An Examination of Literacy and Computer Literacy Amongst Adults Who Are Incarcerated: : An Analysis of the PIAAC
Author: 
Julia J. YiAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 20 - 31
Abstract
In this study, the relationships between literacy, computer experience, and age among and between the general (i.e., "household") and prison samples were examined using the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies. Literacy scores and computer experiences were significantly lower (p < .001) for the prison sample than for the household sample. There were significant differences in the mean literacy scores between the household and prison samples for those with no computer experience, t(2048) = -3.58, p < .01 and for those with computer experience, t(7721) = 8.99, p < .01. Computer experience predicted literacy proficiency across both samples (R-squared = .10, SE = .01, p < .01). Lastly, there was an inverse relationship between age and computer experience, with a widening gap between the household and prison samples as age increased. The inequalities in the essential skills of print and computer literacy between the general and prison populations are concerning and indicate a need for literacy and computer education in prisons.
References
[1]
Anderson, M., & Kumar, M. (2019, May 7). Digital divide persists even as lower-income Americans make gains in tech adoption. In Fact Tanks: News in the Numbers. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/07/digital-divide-persists-even-as-lower-income-americans-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/
[2]
Canadian Council on Learning. (2008). Health literacy in Canada: A healthy understanding 2008. http://www.en.copian.ca/library/research/ccl/health/health.pdf
[3]
Carr, P. G. (2017). Statement on NAEP’s transition to digitally based assessments. U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/dba/statement.aspx
[4]
Childers, S. (2003). Computer literacy: Necessity or buzzword? Information Technology and Libraries, 22(3), 100–104. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1096&context=libraryscience.
[5]
Chua, K. (2017). Skill achievement and returns in developing countries: Evidence from adult skills surveys. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 498–510. Advance online publication.
[6]
Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820.
[7]
Constantino, R. (2005). Print environments between high and low socioeconomic status (SES) communities. Teacher Librarian, 32, 22–25.
[8]
Contardo, J. B. (2010). Providing college to prison inmates. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
[9]
Delaney, R., Subramanian, R., & Patrick, F. (2016). Making the grade: Developing quality postsecondary education programs in prison. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/making-the-grade-postsecondary-education-programs-in-prison.pdf
[10]
Duke, N. (2000). For the rich it’s richer: Print experiences and environments offered to children in very low- and very high-socioeconomic status first-grade classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 441–478.
[11]
Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., & Ainley, J. (2013). International computer and information literacy study: Assessment framework. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. http://pub.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/ICILS_2013_Framework.pdf
[12]
Greenberg, E., Dunleavy, E., & Kutner, M. (2007). Literacy behind bars: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult prison literacy survey. U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Educational Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/Pubseareh/ptibsinfo.asp?pubid=2007473
[13]
Hennick, C. (2017, January 24). In state and county prisons, mobile devices help improve prison life. State Tech Magazine. https://statetechmagazine.com/article/2017/01/state-and-county-prisons-mobile-devices-help-improve-prison-life
[14]
Hogan, J., Thornton, N., Diaz-Hoffmann, L., Mohadjer, L., Krenzke, T., Li, J., VanDeKerckhove, W., Yamamoto, K., & Khorramdel, L. (2016). U.S. program for the international assessment of adult competencies (PIAAC) 2012/2014: Main study and national supplement technical report (NCES 2016-036). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016036.pdf
[15]
Hopkins, S., & Farley, H. (2015). E-learning incarcerated: Prison education and digital inclusion. The International Journal of Humanities Education, 13(2). Advance online publication.
[16]
IEA Data Processing and Research Center. (2018). IEA IDB Analyzer [Statistical software]. www.iea.nl/data
[17]
Lois, M., Bozick, R., Steele, J. L., Saunders, J., & Miles, J. N. V. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR266.html
[18]
Mamedova, S., & Pawlowski, E. (2018). A description of U.S. adults who are not digitally literate. Stats in Brief. U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018161.pdf
[19]
McKay, C. (2018). Digital access to justice from prisons: Is there a right to technology? Criminal Law Journal, 42(5), 303–321. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3382080.
[20]
Moody, K. C., Holzer, C. E., Roman, M. J., Paulsen, K. A., Freeman, D. H., Haynes, M., & Thomas, J. N. (2000). Prevalence of dyslexia among Texas prison inmates. Texas Medicine, 96(6). https://www.texmed.org/ 10876375.
[21]
Moraff, C. (2016, July 19). Digitizing the 21st century prison. Next City. https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/modern-prison-design-education-programs-internet-connection
[22]
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The Nation’s report card: Reading 2011. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2011/
[23]
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). The Nation’s report card: Reading 2019. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/highlights/reading/2019/
[24]
OECD. (2012). Literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments: Framework for the OECD survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing.
[25]
OECD. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing.
[26]
OECD (2015). Adults, computers and problem solving: What’s the problem? OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing. 10.1787/9789264236844-en
[27]
OECD. (n.d.). Survey of adult skills (PIAAC). https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/
[28]
Rainie, L. (2017, February 9). Digital divides – Feeding America. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/02/09/digital-divides-feeding-america/
[29]
Rocha, M., & Ponczek, V. (2011). The effects of adult literacy on earnings and employment. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 755–764.
[30]
Shilson-Thomas, A. (2020). Tools for transforming lives: Using technology to reduce reoffending. Reform. https://reform.uk/sites/default/files/2020-10/Tools for transforming lives_0.pdf
[31]
Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Crites, S. A., Derzis, N. C., & Patterson, D. (2010). An examination of the basic reading skills of incarcerated males. Adult Learning, 21(3–4), 4–12.
[32]
Spires, H. S., & Bartlett, M. E. (2012). Digital literacies and learning: Designing a path forward. The Friday Institute at the North Carolina State University College of Education. https://www.fi.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/media/media/2013/05/digital-literacies-and-learning.pdf
[33]
Tate, T. P., Warschauer, M., & Kim, Y. G. (2019). Learning to compose digitally: The effect of prior computer use and keyboard activity on NAEP writing. Reading and Writing, 32(8), 2059–2082.
[34]
United Nations Human Rights Council. (2011). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of onion and expression (UN Doc A/66/290). United Nations General Assembly. https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A.HRC.17.27_en.pdf
[35]
U.S. Department of Education, Institution of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). International data explorer [Statistical software]. Author. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/piaac/ideuspiaac/
[36]
Vacca, J. S. (2004). Educated prisoners are less likely to return to prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 55(4), 297–305. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26507622.
Index Terms
- An Examination of Literacy and Computer Literacy Amongst Adults Who Are Incarcerated: An Analysis of the PIAAC
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Computer literacy: essential in today's computer-centric world
Computer literacy is a fundamental part of undergraduate curriculum today. Computer literacy is as basic to undergraduate students as the course work in core curriculum in today's computer-centric information age [6]. The number of computers-in-use ...
Parental beliefs and mediation co-mediate the SES effect on chinese preschoolers’ early digital literacy: A chain-mediation model
AbstractDigital technologies are increasingly integrated into the daily lives of young children. However, disparities in access and use quality, known as the ‘digital divide,’ persist. Parents play a crucial role in narrowing this divide during early ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2021.
Publisher
IGI Global
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2021
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in