[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
Skip header Section
Managing the software processJanuary 1989
Publisher:
  • Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
  • 75 Arlington Street, Suite 300 Boston, MA
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-201-18095-4
Published:03 January 1989
Pages:
494
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024Bibliometrics
Abstract

No abstract available.

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Goelzer N and Marczak S Promoting Quality in BDD Scenarios Using Checklist: An Investigation from the Perspective of Novice Professionals Proceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality, (341-350)
  2. ACM
    S. Lisboa de Andrade A, Luz de Quadros E, Oliveira Fortes L and Prikladnicki R Developing a Collaborative Recommendations Guide for Hybrid Software Development: A Focus Group Study Proceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality, (39-48)
  3. ACM
    Vasylieva K, Küpper S and Kuhrmann M Breaking old Habits: On Success Factors in Software Process Improvement Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Software and Systems Processes, (13-23)
  4. ACM
    Rolland K, Fitzgerald B, Dingsøyr T and Stol K (2023). Acrobats and Safety Nets: Problematizing Large-Scale Agile Software Development, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 33:2, (1-45), Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024.
  5. Assyne N, Ghanbari H and Pulkkinen M (2022). The essential competencies of software professionals, Information and Software Technology, 151:C, Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022.
  6. Costa G, Werner C, Braga R, Teixeira E, Ströele V, Araújo M and Miguel M (2021). Design, Application and Evaluation of PROV-SwProcess, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 71:C, Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021.
  7. Meding W, Staron M and Söder O (2021). MeTeaM—A method for characterizing mature software metrics teams, Journal of Systems and Software, 180:C, Online publication date: 1-Oct-2021.
  8. Morales-Trujillo M Learning software quality assurance with bricks Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Joint Track on Software Engineering Education and Training, (11-19)
  9. Alhammad M and Moreno A (2020). Challenges of gamification in software process improvement, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32:6, Online publication date: 4-Jun-2020.
  10. Chugh M, Chanderwal N, Upadhyay R and Punia D (2020). Effect of knowledge management on software product experience with mediating effect of perceived software process improvement, Journal of Information Science, 46:2, (258-272), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020.
  11. Bjarnason E, Sharp H and Regnell B (2019). Improving requirements-test alignment by prescribing practices that mitigate communication gaps, Empirical Software Engineering, 24:4, (2364-2409), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.
  12. ACM
    Meidan A, García-García J, Ramos I and Escalona M (2018). Measuring Software Process, ACM Computing Surveys, 51:3, (1-32), Online publication date: 31-May-2019.
  13. Kuhrmann M and Münch J SPI is dead, isn't it? Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes, (9-13)
  14. Chevers D and Grant G (2019). Developers' views on the adoption and benefits of software process improvement programs in Canadian software development firms, International Journal of Business Information Systems, 32:2, (238-252), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.
  15. Kalliamvakou E, Bird C, Zimmermann T, Begel A, DeLine R and German D (2019). What Makes a Great Manager of Software Engineers?, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 45:1, (87-106), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019.
  16. ACM
    Tashakkori R and Andrews Z A team software process approach to database course Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Southeast Conference, (1-7)
  17. Chevers D and Grant G (2017). Software Process Improvement Adoption and Benefits in Canadian and English‐Speaking Caribbean Software Development Firms, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 77:1, (1-15), Online publication date: 5-Dec-2017.
  18. ACM
    Álvarez T, Rusu C, Álvarez F, Benítez-Guerrero E and Esparza A Applying usability evaluation methods with blind users Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, (1-4)
  19. Chevers D and Grant G (2017). Information Systems Quality and Success in Canadian Software Development Firms, Information Resources Management Journal, 30:3, (1-25), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017.
  20. Kneuper R (2017). Sixty Years of Software Development Life Cycle Models, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 39:3, (41-54), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.
  21. Duggan E, Chevers D, Mills A and Moore S (2016). An Evaluation of Software Development Practices among Small Firms in Developing Countries, Journal of Global Information Management, 24:3, (45-70), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016.
  22. Sen A and Sinha A (2016). An ontological model of the practice transformation process, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 61:C, (298-318), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016.
  23. ACM
    Yordanova K and Kirste T (2015). A Process for Systematic Development of Symbolic Models for Activity Recognition, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 5:4, (1-35), Online publication date: 7-Jan-2016.
  24. ACM
    De Silva I, Rayadurgam S and Heimdahl M A reference model for simulating agile processes Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, (82-91)
  25. ACM
    O'Connor R and Clarke P Software process reflexivity and business performance: initial results from an empirical study Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, (142-146)
  26. ACM
    Kuhrmann M, Konopka C, Nellemann P, Diebold P and Münch J Software process improvement: where is the evidence?: initial findings from a systematic mapping study Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, (107-116)
  27. ACM
    Anslow C and Maurer F An Experience Report at Teaching a Group Based Agile Software Development Project Course Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, (500-505)
  28. Perkusich M, Soares G, Almeida H and Perkusich A (2015). A procedure to detect problems of processes in software development projects using Bayesian networks, Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, 42:1, (437-450), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015.
  29. ACM
    Zhou M and Mockus A Mining micro-practices from operational data Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, (845-848)
  30. ACM
    Ryan K Software processes for a changing world Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Software and System Process, (8-9)
  31. Hurtado Alegría J, Bastarrica M and Bergel A (2014). avispa, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 26:4, (434-450), Online publication date: 15-Apr-2014.
  32. ACM
    Raccoon and Dog (2014). The best laid plans of mice and men, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 39:2, (7-14), Online publication date: 29-Mar-2014.
  33. ACM
    Rahman A Requirements engineering approach for real-time and embedded systems Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, (1-5)
  34. CéRet E, Dupuy-Chessa S, Calvary G, Front A and Rieu D (2013). A taxonomy of design methods process models, Information and Software Technology, 55:5, (795-821), Online publication date: 1-May-2013.
  35. ACM
    Laurent Y, Bendraou R and Gervais M Executing and debugging UML models Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, (1095-1102)
  36. Suarez F, Cusumano M and Kahl S (2013). Services and the Business Models of Product Firms, Management Science, 59:2, (420-435), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013.
  37. ACM
    Shah S, Morisio M and Torchiano M The impact of process maturity on defect density Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, (315-318)
  38. Alegría J and Bastarrica M Building software process lines with CASPER Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Process, (170-179)
  39. Paikari E, Ruhe G and Southekel P Simulation-based decision support for bringing a project back on track Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Process, (13-22)
  40. Lepmets M, McBride T and Ras E (2012). Goal alignment in process improvement, Journal of Systems and Software, 85:6, (1440-1452), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012.
  41. Edberg D, Ivanova P and Kuechler W (2012). Methodology Mashups, Journal of Management Information Systems, 28:4, (271-304), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012.
  42. Thalheim B The science and art of conceptual modelling Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems VI, (76-105)
  43. Jaakkola H Culture sensitive aspects in software engineering Conceptual Modelling and Its Theoretical Foundations, (291-315)
  44. ACM
    Andersen B and Romanski G (2011). Verification of safety-critical software, Communications of the ACM, 54:10, (52-57), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.
  45. ACM
    Maheshwari D, Janssen M and van Veenstra A A multi-level framework for measuring and benchmarking public service organizations Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (73-80)
  46. Thalheim B The science of conceptual modelling Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Database and expert systems applications - Volume Part I, (12-26)
  47. ACM
    Andersen B and Romanski G (2011). Verification of Safety-critical Software, Queue, 9:8, (50-59), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.
  48. Baranov S, Kotlyarov V and Weigert T Verifiable coverage criteria for automated testing Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Integrating System and Software Modeling, (79-89)
  49. Obana M, Hanakawa N and Iida H A process complexity-product quality (PCPQ) model based on process fragment with workflow management tables Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Product-focused software process improvement, (171-185)
  50. ACM
    Espinosa-Curiel I, Rodríguez-Jacobo J and Fernández-Zepeda J A competency framework for the stakeholders of a software process improvement initiative Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Software and Systems Process, (139-148)
  51. Lane S and Richardson I (2011). Process models for service-based applications, Information and Software Technology, 53:5, (424-439), Online publication date: 1-May-2011.
  52. ACM
    Lister R (2011). What if we approached teaching like software engineering?, ACM Inroads, 2:1, (17-18), Online publication date: 25-Feb-2011.
  53. Huestis E and Snowdon J (2011). Complexity of legacy city resource management and value modeling of interagency response, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 55:1&2, (1-12), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  54. ACM
    Armour P (2011). Don't bring me a good idea, Communications of the ACM, 54:1, (27-29), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  55. Tiemens S and Bouwman H (2010). Managed Testing: designing a tool for dealing with Service Providers project risks in software testing, International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 9:2, (224-241), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.
  56. ACM
    Mishra A and Misra S (2010). People management in software industry, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 35:6, (1-4), Online publication date: 27-Nov-2010.
  57. ACM
    Frailey D (2010). Ubiquity symposium 'What is computation?', Ubiquity, 2010:November, Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010.
  58. Müller S, Mathiassen L and Balshøj H (2010). Software Process Improvement as organizational change, Journal of Systems and Software, 83:11, (2128-2146), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010.
  59. Vijaya G and Arumugam S (2010). Monitoring the stability of the processes in defined level software companies using control charts with three sigma limits, WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 7:10, (1230-1239), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010.
  60. Vijaya G and Arumugam S (2010). Monitoring the stability of the processes in defined level software companies using control charts with three sigma limits, WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 7:9, (1200-1209), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010.
  61. ACM
    Yilmaz M and O'Connor R Maximizing the value of the software development process by game theoretic analysis Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Product Focused Software, (93-96)
  62. ACM
    Humayun A, Basit W, Farrukh G, Lodhi F and Aden R An empirical analysis of team review approaches for teaching quality software development Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1, (567-575)
  63. Tassé J, Madhavji N and Azad A Techniques for merging views of software processes Graph transformations and model-driven engineering, (441-472)
  64. Capra E, Francalanci C and Merlo F (2010). The economics of community open source software projects, Advances in Software Engineering, 2010, (1-17), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010.
  65. Hüsig S and Kohn S (2009). Computer aided innovation-State of the art from a new product development perspective, Computers in Industry, 60:8, (551-562), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2009.
  66. Markopoulos E, Bouzoukou N, Alexopoulos G and Bilbao J Software project volume sizing for tracking software intensive investments and business initiatives Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on Mathematical methods and computational techniques in electrical engineering, (633-638)
  67. Punter T, Krikhaar R and Bril R (2009). Software engineering technology innovation - Turning research results into industrial success, Journal of Systems and Software, 82:6, (993-1003), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.
  68. Mishra D and Mishra A (2009). Simplified software inspection process in compliance with international standards, Computer Standards & Interfaces, 31:4, (763-771), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.
  69. ACM
    Hüner K, Ofner M and Otto B Towards a maturity model for corporate data quality management Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing, (231-238)
  70. ACM
    Sharma M and Chandwani M Maturing capability in unified paradigm Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control, (737-746)
  71. ACM
    Simonsson M, Lagerström R and Johnson P A Bayesian network for IT governance performance prediction Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Electronic commerce, (1-8)
  72. Gonzalez-Perez C and Henderson-Sellers B (2008). A work product pool approach to methodology specification and enactment, Journal of Systems and Software, 81:8, (1288-1305), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008.
  73. Markopoulos E, Panayiotopoulos J, Bilbao J, Makatsoris C, Samaras G and Stoilov T Project management process framework for developing and IT systems Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on Computers, (44-50)
  74. ACM
    Becker A, Prikladnicki R and Audy J Strategic alignment of software process improvement programs using QFD Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Business impact of process improvements, (9-14)
  75. ACM
    Liu Z, Guo Z, Qian K, Wei H and Zhang N (2008). UNDER DEVELOPMENTUCD in Chinese IT enterprises, Interactions, 15:3, (68-70), Online publication date: 1-May-2008.
  76. Niño J (2008). Software engineering team studios, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 23:4, (59-65), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008.
  77. ACM
    Glass R (2008). Managing for innovation, Communications of the ACM, 51:3, (17-18), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008.
  78. Maibaum T Challenges in software certification Proceedings of the formal engineering methods 9th international conference on Formal methods and software engineering, (4-18)
  79. Maibaum T Challenges in Software Certification Formal Methods and Software Engineering, (4-18)
  80. Pries-Heje J and Krohn M Organizing improvement work Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Software Process Improvement, (94-105)
  81. Savolainen P, Sihvonen H and Ahonen J SPI with lightweight software process modeling in a small software company Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Software Process Improvement, (71-81)
  82. Krikhaar R and Mermans M Software development improvement with SFIM Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, (65-80)
  83. Simidchieva B, Clarke L and Osterweil L Representing process variation with a process family Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Software process, (109-120)
  84. Chang C and Chu C (2007). Defect prevention in software processes, Journal of Systems and Software, 80:4, (559-570), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2007.
  85. Iivari J and Huisman M (2007). The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of systems development methodologies, MIS Quarterly, 31:1, (35-58), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2007.
  86. Tarhan A and Demirörs O Investigating suitability of software process and metrics for statistical process control Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Software Process Improvement, (88-99)
  87. Börjesson A Simple indicators for tracking software process improvement progress Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Software Process Improvement, (74-87)
  88. Soini J, Tenhunen V and Tukiainen M Current practices of measuring quality in finnish software engineering industry Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Software Process Improvement, (100-110)
  89. ACM
    Bhat T and Nagappan N Evaluating the efficacy of test-driven development Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering, (356-363)
  90. Kindler E, Rubin V and Schäfer W Process mining and petri net synthesis Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Business Process Management Workshops, (105-116)
  91. Markopoulos E and Panayiotopoulos J An information systems acquisition management framework Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on Communications, (626-631)
  92. de Gusmão C and de Moura H Multiple risk management process supported by ontology Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, (462-465)
  93. Porres I and Valiente M Process definition and project tracking in model driven engineering Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, (127-141)
  94. ACM
    Wu J, Wang S, Chau C, Zeng L and Lin J Overseas development for a major U.S. eCommerce website Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, (632-635)
  95. ACM
    Komuro M Experiences of applying SPC techniques to software development processes Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, (577-584)
  96. ACM
    Boehm B A view of 20th and 21st century software engineering Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, (12-29)
  97. ACM
    Oza N Game theory perspectives on client Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Economics driven software engineering research, (49-54)
  98. ACM
    Wiredu G A framework for the analysis of coordination in global software development Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Global software development for the practitioner, (38-44)
  99. ACM
    Mishali O and Katz S Using aspects to support the software process Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, (169-179)
  100. ACM
    Armour P (2006). The operational executive sponsor, Communications of the ACM, 49:3, (15-18), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2006.
  101. Borjesson A (2006). Improve by improving software process improvers, International Journal of Business Information Systems, 1:3, (310-338), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2006.
  102. ACM
    Mookerjee R (2005). Maintaining enterprise software applications, Communications of the ACM, 48:11, (75-79), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005.
  103. Niazi M, Wilson D and Zowghi D (2005). A framework for assisting the design of effective software process improvement implementation strategies, Journal of Systems and Software, 78:2, (204-222), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005.
  104. Kutay C and Ali Babar M Teaching Three Quality Assurance Techniques in Tandem - Lessons Learned Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Quality Software, (307-312)
  105. Leonard A A conceptual framework for explaining the value of end user maturity levels for IT management Proceedings of the 2005 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries, (152-158)
  106. Markopoulos E and Panayiotopoulos J Selecting an information technology project management methodology based on project constraints, goals and dimensions Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Computers, (1-6)
  107. Jormanainen I and Sutinen E A Kids' Club Model for Innovation Creation between Business Life and School Students; the Intelligent Door Project Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, (30-32)
  108. ACM
    Koru A, Ozok A and Norcio A (2005). The effect of human memory organization on code reviews under different single and pair code reviewing scenarios, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30:4, (1-3), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005.
  109. ACM
    Jain A and Boehm B (2005). Developing a theory of value-based software engineering, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30:4, (1-5), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005.
  110. Ivarsson M, Pettersson F and Öhman P Improved control of automotive software suppliers Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, (358-369)
  111. Jönsson P and Wohlin C Understanding the importance of roles in architecture-related process improvement Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, (343-357)
  112. Dick A, Hull M and Jackson K (2005). Specifying process and measuring progress in terms of information state, Journal of Systems and Software, 76:3, (311-322), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2005.
  113. Beecham S, Hall T, Britton C, Cottee M and Rainer A (2005). Using an expert panel to validate a requirements process improvement model, Journal of Systems and Software, 76:3, (251-275), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2005.
  114. Li M Expanding the horizons of software development processes Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, (54-67)
  115. Sugahara K, Ogasawara H, Aoyama T and Higashi T Status of SPI activities in japanese software – a view from JASPIC Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, (498-506)
  116. Ge J, Hu H, Lu P, Hu H and Lü J Translation of nets within nets in cross-organizational software process modeling Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, (360-375)
  117. Harada A, Awane S, Inoya Y, Ohno O, Matsushita M, Kusumoto S and Inoue K Project management system based on work-breakdown-structure process model Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Unifying the Software Process Spectrum, (249-261)
  118. ACM
    Koru A, Ozok A and Norcio A The effect of human memory organization on code reviews under different single and pair code reviewing scenarios Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Human and social factors of software engineering, (1-3)
  119. ACM
    Jain A and Boehm B Developing a theory of value-based software engineering Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Economics-driven software engineering research, (1-5)
  120. Dyba T (2005). An Empirical Investigation of the Key Factors for Success in Software Process Improvement, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31:5, (410-424), Online publication date: 1-May-2005.
  121. Tan Y and Mookerjee V (2005). Comparing Uniform and Flexible Policies for Software Maintenance and Replacement, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31:3, (238-255), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.
  122. Bril R, Krikhaar R and Postma A (2005). Architectural support in industry: a reflection using C-POSH, Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 17:1, (3-25), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005.
  123. Moløkken-Østvold K and Jørgensen M (2004). Group Processes in Software Effort Estimation, Empirical Software Engineering, 9:4, (315-334), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.
  124. ACM
    Carleton L An invitation to the dance of progress Companion to the 19th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, (158-159)
  125. Harjumaa L, Tervonen I and Vuorio P Improving Software Inspection Process with Patterns Proceedings of the Quality Software, Fourth International Conference, (118-125)
  126. Iversen J, Mathiassen L and Nielsen P (2004). Managing risk in software process improvement, MIS Quarterly, 28:3, (395-433), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2004.
  127. Borjesson A and Mathiassen L (2004). Successful Process Implementation, IEEE Software, 21:4, (36-44), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2004.
  128. Jiang J, Klein G, Hwang H, Huang J and Hung S (2004). An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance, Information and Management, 41:3, (279-288), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004.
  129. Nidumolu S and Subramani M (2003). The Matrix of Control, Journal of Management Information Systems, 20:3, (159-196), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003.
  130. Jones C (2003). Variations in Software Development Practices, IEEE Software, 20:6, (22-27), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2003.
  131. Ol'khovich L and Koznov D (2003). OCL-Based Automated Validation Method for UML Specifications, Programming and Computing Software, 29:6, (323-327), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2003.
  132. ACM
    Shoemaker D, Jovanovic V and Drommi A A case for the study of software management within a broad information technology curriculum Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum, (174-179)
  133. ACM
    Müller M and Padberg F (2003). On the economic evaluation of XP projects, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 28:5, (168-177), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2003.
  134. ACM
    Müller M and Padberg F On the economic evaluation of XP projects Proceedings of the 9th European software engineering conference held jointly with 11th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (168-177)
  135. Ortega M, Pérez M and Rojas T (2003). Construction of a Systemic Quality Model for Evaluating a Software Product, Software Quality Journal, 11:3, (219-242), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2003.
  136. ACM
    Rajeswari K and Anantharaman R Development of an instrument to measure stress among software professionals Proceedings of the 2003 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Freedom in Philadelphia--leveraging differences and diversity in the IT workforce, (34-43)
  137. Beecham S, Hall T and Rainer A (2003). Software Process Improvement Problems in Twelve Software Companies, Empirical Software Engineering, 8:1, (7-42), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2003.
  138. Eickelmann N Achieving organizational IT goals through integrating the balanced scorecard and software measurement frameworks Technologies & methodologies for evaluating information technology in business, (32-56)
  139. Frederiksen H and Rose J (2003). The social construction of the software operation, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 15:1, (23-37), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2003.
  140. de Carvalho M, Laurindo F and de Paula Pessôa M Information technology project management to achieve efficiency in Brazilian companies Managing globally with information technology, (260-271)
  141. Sharon D Computer-aided software engineering (CASE) Encyclopedia of Computer Science, (278-282)
  142. Humphrey W (2002). Three Process Perspectives, Annals of Software Engineering, 14:1-4, (39-72), Online publication date: 10-Dec-2002.
  143. Lehman M and Ramil J (2002). Software Evolution and Software Evolution Processes, Annals of Software Engineering, 14:1-4, (275-309), Online publication date: 10-Dec-2002.
  144. Abrahamsson P (2002). Commitment Nets in Software Process Improvement, Annals of Software Engineering, 14:1-4, (407-438), Online publication date: 10-Dec-2002.
  145. Chillarege R (2002). The Marriage of Business Dynamics and Software Engineering, IEEE Software, 19:6, (43-49), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2002.
  146. Leonard A Enabling end users to be more efficient during systems development Proceedings of the 2002 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology, (156-162)
  147. Siakas K and Georgiadou E (2002). Empirical Measurement of the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Software Quality Management, Software Quality Journal, 10:2, (169-180), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2002.
  148. ACM
    Raffo D, Harrison W and Vandeville J Software process decision support Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, (803-809)
  149. Mookerjee V and Chiang I (2002). A dynamic coordination policy for software system construction, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28:7, (684-694), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2002.
  150. Conradi R and Fuggetta A (2002). Improving Software Process Improvement, IEEE Software, 19:4, (92-99), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2002.
  151. ACM
    Bergman M and Mark G Technology choice as a first step in design Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, (224-234)
  152. Baddoo N and Hall T (2002). Software Process Improvement Motivators, Empirical Software Engineering, 7:2, (93-114), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2002.
  153. Kusumoto S, Nishimatsu A, Nishie K and Inoue K (2002). Experimental Evaluation of Program Slicing for Fault Localization, Empirical Software Engineering, 7:1, (49-76), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002.
  154. Hailpern B and Santhanam P (2002). Software debugging, testing, and verification, IBM Systems Journal, 41:1, (4-12), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002.
  155. Hunt A and Thomas D (2002). Ubiquitous Automation, IEEE Software, 19:1, (11-13), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002.
  156. Parzinger M, Nath R and Lemons M (2001). Examining the Effect of the Transformational Leader on Software Quality, Software Quality Journal, 9:4, (253-267), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.
  157. Trienekens J, Kusters R and Van Solingen R (2001). Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Software Quality Journal, 9:4, (269-281), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.
  158. Hall T, Rainer A, Baddoo N and Beecham S An Empirical Study of Maintenance Issues within Process Improvement Programmes in the Software Industry Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'01)
  159. Kanoun K (2001). A Measurement-Based Framework for Software Reliability Improvement, Annals of Software Engineering, 11:1, (89-106), Online publication date: 7-Nov-2001.
  160. Balla K, Bemelmans T, Kusters R and Trienekens J (2001). Quality through Managed Improvement and Measurement (QMIM), Software Quality Journal, 9:3, (177-193), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2001.
  161. ACM
    Lehman M and Ramil J Evolution in software and related areas Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, (1-16)
  162. Abrahamsson P Commitment development in software process improvement Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, (71-80)
  163. Prechelt L and Unger B (2001). An Experiment Measuring the Effects of Personal Software Process (PSP) Training, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27:5, (465-472), Online publication date: 1-May-2001.
  164. Hastings T and Sajeev A (2001). A Vector-Based Approach to Software Size Measurement and Effort Estimation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27:4, (337-350), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001.
  165. Hernández-Orallo J and José Ramírez-Quintana M (2001). Predictive Software, Automated Software Engineering, 8:2, (139-166), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001.
  166. ACM
    Sukhodolsky J (2001). Optimizing software process control, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 26:2, (59-63), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2001.
  167. Schmidt R, Lyytinen K, Keil M and Cule P (2001). Identifying Software Project Risks, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17:4, (5-36), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2001.
  168. Bustard D (2001). Software Engineering Books for Desert Island Reading, Automated Software Engineering, 8:1, (121-123), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2001.
  169. Iivari J, Hirschheim R and Klein H (2000). A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches, Journal of Management Information Systems, 17:3, (179-218), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2000.
  170. ACM
    Blackburn J, Scudder G and Van Wassenhove L (2000). Concurrent software development, Communications of the ACM, 43:11es, (4-es), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2000.
  171. Jiang T and Coyner M Software Process Disturbances 24th International Computer Software and Applications Conference, (167-168)
  172. Nelson K, Armstrong D, Buche M and Ghods M (2000). Evaluating the CMM Level 3 KPA of Intergroup Coordination, Information Technology and Management, 1:3, (171-181), Online publication date: 14-Jul-2000.
  173. ACM
    Nishiyama T, Ikeda K and Niwa T Technology transfer macro-process Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering, (577-586)
  174. ACM
    Mizuno O, Kikuno T, Takagi Y and Sakamoto K Characterization of risky projects based on project managers' evaluation Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering, (387-395)
  175. ACM
    Fenton N and Neil M Software metrics Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, (357-370)
  176. ACM
    Müller H, Jahnke J, Smith D, Storey M, Tilley S and Wong K Reverse engineering Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, (47-60)
  177. ACM
    Countermine T and Pfeiffer P Implementing an IT concentration in a CS department Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, (275-279)
  178. Hanlon D, Spence M and Pfeiffer P Mixing Project Management and Distance Education Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training
  179. ACM
    Countermine T and Pfeiffer P (2000). Implementing an IT concentration in a CS department, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32:1, (275-279), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2000.
  180. Ropponen J and Lyytinen K (2000). Components of Software Development Risk, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26:2, (98-112), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2000.
  181. Hong J, Lee K, Bang E, Cho T and Lim T ASP (A Software Process) for Improving Software Process Proceedings of the Sixth Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference
  182. Krishnan M and Kellner M (1999). Measuring Process Consistency, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25:6, (800-815), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1999.
  183. ACM
    Miller J, Ferguson J and Murphy P Groupware support for asynchronous document review Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on Computer documentation, (185-192)
  184. Krishnan M, Mukhopadhyay T and Zubrow D (1999). Software Process Models and Project Performance, Information Systems Frontiers, 1:3, (267-277), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.
  185. Siakas K, Georgiadou E and Sadler C (1999). Software Quality Management from a Cross-Cultural Viewpoint, Software Quality Journal, 8:2, (85-95), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.
  186. Fenton N and Neil M (1999). A Critique of Software Defect Prediction Models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25:5, (675-689), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.
  187. Abrahamsson P (1999). Commitment to Software Process Improvement—Development of Diagnostic Tool to Facilitate Improvement, Software Quality Journal, 8:1, (63-76), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.
  188. Kuvaja P (1999). BOOTSTRAP 3.0—A SPICE1 Conformant Software Process Assessment Methodology, Software Quality Journal, 8:1, (7-19), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999.
  189. Middleton P (1999). Management of software engineering, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 12:2-5, (174-180), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1999.
  190. Macdonald F and Miller J (1999). A Comparison of Computer Support Systems for Software Inspection, Automated Software Engineering, 6:3, (291-313), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1999.
  191. ACM
    Swanson E IS maintainability Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, (164-173)
  192. Humphrey W (1999). Why don’t they practice what we preach?, Annals of Software Engineering, 6:1-4, (201-222), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1999.
  193. Mills E (1999). Metrics in the software engineering curriculum, Annals of Software Engineering, 6:1-4, (181-200), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1999.
  194. ACM
    Iversen J, Nielsen P and Norbjerg J (1999). Situated assessment of problems in software development, ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 30:2, (66-81), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1999.
  195. Sawyer P, Sommerville I and Viller S (1999). Capturing the Benefits of Requirements Engineering, IEEE Software, 16:2, (78-85), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1999.
  196. ACM
    Swanson E (1999). IS “maintainability”, ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 30:1, (65-76), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1999.
  197. ACM
    Brykczynski B (1999). A survey of software inspection checklists, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 24:1, (82), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1999.
  198. ACM
    Jarke M (1998). Requirements tracing, Communications of the ACM, 41:12, (32-36), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998.
  199. Porter A and Votta L (1998). Comparing Detection Methods For Software Requirements Inspections, Empirical Software Engineering, 3:4, (355-379), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998.
  200. Middleton P (1998). Software quality by administration, Software Quality Journal, 7:3/4, (261-275), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1998.
  201. Visconti M and Cook C (1998). Evolution of a maturity model – critical evaluation and lessons learned, Software Quality Journal, 7:3/4, (223-237), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1998.
  202. Parzinger M and Nath R (1998). TQM implementation factors for software development, Software Quality Journal, 7:3/4, (239-260), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1998.
  203. Johnson P and Tjahjono D (1998). Does Every Inspection Really Need a Meeting?, Empirical Software Engineering, 3:1, (9-35), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1998.
  204. ACM
    Dutta S, Van Wassenhove L and Kulandaiswamy S (1998). Benchmarking European software management practices, Communications of the ACM, 41:6, (77-86), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998.
  205. Regnell B, Beremark P and Eklundh O (1998). A market-driven requirements engineering process: Results from an industrial process improvement programme, Requirements Engineering, 3:2, (121-129), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998.
  206. Athey T (1998). Leadership Challenges for the Future, IEEE Software, 15:3, (72-77), Online publication date: 1-May-1998.
  207. April A, Abran A and Merlo E Process assurance audits Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (482-485)
  208. Fujiwara F, Goto T and Araki S Examples of applying software estimate tool Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (469-472)
  209. Kajko-Mattsson M A conceptual model of software maintenance Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (422-425)
  210. Mizuno O, Kikuno T, Inagaki K, Takagi Y and Sakamoto K Analyzing effects of cost estimation accuracy on quality and productivity Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (410-420)
  211. Jalote P and Haragopal M Overcoming the NAH syndrome for inspection deployment Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (371-378)
  212. Aoyama M Agile software process and its experience Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, (3-12)
  213. ACM
    Kaplan D, Krishnan R, Padman R and Peters J (1998). Assessing data quality in accounting information systems, Communications of the ACM, 41:2, (72-78), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1998.
  214. Van Genuchten M, Cornelissen W and Van Dijk C (1997). Supporting inspections with an electronic meeting system, Journal of Management Information Systems, 14:3, (165-178), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1997.
  215. Sweeney A and Bustard D (1997). Software process improvement, Software Quality Journal, 6:4, (265-274), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1997.
  216. Belli F and Crisan R Empirical Performance Analysis of Computer-Supported Code-Reviews Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering
  217. ACM
    Joeris G (1997). Change management needs integrated process and configuration management, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 22:6, (125-141), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1997.
  218. Joeris G Change management needs integrated process and configuration management Proceedings of the 6th European SOFTWARE ENGINEERING conference held jointly with the 5th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (125-141)
  219. Beirne M, Panteli A and Ramsay H (1997). Going soft on quality?, Software Quality Journal, 6:3, (195-209), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1997.
  220. Reiblein S and Symons A (1997). SPI, Software Quality Journal, 6:2, (89-98), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1997.
  221. Boldyreff C, Drost M, Hinley D, Morrell M and Symons A (1997). A basis for process improvement inapplication management, Software Quality Journal, 6:2, (99-111), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1997.
  222. Drake J Social Issues in the Collection and Use of Software Metric Data Position Paper Proceedings of the 21st International Computer Software and Applications Conference, (586-587)
  223. Aoyama M Agile Software Process model Proceedings of the 21st International Computer Software and Applications Conference, (454-459)
  224. ACM
    Cusumano M and Selby R (1997). How Microsoft builds software, Communications of the ACM, 40:6, (53-61), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1997.
  225. Porter A, Siy H, Toman C and Votta L (1997). An Experiment to Assess the Cost-Benefits of Code Inspections in Large Scale Software Development, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23:6, (329-346), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1997.
  226. ACM
    Houdek F and Kempter H (1997). Quality patterns—an approach to packaging software engineering experience, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 22:3, (81-88), Online publication date: 1-May-1997.
  227. ACM
    Houdek F and Kempter H Quality patterns—an approach to packaging software engineering experience Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Software reusability, (81-88)
  228. ACM
    Curtis B Software process improvement Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, (624-625)
  229. ACM
    Osterweil L Software processes are software too, revisited Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, (540-548)
  230. ACM
    Kusumoto S, Mizuno O, Kikuno T, Hirayama Y, Takagi Y and Sakamoto K A new software project simulator based on generalized stochastic Petri-net Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, (293-302)
  231. ACM
    Johnson P and Tjahjono D Assessing software review meetings Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, (118-127)
  232. ACM
    Stein M, Riedl J, Harner S and Mashayekhi V A case study of distributed, asynchronous software inspection Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, (107-117)
  233. Upchurch R and Sims-Knight J Designing process-based software curriculum Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training
  234. Habra N Peopleware Integration in an Evolving Software Engineering Curriculum Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training
  235. ACM
    Kelsey R (1997). Integrating a defect typology with containment metrics, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 22:2, (64-67), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997.
  236. Porter A and Johnson P (1997). Assessing Software Review Meetings, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23:3, (129-145), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997.
  237. Rozman I, Vajde Horvat R, Gyórkós J and Hericùko M (1997). PROCESSUS – Integration of SEI CMM and ISO quality models, Software Quality Journal, 6:1, (37-63), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1997.
  238. Fusaro P, Lanubile F and Visaggio G (1997). A Replicated Experiment to Assess Requirements InspectionTechniques, Empirical Software Engineering, 2:1, (39-57), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1997.
  239. Fayad M and Cline M (1996). Guest Editors' Introduction, Computer, 29:9, (26-31), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1996.
  240. Callahan J and Ramakrishnan S Software project management and measurement on the World-Wide-Web (WWW) Proceedings of the 5th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE'96)
  241. Troster J and Tian J Exploratory analysis tools for tree-based models in software measurement and analysis Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools (SAST '96)
  242. Arluk J, Michaely B and Ze'evi M SoftTrak Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Assessment of Software Tools (SAST '96)
  243. Madachy R System dynamics modeling of an inspection-based process Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Software engineering, (376-386)
  244. Humphrey W (1996). Using A Defined and Measured Personal Software Process, IEEE Software, 13:3, (77-88), Online publication date: 1-May-1996.
  245. Brown S, Wilde N and Carlin J A Software Maintenance Process Architecture Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Software Engineering Education
  246. ACM
    Casaday G and Rainis C Requirements, models, and prototypes for HCI design Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (361-362)
  247. Abreu F and Melo W Evaluating the Impact of Object-Oriented Design on Software Quality Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Software Metrics: From Measurement to Empirical Results
  248. ACM
    Hilburn T (1996). Inspections of formal specifications, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 28:1, (150-154), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1996.
  249. ACM
    Hilburn T Inspections of formal specifications Proceedings of the twenty-seventh SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, (150-154)
  250. ACM
    Kelsey R (1996). Bad fixes, change specifications, and linguistic constraints on problem diagnosis, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 21:2, (74-78), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1996.
  251. ACM
    Shoemaker D and Jovanovic V (1996). Educating software executives, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 21:2, (45-46), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1996.
  252. ACM
    Fayad M, Tsai W and Fulghum M (1996). Transition to object-oriented software development, Communications of the ACM, 39:2, (108-121), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1996.
  253. Morgan G and Lowry G Software Engineering Process Improvement Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Software Engineering: Education and Practice (SE:EP '96)
  254. Younessi H and Grant D Using the CMM to Evaluate Student SE Projects Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Software Engineering: Education and Practice (SE:EP '96)
  255. Thomas S, Hurley S and Barnes D Looking for the human factors in software quality management Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Software Engineering: Education and Practice (SE:EP '96)
  256. Ho-Stuart C and Thomas R Laboratory practice with software quality assurance Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Software Engineering: Education and Practice (SE:EP '96)
  257. Ramakrishnan S and Menzies T An Ongoing OO Software Engineering Measurement Experiment Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Software Engineering: Education and Practice (SE:EP '96)
  258. Rooijmans J, Aerts H and Van Genuchten M (1996). Software Quality in Consumer Electronics Products, IEEE Software, 13:1, (55-64), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1996.
  259. Wittman R Case tool integration and utilization within the joint theater level simulation (JTLS) Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation, (1147-1151)
  260. Deephouse C, Mukhopadhyay T, Goldenson D and Kellner M (1995). Software processes and project performance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12:3, (187-205), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1995.
  261. Li X A comparison-based approach for software inspection Proceedings of the 1995 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research
  262. ACM
    Vayda T (1995). Lessons from the battlefield, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 30:10, (439-452), Online publication date: 17-Oct-1995.
  263. ACM
    Vayda T Lessons from the battlefield Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, (439-452)
  264. ACM
    Porter A, Siy H, Toman C and Votta L (1995). An experiment to assess the cost-benefits of code inspections in large scale software development, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 20:4, (92-103), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1995.
  265. ACM
    Porter A, Siy H, Toman C and Votta L An experiment to assess the cost-benefits of code inspections in large scale software development Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (92-103)
  266. Nidumolu S (1995). The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance, Information Systems Research, 6:3, (191-219), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1995.
  267. ACM
    Henninger S (1995). Developing domain knowledge through the reuse of project experiences, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 20:SI, (186-195), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1995.
  268. ACM
    Henninger S Developing domain knowledge through the reuse of project experiences Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Software reusability, (186-195)
  269. Porter A, Votta L and Basili V (1995). Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21:6, (563-575), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1995.
  270. ACM
    Allen C (1995). Succeeding as a clandestine change agent, Communications of the ACM, 38:5, (81-86), Online publication date: 1-May-1995.
  271. ACM
    Stiglic B, Heričko M and Rozman I (1995). How to evaluate object-oriented software development?, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 30:5, (3-10), Online publication date: 1-May-1995.
  272. ACM
    Henninger S, Lappala K and Raghavendran A An organizational learning approach to domain analysis Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering, (95-104)
  273. ACM
    Cook J and Wolf A Automating process discovery through event-data analysis Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering, (73-82)
  274. ACM
    Sumner M Factors influencing the success of computer-assisted software engineering Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGCPR conference on Supporting teams, groups, and learning inside and outside the IS function reinventing IS, (148-155)
  275. Sumner M (1995). Factors Influencing the Success of Computer-Assisted Software Engineering, Information Resources Management Journal, 8:2, (25-31), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1995.
  276. ACM
    Mashayekhi V, Feulner C and Riedl J (1994). CAIS, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 19:5, (21-34), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1994.
  277. ACM
    Mashayekhi V, Feulner C and Riedl J CAIS Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (21-34)
  278. Jones C (1994). Globalization of Software Supply and Demand, IEEE Software, 11:6, (17-24), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1994.
  279. Raz T and Yaung A Inspection effectiveness in software development Proceedings of the 1994 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research
  280. Raffo D Capturing software process and product characteristics in process models using task element decomposition Proceedings of the 1994 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research
  281. Bradac M, Perry D and Votta L (1994). Prototyping a Process Monitoring Experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20:10, (774-784), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1994.
  282. Joos R (1994). Software Reuse at Motorola, IEEE Software, 11:5, (42-47), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1994.
  283. Bhandari I and Biyani S On the role of statistical significance in exploratory data analysis Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, (61-72)
  284. ACM
    Gossain S (1994). Using the Shlaer-Mellor method to support a level 4 software process, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 19:3, (69-74), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1994.
  285. Brodman J and Johnson D What small business and small organizations say about the CMM Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, (331-340)
  286. Yu E and Mylopoulos J Understanding “why” in software process modelling, analysis, and design Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, (159-168)
  287. Johnson P An instrumented approach to improving software quality through formal technical review Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, (113-122)
  288. Porter A and Votta L An experiment to assess different defect detection methods for software requirements inspections Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering, (103-112)
  289. ACM
    Mathiassen L and Sørensen C Managing CASE introduction Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations, (242-251)
  290. ACM
    Sullivan S (1994). Reciprocal peer reviews, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 26:1, (314-318), Online publication date: 12-Mar-1994.
  291. ACM
    Collofello J, Kantipudi M and Kanko M (1994). Assessing the software process maturity of software engineering courses, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 26:1, (16-20), Online publication date: 12-Mar-1994.
  292. ACM
    Sullivan S Reciprocal peer reviews Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education, (314-318)
  293. ACM
    Collofello J, Kantipudi M and Kanko M Assessing the software process maturity of software engineering courses Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education, (16-20)
  294. ACM
    Votta L Does every inspection need a meeting? Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering, (107-114)
  295. ACM
    Okamura K Combining local negotiation and global planning in cooperative software development projects Proceedings of the conference on Organizational computing systems, (239-249)
  296. ACM
    Votta L (1993). Does every inspection need a meeting?, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 18:5, (107-114), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1993.
  297. Bhandari I, Halliday M, Tarver E, Brown D, Chaar J and Chillarege R (1993). A Case Study of Software Process Improvement During Development, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19:12, (1157-1170), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1993.
  298. Chaar J, Halliday M, Bhandari I and Chillarege R (1993). In-Process Evaluation for Software Inspection and Test, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19:11, (1055-1070), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1993.
  299. Vander Wiel S and Votta L (1993). Assessing Software Designs Using Capture-Recapture Methods, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19:11, (1045-1054), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1993.
  300. Yaung A and Raz T Linkage metrics for process reengineering Proceedings of the 1993 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research: software engineering - Volume 1, (356-370)
  301. Raffo D Evaluating the impact of process improvements quantitatively using process modeling Proceedings of the 1993 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research: software engineering - Volume 1, (290-313)
  302. ACM
    Klingler C A case study in process definition Proceedings of the conference on TRI-Ada '93, (65-79)
  303. ACM
    Hefley W (1993). The Cobbler's children, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 18:4, (19-25), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1993.
  304. Bhandari I Attribute focusing Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, (61-69)
  305. Lai R (1993). The Move to Mature Processes, IEEE Software, 10:4, (14-17), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1993.
  306. Dion R (1993). Process Improvement and the Corporate Balance Sheet, IEEE Software, 10:4, (28-35), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1993.
  307. Paulk M, Curtis B, Chrissis M and Weber C (1993). Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, IEEE Software, 10:4, (18-27), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1993.
  308. ACM
    Fischer S, Achterberg J and Vinig T Identifying different paradigms for managing information technology Proceedings of the 1993 conference on Computer personnel research, (37-55)
  309. Rubin H Software process maturity Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, (468-476)
  310. Brown A An examination of the current state of IPSE technology Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, (338-347)
  311. Tamai T and Itou A Requirements and design change in large-scale software development Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, (167-176)
  312. Bradac M, Perry D and Votta L Prototyping a process monitoring experiment Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, (155-165)
  313. Bhandari I and Roth N Post-process feedback with and without attribute focusing Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, (89-98)
  314. Kitson D and Masters S An analysis of SEI software process assessment results: 1987–1991 Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Software Engineering, (68-77)
  315. ACM
    Grant D (1992). Object-orientation and Ada, ACM SIGPLAN OOPS Messenger, 4:2, (299-302), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1993.
  316. Banker R, Kauffman R and Zweig D (1993). Repository Evaluation of Software Reuse, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19:4, (379-389), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1993.
  317. ACM
    Grimm J, Lamont G and Terzuoli A A parallelized search strategy for solving a multicriteria aircraft routing problem Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/SIGAPP symposium on Applied computing: states of the art and practice, (570-577)
  318. ACM
    Yaung A A linkage analyzer for process management Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/SIGAPP symposium on Applied computing: states of the art and practice, (215-221)
  319. Abdel-Hamid T (1993). Adapting, Correcting, and Perfecting Software Estimates, Computer, 26:3, (20-29), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1993.
  320. ACM
    Brykczynski B and Wheeler D (1993). An annotated bibliography on software inspections, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 18:1, (81-88), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1993.
  321. ACM
    Loy P (1993). The method won't save you, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 18:1, (30-34), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1993.
  322. ACM
    Grant D Object-orientation and Ada Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications (Addendum), (299-302)
  323. Sanyal S, Aida K, Gaitanos K, Wowk G and Lahiri S Defect tracking and reliability modeling for a new product release Proceedings of the 1992 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research - Volume 1, (409-422)
  324. Holt R, Penny D and Mancoridis S Multicolour programming and metamorphic programming Proceedings of the 1992 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research - Volume 1, (43-58)
  325. ACM
    Iivari J and Ervasti I (1992). The impact of alternative IS acquisition strategies upon IS success, ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel, 14:1-2, (45-59), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1992.
  326. ACM
    Walsh J (1992). Preliminary defect data from the iterative development of a large C++ program (experience report), ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 27:10, (178-183), Online publication date: 31-Oct-1992.
  327. ACM
    Walsh J Preliminary defect data from the iterative development of a large C++ program (experience report) Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, (178-183)
  328. Yeh R (1992). Notes on Concurrent Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 4:5, (407-414), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1992.
  329. ACM
    Krasner H, Terrel J, Linehan A, Arnold P and Ett W (1992). Lessons learned from a software process modeling system, Communications of the ACM, 35:9, (91-100), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1992.
  330. ACM
    Curtis B, Kellner M and Over J (1992). Process modeling, Communications of the ACM, 35:9, (75-90), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1992.
  331. ACM
    Lantzy M Application of statistical process control to the software process Proceedings of the ninth Washington Ada symposium on Ada: Empowering software users and developers, (113-123)
  332. ACM
    Eick S, Loader C, Long M, Votta L and Vander Wiel S Estimating software fault content before coding Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering, (59-65)
  333. ACM
    Iivari J and Ervasti I The impact of alternative IS acquisition options upon the IS implementation and success Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, (338-349)
  334. ACM
    Licker P Setting quality sights on HR management in IS Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, (109-116)
  335. ACM
    Bechtold R Software engineering process support based on fuzzy imploding Petri nets Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM Southeast Regional Conference, (312-319)
  336. ACM
    Scott G (1992). Can software engineering afford to improve the process?, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 17:2, (39-42), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1992.
  337. ACM
    Huff C (1992). Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget, Communications of the ACM, 35:4, (45-54), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1992.
  338. ACM
    van Reeken A (1992). Some notes on program design, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 17:1, (42), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1992.
  339. ACM
    Mogilensky J Tutorial Introduction to Ada: Tri-Ada '91 Tutorial, (491-527)
  340. ACM
    Mogilensky J Process maturity as a guide to phased Ada adoption Proceedings of the eighth annual Washington Ada symposium & summer SIGAda meeting on Ada: software: foundation for competitveness, (16-23)
  341. Bush M Process assessments in NASA Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering, (299-304)
  342. Curtis B Techies as non-technological factors in software engineering? Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering, (147-148)
  343. Kellner M, Curtis B, DeMarco T, Kishida K, Schlumberger M and Tully C Non-technological issues in software engineering Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering, (144-146)
  344. Humphrey W, Kitson D and Gale J A comparison of U.S. and Japanese software process maturity Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering, (38-49)
  345. ACM
    Sprague K (1991). The role of software configuration management in a measurement-based software engineering program, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 16:2, (62-66), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1991.
  346. Singpurwalla N (1991). Determining an Optimal Time Interval for Testing and Debugging Software, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17:4, (313-319), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1991.
  347. ACM
    Ford G (1991). The SEI undergraduate curriculum in software engineering, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 23:1, (375-385), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1991.
  348. ACM
    Ford G The SEI undergraduate curriculum in software engineering Proceedings of the twenty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, (375-385)
  349. Humphrey W and Singpurwalla N (1991). Predicting (Individual) Software Productivity, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 17:2, (196-207), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1991.
  350. ACM
    Gross R and Umphress D Software engineering as a radical novelty Proceedings of the conference on TRI-ADA '90, (501-507)
  351. ACM
    Reifer D SoftCost-Ada Proceedings of the conference on TRI-ADA '90, (472-482)
  352. ACM
    Anderson J Technology insertion Proceedings of the seventh Washington Ada symposium on Ada, (163-171)
  353. ACM
    Mogilensky J Approaches to upgrading software process maturity Proceedings of the seventh Washington Ada symposium on Ada, (23-28)
Contributors
  • Carnegie Mellon University

Reviews

Judy Marian Myerson

The concept of organization maturity emerged in early 1990's in the software development industry. It departs from the old concepts of software maturity that fail to consider the impacts of organizational and management styles on software development. Humphrey's basic purpose is to show that software engineering can be a more effective method of turning chaotic software development into a more controlled and manageable process. The book fulfills its purpose by presenting a framework and some techniques for evaluating and improving the process of developing software rather than presenting a specific set of solutions. The framework is embodied in a model of the SEI Software Process Maturity. It refers to the maturity of a software organization in improving a process of developing a product. The focus is shifted from fixing problems to preventing them. The book grew out of work at the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University on a U.S. Air Force project. It could be used as an optional text in a graduate software engineering course, although exercises are absent. Another possibility is the use of the book as a tutorial or reference for software engineering and computer personnel. The book is divided into 20 chapters and three appendices. The chapters are grouped into five parts, each of which are identified with a separate facet of the software process improvement. Each book part is introduced with a brief overview and contains chapter summaries. Part I discusses a model of five levels of software process maturity, and covers the first level: the Initial Process. The software developmental at this stage is semi-chaotic. It provides an opportunity for automated approach for development and implementation of software process changes. In Part II, the Repeatable Process looks at plans for repeating the project successes. A set of predefined process procedures could be used as templates for several approaches to software development. Part III describes the qualitative characteristics of the software development in the Defined Process. Process definitions are built from the standardization of development activities in the software process. They can be used to tailor the procedures specific to a process activity. In the part on the Managed Process, quantitative methods, such as data gathering and analyses, are emphasized. They are used to measure quality of the product and the process by which the product is developed. The book ends with a discussion on the Optimizing Process. The emphasis is placed on the quantitative basis for continued capital investment in process automation and improvement. New ideas and technologies may be used in quantitative feedback. Appendix A provides a software process maturity framework. It is presented here to provide a broader perspective on the improvement needs of software organization. In it, fifteen arbitrary categories of software process improvement actions are grouped into four major topics: organization, project management, process management and technology. The typography, and illustrations are good. The book length and index appear to be adequate. The references at the end of each chapter are interesting and up to date. This book is a reference in Edward Yourdan's, "Decline and Fall of American Programmer," which looks at the implications of the model. Overall, Humphrey's book opens a door to further discussions on software engineering processes.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Recommendations