[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/3463952.3464158acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Solver Agent: Towards Emotional and Opponent-Aware Agent for Human-Robot Negotiation

Published: 03 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Negotiation is one of the crucial processes for resolving conflicts between parties. In automated negotiation, agent designers mostly take opponent's offers and the remaining time into account while designing their strategies. While designing a negotiating agent interacting with a human directly, other information such as opponent's emotional changes during the negotiation can establish a better interaction and reach an admissible settlement for joint interests. Accordingly, this paper proposes a bidding strategy for humanoid robots, which incorporates their opponents' emotional states and awareness of the agent's changing behavior.

References

[1]
Reyhan Aydougan, Tim Baarslag, Koen V. Hindriks, Catholijn M. Jonker, and Pinar Yolum. 2013. Heuristic-Based Approaches for CP-Nets in Negotiation. In Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions, Takayuki Ito, Minjie Zhang, Valentin Robu, and Tokuro Matsuo (Eds.). Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 435. Springer, 113--123.
[2]
Reyhan Aydougan, Onur Keskin, and Umut cCakan. 2020. Let's negotiate with Jennifer! Towards a Speech-based Human-Robot Negotiation. In Advances in Automated Negotiations, T. Ito, R. Aydoug an, and M. Zhang (Eds.). Springer, 3--16.
[3]
Tim Baarslag, Reyhan Aydougan, Koen V. Hindriks, Katsuhide Fuijita, Takayuki Ito, and Catholijn M. Jonker. 2015. The Automated Negotiating Agents Competition, 2010--2015. AI Magazine, Vol. 36, 4 (December 2015), 115--118.
[4]
Dave de Jonge and Carles Sierra. 2015. NB(3): a multilateral negotiation algorithm for large, non-linear agreement spaces with limited time. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst., Vol. 29, 5 (2015), 896--942.
[5]
Paul Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 6, 3--4 (1992), 169--200.
[6]
Peyman Faratin, Carles Sierra, and Nick R Jennings. 1998. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 24, 3--4 (1998), 159--182.
[7]
Shaheen Fatima, Sarit Kraus, and Michael Wooldridge. 2014. Principles of automated negotiation .Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Galit Haim, Ya'akov (Kobi) Gal, Michele Gelfand, and Sarit Kraus. 2012. A cultural sensitive agent for human-computer negotiation. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2012, Valencia, Spain, June 4--8, 2012 (3 Volumes), Wiebe van der Hoek, Lin Padgham, Vincent Conitzer, and Michael Winikoff (Eds.). IFAAMAS, 451--458.
[9]
Koen V. Hindriks, Catholijn M. Jonker, and Dmytro Tykhonov. 2011. Let's dans! An analytic framework of negotiation dynamics and strategies. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, Vol. 9, 4 (2011), 319--335.
[10]
Shogo Kawaguchi, Katsuhide Fujita, and Takayuki Ito. 2012. AgentK: Compromising strategy based on estimated maximum utility for automated negotiating agents. In New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. Springer, 137--144.
[11]
Jamy Li. 2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 77 (2015), 23--37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001
[12]
Shan Li and Weihong Deng. 2019. Reliable Crowdsourcing and Deep Locality-Preserving Learning for Unconstrained Facial Expression Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 28, 1 (2019), 356--370.
[13]
Raz Lin and Sarit Kraus. 2010. Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Commun. ACM, Vol. 53, 1 (2010), 78--88.
[14]
Johnathan Mell and Jonathan Gratch. 2016. IAGO: Interactive Arbitration Guide Online (Demonstration). In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, Singapore, May 9--13, 2016, Catholijn M. Jonker, Stacy Marsella, John Thangarajah, and Karl Tuyls (Eds.). ACM, 1510--1512.
[15]
J. Mell, J. Gratch, R. Aydo?an, T. Baarslag, and C. M. Jonker. 2019. The Likeability-Success Tradeoff: Results of the 2nd Annual Human-Agent Automated Negotiating Agents Competition. In 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). 1--7.
[16]
Johnathan Mell, Jonathan Gratch, Tim Baarslag, Reyhan Aydougan, and Catholijn M. Jonker. 2018. Results of the First Annual Human-Agent League of the Automated Negotiating Agents Competition. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA 2018, Sydney, NSW, Australia, November 05-08, 2018, Anton Bogdanovych, Deborah Richards, Simeon Simoff, Catherine Pelachaud, Dirk Heylen, and Tomas Trescak (Eds.). ACM, 23--28.
[17]
Noam Peled, Ya'akov (Kobi) Gal, and Sarit Kraus. 2015. A study of computational and human strategies in revelation games. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Vol. 29, 1 (2015), 73--97.
[18]
Marco Perugini, Marcello Gallucci, Fabio Presaghi, and Anna Ercolani. 2003. The Personal Norm of Reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, Vol. 17 (07 2003), 251 -- 283. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.474
[19]
Davide Pietroni, Gerben A Van Kleef, Carsten KW De Dreu, and Stefano Pagliaro. 2008. Emotions as strategic information: Effects of other's emotional expressions on fixed-pie perception, demands, and integrative behavior in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 44, 6 (2008), 1444--1454.
[20]
Raquel Ros and Carles Sierra. 2006. A Negotiation Meta Strategy Combining Trade-off and Concession Moves. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Vol. 12 (03 2006), 163--181.
[21]
Victor Sanchez-Anguix, Reyhan Aydougan, Vicente Julian, and Catholijn Jonker. 2014. Unanimously acceptable agreements for negotiation teams in unpredictable domains. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 13, 4 (2014), 243--265.
[22]
Klaus Scherer. 2005. Scherer KR. What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc Sci Inf 44: 695--729. Social Science Information, Vol. 44 (12 2005), 695--792.
[23]
Marwan Sinaceur and Larissa Z Tiedens. 2006. Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 42, 3 (2006), 314--322.
[24]
Rustam M. Vahidov, Gregory E. Kersten, and Bo Yu. 2017. Human-Agent Negotiations: The Impact Agents' Concession Schedule and Task Complexity on Agreements. In 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2017, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA, January 4--7, 2017, Tung Bui (Ed.). ScholarSpace / AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 1--9.
[25]
Gerben A Van Kleef, Carsten KW De Dreu, and Antony SR Manstead. 2004. The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 86, 1 (2004), 57.
[26]
Colin R Williams, Valentin Robu, Enrico H Gerding, and Nicholas R Jennings. 2013. Iamhaggler2011: A gaussian process regression based negotiation agent. In Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions. Springer, 209--212.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)You Look Nice, but I Am Here to Negotiate: The Influence of Robot Appearance on Negotiation DynamicsCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640759(598-602)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Effects of Agent's Embodiment in Human-Agent NegotiationsProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3570945.3607362(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
  • (2023)A Q-learning approach to generating behavior of emotional persuasion with adaptive time belief in decision-making of agent-based negotiationInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2023.119158642:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AAMAS '21: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems
May 2021
1899 pages
ISBN:9781450383073

Sponsors

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 03 May 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. emotional awareness
  2. human-agent negotiation
  3. human-robot interaction
  4. human-robot negotiation
  5. negotiation strategy
  6. opponent behavior

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract

Funding Sources

  • The Scientific and Research Council of Turkey

Conference

AAMAS '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)You Look Nice, but I Am Here to Negotiate: The Influence of Robot Appearance on Negotiation DynamicsCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640759(598-602)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Effects of Agent's Embodiment in Human-Agent NegotiationsProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3570945.3607362(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
  • (2023)A Q-learning approach to generating behavior of emotional persuasion with adaptive time belief in decision-making of agent-based negotiationInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2023.119158642:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media