[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/4479.4487guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Separating the polynomial-time hierarchy by oracles

Published: 23 October 1985 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)An Algorithmic Approach to Uniform Lower BoundsProceedings of the conference on Proceedings of the 38th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.35(1-26)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2023)New Sampling Lower Bounds via the SeparatorProceedings of the conference on Proceedings of the 38th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.26(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2018)On the complexity of the cayley semigroup membership problemProceedings of the 33rd Computational Complexity Conference10.5555/3235586.3235611(1-12)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Michael Sipser

This paper solves a long standing, open question by establishing the existence of an oracle separating the union of the polynomial time hierarchy from polynomial space. It further states without proof an extension of this result to obtain an oracle separating all of the levels of the polynomial time hierarchy. The core of this result is an exponential lower bound on the size of constant depth Boolean circuits for computing the parity function. The connection between this circuit size lower bound and the oracle existence question had been previously shown by Furst, Saxe, and Sipser [1]. However, their merely superpolynomial lower bound was not strong enough. Yao's improvement on this result incorporates ideas from this and other previous papers, most notably Boppana's exponential lower bound for monotone circuits [2]. The central point is to analyze the way a function is likely to be simplified by randomly pre-setting a large random subset of its variables. Yao's analysis is deep and intricate. The presentation is well written and thorough, though the complexity of the argument is daunting. Very recently, Hastad (at MIT) has further tightened and greatly simplified Yao's proof [3].

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Proc. 26th annual symposium on Foundations of computer science
October 1985
552 pages
ISBN:0818606444

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 23 October 1985

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)An Algorithmic Approach to Uniform Lower BoundsProceedings of the conference on Proceedings of the 38th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.35(1-26)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2023)New Sampling Lower Bounds via the SeparatorProceedings of the conference on Proceedings of the 38th Computational Complexity Conference10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2023.26(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2018)On the complexity of the cayley semigroup membership problemProceedings of the 33rd Computational Complexity Conference10.5555/3235586.3235611(1-12)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2018
  • (2017)Tight bounds on the Fourier spectrum of AC0Proceedings of the 32nd Computational Complexity Conference10.5555/3135595.3135610(1-31)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2017
  • (2017)Bounded independence plus noise fools productsProceedings of the 32nd Computational Complexity Conference10.5555/3135595.3135609(1-30)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2017
  • (2017)Open Problems ColumnACM SIGACT News10.1145/3106700.310670748:2(34-39)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2017
  • (2017)A polynomial restriction lemma with applicationsProceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3055399.3055470(615-628)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2017
  • (2016)Super-linear gate and super-quadratic wire lower bounds for depth-two and depth-three threshold circuitsProceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/2897518.2897636(633-643)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2016
  • (2015)On randomness extraction in AC0Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Computational Complexity10.5555/2833227.2833257(601-668)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2015
  • (2015)Majority is incompressible by AC0[p] circuitsProceedings of the 30th Conference on Computational Complexity10.5555/2833227.2833234(124-157)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media