]
Smith WP, Arnkelsson GB (2000) Stability of related attributes and the inference of ability through social comparison. In: Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. Plenum, New York.
[34]
Thalmann D (2001) The foundations to build a virtual human society. In: Proceedings of intelligent virtual actors (IVA-2001). Springer, Berlin, pp 1-14.
[35]
Tissera PC, Printista M, Errecalde ML (2007) Evacuation simulations using cellular automata. J Comput Sci Technol.
[36]
Toyama MC, Bazzan ALC, da Silva R (2006) An agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics: from lane formation to auditorium evacuation. In: Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS).
[37]
Tu X, Terzopoulos D (1994) Artificial fishes: physics, locomotion, perception, behavior. In: SIGGRAPH '94': proceedings of the 21st annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press, New York, pp 43-50.
[38]
Turner R, Killian LM (1972) Collective Behavior, 1993 edition. Prentice Hall, New York.
[39]
Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling--Northwestern University; http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
[40]
Wolff M (1973) Notes on the behaviour of pedestrians. In: People in places: the sociology of the familiar, pp 35-48.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory  Volume 16, Issue 4
December 2010
111 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2010

Author Tags

  1. Cognitive modeling
  2. Model of social comparison theory
  3. Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Social cognitive theory and women’s career choices: an agent—based model simulationComputational & Mathematical Organization Theory10.1007/s10588-020-09317-628:1(1-26)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2019)Towards understanding socio-cognitive behaviors of crowds from visual surveillance dataMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-019-08201-z79:3-4(1781-1799)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2019
  • (2019)Simulating evacuation crowd with emotion and personalityArtificial Life and Robotics10.1007/s10015-018-0459-524:1(59-67)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019
  • (2018)Simulating Urban Pedestrian Crowds of Different CulturesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/31023029:3(1-27)Online publication date: 18-Jan-2018
  • (2017)A simulation of multiple grouping movements for pedestriansInternational Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics10.1504/IJCVR.2017.0834457:3(276-284)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
  • (2017)Controlling for false negatives in agent-based modelsComputational & Mathematical Organization Theory10.1007/s10588-016-9218-023:1(94-121)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
  • (2017)Modeling Skiers’ Dynamics and BehaviorsComputational Collective Intelligence10.1007/978-3-319-67077-5_10(97-106)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2017
  • (2016)Implicit coordination in crowded multi-agent navigationProceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3016100.3016247(2487-2493)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2016
  • (2014)Towards realistic and effective Agent-based models of crowd dynamicsNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.057146:C(199-209)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2014
  • (2013)Curing robot autismProceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems10.5555/2484920.2485047(801-804)Online publication date: 6-May-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media