[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Simulation Designs and Correlation Induction for Reducing Second-Order Bias in First-Order Response Surfaces

Published: 01 October 1993 Publication History

Abstract

<P>Construction of simulation designs for the estimation of response surface metamodels is often based on optimal design theory. Underlying such designs is the assumption that the postulated model provides the correct representation of the simulated response. As a result, the location of design points and the assignment of pseudorandom number streams to these experiments are determined through the minimization of some function of the covariance matrix of the model coefficient estimators. In contrast, we assume that the postulated model may be incorrect. Attention is therefore directed to the development of simulation designs that offer protection against the bias due to possible model misspecification as well as error variance. The particular situation examined is the estimation of first-order response surface models in the presence of polynomials of order two. Traditional two-level factorial plans combined with one of three pseudorandom number assignment strategies define the simulation designs. Specification of the factor settings for these experimental plans are based on two integrated mean squared error criteria of particular interest in response surface studies. For both design criteria, comparisons of the optimal designs across the three assignment strategies are presented to assist experimenters in the selection of an appropriate simulation design.</P>

References

[1]
Box, G. E. P., AND N. R. DRAPER. 1959. A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface Design. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 54, 622-654.
[2]
Box, G. E. P., AND N. R. DRAPER. 1963. The Choice of a Second Order Rotatable Design. Biometrika, 50, 335-352.
[3]
Box, G. E. P., AND N. R. DRAPER. 1987. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley, New York.
[4]
Box, G. E. P., AND J. S. HUNTER. 1954. A Confidence Region for the Solution of a Set of Simultaneous Equations With an Application to Experimental Design. Biometrika, 41, 190-199.
[5]
Box, G. E. P., AND J. S. HUNTER. 1957. Multifactor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces. Ann. Math. Statist., 28, 195-241.
[6]
Box, G. E. P., AND J. S. HUNTER. 1961. The 2k-p Fractional Factorial Designs, I and II. Technometrics, 3, 311-351 and 449-458.
[7]
DONOHUE, J. M. 1988. The Use of Correlated Simulation Experiments in Response Surface Optimization. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
[8]
DONOHUE, J. M., E. C. HOUCK AND R. H. MYERS. 1992. Simulation Designs for Quadratic Response Surface Models in the Presence of Model Misspecification. Mgmt. Sci., 38, 1765-1791.
[9]
DRAPER, N. R., AND W. E. LAWRENCE. 1965. Designs Which Minimize Model Inadequacies: Cuboidal Regions of Interest. Biometrika, 52, 111-118.
[10]
HILL, W. J., AND W. G. HUNTER. 1966. A Review of Response Surface Methodology: A Literature Survey. Technometrics, 8, 571-590.
[11]
HUSSEY, J. R., R. H. MYERS AND E. C. HOUCK. 1987a. Correlated Simulation Experiments in First-Order Response Surface Designs. Opns. Res., 35, 744-758.
[12]
HUSSEY, J. R., R. H. MYERS AND E. C. HOUCK. 1987b. Pseudorandom Number Assignments in Quadratic Response Surface Designs. IIE Trans., 19, 395-403.
[13]
KHURI, A. I., AND J. A. CORNELL. 1987. Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses., Marcel Dekker, New York.
[14]
KIEFER, J. 1978. Comment: Pseudorandom Number Assignment in Statistically Designed Simulation and Distribution Sampling Experiments. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 73, 523-524.
[15]
MEAD, R., AND D. J. PIKE. 1975. A Review of Response Surface Methodology From a Biometric Viewpoint. Biometrics, 31, 462-509.
[16]
MYERS, R. H. 1976. Response Surface Methodology. Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
[17]
MYERS, R. H., A. I. KHURI AND W. H. CARTER. 1989. Response Surface Methodology: A Literature Review: 1966-1988. Technometrics, 31, 137-157.
[18]
MYERS, R. H., AND S. J. LAHODA. 1975. A Generalization of the Response Surface Mean Square Error Criterion With a Specific Application to the Slope. Technometrics, 17, 481-486.
[19]
NOZARI, A., S. F. ARNOLD AND C. D. PEGDEN. 1987. Statistical Analysis for Use With the Schruben and Margolin Correlation Induction Strategy. Opns. Res., 35, 127-139.
[20]
SCHRUBEN, L. W., AND B. H. MARGOLIN. 1978. Pseudorandom Number Assignment in Statistically Designed Simulation and Distribution Sampling Experiments. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 73, 504-520.
[21]
STEINBERG, D. M., AND W. G. HUNTER. 1984. Experimental Design: Review and Comment. Technometrics, 26, 71-130.
[22]
TEW, J. D., AND J. R. WILSON. 1992. Validation of Correlation Induction Strategies for Simulation Experiments. Opns. Res., 40, 87-103.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Simulation Designs and Correlation Induction for Reducing Second-Order Bias in First-Order Response Surfaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Operations Research
      Operations Research  Volume 41, Issue 5
      October 1993
      193 pages

      Publisher

      INFORMS

      Linthicum, MD, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 October 1993

      Author Tags

      1. simulation: design of experiments
      2. statistics: estimation of first-order response surfaces

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2005)State-of-the-Art ReviewINFORMS Journal on Computing10.1287/ijoc.1050.013617:3(263-289)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005
      • (2002)Recent advances in simulation optimizationProceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers10.5555/1030453.1030506(377-383)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2002
      • (1998)Simulation metamodelsProceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation10.5555/293172.293221(167-176)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998
      • (1995)The use of variance reduction techniques in the estimation of simulation metamodelsProceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation10.1145/224401.224462(194-200)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1995
      • (1994)MetamodelingProceedings of the 26th conference on Winter simulation10.5555/193201.194027(237-244)Online publication date: 11-Dec-1994

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media