[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2204.05093 (cs)
COVID-19 e-print

Important: e-prints posted on arXiv are not peer-reviewed by arXiv; they should not be relied upon without context to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information without consulting multiple experts in the field.

[Submitted on 11 Apr 2022]

Title:When is Good Good Enough? Context Factors for Good Remote Work of Agile Software Development Teams. The Otto Case

Authors:Lisa Rometsch, Richard Wegner, Florian Brusch, Michael Neumann, Lukas Linke
View PDF
Abstract:The Covid-19 pandemic led to several challenges in everybody working life. Many companies worldwide enabled comprehensive remote work settings for their employees. Agile Software Development Teams are affected by the switch to remote work as agile methods setting communication and collaboration in focus. The well-being and motivation of software engineers and developers, which impacting their performance, are influenced by specific context factors. This paper aims to analyze identify specific context factors for a good remote work setting. We designed a single case study at a German ecommerce company and conducted an experiment using a gamification approach including eight semi-structured interviews. Our results show, that the agile software development team members to their health. Furthermore, most the team members value the gamification approach to put more focus on physical activities and the health well-being. We discuss several practical implications and provide recommendations for other teams and companies.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2204.05093 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2204.05093v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.05093

Submission history

From: Michael Neumann [view email]
[v1] Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:53:11 UTC (289 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-04
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)