article

Investigating information systems with action research

Author:

Richard L. BaskervilleAuthors Info & Claims

Communications of the AIS, Volume 2, Issue 3es

Pages 4 - es

Published: 01 November 1999 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

References

[1]

Argyris, C., R. Putnam and D. Smith. (1985) Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention, San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

Google Scholar

[2]

Argyris, C. and D. Schon. (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Google Scholar

[3]

Argyris, C. and D. Schon. (1991) "Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared." in W. F. Whyte, (ed.) Participatory Action Research, Newbury Park, N.J.: Sage, pp. 85-96.

Google Scholar

[4]

Baskerville, R. (1993) "Semantic Database Prototypes," Journal of Information Systems, (3) 2, pp. 119-144.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

Baskerville, R. (1997) "Distinguishing Action Research From Participative Case Studies," Journal of Systems and Information Technology, (1) 1, pp. 25 - 45.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[6]

Baskerville, R. and A. Lee. (1999) "Distinctions Among Different Types of Generalizing in Information Systems Research." in O. Ngwenyama et al., (eds.) New IT Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Baskerville, R. and J. Pries-Heje. (1999) "Grounded Action Research: A Method For Understanding IT in Practice," Accounting, Management and Information Technology, (9), pp. 1-23.

Google Scholar

[8]

Baskerville, R. and A. T. Wood-Harper. (1996) "A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research," Journal of Information Technology, (11) 3, pp. 235-246.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[9]

Baskerville, R. and A. T. Wood-Harper. (1998) "Diversity in Information Systems Action Research Methods," European Journal of Information Systems, (7) 2, pp. 90-107.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Berger, P. and T. Luckmann. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge., New York: Anchor Press.

Google Scholar

[11]

Blum, F. (1955) "Action research--A scientific approach?," Philosophy of Science, (22) 1, pp. 1-7.

Google Scholar

[12]

Checkland, P. (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, UK: J. Wiley.

Google Scholar

[13]

Checkland, P. and S. Holwell. (1998) Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of The Field, Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[14]

Checkland, P. and J. Scholes. (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Practice, Chichester, UK: J. Wiley.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

Clark, P. (1972) Action Research and Organizational Change, London: Harper & Row.

Google Scholar

[16]

Elden, M. and R. F. Chisholm. (1993) "Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue," Human Relations, (46) 2, pp. 121- 142.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[17]

Halfpenny, P. (1979) "The Analysis of Qualitative Data," Sociological Review, (27), pp. 799-827.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[18]

Hult, M. and S. Lennung. (1980) "Towards A Definition of Action Research: A Note and Bibliography," Journal of Management Studies, (17), pp. 241-250.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[19]

Jepsen, L., L. Mathiassen and P. Nielsen. (1989) "Back To The Thinking Mode: Diaries for The Management of Information Systems Development Projects," Behaviour and Information Technology, (8) 3, pp. 207-217.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[20]

Kant, I. (1908) "The Critique of Pure Reason (1781)." in B. Rand, (ed.) Modern Classical Philosophers, Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 370-456.

Google Scholar

[21]

Keen, P. (1991) "Relevance and Rigor in Information Systems Research: Improving Quality, Confidence Cohesion and Impact." in H.-E. Nissen, H. Klein, and R. Hirschheim, (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 27-49.

Google Scholar

[22]

Kubr, M. (1986) Management Consulting: A Guide to the Profession 2nd Ed., Geneva: International Labour Office.

Google Scholar

[23]

Lau, F. (1997) "A Review On The Use of Action Research in Information Systems Studies." in A. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J. DeGross, (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 31-68.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

Lewin, K. (1947a) "Frontiers in Group Dynamics," Human Relations, (1) 1, pp. 5-41.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[25]

Lewin, K. (1947b) "Frontiers in Group Dynamics II," Human Relations, (1) 2, pp. 143-153.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[26]

Lippitt, G. and R. Lippit. (1978) The Consulting Process In Action, San Diego, CA: University Associates.

Google Scholar

[27]

Mumford, E. and M. Weir. (1979) Computer Systems Work Design: The ETHICS Method, London: Associated Business Press.

Google Scholar

[28]

Peters, M. and V. Robinson. (1984) "The Origins and Status of Action Research," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, (20) 2, pp. 113-124.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[29]

Rapoport, R. (1970) "Three Dilemmas of Action Research," Human Relations, (23) 6, pp. 499-513.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[30]

Sanford, N. (1976) "Whatever Happened to Action Research?" in A.Clark, (ed.) Experimenting with Organizational Life: The Action Research Approach., New York: Plenum, pp. 11-18.

Google Scholar

[31]

Schein, E. (1969) Process Consultation: Its Role in Organizational Development, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Google Scholar

[32]

Susman, G. and R. Evered. (1978) "An Assessment of The Scientific Merits of Action Research," Administrative Science Quarterly, (23) 4, pp. 582- 603.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[33]

Trist, E. (1976) "Engaging with Large-scale Systems." in A. Clark, (ed.) Experimenting with Organizational Life: The Action Research Approach, New York: Plenum, pp. 43-75.

Google Scholar

[34]

von Foerster, H. (1984) "Principles of Self-Organization -- In a Socio- Managerial Context." in H. Ulrich and G. J. B. Probst, (eds.) Self-Organization and Management of Social Systems: Insights, Promises, Doubts and Questions, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 2-24.

Google Scholar

[35]

Warmington, A. (1980) "Action Research: Its Method and Its Implications," Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, (7) 4, pp. 23-39.

Google Scholar

[36]

Westfall, R.D. (1999) "An IS Research Relevance Manifesto" Communications of the Association for Information Systems (2)14, September http://cais.isworld.org/contents.asp (Current as of 30 September 1999)

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[37]

Whyte, W. F., D. J. Greenwood and P. Lazes. (1991) "Participatory Action Research: Through Practice to Science in Social Research." in W. F. Whyte, (ed.) Participatory Action Research, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 19-55.

Google Scholar

[38]

Wood-Harper, T. (1985) "Research Methods in Information Systems: Using Action Research." in E. Mumford et al., (eds.) Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 169-191.

Google Scholar

[39]

Wood-Harper, T. (1989) "Comparison of Information Systems Definition Methodologies: An Action Research Multiview Perspective. University of East Anglia Ph.D. Thesis.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[40]

Wood-Harper, T., L. Antill and D. E. Avison. (1985) Information Systems Definition: The Multiview Approach, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Nguyen T(2023)Developing health information systems in developing countriesThe Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries10.1002/isd2.1226889:5Online publication date: 10-Sep-2023
Benfell A(2021)Modeling functional requirements using tacit knowledge: a design science research methodology informed approachRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-020-00330-426:1(25-42)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00766-020-00330-4
Skargren F(2020)What is the point of benchmarking e-government? An integrative and critical literature review on the phenomenon of benchmarking e-governmentInformation Polity10.3233/IP-19013125:1(67-89)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/IP-190131
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Symbolic action research in information systems: introduction to the special issue

This special issue introduction explores the need to study information systems as symbolic action systems, defines broadly the research domain and related assumptions, notes the origins of this perspective, articulates its key lines of study, and ...
Negotiation in information systems action research
ISCNZ '96: Proceedings of the 1996 Information Systems Conference of New Zealand (ISCNZ '96)

The paper discusses the gradual negotiation process involved in the resolution of the initiative dilemma of IS action research. This dilemma occurs when the researcher faces the decision to either take the initiative to define an opportunity for ...
Emerging Action Research Traditions: Rigor in Practice

The authors argue here that contemporary use of action research shares the exploratory, inductive nature of many qualitative research approaches-no matter the type of data collected-because the type of research problems studied are set in complex, ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Communications of the AIS Volume 2, Issue 3es

Nov. 1999

286 pages

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Information Systems

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 1999

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

76
Total Citations
View Citations
8,317
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Nguyen T(2023)Developing health information systems in developing countriesThe Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries10.1002/isd2.1226889:5Online publication date: 10-Sep-2023
Benfell A(2021)Modeling functional requirements using tacit knowledge: a design science research methodology informed approachRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-020-00330-426:1(25-42)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00766-020-00330-4
Skargren F(2020)What is the point of benchmarking e-government? An integrative and critical literature review on the phenomenon of benchmarking e-governmentInformation Polity10.3233/IP-19013125:1(67-89)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/IP-190131
Alami ANielsen PWa̧sowski A(2020)A tailored participatory action research for foss communitiesEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-020-09849-025:5(3639-3670)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-020-09849-0
Weir CBecker INoble JBlair LSasse MRashid ASharp HWhalen M(2019)Interventions for software securityProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00013(41-50)Online publication date: 27-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00013
Gennari RMelonio ARizvi M(2019)Turn taking with turn-talk in groupMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-018-7090-278:10(13461-13487)Online publication date: 1-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11042-018-7090-2
Durcikova ALee ABrown S(2018)Making rigorous research relevantMIS Quarterly10.25300/MISQ/2018/1414642:1(241-263)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.25300/MISQ/2018/14146
Ahmadi MWeibert AOgonowski CAal KGäckle KMarsden NWulf VMarsden NWulf VRode JWeibert A(2018)Challenges and lessons learned by applying living labs in gender and IT contextsProceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT10.1145/3196839.3196878(239-249)Online publication date: 14-May-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3196839.3196878
Fiorini SSewell ABumbalough MChauhan PShepard LRehrey GGroth DPardo ABartimote-Aufflick KLynch GShum SFerguson RMerceron AOchoa X(2018)An application of participatory action research in advising-focused learning analyticsProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge10.1145/3170358.3170387(89-96)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3170358.3170387
Huttunen HKlakegg Svan Berkel NVisuri AFerreira DHalonen R(2017)Understanding elderly careProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services10.1145/3151759.3151835(390-394)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3151759.3151835
Show More Cited By

Abstract

References

Cited By

Recommendations

Symbolic action research in information systems: introduction to the special issue

Negotiation in information systems action research

Emerging Action Research Traditions: Rigor in Practice

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations