[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/2816272.2816308guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article
Free access

Subject knowledge, thesaurus-assisted query expansion and search success

Published: 26 April 2004 Publication History

Abstract

This study explored how experts and novices in pedagogics expanded queries supported by the ERIC thesaurus, and how this was connected to the search success in an easy and a difficult search task. The expert group consisted of 15 undergraduates in pedagogy and the novice group of 15 students with no studies in this field. Their search logs were recorded and a pre- and post-search interview was conducted. The results show that the number and type of terms selected from the thesaurus for expansion by experts improved search effectiveness, whereas there were no connections between the use of thesaurus and improvement of effectiveness among novices. Thus, a vital condition for benefiting a thesaurus in query expansion to improve search results is sufficient familiarity with the search topic. The results suggest also that it is not in the first place the number of terms used in expansion, but their type and quality which is crucial for search success.

References

[1]
Aitchinson, J., Gilchrist, A., Bawden, D. (1997). Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual. London: Aslib.
[2]
Bates, M. J. (1986). Subject access to online catalogues: a design model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37(6): 357--376.
[3]
Beaulieu, M. (1997). Experiments of interfaces to support query expansion. Journal of Documentation 53(1):8--19.
[4]
Borlund, P. (2000). Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Doctoral Dissertation. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.
[5]
Fidel, R. (1991). Searchers' selection of search keys. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42: 490--527.
[6]
Hsieh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 44: 161--174.
[7]
Ingwersen, P. (1999). Cognitive information retrieval. In: M. Williams (ed) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 34. (pp. 3--52). Medford: Information Today.
[8]
Jones, S., Gatford, M., Robertson, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M., Seeker, J. (1995). Interactive thesaurus navigation: Intelligence rules OK? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46 (1): 52--59.
[9]
Nielsen, M. L. (2002). The word association method: a gateway to work-task based retrieval. Doctoral dissertation. Åbo: Åbo Academy University Press.
[10]
Pollard, R. (1993). A hypertext-based thesaurus as a subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases. Information Processing & Management 29(3): 345--357.
[11]
Robertson, S. I. (2001). Problem solving. Hove: Psychology Press.
[12]
Shiri, A., Revie, C. (2001). User-thesaurus interaction in a web-based database. In: Proceedings of the Infotech Oulu. International workshop in information retrieval. (pp. 23--32). Oulu.
[13]
Shiri, A., Revie, C., Chowdhury, G. (2002). Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces. Journal of Information Science 28(2): 111--122.
[14]
Shute, S., Smith, P. (1993). Knowledge-based search tactics. Information Processing & Management 29(1): 29--45.
[15]
Sormunen, E. (2000). A method of measuring wide range performance of Boolean queries in full-text databases. Acta Universalis Tamperensis 748. Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
[16]
Sutcliffe, A. G., Ennis, M., Watkinson, S. J. (2000). Empirical studies of end-user information searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51:1211--1231.
[17]
Vakkari, P. (2001). A Theory of the Task-based Information Retrieval. Journal of Documentation 57 (1): 44--60
[18]
Vakkari, P. (2002). Subject knowledge, source of terms and term selection in query expansion. In: Crestani & al. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. Proceedings of the 24th ECIR. (pp. 110--123). Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
[19]
Vakkari, P., Sormunen, E. (2004) The influence of relevance levels on the effectiveness of interactive information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 55. To be appear.
[20]
Wang, P. (1997). User's information needs at different stages of a research project: a cognitive view. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B., Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context (pp. 307--318). London & Los Angeles: Taylor.
[21]
White, M., Iivonen, M. (2002). Assessing level of difficulty in web search questions. Library Quarterly 72(2): 205--233.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
RIAO '04: Coupling approaches, coupling media and coupling languages for information retrieval
April 2004
935 pages
ISBN:905450096

Publisher

LE CENTRE DE HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES D'INFORMATIQUE DOCUMENTAIRE

Paris, France

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2004

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 51
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media