Beyond the User: Mapping Subject Positions for Robots in Public Spaces
Pages 163 - 173
Abstract
The concept of the "user'' is central to research in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Drawing on the field studies of functional service robots in public spaces, the paper contributes a conceptual framework for describing positions and roles humans can take beyond being robot users. We rely on the concept of "subject position'' from Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) to map out people beyond users into three ecologies: Service, Street Life, and Public Discourse. Through the lens of these ecologies, we highlight how people encounter the robot as (i) an actor in service provision, (ii) a (social and material) actor moving with other members of the street, and (iii) a matter of public concern. The paper contributes a vocabulary for describing the diverse roles of humans and offers methodological suggestions for more holistic research and design of HRI. Further, we outline disciplinary and ethical considerations relating to designing with ecologies in mind.
References
[1]
H. R. Lee, E. Cheon, C. Lim, and K. Fischer, ''Configuring Humans: What Roles Humans Play in HRI Research,'' in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '22. Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan: IEEE Press, Mar. 2022, pp. 478--492.
[2]
K. Winkle, E. Lagerstedt, I. Torre, and A. Offenwanger, ''15 years of (who)man robot interaction: Reviewing the h in human-robot interaction,'' J. Hum.-Robot Interact., vol. 12, no. 3, apr 2023. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3571718
[3]
J. E. Martinez, D. VanLeeuwen, B. B. Stringam, and M. R. Fraune, ''Hey?! what did you think about that robot? groups polarize users' acceptance and trust of food delivery robots,'' in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 417--427. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576984
[4]
H. Huttenrauch and K. Eklundh, ''To help or not to help a service robot,'' in The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. Millbrae, CA, USA: IEEE, 2003, p. 379--384. (Online). Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1251875/
[5]
A. Weiss, J. Igelsbock, M. Tscheligi, A. Bauer, K. Kuhnlenz, D. Wollherr, and M. Buss, ''Robots asking for directions - the willingness of passers-by to support robots,'' in 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Osaka: IEEE, Mar. 2010, p. 23--30. (Online). Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5453273/
[6]
F. Babel, J. Kraus, and M. Baumann, ''Findings From A Qualitative Field Study with An Autonomous Robot in Public: Exploration of User Reactions and Conflicts,'' International Journal of Social Robotics, 2022. (Online). Available: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12369-022-00894-x
[7]
A. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, D. Sirkin, A. Abrams, and L. Platte, ''The forgotten in hri: Incidental encounters with robots in public spaces,'' in Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 656--657. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3374852
[8]
H. R. M. Pelikan, S. Reeves, and M. N. Cantarutti, ''Encountering Autonomous Robots on Public Streets,'' in Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE International conference on Human-robot interaction - HRI'24. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), mar 2024, pp. 561--571. (Online). Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3610977.3634936
[9]
A. F. T. Winfield, S. Booth, L. A. Dennis, T. Egawa, H. Hastie, N. Jacobs, R. I. Muttram, J. I. Olszewska, F. Rajabiyazdi, A. Theodorou, M. A. Underwood, R. H. Wortham, and E. Watson, ''IEEE P7001: A Proposed Standard on Transparency,'' Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 8, Jul. 2021, publisher: Frontiers. (Online). Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/10.3389/frobt.2021.665729/full
[10]
J. Forlizzi, ''The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture,'' International Journal of design, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008.
[11]
J. Bardzell and S. Bardzell, ''The user reconfigured: on subjectivities of information,'' in Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives, ser. CA '15. Aarhus N: Aarhus University Press, Aug. 2015, pp. 133--144. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21298
[12]
E. P. S. Baumer and J. R. Brubaker, ''Post-userism,'' in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI '17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, May 2017, pp. 6291--6303. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025740
[13]
J. Scholtz, ''Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions,'' in 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the, Jan. 2003, pp. 10 pp.--. (Online). Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1174284
[14]
J. Sung, R. E. Grinter, and H. I. Christensen, ''Domestic robot ecology: An initial framework to unpack long-term acceptance of robots at home,'' International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 2, pp. 417--429, 2010.
[15]
J. Forlizzi and C. DiSalvo, ''Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home,'' in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, 2006, pp. 258--265.
[16]
B. Cagiltay and B. Mutlu, ''Toward family-robot interactions: A family-centered framework in hri,'' in Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Boulder CO USA: ACM, Mar. 2024, p. 76--85. (Online). Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634976
[17]
E. Hornecker, A. Krummheuer, A. Bischof, and M. Rehm, ''Beyond dyadic HRI: building robots for society,'' interactions, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 48--53, 2022, publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.
[18]
L. Tian, P. Carreno-Medrano, A. Allen, S. Sumartojo, M. Mintrom, E. Coronado Zuniga, G. Venture, E. Croft, and D. Kulic, ''Redesigning human-robot interaction in response to robot failures: a participatory design methodology,'' in Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI EA '21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3443440
[19]
W. A. Rogers, T. Kadylak, and M. A. Bayles, ''Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human--Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults,'' Human Factors, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 441--450, May 2022, publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211037465
[20]
S. Bødker, ''When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges,'' in Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, ser. NordiCHI '06. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Oct. 2006, pp. 1--8. (Online). Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1182475.1182476
[21]
S. Lazem, D. Giglitto, M. S. Nkwo, H. Mthoko, J. Upani, and A. Peters, ''Challenges and Paradoxes in Decolonising HCI: A Critical Discussion,'' Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 159--196, Jun. 2022. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-021-09398-0
[22]
N. Sambasivan, E. Cutrell, K. Toyama, and B. Nardi, ''Intermediated technology use in developing communities,'' in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI'10. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010, p. 2583--2592. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753718
[23]
K. Spiel, O. Keyes, A. M. Walker, M. A. DeVito, J. Birnholtz, E. Brulé, A. Light, P. Barlas, J. Hardy, A. Ahmed, J. A. Rode, J. R. Brubaker, and G. Kannabiran, ''Queer(ing) hci: Moving forward in theory and practice,'' in Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI EA '19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, p. 1--4. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3311750
[24]
K. Spiel and R. Angelini, ''Expressive bodies engaging with embodied disability cultures for collaborative design critiques,'' in Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ser. ASSETS '22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3551350
[25]
L. Augustin, S. Pfrang, A. Wolffram, and C. Beyer, ''The value of the non-user: Developing (non-)user profiles for the development of a robot vacuum with the use of the (non-)persona,'' Proceedings of the Design Society, vol. 1, pp. 3131--3140, Aug. 2021.
[26]
A. Dobrosovestnova, R. Vetter, and A. Weiss, ''Identity and Community Matter(s): Exploring Socio-cultural Dimensions of Functional Service Robots Acceptance in Public Spaces,'' in 2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), Aug. 2024, pp. 2139--2146, iSSN: 1944--9437. (Online). Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10731405
[27]
A. Dobrosovestnova and A. Weiss, ''What we learn on the streets: Situated human-robot interactions from an industry perspective,'' in Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 407--411. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3610978.3640753
[28]
A. Dobrosovestnova, I. Schwaninger, and A. Weiss, ''With a little help of humans. an exploratory study of delivery robots stuck in snow,'' in 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1023--1029.
[29]
M. Waqas, Z. L. B. Hamzah, and N. A. M. Salleh, ''Customer experience: a systematic literature review and consumer culture theorybased conceptualisation,'' Management Review Quarterly, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 135--176, Feb. 2021. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00182-w
[30]
J. Clarke, J. Newman, N. Smith, E. Vidler, and L. Westmarland, Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services. SAGE, Jan. 2007.
[31]
B. Brewer, ''Citizen or customer? Complaints handling in the public sector,'' International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 549--556, Dec. 2007, publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307083457
[32]
P. Ekman, R. D. Raggio, and S. M. Thompson, ''Service network value co-creation: Defining the roles of the generic actor,'' Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 56, pp. 51--62, 2016.
[33]
S. L. Vargo and R. F. Lusch, ''A service-dominant logic for marketing,'' in The SAGE handbook of marketing theory. London, UK: SAGE Publication Ltd, 2009, pp. 219--234. (Online). Available: https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=4913713&publisher=FZ7200#page=238
[34]
S. Jinxing, L. Qinxin, W. Zi Ye, and C. M. Jiang, ''Autonomous bus services: current research status and future recommendations,'' Digital Transportation and Safety, vol. 2, no. DTS-2023-0019, p. 229, 2023. (Online). Available: http://www.maxapress.com/article/doi/10.48130/D TS-2023-0019
[35]
J. Seibt, C. Vestergaard, and M. F. Damholdt, ''Sociomorphing, not anthropomorphizing: towards a typology of experienced sociality,'' in Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics. IOS Press, 2020, pp. 51--67.
[36]
B. Chun and H. Knight, ''The Robot Makers: An Ethnography of Anthropomorphism at a Robotics Company,'' ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1--36, Jul. 2020. (Online). Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3377343
[37]
L. Ryave and J. N. Schenkein, Notes on the art of walking. Middlesex, England: Penguin Education, 1974, p. 265--274.
[38]
A. Deppermann, E. Laurier, L. Mondada, M. Broth, J. Cromdal, E. De Stefani, P. Haddington, L. Levin, M. Nevile, and M. Rauniomaa, ''Overtaking as an interactional achievement: video analyses of participants' practices in traffic,'' Gesprächsforschung, vol. 19, p. 1--131, 2018.
[39]
P. McIlvenny, M. Broth, and P. Haddington, ''Moving together: Mobile formations in interaction,'' Space and Culture, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 104--106, May 2014. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/120633121350 8679http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1206331213508679
[40]
P. McIlvenny, ''Vélomobile formations-in-action: Biking and talking together,'' Space and Culture, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 137--156, May 2014. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508494
[41]
J. A. Oravec, ''Rage against robots: Emotional and motivational dimensions of anti-robot attacks, robot sabotage, and robot bullying,'' Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 189, p. 122249, Apr. 2023. (Online). Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522007703
[42]
V. B. Chi, S. Mehrotra, T. Misu, and K. Akash, ''Should i help a delivery robot? cultivating prosocial norms through observations,'' in Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI EA '24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650855
[43]
D. Weinberg, H. Dwyer, S. E. Fox, and N. Martelaro, ''Sharing the Sidewalk: Observing Delivery Robot Interactions with Pedestrians during a Pilot in Pittsburgh, PA,'' Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, vol. 7, no. 5, 2023. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7050053
[44]
S. Thellman, E. Marsja, A. Anund, and T. Ziemke, ''Will It Yield? Expectations on Automated Shuttle Bus Interactions With Pedestrians and Bicyclists,'' in HRI'23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2023, pp. 292--296.
[45]
S. Thellman, F. Babel, and T. Ziemke, ''Cycling with Robots : How Long-Term Interaction Experience with Automated Shuttle Buses Shapes Cyclist Attitudes,'' in HRI '24 Companion, March 11--14, 2024, Boulder, CO, USA interaction, 2024.
[46]
A. Dobrosovestnova, R. Vetter, and A. Weiss, ''Attitudes towards social robots (asor): Revisiting the scale with four types of robots,'' in Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '24. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 402--406. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3610978.3640573
[47]
A. Weiss, N. Mirnig, R. Buchner, F. Förster, and M. Tscheligi, ''Transferring human-human interaction studies to HRI scenarios in public space,'' in IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 6947 LNCS, no. PART 2. Springer Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 230--247. (Online). Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978--3--642--23771--3_18
[48]
B. Latour, ''Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,'' Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225--248, Jan. 2004, publisher: The University of Chicago Press. (Online). Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/421123
[49]
M. Callon, ''Elaborating the notion of performativity,'' Le Libellio d'AEGIS, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 18, 2009. (Online). Available: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-00460877
[50]
E. Ackerman, ''My Fight With a Sidewalk Robot,'' Nov. 2019. (Online). Available: https://ncdj.org/2019/11/my-fight-with-a-sidewalk-robot/
[51]
D. Burema, ''A critical analysis of the representations of older adults in the field of human--robot interaction,'' AI & SOCIETY, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 455--465, Jun. 2022. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01205-0
[52]
K. Nader, P. Toprac, S. Scott, and S. Baker, ''Public understanding of artificial intelligence through entertainment media,'' AI & SOCIETY, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 713--726, Apr. 2024. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01427-w
[53]
J. Koebler, ''Food Delivery Robot Casually Drives Under Police Tape, Through Active Crime Scene,'' Sep. 2022. (Online). Available: https://www.vice.com/en/article/food-delivery-robot-casually-drives-under-police-tape-through-active-crime-scene/
[54]
Reuters, ''Waymo robotaxi accident with San Francisco cyclist draws regulatory review,'' Reuters, Feb. 2024. (Online). Available: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/driverless-waymo-car-hits-cyclist-san-francisco-causes-minor-scratches-2024-02-07/
[55]
''Urban Robotics Foundation - is your city ready for robots?'' (Online). Available: https://www.urbanroboticsfoundation.org
[56]
''Accessibility & Inclusion at Starship.'' (Online). Available: https://www.starship.xyz/accessibility/
[57]
M. François, F. Osiurak, A. Fort, P. Crave, and J. Navarro, ''Usability and acceptance of truck dashboards designed by drivers: Two participatory design approaches compared to a user-centered design,'' International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 81, p. 103073, Jan. 2021. (Online). Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814120306636
[58]
H. Z. Han, F. M. Li, A. Baca-Vazquez, D. Byrne, N. Martelaro, and S. E. Fox, ''Co-design Accessible Public Robots: Insights from People with Mobility Disability, Robotic Practitioners and Their Collaborations,'' Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, may 2024. (Online). Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642875
[59]
''Road Traffic Act--Riigi Teataja.'' (Online). Available: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/515072022005/consolide
[60]
S. C. Connect, ''Toronto Bans Automated Robots From Sidewalk Operation Until Further Study,'' Jan. 2022. (Online). Available: https://smartcitiesconnect.org/toronto-bans-automated-robots-from-sidewalk-operation-until-further-study/
[61]
A. M. H. Abrams, P. S. C. Dautzenberg, C. Jakobowsky, S. Ladwig, and A. M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, ''A theoretical and empirical reflection on technology acceptance models for autonomous delivery robots,'' in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 272--280. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444662
[62]
E. Schneiders, S. Benford, A. Chamberlain, C. Mancini, S. Castle-Green, V. Ngo, J. Row Farr, M. Adams, N. Tandavanitj, and J. Fischer, ''Designing multispecies worlds for robots, cats, and humans,'' in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2024, pp. 1--16.
[63]
M. Colley, M. Walch, J. Gugenheimer, A. Askari, and E. Rukzio, ''Towards inclusive external communication of autonomous vehicles for pedestrians with vision impairments,'' in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1--14.
[64]
M. Arvola, M. Forsblad, M. Wiberg, and H. Danielsson, ''Autonomous Vehicles for Children with Mild Intellectual Disability: Perplexity, Curiosity, Surprise, and Confusion,'' in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, no. 23. New York, NY, USA: ACM, sep 2023, pp. 1-- 8. (Online). Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605655.3605688
[65]
X. Z. Tan, M. Vázquez, E. J. Carter, C. G. Morales, and A. Steinfeld, ''Inducing Bystander Interventions during Robot Abuse with Social Mechanisms,'' ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 169--177, 2018.
[66]
H. Song and A. M. Rosenthal-Von der Pütten, ''Can you let me go? Exploring Delivery Robots' Verbal Response to Physical Bullying and its Impact on Perceived Safety, Comfort, Acceptability, and Existence Acceptance by Co-Present Individuals,'' in ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE Computer Society, mar 2024, pp. 994--998. (Online). Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640582
[67]
T. Williams, ''The eye of the robot beholder: Ethical risks of representation, recognition, and reasoning over identity characteristics in human-robot interaction,'' in Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 1--10. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580031
[68]
K. Winkle, D. McMillan, M. Arnelid, K. Harrison, M. Balaam, E. Johnson, and I. Leite, ''Feminist human-robot interaction: Disentangling power, principles and practice for better, more ethical hri,'' in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 72--82. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576973
[69]
T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn, ''A survey of socially interactive robots,'' Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 143--166, Mar. 2003. (Online). Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092188900200372X
[70]
M. A. Goodrich and A. C. Schultz, ''Human--Robot Interaction: A Survey,'' Foundations and Trends® in Human--Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 203--275, Jan. 2008, publisher: Now Publishers, Inc. (Online). Available: https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/HCI-005
[71]
M. Stickdorn and J. Schneider, This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[72]
E. Baraldi, G. L. Gregori, and A. Perna, ''Network evolution and the embedding of complex technical solutions: The case of the Leaf House network,'' Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 838--852, Aug. 2011. (Online). Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001985011100068X
[73]
B. Madadi, R. Van Nes, M. Snelder, and B. Van Arem, ''Optimizing Road Networks for Automated Vehicles with Dedicated Links, Dedicated Lanes, and Mixed-Traffic Subnetworks,'' Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 8853583, 2021. (Online). Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1155/2021/8853583
[74]
N. E. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, ''User-technology relationships: Some recent developments,'' in Handbook for Social Studies of Science. MIT press, 2007, pp. 541--567.
[75]
W. Xu, M. J. Dainoff, L. Ge, and Z. Gao, ''Transitioning to human interaction with ai systems: New challenges and opportunities for hci professionals to enable human-centered ai,'' International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 494--518, 2023.
[76]
A. Johnson, S. Dey, H. Nguyen, M. Groth, S. Joyce, L. Tan, N. Glozier, and S. B. Harvey, ''A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being,'' Australian Journal of Management, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 402--424, 2020. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220922292
[77]
W. J. Orlikowski, ''Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work,'' Organization Studies, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1435--1448, Sep. 2007, publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
[78]
J. A. Vertesi, A. Goldstein, D. Enriquez, L. Liu, and K. T. Miller, ''Pre-Automation: Insourcing and Automating the Gig Economy,'' Sociologica, pp. 167--193, Jan. 2021, artwork Size: 167--193 Pages Publisher: Sociologica. (Online). Available: https://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/11657
[79]
N. Carrillo and S. Martínez, ''Scientific Inquiry: From Metaphors to Abstraction,'' Perspectives on Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 233--261, Apr. 2023. (Online). Available: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00571
[80]
S. Wyatt, ''Technological determinism is dead; long live technological determinism,'' The handbook of science and technology studies, vol. 3, pp. 165--180, 2008.
Index Terms
- Beyond the User: Mapping Subject Positions for Robots in Public Spaces
Recommendations
Beyond the Individual: The Contextual Wheel of Practice as a Research Framework for Sustainable HCI
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAddressing human impact on the environment by focusing on shared everyday practices, rather than just individual behavior is an approach that shows promise. However, it can be challenging to put this approach into concrete use, especially in teams ...
Using a Service Lens to Better Understand Practices –and Vice Versa
AbstractMany studies of practices involve service exchange, and many service researchers have discovered the central role that sociotechnical practices play in service –in particular, within the service-dominant logic school of thought. In this paper, we ...
Quantitative Falsification for Qualitative Findings: Falsifying an Ethnographic Theory of American Public Discourse on Nuclear Waste With Text Mining in R
How can ethnographic theories that are qualitative and interpretive in nature also be scientific? This article puts forth an illustrative answer: It employs quantitative text mining methods to falsify prior findings reached largely through qualitative ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2025
2069 pages
- General Chairs:
- Wafa Johal,
- Séverin Lemaignan,
- Program Chairs:
- Dražen Brščić,
- Marynel Vázquez,
- Vicky Charisi
Sponsors
Publisher
IEEE Press
Publication History
Published: 04 March 2025
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 1Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in