[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/2484920.2485051acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A fuzzy logic based reputation model against unfair ratings

Published: 06 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Reputation systems have become more and more important in facilitating transactions in online systems. However, the accuracy of reputation systems has always been a concern for the users due to the existence of unfair ratings. Though many approaches have been proposed to mitigate the adverse effect of unfair ratings, most of them use the credibility of the rating provider alone to decide whether the rating is unfair without considering other aspects of the rating itself. Models that do consider multiple aspects often combine them through arbitrarily set weights. Therefore, they cannot work well when the credibility is not evaluated accurately or when the weights are not set properly. To resolve this problem, in this paper, we propose a reputation model which considers and combines the temporal, similarity and quantity aspects of the user ratings based on fuzzy logic to improve the accuracy of reputation evaluation. Experimental results based on a set of real user data from a cyber competition show that the proposed model is more robust against unfair ratings than the existing approaches, especially under Sybil attack conditions.

References

[1]
www.douban.com.
[2]
Buy iTunes Ratings and Commnets -- Increase iTunes Sales and Downloads. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TWV4XaxCo.
[3]
C. Burnett, T. J. Norman, and K. Sycara. Bootstrapping trust evaluations through stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 241--248, 2010.
[4]
A. Gelman. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida, USA, 2004.
[5]
A. Jøsang and R. Ismail. The beta reputation system. In Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, pages 324--337, 2002.
[6]
A. Jøsang, R. Ismail, and C. Boyd. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support System, 43(2):618--644, 2007.
[7]
S. Liu, A. C. Kot, C. Miao, and Y.-L. Theng. A dempster-shafer theory based witness trustworthiness model to cope with unfair ratings in e-marketplace. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 99--106, 2012.
[8]
Y. Liu and Y. Sun. Anomaly detection in feedback-based reputation systems through temporal and correlation analyssis. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, 2010.
[9]
D. Montgomery. Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 2004.
[10]
Z. Noorian, S. Marsh, and M. Fleming. Multi-layer cognitive filtering by behavioral modeling. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 871--878, 2011.
[11]
T. J. Ross. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. Wiley, 2010.
[12]
M. Sensoy, J. Zhang, P. Yolum, and R. Cohen. POYRAZ: context-aware service selection under deception. Computational Intelligence, 25(4):335--366, 2009.
[13]
G. Shafter. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, 1976.
[14]
Y. Sun and Y. Liu. Security of online reputation systems: evolution of attacks and defenses. Signal Processing Magazine, Special Issue On Signal and Information Processing for Social Learning and Networking, 29(2):87--97, 2012.
[15]
W. T. L. Teacy, N. R. Jennings, A. Rogers, and M. Luck. A hierarchical bayesian trust model based on reputation and group behaviour. In the 6th European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 206--212, 2008.
[16]
W. T. L. Teacy, J. Patel, N. R. Jennings, and M. Luck. TRAVOS: trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 12(2):183--198, 2006.
[17]
L.-X. Wang. A course in fuzzy systems and control. Prentice Hall, 1997.
[18]
J. Weng, C. Miao, and A. Goh. An entropy-based approach to protecting rating systems from unfair testimonies. IEICE Trans. INF. and SYST., E89-D(9):2502--2511, September 2006.
[19]
J. Weng, Z. Shen, C. Miao, A. Goh, and C. Leung. Credibility: How agents can handle unfair third-party testimonies in computational trust models. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE), 22:1286--1298, 2010.
[20]
A. Whitby, A. Jøsang, and J. Indulska. Filtering out unfair ratings in bayesian reputation systems. ICFAIN J. Management Res., 4(2):48--64, 2005.
[21]
B. Yu and M. Singh. Detecting deception in reputation management. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 73--80, 2003.
[22]
H. Yu, Z. Shen, and B. An. An adaptive witness selection method for reputation-based trust models. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA), pages 184--198, 2012.
[23]
H. Yu, Z. Shen, C. Miao, C. Leung, and D. Niyato. A survey of trust and reputation management systems in wireless communications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98:1755--1772, 2010.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A fuzzy logic based reputation model against unfair ratings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AAMAS '13: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
    May 2013
    1500 pages
    ISBN:9781450319935

    Sponsors

    • IFAAMAS

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Richland, SC

    Publication History

    Published: 06 May 2013

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. fuzzy logic
    2. reputation
    3. unfair rating

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    AAMAS '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    AAMAS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 140 of 599 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)Building ethics into artificial intelligenceProceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3304652.3304793(5527-5533)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
    • (2017)Trust TraversalComputer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking10.1016/j.comnet.2017.04.016120:C(105-125)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2017
    • (2016)Balancing quality and budget considerations in mobile crowdsourcingDecision Support Systems10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.01990:C(56-64)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016
    • (2016)Trust-based group services selection in web-based service-oriented environmentsWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-015-0362-019:5(807-832)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
    • (2015)Emotional Interactions between Artificial Companion Agents and the ElderlyProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/2772879.2773541(1991-1992)Online publication date: 4-May-2015
    • (2015)An Affective Agent for Studying Composite EmotionsProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/2772879.2773518(1947-1948)Online publication date: 4-May-2015
    • (2015)Quality and Budget Aware Task Allocation for Spatial CrowdsourcingProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/2772879.2773387(1689-1690)Online publication date: 4-May-2015
    • (2015)Empirical Analysis of Reputation-aware Task Delegation by Humans from a Multi-agent GameProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/2772879.2773386(1687-1688)Online publication date: 4-May-2015
    • (2015)Using Information Theory to Improve the Robustness of Trust SystemsProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/2772879.2773255(791-799)Online publication date: 4-May-2015
    • (2015)Trust and Reputation Models for Multiagent SystemsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/281682648:2(1-42)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2015
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media