Paradigm and Architecture of Computing Augmented Learning Management System for Computer Science Education
Pages 60 - 70
Abstract
Literature suggests that existing learning management systems should be extended to integrate learning activities that aim at enhancing comprehension of students in Computer Science education. Therefore, literature has proposed Computing Augmented Learning Management System CALMS that meets the needs of online Computer Science education. However, it's unclear the current state of architecture for the CALMS to assist researchers interrogate and extend its modules for online Computer Science education. Pedagogically to ascertain the thinking direction of current Computer Science educators it's also relevant to understand philosophical stance of learning events from the new idea of CALMS for online computer science education. The review reveals that learning events of the CALMS suggest an adaption of moderate constructivism stance for online Computer Science education. The CALMS incorporate annotations, algorithm or animation visualization and automatic assessment for the purposes of computer science education.
References
[1]
Akingbade, A., Finley, T., Jackson, D., Patel, P., & Rodger, S. H. 2003. JAWAA: Easy web-based animation from CS 0 to advanced CS courses. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 351, 162-166.
[2]
Ala-Mutka, K. M. 2005. A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments. Computer Science Education, 152, 83-102.
[3]
Alstes, A., & Lindqvist, J. 2007. VERKKOKE: Learning routing and network programming online. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 393, 91-95.
[4]
Ashton, H. S., Beevers, C. E., Milligan, C. D., Schofield, D. K., Thomas, R. C., & Youngson, M. A. 2006. Moving beyond objective testing in online assessment pp. 116-127. Information Science Publishing.
[5]
Ben-Ari, M. 2001. Constructivism in computer science education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 201, 45-73.
[6]
BrusilovskyP.EdwardsS.KumarA.MalmiL.BenottiL.BuckD.UrquizaJ. 2014. Increasing adoption of smart learning content for computer science education.Proceedings of the ACM Working Group Reports on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education pp. 31-57. 10.1145/2713609.2713611
[7]
Carter, J., Ala-Mutka, K., Fuller, U., Dick, M., English, J., Fone, W., & Sheard, J. 2003. How shall we assess this? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 354, 107-123.
[8]
Cheang, B., Kurnia, A., Lim, A., & Oon, W. C. 2003. On automated grading of programming assignments in an academic institution. Computers & Education, 412, 121-131.
[9]
ChudáD. 2007. Visualization in education of theoretical computer science.Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Computer systems and technologies pp.15-21. 10.1145/1330598.1330687
[10]
Cronjé, J. 2006. Paradigms regained: Toward integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional design and the learning sciences. Educational Technology Research and Development, 544, 387-416.
[11]
Gotel, O., Scharff, C., & Wildenberg, A. 2008. Teaching software quality assurance by encouraging student contributions to an open source web-based system for the assessment of programming assignments. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 403, 214-218.
[12]
GreeningT. 2000. Emerging Constructivist Forces in Computer Science Education: Shaping a New Future?Proceedings of the Springer on Computer Science Education in the 21st century pp.47-80. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1298-0_5
[13]
Helmick, M. T. 2007. Interface-based programming assignments and automatic grading of java programs. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 393, 63-67.
[14]
Higgins, C., Hegazy, T., Symeonidis, P., & Tsintsifas, A. 2003. The coursemarker cba system: Improvements over ceilidh. Education and Information Technologies, 83, 287-304.
[15]
Ihantola, P. 2011. Automated assessment of programming assignments: visual feedback, assignment mobility, and assessment of students' testing skills. Aalto University.
[16]
Jonassen, D. H. 1991. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 393, 5-14.
[17]
Joy, M., & Luck, M. 1999. Plagiarism in programming assignments. IEEE Transactions on Education, 422, 129-133.
[18]
Luck, M., & Joy, M. 1999. A secure on-line submission system. Software, Practice & Experience, 298, 721-740.
[19]
Mulrow, C. D. 1994. Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 3096954, 597-599. 8086953
[20]
Naps, T. J. 2005. Addressing the Need to Support Algorithm Visualization with Tools for Active Engagement. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 255, 49-55. 16209170
[21]
Pribela, I., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. 2007. Testing almost any aspect of students' assignments. Proceedings of the3rd Balkan Conference in Informatics, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp.173-182.
[22]
PribelaI.IvanovićM.BudimacZ. 2011. System for Testing Different Kinds of Students' Programming Assignments.Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Information Technology ICIT.
[23]
PribelaI.RakićG.BudimacZ. 2012. First Experiences in Using Software Metrics in Automated Assessment.Proceedings of the 15th International Multiconference on Information Society, pp. 250-253.
[24]
Röβling, G., Joy, M., Moreno, A., Radenski, A., Malmi, L., Kerren, A., & Iturbide, J. A. V. et al . 2008. Enhancing learning management systems to better support computer science education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 404, 142-166.
[25]
Röβling, G., & Kothe, A. 2009. Extending moodle to better support computing education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 413, 146-150.
[26]
RöβlingG.McNallyM.CrescenziP.RadenskiA.IhantolaP.Sánchez-TorrubiaM. G. 2010. Adapting moodle to better support CS education.Proceedings of the 2010 ITiCSE working group reports, pp.15-27. 10.1145/1971681.1971684
[27]
Seink, W., Goller, S., Robling, G., & Hofmann, D. eMargo: Eine Digitale Randspalte zum Selbststudium nichtnur dar Informatik. Proceedings der Pre-conference Workshops der 5. e- learning Fachtagung informatik, pp.101-108.
[28]
Skinner, B. F. 1953. Science and Human Behavior. Pearson Education Inc.
[29]
ThotaN.WhitfieldR. 2009. Use of CALMS to enrich learning in introductory programming courses.Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education pp.970-974.
[30]
Vesin, B., Klasnja-Milicevic, A., & Ivanovic, M. 2013. Improving testing abilities of a programming tutoring system. Proceedings of the 2013 17th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing ICSTCC pp. 669-673. 10.1109/ICSTCC.2013.6689037
[31]
Watson, T. S., & Skinner, C. H. 2001. Functional behavioral assessment: Principles, procedures, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 302, 156-172.
[32]
Zendler, A., & Spannagel, C. 2008. Empirical foundation of central concepts for computer science education. Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 82, 6-12.
- Paradigm and Architecture of Computing Augmented Learning Management System for Computer Science Education
Recommendations
Enhancing learning management systems to better support computer science education
Many individual instructors -- and, in some cases, entire universities -- are gravitating towards the use of comprehensive learning management systems (LMSs), such as Blackboard and Moodle, for managing courses and enhancing student learning. As useful ...
Motivational active learning for computer science education (abstract only)
SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationMotivational Active Learning (MAL) is an innovative pedagogical approach based on MIT's teaching format TEAL (Technology-Enabled Active Learning) combined with advanced motivational strategies based on gamification design aspects. The main idea of MAL ...
The Development of Blended-Learning Teaching Portfolio Course Using TBL Approach
This article was written to develop a teaching portfolio that helps lecturers maximize the benefits of blended learning, a combination of in-person and online learning, through the use of Team-Based Learning TBL teaching and learning approach. Studies ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
IGI Global
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 April 2017
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024