[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/3378680.3378762acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Second language tutoring using social robots: a large-scale study

Published: 10 January 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We present a large-scale study of a series of seven lessons designed to help young children learn English vocabulary as a foreign language using a social robot. The experiment was designed to investigate 1) the effectiveness of a social robot teaching children new words over the course of multiple interactions (supported by a tablet), 2) the added benefit of a robot's iconic gestures on word learning and retention, and 3) the effect of learning from a robot tutor accompanied by a tablet versus learning from a tablet application alone. For reasons of transparency, the research questions, hypotheses and methods were preregistered. With a sample size of 194 children, our study was statistically well-powered. Our findings demonstrate that children are able to acquire and retain English vocabulary words taught by a robot tutor to a similar extent as when they are taught by a tablet application. In addition, we found no beneficial effect of a robot's iconic gestures on learning gains.

References

[1]
T. Belpaeme, J. Kennedy, A. Ramachandran, B. Scassellati, and F. Tanaka, "Social robots for education: A review," Science Robotics, vol. 3, no. 21, p. eaat5954, 2018.
[2]
I. Leite, M. McCoy, M. Lohani, D. Ullman, N. Salomons, C. Stokes, S. Rivers, and B. Scassellati, "Emotional Storytelling in the Classroom: Individual versus Group Interaction between Children and Robots." ACM Press, 2015, pp. 75--82.
[3]
T. Belpaeme, P. Vogt, R. Van den Berghe, K. Bergmann, T. Göksun, M. De Haas, J. Kanero, J. Kennedy, A. C. Küntay, O. Oudgenoeg-Paz et al., "Guidelines for designing social robots as second language tutors," International Journal of Social Robotics, pp. 1--17, 2018.
[4]
T. Kanda, T. Hirano, D. Eaton, and H. Ishiguro, "Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial," J Hum Comp Interact, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 61--84, 2004.
[5]
S. Lee, H. Noh, J. Lee, K. Lee, G. G. Lee, S. Sagong, and M. Kim, "On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning," ReCALL, vol. 23, no. 01, pp. 25--58, 2011.
[6]
J. K. Westlund and C. Breazeal, "The Interplay of Robot Language Level with Children's Language Learning during Storytelling." ACM Press, 2015, pp. 65--66.
[7]
D. Leyzberg, S. Spaulding, M. Toneva, and B. Scassellati, "The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains," in Proc of the 34th Annual Conf of the Cognitive Science Society, 2012.
[8]
K. VanLehn, "The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems," Educational Psychologist, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 197--221, 2011.
[9]
M. Saerbeck, T. Schut, C. Bartneck, and M. D. Janse, "Expressive Robots in Education: Varying the Degree of Social Supportive Behavior of a Robotic Tutor," in Proc of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2010, pp. 1613--1622.
[10]
J. Kennedy, P. Baxter, E. Senft, and T. Belpaeme, "Social Robot Tutoring for Child Second Language Learning," in Proc of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2016, pp. 67--74.
[11]
J. de Wit, T. Schodde, B. Willemsen, K. Bergmann, M. de Haas, S. Kopp, E. Krahmer, and P. Vogt, "The effect of a robot's gestures and adaptive tutoring on children's acquisition of second language vocabularies," in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2018, pp. 50--58.
[12]
K. Dautenhahn, "Human-robot interaction," The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed., 2013.
[13]
P. Baxter, J. Kennedy, E. Senft, S. Lemaignan, and T. Belpaeme, "From characterising three years of HRI to methodology and reporting recommendations," in The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 2016, pp. 391--398.
[14]
I. Leite, C. Martinho, and A. Paiva, "Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey," International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 291--308, 2013.
[15]
L. M. Marulis and S. B. Neuman, "The Effects of Vocabulary Intervention on Young Children's Word Learning: A Meta-Analysis," Rev Educ Res, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 300--335, 2010.
[16]
G. Gordon, S. Spaulding, J. K. Westlund, J. J. Lee, L. Plummer, M. Martinez, M. Das, and C. Breazeal, "Affective Personalization of a Social Robot Tutor for Childrens Second Language Skills," in Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
[17]
J. R. Movellan, M. Eckhardt, M. Virnes, and A. Rodriguez, "Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills," in Proc of the 4th ACM/IEEE Int Conf on Human-Robot Interaction, 2009, pp. 307--308.
[18]
H. H. Clark, Using Language. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[19]
G. Pezzulo, L. W. Barsalou, A. Cangelosi, M. H. Fischer, K. McRae, and M. Spivey, "Computational grounded cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 3, p. 612, 2013.
[20]
A. M. Glenberg, "Embodiment for education," Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach, pp. 355--372, 2008.
[21]
D. McNeill, Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago press, 1992.
[22]
M. Tomasselo and J. Todd, "Joint attention and lexical acquisition style," First Lang, vol. 4, pp. 197--212, 1983.
[23]
M. Tellier, "The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children," Gestures in Language Development, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 219--235, 2008.
[24]
M. Macedonia and K. von Kriegstein, "Gestures enhance foreign language learning," Biolinguistics, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 393--416, 2012.
[25]
M. Macedonia, K. Bergmann, and F. Roithmayr, "Imitation of a pedagogical agents gestures enhances memory for words in second language," Science Journal of Education, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 162--169, 2014.
[26]
S. D. Kelly, T. McDevitt, and M. Esch, "Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language," Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 313--334, 2009.
[27]
B. Irfan, J. Kennedy, S. Lemaignan, F. Papadopoulos, E. Senft, and T. Belpaeme, "Social psychology and human-robot interaction: An uneasy marriage," in Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2018, pp. 13--20.
[28]
G.-Z. Yang, J. Bellingham, P. E. Dupont, P. Fischer, L. Floridi, R. Full, N. Jacobstein, V. Kumar, M. McNutt, R. Merrifield et al., "The grand challenges of science robotics," Science Robotics, vol. 3, no. 14, p. eaar7650, 2018.
[29]
J. Kennedy, S. Lemaignan, C. Montassier, P. Lavalade, B. Irfan, F. Papadopoulos, E. Senft, and T. Belpaeme, "Child Speech Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: Evaluations and Recommendations," in Proc of the 12th ACM/IEEE Int Conf on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2017, pp. 82--90.
[30]
J. Kanero, O. E. Demir-Lira, S. Koskulu, G. Oranç, I. Franko, A. C. Küntay, and T. Göksun, "How do robot gestures help second language learning?" in Earli SIG 5 Abstract book, 2018.
[31]
L. M. Dunn, L. M. Dunn, and L. Schlichting, Peabody picture vocabulary test-III-NL. Amsterdam: Pearson, 2005.
[32]
H. Mulder, H. Hoofs, J. Verhagen, I. van der Veen, and P. P. M. Leseman, "Psychometric properties and convergent and predictive validity of an executive function test battery for two-year-olds," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, p. 733, 2014.
[33]
S. Chiat, "Non-word repetition," in Methods for assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment,. N. M. E. S. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong, Ed. Bristol: Multilingualism Matters, 2015, pp. 227--250.
[34]
C. Zaga, M. Lohse, K. P. Truong, and V. Evers, "The effect of a robots social character on childrens task engagement: Peer versus tutor," in International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 2015, pp. 704--713.
[35]
C. D. Wallbridge, S. Lemaignan, and T. Belpaeme, "Qualitative review of object recognition techniques for tabletop manipulation," in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction. ACM, 2017, pp. 359--363.
[36]
J. Kennedy, P. Baxter, and T. Belpaeme, "The robot who tried too hard: Social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning," in Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE International conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2015, pp. 67--74.
[37]
T. Schodde, K. Bergmann, and S. Kopp, "Adaptive Robot Language Tutoring Based on Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and Predictive Decision-Making," in Proc of the 12th ACM/IEEE Int Conf on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2017.
[38]
J. Kory Westlund, L. Dickens, S. Jeong, P. Harris, D. DeSteno, and C. Breazeal, "A comparison of children learning new words from robots, tablets, & people," in Proceedings of the 1st Int Conf on Social Robots in Therapy and Education, 2015.
[39]
J.-A. Mondria and B. Wiersma, "Receptive, productive, and receptive+ productive l2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make," Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 79--100, 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Have I Got the Power? Analysing and Reporting Statistical Power in HRIACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/349524611:2(1-16)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Non-Dyadic Interaction: A Literature Review of 15 Years of Human-Robot Interaction Conference PublicationsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/348824211:2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '19: Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2019
812 pages
ISBN:9781538685556

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • IEEE-RAS: Robotics and Automation

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 10 January 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. child-robot interaction
  2. gesture
  3. long-term interaction
  4. robots for learning
  5. second language tutoring

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Have I Got the Power? Analysing and Reporting Statistical Power in HRIACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/349524611:2(1-16)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Non-Dyadic Interaction: A Literature Review of 15 Years of Human-Robot Interaction Conference PublicationsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/348824211:2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media