[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

When to arrive at a queue with earliness, tardiness and waiting costs

Published: 01 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We consider a queueing facility where customers decide when to arrive. All customers have the same desired arrival time (w.l.o.g.time zero). There is one server, and the service times are independent and exponentially distributed. The total number of customers that demand service is random, and follows the Poisson distribution. Each customer wishes to minimize the sum of three costs: earliness, tardiness and waiting. We assume that all three costs are linear with time and are defined as follows. Earliness is the time between arrival and time zero, if there is any. Tardiness is simply the time of entering service, if it is after time zero. Waiting time is the time from arrival until entering service. We focus on customers rational behavior, assuming that each customer wants to minimize his total cost, and in particular, we seek a symmetric Nash equilibrium strategy. We show that such a strategy is mixed, unless trivialities occur. We construct a set of equations that its solution provides the symmetric Nash equilibrium. The solution is a continuous distribution on the real line. We also compare the socially optimal solution (that is, the one that minimizes total cost across all customers) to the overall cost resulting from the Nash equilibrium.

References

[1]
J. Breinbjerg, Equilibrium arrival times to queues with general service times and non-linear utility functions, European J. Oper. Res., 261 (2017) 595-605.
[2]
M. Haviv, When to arrive at a queue with tardiness costs, Perform. Eval., 70 (2013) 387-399.
[3]
N. Shimkin, S. Juneja, The concert queueing game: strategic arrivals with waiting and tardiness costs, Queueing Syst., 74 (2013) 369-402.
[4]
R. Jain, S. Juneja, The concert/cafeteria queuing problem: a game of arrivals, in: Proceeding of the Fourth International ICST Conference on Performance Evaluation on Performance Methodology, ACM, Pisa, Italy, 2009.
[5]
L. Ravner, Equilibrium arrival times to a queue with order penalties, European J. Oper. Res., 239 (2014) 456-468.
[6]
W.S. Vickrey, Congestion theory and transport investment, Amer. Econ. Rev., 59 (1969) 251-260.
[7]
N. Shimkin, S. Juneja, R. Jain, The concert/cafeteria queuing problem: to wait or to be late, Discrete Event Dyn. Syst., 21 (2011) 103-138.
[8]
A. Glazer, R. Hassin, L. Ravner, Equilibrium and efficient clustering of arrival times to a queue Archive, 2017. (https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04776).
[9]
R. Hassin, A. Glazer, ?/m/1: on the equilibrium distribution of customer arrivals, European J. Oper. Res., 13 (1983) 146-175.
[10]
Y. Kleiner, R. Hassin, Equilibrium and optimal arrival patterns to a server with opening and closing times, IIE Trans., 43 (2011) 164-175.
[11]
H. Honnappa, R. Jain, Strategic arrivals into queueing networks: the network queueing game, Oper. Res., 63 (2014) 247-259.
[12]
J. Breinbjerg, A. Sebald, L.P. Sterdal, Strategic behavior and social outcomes in a bottleneck queue: experimental evidence, Rev. Econ. Des., 20 (2016) 207-236.
[13]
D.A. Seale, J.E. Parco, W.E. Stein, A. Rapoport, Joining a queue or staying out: effects of information structure and service time on arrival and staying out decisions, Exp. Econ., 8 (2005) 117-144.
[14]
W.E. Stein, A. Rapoport, D.A. Seale, D.A. Zhang, R. Zwick, Batch queues with choice of arrivals: equilibrium analysis and experimental study, Games Econom. Behav., 59 (2007) 345-363.
[15]
A. Rapopot, A. Stein, W.E. Parco, D.A. Seale, Equilibrium play in single-server queues with endogenously determined arrival times, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 55 (2004) 67-91.
[16]
J. McMillan, P. McAfee, Auctions with a stochastic number of bidders, J. Econom. Theory, 43 (1987) 1-19.
[17]
I. Milchtaich, M. Haviv, Auctions with a random number of identical bidders, Econom. Lett., 144 (2012) 143-146.
[18]
O. Kella, M. Haviv, Y. Kerner, Equilibrium strategies in queues based on time or index of arrival, Probab. Engrg. Inform. Sci., 24 (2010) 13-25.
[19]
T. Platz, L.P. Sterdal, The curse of the first-in-first-out queue discipline, Games Econom. Behav., 104 (2017) 165-176.
[20]
A. Lago, C.F. Daganzo, Spillovers, Merging traffic and the morning commute, Transp. Res. B, 41 (2007) 670-683.
[21]
A. Lago, C.F. Daganzo, Information and time-of-usage decisions in the bottleneck model with stochastic capacity and demand, Eur. Econ. Rev., 43 (1999) 525-548.
[22]
H. Ostubo, A. Rapoport, Vickreys model of traffic congestion discretized, Transp. Res. B, 42 (2008) 873-889.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A survey of queueing systems with strategic timing of arrivalsQueueing Systems: Theory and Applications10.1007/s11134-021-09717-899:1-2(163-198)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2021
  1. When to arrive at a queue with earliness, tardiness and waiting costs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Performance Evaluation
    Performance Evaluation  Volume 117, Issue C
    December 2017
    62 pages

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

    Netherlands

    Publication History

    Published: 01 December 2017

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)A survey of queueing systems with strategic timing of arrivalsQueueing Systems: Theory and Applications10.1007/s11134-021-09717-899:1-2(163-198)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2021

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media