[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/1920331.1920426dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesasistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

High school seniors' social network and other ICT use preferences and concerns

Published: 22 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

The study develops an in-depth picture of teens' thoughts and opinions related to social networks and ICT's, particularly preferences towards, and concerns related to, their use. Using a series of six semi-structured focus group interviews, data were gathered from 45 high school seniors attending a highly technological public high school. Focus group questions included 1) preferred methods for communicating with friends and family; 2) reasons for engaging or not engaging in online social networking; 3) how ICT's for social networking and other communication purposes were selected; and 4) decisions related to accepting online "friends."
Findings contradicted earlier "digital natives" literature, which suggests that teens are avid users of technology for technology's sake. Instead, the teens viewed ICTs and social networks from a more pragmatic view, using them as tools for quick and easy communication and for relationship building and maintenance.
General findings indicated that 1) communication media were selected based on the closeness of the relationship with the message receiver(s) and the number of intended receivers; 2) social networks, such as Facebook, were used for less frequent contact with wider range of friends and relatives; 3) teens used ICTs differently for communication with adults than with peers; and 4) teens preferred to use email for interactions with teachers.
An eight-category typology of four ICT capability preferences (Simplicity of interface design/Ease of use, Speed of use, Constant contact/Ubiquitous communication, and Multitasking) and four ICT use concerns (Information privacy, Information security, Communication overload; and Reduced face-to-face communication and interaction) is proposed.

References

[1]
Agosto, D. E. (2002). A model of young people's decision-making in using the web. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 311--341.
[2]
Agosto, D. E., & Abbas, J. (2009). Teens and social networking: How public libraries are responding to the latest online trend. Public Libraries, 48(3), 32--37.
[3]
Boyd, D. (June 24 2007). Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace. Apophenia Blog. http://www.danah.org/papers/essays/ClassDivisions.html.
[4]
Boyd, D. (2009). The not-so-hidden politics of class online. Personal Democracy Forum, http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/PDF2009.html.
[5]
Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up digital. Change, 32(2), 10--20.
[6]
Chase, L., & Alvarez, J. (2000). Internet research: The role of the focus group. Library & Information Science Research, 22, 357--369.
[7]
Costello, B., Lenholt, R., & Stryker, J. (2004). Learning styles of the Net Generation. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30, 452--460.
[8]
Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass, M., Holder, J., Hopkins, C. J., Kushner, E. J., Miyagishima, B. K., & Toney, C. D. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 24--37.
[9]
Foehr, U. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7592.pdf.
[10]
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 47--78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[11]
Frand, J. L. (2000). The information-age mindset. EDUCAUSE Review, 35, 14--20.
[12]
Gasson, S., & Agosto, D. E. (2008). Millennial students & technology use: Implications for undergraduate education. In Education in HCI: HCI in Education - The HCIC 2008 Winter Workshop. Human Computer Interaction Consortium, Snow Mountain Ranch, Fraser, Colorado, January 31 - February 3, 2008.
[13]
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
[14]
Harris, F. J. (2005). I found it on the Internet: Coming of age online. Chicago: American Library Association, 2005.
[15]
Head., A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010). How today's college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15(3).
[16]
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, Justin W. (2008). Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 125--146.
[17]
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. November 2008. http://www.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7BB0386CE3-8B29-4162-8098-E466FB856794%7D/DML_ETHNOG_WHITEPAPER.PDF.
[18]
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[19]
Kelly, D., Wacholder, N., Rittman, R., Sun, Y., Kantor, P., Small, S., & Strzalkowski. (2007). Using interview data to identify evaluation criteria for interactive, analytical question-answering systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1032--1043.
[20]
Large, A. (2005). Children, teenagers, and the Web. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 347--392.
[21]
Large, A., Beheshti, J., & Rahman, T. (2002). Design criteria for children's Web portals: The users speak out. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 79--94.
[22]
Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington DC. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones.aspx.
[23]
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005web.pdf.pdf.
[24]
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (February 3, 2010). Social media and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx.
[25]
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[26]
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[27]
U. S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The condition of education 2010. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=51.
[28]
Oblinger, D. G. (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the new students. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4), 36--47.
[29]
Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2006). Is it age or IT? First steps toward understanding the Net Generation. CSLA Journal, 29(2), 8--16.
[30]
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
[31]
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1--5.
[32]
Rideout, V. J., Foehr U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8--18 year olds. Washington, D.C.: Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfm
[33]
Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native: Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61, 364--379.
[34]
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). American factfinder. http://factfinder.census.gov/.
[35]
Wallis, C. (2006). The multitasking generation. Time, 167(13), 48--55.
[36]
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.
[37]
Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Beyond TutoringProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300679(1-14)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2016)Self-compassion, psychological resilience and social media use in Thai studentsProceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion!10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.4(1-8)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016
  • (2016)The Strength of Awkward TiesProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/2957276.2957282(375-383)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ASIS&T '10: Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem - Volume 47
October 2010
824 pages

Publisher

American Society for Information Science

United States

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2010

Author Tags

  1. ICTs
  2. MySpace
  3. facebook
  4. social networking
  5. teens

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ASIS&T '10
ASIS&T '10: Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem
October 22 - 27, 2010
Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh

Acceptance Rates

ASIS&T '10 Paper Acceptance Rate 52 of 149 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 135 of 277 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Beyond TutoringProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300679(1-14)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2016)Self-compassion, psychological resilience and social media use in Thai studentsProceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion!10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.4(1-8)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016
  • (2016)The Strength of Awkward TiesProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/2957276.2957282(375-383)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016
  • (2015)Hey, I Have a Problem in the SystemProceedings of the Third International Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy, and Trust - Volume 919010.5555/2991236.2991274(391-403)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2015
  • (2015)Designing for young people's ICT useProceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/2818187.2818269(130-137)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2015
  • (2015)Illegitimate Civic ParticipationProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2675133.2675156(1694-1703)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2015
  • (2015)Theorizing on the take-up of social technologies, organizational policies and norms, and consultants' knowledge-sharing practicesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2316166:1(162-179)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015
  • (2013)How and why teenagers use video chatProceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work10.1145/2441776.2441861(759-768)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2013
  • (2012)Going to college and staying connectedProceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work10.1145/2145204.2145322(789-798)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2012
  • (2012)Integrating local and remote worlds through channel blendingProceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work10.1145/2145204.2145299(617-626)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2012
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media