What Constitutes a Helpful Health-Related Answer?: : The Impacts of Emotional Content and Question-Answer Congruence
Pages 1 - 35
Abstract
Given the unwieldy glut of information in online health question-answer (Q&A) service, it is essential to understand what constitutes helpful answers in the medical domain. Despite the fact that studies have examined the impacts of answer content factors on answer helpfulness, there are two gaps that need further analysis. First, the empirical results of the existing relevant studies on the effect of answer emotion are inconsistent. Second, prior studies only have examined the independent impacts of answer content factors and question content cues on answer helpfulness. To fill this gap, a research model reflecting the impacts of emotional content and question-answer congruence on answer helpfulness was developed and empirically examined. Our empirical analyses confirm that emotional content and answer helpfulness are related to one another in the form of an inverted U-shape and indicate that two types of question-answer congruence (emotional intensity congruence and linguistic style matching) positively affect answer helpfulness. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
References
[1]
AdamicL. A.ZhangJ.BakshyE.AckermanM. S. (2008). Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: Everyone knows something. In WWW ’08: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 665–674). ACM. 10.1145/1367497.1367587
[2]
AL-Smadi, M., Jaradat, Z., AL-Ayyoub, M., & Jararweh, Y.AL-Smadi. (2017). Paraphrase identification and semantic text similarity analysis in Arabic news tweets using lexical, syntactic, and semantic features. Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 640–652.
[3]
Anderson, B., Goldin, P. R., Kurita, K., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Self-representation in social anxiety disorder: Linguistic analysis of autobiographical narratives. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(10), 1119–1125.
[4]
Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1–10.
[5]
Bae, B. J., & Yi, Y. J. (2017). What answers do questioners want on social Q&A? User preferences of answers about STDs. Internet Research, 27(5), 1104–1121.
[6]
Bapna, S., Benner, M. J., & Qiu, L. (2019). Nurturing online communities: An empirical investigation. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 43(2), 425–452.
[7]
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545–552.
[8]
Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, N. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), 2–20.
[9]
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press.
[10]
Chen, L., Xu, P., & Liu, D. (2020). Effect of crowd voting on participation in crowdsourcing contests. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(2), 510–535.
[11]
Chen, P. Y., Pavlou, P., Wu, S., & Yang, Y. (2021). Attracting high-quality contestants to contest in the context of crowdsourcing contest platform. Production and Operations Management, 30(6), 1751–1771.
[12]
Chen, Y., Ho, T. H., & Kim, Y. M. (2010). Knowledge market design: A field experiment at Google Answers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), 641–664.
[13]
Cheng, L. C., & Yang, Y. (2022). The effect of online reviews on movie box office sales: An integration of aspect-based sentiment analysis and economic modeling. [JGIM]. Journal of Global Information Management, 30(1), 1–16.
[14]
Cheung, C. M. Y., Sia, C. L., & Kuan, K. K. Y. (2012). Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(8), 618–635.
[15]
Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In Fiedler, K. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343–359). Psychology Press.
[16]
Chung, S., & Park, J. (2013). Effects of social and temporal distance on evaluation of corporate ambivalent behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(7), 1219–1224.
[17]
Cronin, R. M., Conway, D., Condon, D., Jerome, R. N., Byrne, D. W., & Harris, P. A. (2018). Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient-reported outcomes portal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 25(11), 1470–1480.
[18]
Edwards, J. R. (2008). Person–environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 167–230.
[19]
Eslami, S. P., Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Which online reviews do consumers find most helpful? A multi-method investigation. Decision Support Systems, 113, 32–42.
[20]
Fang, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). Users’ continued participation behavior in social Q&A communities: A motivation perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 87–109.
[21]
Faraj, S., Kudaravalli, S., & Wasko, M. (2015). Leading collaboration in online communities. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(2), 393–412.
[22]
Fedorikhin, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2010). Positive mood and resistance to temptation: The interfering influence of elevated arousal. The Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 698–711.
[23]
Filieri, R., Raguseo, E., & Vitari, C. (2018). When are extreme ratings more helpful? Empirical evidence on the moderating effects of review characteristics and product type. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 134–142.
[24]
Finney Rutten, L. J., Blake, K. D., Greenberg-Worisek, A. J., Allen, S. V., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2019). Online health information seeking among US adults: Measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.), 134(6), 617–625.
[25]
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. The Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.
[26]
Garbarino, E. C., & Edell, J. A. (1997). Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. The Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 147–158.
[27]
Haans, R. F. J., Pieters, C., & He, Z. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195.
[28]
Ham, J., Lee, K., Kim, T., & Koo, C. (2019). Subjective perception patterns of online reviews: A comparison of utilitarian and hedonic values. Information Processing & Management, 56(4), 1439–1456.
[29]
HarperF. M.RabanD.RafaeliS.KonstanJ. A. (2008). Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In CHI ’08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 865–874). ACM. 10.1145/1357054.1357191
[30]
Harris Interactive. (2011, September 15). The growing influence and use of health care information obtained online. Retrieved November 12, 2021 from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-growing-influence-and-use-of-health-care-information-obtained-online-129893198.html
[31]
Heinrich, C., Maffioli, A., & Vázquez, G. (2010). A primer for applying propensity-score matching. Inter-American Development Bank, Technical Note No. IDB-TN-161. https://publications.iadb.org/en/primer-applying-propensity-score-matching
[32]
Hendrickx, J. (2002). Review of regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata by Long and Freese. The Stata Journal, 2(1), 103–105.
[33]
Hesse, B. W., Nelson, D. E., Kreps, G. L., Croyle, R. T., Arora, N. K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2005). Trust and sources of health information: The impact of the internet and its implications for health care providers: Findings from the first health information national trends survey. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(22), 2618–2624.
[34]
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. The American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217–1230.
[35]
Hofstetter, R., Zhang, J. Z., & Herrmann, A. (2018). Successive open innovation contests and incentives: Winner-take-all or multiple prizes? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), 492–517.
[36]
HsiehG.KrautR. E.HudsonS. E. (2010). Why pay?: Exploring how financial incentives are used for question & answer. In CHI ’10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 305–314). ACM. 10.1145/1753326.1753373
[37]
Huang, N., Hong, Y., & Burtch, G. (2017). Social network integration and user content generation: Evidence from natural experiments. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 41(4), 1035–1058.
[38]
Huang, S., & Wang, L. (2022). An exploration study on the consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic on online Q&A communities. Journal of Global Information Management, 30(1), 1–22.
[39]
Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2011). Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493), 345–361.
[40]
Jensen, M. L., Averbeck, J. M., Zhang, Z., & Wright, K. B. (2013). Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(1), 293–324.
[41]
JeonG. Y. J.KimY. M.ChenY. (2010). Re-examining price as a predictor of answer quality in an online Q&A site. In CHI ’10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 325–328). ACM. 10.1145/1753326.1753375
[42]
JinJ.LiuY. (2010). How to interpret the helpfulness of online product reviews: Bridging the needs between customers and designers. In SMUC ’10: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents (pp. 87–94). ACM. 10.1145/1871985.1872000
[43]
Jin, J., Yan, X., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). How users adopt healthcare information: An empirical study of an online Q&A community. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 86, 91–103.
[44]
Jones, Q., Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 194–210.
[45]
Kazmer, M. M., Lustria, M. L. A., Cortese, J., Burnett, G., Kim, J.-H., Ma, J., & Frost, J. (2014). Distributed knowledge in an online patient support community: Authority and discovery. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1319–1334.
[46]
Kim, S., Oh, J. S., & Oh, S. (2007). Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 1–15.
[47]
Kim, S., & Oh, S. (2009). Users’ relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 716–727.
[48]
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.). (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
[49]
Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562–589). SAGE Publications.
[50]
Kreft, I. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications.
[51]
Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2001). The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: Internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(7), 1245–1259.
[52]
Kumar, N., Qiu, L., & Kumar, S. (2018). Exit, voice, and response on digital platforms: An empirical investigation of online management response strategies. Information Systems Research, 29(4), 849–870.
[53]
Lee, S. Y., Rui, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2019). Is best answer really the best answer? The politeness bias. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 43(2), 579–600.
[54]
Li, M., & Huang, P. (2020). Assessing the product review helpfulness: Affective-cognitive evaluation and the moderating effect of feedback mechanism. Information & Management, 57(7), 103359.
[55]
Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.
[56]
Liu, X., Wang, G. A., Fan, W., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Finding useful solutions in online knowledge communities: A theory-driven design and multilevel analysis. Information Systems Research, 31(3), 731–752.
[57]
Liu, Z., Hatton, M. R., Kull, T., Dooley, K., & Oke, A. (2021). Is a large award truly attractive to solvers? The impact of award size on crowd size in innovation contests. Journal of Operations Management, 67(4), 420–449.
[58]
Lou, J., Fang, Y., Lim, K. H., & Peng, J. Z. (2013). Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 356–371.
[59]
Miranda-Moreno, L. F., & Fu, L. (2006). A comparative study of alternative model structures and criteria for ranking locations for safety improvements. Networks and Spatial Economics, 6(2), 97–110.
[60]
Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.
[61]
Oh, S., & Worrall, A. (2013). Health answer quality evaluation by librarians, nurses, and users in social Q&A. Library & Information Science Research, 35(4), 288–298.
[62]
Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148.
[63]
Peng, C. H., Yin, D., & Zhang, H. (2020). More than words in medical question-and-answer sites: A content-context congruence perspective. Information Systems Research, 31(3), 913–928.
[64]
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count. Psychology Press.
[65]
Pham, L., Klaus, T., & Changchit, C. (2023). Factors influencing intention to use online consumer reviews: The case of Vietnam. [JGIM]. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(1), 1–22.
[66]
Pham, M. T. (2007). Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 155–178.
[67]
Rains, S. A. (2016). Language style matching as a predictor of perceived social support in computer-mediated interaction among individuals coping with illness. Communication Research, 43(5), 694–712.
[68]
Schwarz, N. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 433–440.
[69]
ShahC.PomerantzJ. (2010). Evaluating and predicting answer quality in community QA. In SIGIR ’10: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 411–418). ACM. 10.1145/1835449.1835518
[70]
Silberg, W. M., Lundberg, G. D., & Musacchio, R. A. (1997). Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(15), 1244–1245.
[71]
Tan, S. S., & Goonawardene, N. (2017). Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(1), e9.
[72]
Toma, C. L., & D’Angelo, J. D. (2015). Tell-tale words: Linguistic cues used to infer the expertise of online medical advice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(1), 25–45.
[73]
Wakslak, C., & Trope, Y. (2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science, 20(1), 52–58.
[74]
WangH.JiY.WangW. (2017). Quality evaluation for answers in Chinese QA community based on random forest––Examples from Zhihu. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2017) (pp. 1184–1190). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/hsmet-17.2017.218
[75]
Wang, J., Gupta, M., & Rao, H. R. (2015). Insider threats in a financial institution: Analysis of attack-proneness of information systems applications. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(1), 91–112.
[76]
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Han, W., & Qiu, L. (2022). Do emotions sell? The impact of emotional expressions on sales in the space-sharing economy. Production and Operations Management, 31(1), 65–82.
[77]
Wang, X., Tang, L. R., & Kim, E. (2019). More than words: Do emotional content and linguistic style matching matter on restaurant review helpfulness? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 438–447.
[78]
Winkielman, P., Huber, D. E., Kavanagh, L. C., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. In Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. Guilford Press.
[79]
Xiang, Y. T., Yu, X., Sartorius, N., Ungvari, G. S., & Chiu, H. F. K. (2012). Mental health in China: Challenges and progress. Lancet, 380(9855), 1715–1716.
[80]
Xu, A. J., & Wyer, R. S.Jr. (2010). Puffery in advertisements: The effects of media context, communication norms, and consumer knowledge. The Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 329–343.
[81]
Yan, Z., Kuang, L., & Qiu, L. (2022). Prosocial behaviors and economic performance: Evidence from an online mental healthcare platform. Production and Operations Management, 31(10), 3859–3876.
[82]
Yang, M., Ren, Y., & Adomavicius, G. (2019). Understanding user-generated content and customer engagement on Facebook business pages. Information Systems Research, 30(3), 839–855.
[83]
Yang, S., Zhou, C., & Chen, Y. (2021). Do topic consistency and linguistic style similarity affect online review helpfulness? An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Processing & Management, 58(3), 102521.
[84]
Yin, D., Bond, S. D., & Zhang, H. (2017). Keep your cool or let it out: Nonlinear effects of expressed arousal on perceptions of consumer reviews. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 447–463.
[85]
Yin, D., Mitra, S., & Zhang, H. (2016). Research note—When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 131–144.
[86]
Yu, Y., Khern-am-nuai, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2022). When paying for reviews pays off: The case of performance-contingent monetary rewards. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 46(1), 609–626.
[87]
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27.
[88]
Zhang, T., Liu, F. C., Gao, B., & Yen, D. (2021). Top management team social interaction and conservative reporting decision: A language style matching approach. Decision Support Systems, 142, 113469.
[89]
Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Fan, W. (2020). User adoption of physician’s replies in an online health community: An empirical study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(10), 1179–1191.
[90]
Zhang, Y., Lu, T., Phang, C. W., & Zhang, C. (2019). Scientific knowledge communication in online Q&A communities: Linguistic devices as a tool to increase the popularity and perceived professionalism of knowledge contribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(8), 1129–1173.
[91]
Zhang, Y., & Wang, P. (2016). Interactions and user-perceived helpfulness in diet information social questions & answers. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 33(4), 295–307.
[92]
Zhou, J., Zhang, Q., Zhou, S., Li, X., & Zhang, X. (2023). Unintended emotional effects of online health communities: A text mining-supported empirical study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 47(1), 195–226.
[93]
Zhou, J., Zuo, M., & Ye, C. (2019). Understanding the factors influencing health professionals’ online voluntary behaviors: Evidence from YiXinLi, a Chinese online health community for mental health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 130, 103939.
[94]
Zhou, Y., Yang, S., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Yao, J., & Qazi, A. (2020). Does the review deserve more helpfulness when its title resembles the content? Locating helpful reviews by text mining. Information Processing & Management, 57(2), 102179.
Index Terms
- What Constitutes a Helpful Health-Related Answer?: The Impacts of Emotional Content and Question-Answer Congruence
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
More than Words in Medical Question-and-Answer Sites: A Content-Context Congruence Perspective
Application Abstract
Given the popularity and prevalence of medical question-and-answer (Q&A) services, it is increasingly important to understand what constitutes a helpful answer in the medical domain. Whereas prior studies have focused primarily on the independent impacts ...
The insight for management: Most user-generated content platforms offer guidelines for content contributors to guide their writing in ways more conducive to being helpful, and these guidelines typically prescribe a simplistic formula centered around ...
Given the popularity and prevalence of medical question-and-answer (Q&A) services, it is increasingly important to understand what constitutes a helpful answer in the medical domain. Prior studies on user-generated content have examined the independent ...
Review-guided Helpful Answer Identification in E-commerce
WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020Product-specific community question answering platforms can greatly help address the concerns of potential customers. However, the user-provided answers on such platforms often vary a lot in their qualities. Helpfulness votes from the community can ...
Materializing views with minimal size to answer queries
PODS '03: Proceedings of the twenty-second ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systemsIn this paper we study the following problem. Given a database and a set of queries, we want to find, in advance, a set of views that can compute the answers to the queries, such that the size of the viewset (i.e., the amount of space, in bytes, ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2024.
Publisher
IGI Global
United States
Publication History
Published: 23 May 2024
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025