Tracking Comet ISON through the Twittersphere: Visualizing Science Communication in Social Media
Pages 57 - 72
Abstract
People are increasingly turning to the Internet and social media for science-related information and communication. Online social media systems are a convenient source of timely and rapid information, including science-related information; however it is argued that the emergence of social media systems is a fundamentally new development in science communication. A distinguishing characteristic of social media systems is their support for 'democratic,' user-generated content, and for the public debate and contestation of scientific ideas. The emergence of the online environment as an important source of science information is still comparatively new, as is research to understand how people find and use science information in this setting. This study investigates how information about comet ISON was communicated on the Twitter social media platform. Tweet time sequence visualization and network visualization were found to offer complementary insights into the Twitter data, and to offer a productive methodological approach for future research work.
References
[1]
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. 2010. The changing information environment for nanotechnology: Online audiences and content. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 124, 1083-1094. 21170132.
[2]
Bik, H. M., & Goldstein, M. C. 2013. An introduction to social media for scientists. PLoS Biology, 114, e1001535. 23630451.
[3]
Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. 2010, January 5-8. Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. Paper presented at the43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii. 10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
[4]
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. 2011, March 28- April 1. Information credibility on twitter. Paper presented at the20th international conference on World Wide Web, Hyderabad, India.
[5]
Chang, K. 2013. Comet Nears Sun, Offering Planetary Clues. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/27/us/comet-nears-sun-offering-planetary-clues.html
[6]
de Semir, V. 2010. Science Communication & Science Journalism. Madrid: Media for Science Forum.
[7]
Drake, N. 2012. Physicists on alert for Higgs announcement. Science News Online. Retrieved from https://www.sciencenews.org/node/15499
[8]
Fahy, D., & Nisbet, M. C. 2011. The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices. Journalism, 127, 778-793.
[9]
Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. 1991. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software, Practice & Experience, 2111, 1129-1164.
[10]
Grier, C., Thomas, K., Paxson, V., & Zhang, M. 2010, October 4-8. @spam: the underground on 140 characters or less. Paper presented at the17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, Chicago. 10.1145/1866307.1866311
[11]
Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. 2013. Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 182, 40-60.
[12]
Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. 2009, January 5-8. Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Paper presented at the42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
[13]
QSR International. 2012a. NCapture Version 1.0.72.0. Doncaster, Victoria: QSR International.
[14]
QSR International. 2012b. NVIVO Version 10.0.138.0. Doncaster, Victoria: QSR International.
[15]
Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. 2013. Contesting Science by Appealing to Its Norms: Readers Discuss Climate Science in the Daily Mail. Science Communication, 353, 383-410.
[16]
Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J., & Decker, S. 2010, April 26-27. Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. Paper presented at theWeb Science Conference, Raleigh, NC.
[17]
Mahrt, M., & Puschmann, C. 2014. Science blogging: An exploratory study of motives, styles, and audience reactions. Journal of Science Communication, 133, A05.
[18]
Microsoft. 2010. Excel Version 14.0.6112.5000. Redmond, Washington: Microsoft.
[19]
Miller, G. 2011. Social Scientists Wade into the Tweet Stream. Science, 3336051, 1814-1815. 21960603.
[20]
Pinholster, G., & Ham, B. 2013. AAAS News and Notes. Science, 3426165, 1464-1466.
[21]
Revkin, A. C. 2010. Into the breach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 86, 283-283.
[22]
Runge, K. K., Yeo, S. K., Cacciatore, M., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., Xenos, M., & Su, L.-F. et al. 2013. Tweeting nano: How public discourses about nanotechnology develop in social media environments. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 151, 1-11.
[23]
Sandu, O., & Christensen, L. L. 2011. Outrageous Outreach-Unconventional Ways of Communicating Science. Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal, 11, 22-30.
[24]
Segev, E., & Baram-Tsabari, A. 2012. Seeking science information online: Data mining Google to better understand the roles of the media and the education system. Public Understanding of Science Bristol, England, 217, 813-829. 23832560.
[25]
Shan, L., Regan, Á., De Brún, A., Barnett, J., van der Sanden, M. C. A., Wall, P., & McConnon, ÁÁ. 2014. Food crisis coverage by social and traditional media: A case study of the 2008 Irish dioxin crisis. Public Understanding of Science Bristol, England, 238, 911-928. 23825281.
[26]
Sheets, C. A. 2013. What Do #FF, #TBT, #GFF, FOH, RLRT And Other Twitter & Instagram Hashtags & Terms Mean? IBTimes. Retrieved from http://www.ibtimes.com/what-do-ff-tbt-gff-foh-rlrt-other-twitter-instagram-hashtags-terms-mean-1021098
[27]
Sugimoto, C. R., & Thelwall, M. 2013. Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination in TED videos. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 644, 663-674.
[28]
The Gephi Consortium. 2012. Gephi Version 0.8.1. Paris: The Gephi Consortium.
[29]
Veltri, G. A. 2013. Microblogging and nanotweets: Nanotechnology on Twitter. Public Understanding of Science Bristol, England, 227, 832-849. 23825265.
[30]
Watermeyer, R. 2010. Social network science: Pedagogy, dialogue, deliberation. Journal of Science Communication, 0901, A04.
[31]
Wilcox, C. 2012. Guest editorial: It's time to e-volve: Taking responsibility for science communication in a digital age. The Biological Bulletin, 2222, 85-87. 22589398.
[32]
Yanamandra-Fisher, P. A., & Warner, E. 2013, September 8-13. Pro-Am Collaboration for Support of NASA Comet ISON Observing Campaign CIOC. Paper presented at theEuropean Planetary Science Congress, London.
Recommendations
What makes you tick? The psychology of social media engagement in space science communication
The rise of social media has transformed the way the public engages with science organisations and scientists. Retweet, Like, Share and Comment are a few ways users engage with messages on Twitter and Facebook, two of the most popular social media ...
Celebrity's self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships
This study investigated how celebrities' self-disclosure on personal social media accounts, particularly Twitter, affects fans' perceptions. An online survey was utilized among a sample of 429 celebrity followers on Twitter. Results demonstrated that ...
Demographics of News Sharing in the U.S. Twittersphere
HT '17: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social MediaThe widespread adoption and dissemination of online news through social media systems have been revolutionizing many segments of our society and ultimately our daily lives. In these systems, users can play a central role as they share content to their ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
IGI Global
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 October 2015
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025