Open AccessArticle

A Monolithic Electrochemical Micro Seismic Sensor Capable of Monitoring Three-Dimensional Vibrations

Lianhong Chen

^1,2,

Zhenyuan Sun

^1,2

Guanglei Li

^1,2,

Deyong Chen

^1,2,*,

Junbo Wang

^1,2 and

Jian Chen

^1,2

State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China

School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Sensors 2018, 18(4), 1047; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041047

Submission received: 5 March 2018 / Revised: 26 March 2018 / Accepted: 28 March 2018 / Published: 31 March 2018

(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Download

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

A monolithic electrochemical micro seismic sensor capable of monitoring three-axial vibrations was proposed in this paper. The proposed micro sensor mainly consisted of four sensing units interconnected within flow channels and by interpreting the voltage outputs of the sensing units, vibrations with arbitrary directions can be quantified. The proposed seismic sensors are fabricated based on MEMS technologies and characterized, which produced sensitivities along x, y, and z axes as 2473.2 ± 184.5 V/(m/s), 2261.7 ± 119.6 V/(m/s), and 3480.7 ± 417.2 V/(m/s) at 30 Hz. In addition, the vibrations in x-y, x-z, and y-z planes were applied to the developed seismic sensors, leading to comparable monitoring results after decoupling calculations with the input velocities. Furthermore, the results have shown its feasibilities for seismic data recording.

Keywords:

monolithic electrochemical seismic sensor; three-dimensional vibrations monitoring; decoupling mechanism

1. Introduction

Seismic sensors capable of sensing the seismic motions of the earth are considered as key components in the field of seismology [1], such as geophysical exploration [2,3] and seismic monitoring [4,5,6]. Especially in some applications, like structure damage detection [7,8,9,10,11], some automated sensors with smart materials are used [12,13]. According to the differences in operation principles, the conventional seismic sensors are mainly divided into variable capacitance seismic sensors [14,15], fiber-optic sensors [16,17], micro-electromechanical system accelerometers [18,19], and electrochemical seismic sensors [20,21]. Due to the use of liquid proof masses, electrochemical seismic sensors are featured with high sensitivities and low noise levels in the low-frequency domain, which is successfully used in self-contained broadband bottom seismographs.

However, in some field where the monitoring of three-dimensional motion actually is widely required from the perspective of applications (e.g., earthquake early warning system [22], seismic data recording system [23] and furthermore measuring shear stress in aerodynamics structures [24]), the monitoring of three-dimensional motions based on electrochemical approach, which is usually orthogonally mounted by three unidirectional seismic sensors, suffers from key limitations of bulky structures and high cost [21].

To deal with this issue, a monolithic electrochemical seismic sensor was proposed, which consisted of the acrylic glass housing, two membranes, an electrolyte solution, and four sensing units, enabling the monitoring of three-dimensional vibration signals. More specifically, the sensing units were located at the centers of the flow channels inside the glass housing and were connected with each other by electrolyte solutions (KI and

I_{2}

), which were filled into the space between the glass housing and the membranes. On top of the housing, four sensing units were separated by a separation plate.

2. Structure and Operating Principle

The proposed structure of monolithic seismic sensor, including the overall schematic, the cross-section in x and y axial direction and the schematic of sensing units in the flow channel were shown as Figure 1. The external vibration, which is usually represented as the velocity form, was applied to the device resulting in the convection of the liquid with the support of the rubber membrane. The sensing units in channels detected the change of active ions caused by the convection and then output the electric information.

In order to improve the performance in sensitivities and reliabilities of the proposed devices, the cross-flow separation plates shown in Figure 1a were included to limit the flow of electrolyte solutions. The separation plates divided the liquid masses into four parts in four channels, which were connected with each other through the bottom of the device. The liquid part in this modified structure was simplified ias Figure 1b.

More specially, the sensing mechanism can be explained by a mechanical part and an electrochemical part. The mechanical part, which consists of an acrylic glass block, rubber membranes and a liquid inertial mass, transfers the external vibrations to the velocities of the liquid mass inside the channel based on the restoring force generated by the membranes.

Due to the effects of the external vibrations in membranes and the exist of the viscous forces in the liquid, the convection of the electrolyte solution was generated. According to the Newton’s Second Law of Motion, the characteristic of the mechanical part is expressed as follows.

m \frac{d^{2} V}{{dt}^{2}} \frac{1}{S_{c}} + R_{h} S_{c} \frac{dV}{dt} + kV = - m \frac{{dv}_{ex}}{dt},

(1)

where

v_{ex}

represents the amplitudes of the external vibration velocity;

S_{c}

represents the cross sectional area of the channels;

R_{h}

represents the flow resistance coefficient and k represents the elastic coefficient of the rubber membrane. The transfer function of mechanical part is solved as follow.

| H_{1} (ω) | = | \frac{v_{in}}{v_{ex}} | = \frac{ω^{2}}{\sqrt{{(ω^{2} - ω_{0}^{2})}^{2} + R_{e}^{2} ω^{2}}},

(2)

where

ω_{0} = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}

represents the resonant frequency of the device and

R_{e} = \frac{R_{h} S_{c}^{2}}{m}

represents the equivalent damping [25]. As presented in (2), with the same frequency and channel geometries, the output velocity of the liquid and the input vibration velocity remain linear.

The electrochemical part, including an electrolyte solution and sensing units, ensured that the motions of the liquid mass in channels can be transferred into the electrical outputs completely. The sensing unit composed of an insulation silicon substrate layer and a pair of planar platinum electrodes fabricated on the both surfaces of the substrate was fixed transversely in the center of channels, as shown in Figure 1a. The layouts of the anodes and the cathodes of the sensing units in channel B and C were opposite to that in channel A and D. The voltage drops between the anodes and the cathodes in the sensing units were set to 0.3 V. With the application of an electric potential, electrochemical reactions

3 I^{-} - 2 e^{-} \to I_{3}^{-}

and

I_{3}^{-} + 2 e^{-} \to 3 I^{-}

[24] occur on the anodes and cathodes, respectively.

The electrode currents were generated by the ionic flux on the electrodes. According to the Faraday’s Law, cathode output currents were presented as follow.

I_{o} = nF \int J n ds,

(3)

where n = 1 represents the number of the exchanged electronics in the reaction; F = 96,500 represents the Faraday constant;

n

represents the unit normal vectors on the cathode; s represents the surface area of the cathode. Besides, the Nernst-Plank equation, Fick Laws, Navier-Stocks equation, and Butler-Volmer equation describe the transfer in the electrochemical part [25]. With the linear simplification of the boundary conditions, the transfer function of the electrochemical part can be expressed as:

| H_{2} (ω) | = | \frac{I_{o}}{v_{in}} | = \frac{C}{\sqrt{1 + {(\frac{ω}{ω_{D}})}^{2}}},

(4)

where C is the transfer constant, which depends on the device;

ω_{D}

represents the diffusion frequency, which is related to the diffusion coefficient of the liquid. Based on an operational amplifier and a decoupling circuit, the cathode currents can be changed to voltages, where the amplitudes of voltages are proportional to the input vibration velocities.

Without environmental vibrations, as shown in Figure 1b, a stable concentration gradient of

I_{3}^{-}

, the active ions in the electrochemical reactions due to their far lower concentrations than

I^{-}

[25], forms between anodes and cathodes, resulting in an equilibrium stage where the cathode currents through every unit remain equal. Due to the exists of differential calculations in the decoupling circuit, the output voltage is zero.

In response to an external vibration along different axis, the mechanisms are different. For example, in case of a seismic vibration in the x axis, the output voltage of the direction vibration (

u_{x}

) is represented as follow.

u_{x} = (u_{A} + u_{B}) - (u_{C} + u_{D}) = u_{A} - u_{C} + u_{B} - u_{D}

(5)

where

u_{x}

represents the final output voltage in response to the vibration along the axis and

u_{A}, u_{B}, u_{C}

, and

u_{D}

represent the outputs of sensing units in the channel A, B, C, and D.

The operating mechanism under the condition of x-axis vibration is presented in Figure 2. Due to the limit of the separation plate and the membranes, the electrolyte solution flows as shown in Figure 2, resulting in an opposite change of liquid flow in channel A and channel B. but due to the opposite cathode-anode layout, the active ions both moved from the cathode to the anode in each channel in A and B, producing comparable current outputs.

Thus,

u_{A}

and

u_{B}

should be added together to double the output. The same phenomenon takes place in channels C and D. Owing to the opposite cathode-anode layout between the sensing units in channel A and C, B and D, the amplitudes of formula

(u_{A} + u_{B}

) are opposite to that of (

u_{c} + u_{D})

and, thus, the final output voltage is formed by the difference of

(u_{A} + u_{B}

) and (

u_{c} + u_{D})

Equation (5) also ensures that

u_{x}

is not affected by the vibrations in other axes. For example, in response to the y-vibration, the outputs in

u_{A}

and

u_{C}

caused by the corresponding motion of the solution were positive while the outputs in

u_{B}

and

u_{D}

were negative in the same half period. Through the equation (

u_{A} - u_{C}

) and (

u_{B} - u_{D}

), the same outputs would be offset. In the same way, for cases of z vibrations along the axis, the outputs of sensing units in channels A and D, B and C are comparable, canceling the output of u_x.

The output voltage in response to the y direction vibration (

u_{y}

) is represented as:

u_{y} = (u_{A} + u_{C}) - (u_{B} + u_{D}) = u_{A} - u_{B} + u_{C} - u_{D}

(6)

where

u_{y}

represents the final output voltage in response to the vibration along the y axis.

The operating principle can be explained in Figure 3. Similarly with x-axis vibration, an opposite change of active ion concentrations in channel A and channel C was generated.

u_{A}

and

u_{C}

u_{B}

and

u_{D}

should be added together to double the output and the final output can be expressed as the difference of

(u_{A} + u_{C}

) and (

u_{B} + u_{D})

as represented in Equation (6). In the same way with Equation (5), the comparable output caused by x-vibration and z-vibration can be cancelled through the decoupling,

U_{y}

was zero.

The operating mechanism under the condition of z-axis vibration is shown in Figure 4. When a z-axial vibration is applied, the electrolyte solution moves along the direction as arrows described, leading to identical movements in channels of A, B, C, and D. Thus, due to the opposite cathode-anode layout in sensing units in channels B and C, the output voltage of the z-direction vibration (

u_{z}

) is represented as:

u_{z} = u_{A} - u_{B} - u_{C} + u_{D} = u_{A} - u_{B} + u_{D} - u_{C}

(7)

Again, in response to the seismic vibrations from other axes including both x and y directions, there is no output and

u_{z}

is always zero. Thus, Equation (7) ensures that

u_{z}

is not affected by the vibrations in the other axes.

3. Fabrication

Figure 5a showed the fabrication progress of the electrodes in sensing units with Micro-electromechanical Systems (MEMS) technology. Firstly, the insulating spacers based on 130

μ m

thick silicon wafer were formed by the 600 nm thick silicon oxide layer on both sides of the wafer substrate. Then the AZ1500 photoresist was spin-coated on one side of the wafer. Through the lithography progress, the arrays of holes were patterned by UV lithography after the soft bake of the photoresist. A 120 nm platinum electrode was sputtered on one side of the wafer. After the lift-off progress, the area of holes was exposed. The electrode on the other side of the wafer was conducted in the same way and two totally same electrodes were formed. Next, DRIE (deep reaction ion etching) was used to form the channels in the wafer with AZ4620 photoresist pre-coated on the front side of the wafer to protect the electrodes from being etched in DRIE progress.

Then the electrode chips were compressed mechanically by the unit glass housing and two O-shaped rubber rings in between with bolts. The O-rings were easily deformable so that the channels described in Figure 5a can be sealed completely instead of the use of any kinds of adhesive.

The pictures of electrode chips with flow holes after MEMS progress and the sensing unit were shown as Figure 5b,c.

The sensing units were immobilized in an acrylic glass housing (see Figure 5d) with the alignment of the holes in the sensing units and the glass housing, forming flow channels. The membranes covered the top and bottom surfaces of the housing to form a sealed cavity by mechanical compressing. The electrolyte solution was then injected into the cavity through a liquid valve in the housing. The assembled device was shown in Figure 5e.

4. Results

The performances of the three-dimensional devices were measured by a vertical platform for the characterization of x- and y-axial vibrations and a horizontal platform to characterize z-axial responses. More specifically, a 4808-type vibration exciter manufactured by B & K in 22820 Savi Ranch Parkway, Yorba Linda, CA, USA [25] was included in the vertical test and a low-frequency acceleration calibration system fabricated by Dongling Technologies in Suzhou city, Zhejiang province, China was used in the horizontal characterization.

To identify both sensitivities and cross-talks of the proposed monolithic seismic sensor in response to three-dimensional vibrations, experiments with single inputs at the x, y, or z axes were conducted (see Figure 6).

Figure 6a presented the output voltages of three axes in response to x-axis vibrations. The sensitivity at the x axis at 30 Hz was characterized as 2473.23 ± 184.55 V/(m/s). Meanwhile, in response to x-direction vibrations, the voltage outputs at y and z directions were much lower compared to the values of the x-direction voltages. The ratios of output and the crosstalk

u_{x}

u_{y}

and

u_{x}

u_{z}

were 7.65 and 8.66 at 30 Hz. The unwanted output voltages at the y and z directions were due to the mismatched electrodes in micro-fabrication, which cannot be avoided entirely. However, this issue can be to an extent addressed by accurately controlling the fabrication and packaging steps to decrease potential geometrical differences among sensing units.

Figure 6b showed the voltage outputs of three axes in response to a vibration along the y axis. The sensitivity at the y axis at 30 Hz was quantified as 2261.71 ± 119.68 V/(m/s), which was comparable to the sensitivity of the x axis when x-directional vibrations were applied due to the axisymmetric structure in the x-y plane. The ratios of output and the crosstalk

u_{y}

u_{x}

and

u_{y}

u_{z}

were quantified as 8.34 and 7.27 at 30 Hz.

As shown in Figure 6c, the sensitivity of the z-axis in response to z vibration inputs was quantified as 3480.71 ± 417.20 V/(m/s) at 30 Hz, which was higher than the corresponding sensitivities in the x and y axes. It was speculated that due to the effect of the membranes, the motion of the liquid under the membranes, which was considered as the part with the largest velocity caused by the external horizontal vibration, cannot convert the horizontal velocity into the channel-direction velocity completely. Thus, external vibrations at the z direction without the energy loss in velocity conversion can lead to higher voltage outputs in comparison to x and y directional vibrations. The ratios of output and the crosstalk

u_{z}

u_{x}

and

u_{z}

u_{y}

were quantified as 8.84 and 11.57 at 30 Hz.

Furthermore, the outputs of the devices in response to applied inputs at the angles of 45° within the x-y, x-z, and y-z planes were collected. Note that the inputs were applied by the vibration exciter and a home-developed framework, as shown in Figure 7. The angle was strictly confirmed with angular measuring tools.

In response to an input within the x-y plane, the corresponding monitoring velocities calculated with the vector synthesis by the ratios of the axial outputs and the corresponding sensitivities in x and y axes, shown in Figure 6, were quantified as the function of input velocities (see Figure 8a).

As shown in Figure 8a, the slopes of the curves in response to the 45-degree angle inputs were quantified as 0.97, which were comparable with the slopes of the input curves, validating the feasibility of the monolithic device. In response to inputs within the y-z plane, the slopes of the monitoring curves in response to the 45-degree angle inputs were quantified as 0.90, as shown in Figure 8b. Similarly, in response to the 45-degree angle x-z plane input, the slopes of the monitoring curves in response to the 45-degree angle inputs were quantified as 0.87 (see Figure 8c). The comparable curves proved the proposed devices were capable of monitoring the vibrations in any directions.

In summary, no matter which direction the vibrations were input along, the voltage outputs by the monolithic device were close to the theoretical result, which proved the feasibility in measuring three-dimensional vibration through the decoupling from the mix input.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a MEMS based monolithic electrochemical seismic sensor, which can monitor three-dimensional vibrations, was demonstrated in this paper. Experimental results showed the prominent differences of output voltages between input axis and the other axes. The ratios of the outputs and the crosstalk of the other axes are about 10, which illustrated the great independence and the negligible crosstalk. In addition, at 30 Hz, the sensitivity at the x axis was characterized as 2473.23 ± 184.55 V/(m/s). y axis sensitivity was quantified as 2261.71 ± 119.68 V/(m/s), and z axis sensitivity can reach 3480.71 ± 417.20 V/(m/s).

The vibration information along three axes can be decoupled accurately from the mixed input in x-y, x-z, and y-z plane. The average ratios of the monitoring velocities and the input at three axes were calculated as 0.97, 0.90, 0.87, respectively and the feasibility of the decoupling calculation can be proved from it.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National 863 Program of China under Grant 2014AA09158, the National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project of China under Grant 2013YQ12035703 and the State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan under Grant 2016YFC0301801.

Author Contributions

L. Chen and S. Yuan conceived and designed and performed the experiments; G. Li analyzed the data; and J. Wang, D. Chen, and J. Chen contributed in writing the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Deng, T.; Chen, D.Y.; Wang, J.B.; Chen, J.; He, W.T.; Fan, Y.J. A MEMS based electrochemical seismic sensor. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXVII), Barcelona, Spain, 16–20 June 2013; pp. 920–923. [Google Scholar]
Huang, H.; Carande, B.; Tang, R.; Oiler, J.; Dmitriy, Z.; Vadim, A.; Yu, H. Development of a micro seismometer based on molecular electronic transducer technology for planetary exploration. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 26th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Taipei, Taiwan, 22–24 January 2013; pp. 629–632. [Google Scholar]
Abramovich, I.A.; Zhu, T. Next Generation Robust Low Noise Seismometer for Nuclear Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 30th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies, Portsmouth, VA, USA, 23–25 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
Milligan, D.J.; Homeijer, B.; Walmsley, R. An ultra-low noise MEMS accelerometer for seismic imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors, Limerick, Ireland, 28–31 October 2011; pp. 1281–1284. [Google Scholar]
Hons, M.S.; Stewart, R.R.; Lawton, D.C.; Bertram, M.B.; Hauer, G. Field data comparisons of MEMS accelerometers and analog geophones. Lead. Edge 2008, 27, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sun, B.; Li, H.; Sun, X. A study based on real-time data acquisition system of intelligent seismometers in two dimension seismic prospecting. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Chengdu, China, 5–8 August 2012; pp. 2400–2404. [Google Scholar]
Ubertini, F.; Cavalagli, N.; Kita, A.; Comanducci, G. Assessment of a monumental masonry bell-tower after 2016 central Italy seismic sequence by long-term SHM. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2018, 16, 775–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Clementi, F.; Pierdicca, A.; Formisano, A.; Catinari, F.; Lenci, S. Numerical model upgrading of a historical masonry building damaged during the 2016 Italian earthquakes: The case study of the Podestà palace in Montelupone (Italy). J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2017, 7, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Deraemaeker, A.; Reynders, E.; De Roeck, G.; Kullaa, J. Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2008, 22, 34–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Krstevska, L.; Tashkov, L.; Naumovski, N.; Florio, G.; Formisano, A.; Fornaro, A.; Landolfo, R. In-situ experimental testing of four historical buildings damaged during the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. In Proceedings of the Final Conference on COST ACTION C26: Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events, Naples, Italy, 16–18 September 2010; pp. 427–432, ISBN 978-041560685-1. [Google Scholar]
Gentile, C.; Gallino, N. Ambient vibration testing and structural evaluation of an historic suspension footbridge. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2008, 39, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kavitha, S.; Daniel, R.J.; Sumangala, K. Design and Analysis of MEMS Comb Drive Capacitive Accelerometer for SHM and Seismic Applications. Measurement 2016, 93, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, H.; Pike, W.T. A micromachined angular-acceleration sensor for geophysical applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 173506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Laudati, A.; Mennella, F.; Giordano, M.; D’Altrui, G.; Tassini, C.C.; Cusano, A. A fiber-optic Bragg grating seismic sensor. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2007, 19, 1991–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lindsey, N.J.; Martin, E.R.; Dreger, D.S.; Freifeld, B.; Cole, S.; James, S.R.; Ajo-Franklin, J.B. Fiber-Optic Network Observations of Earthquake Wavefields. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 11792–11799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Edalatfar, F.; Yaghootkar, B.; Qureshi, A.Q.A.; Azimi, S.; Bahreyni, B. Design, fabrication and characterization of a high performance MEMS accelerometer. In Proceedings of the Sensors, Orlando, FL, USA, 30 October–3 November 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
Laine, J.; Mougenot, D. Benefits of MEMS based seismic accelerometers for oil exploration. In Proceedings of the Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, Lyon, France, 10–14 June 2007; pp. 1473–1477. [Google Scholar]
Deng, T.; Chen, D.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; He, W. A MEMS based electrochemical vibration sensor for seismic motion monitoring. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2014, 23, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antonov, A.; Shabalina, A.; Razin, A.; Avdyukhina, S.; Egorov, I.; Agafonov, V. Low-Frequency Seismic Node Based on Molecular-Electronic Transfer Sensors for Marine and Transition Zone Exploration. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2017, 34, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, D.Y.; Hsiao, N.C.; Wu, Y.M. The Earthworm based earthquake alarm reporting system in Taiwan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2015, 105, 568–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Havskov, J.; Alguacil, G. Instrumentation in Earthquake Seismology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Hughes, C.N.; Dutta, D.; Bashirzadeh, Y.; Ahmed, K.; Qian, S. Measuring Shear Stress with A MicroFluidic Sensor to Improve Aerodynamic Efficiency. In Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 5–9 January 2015; p. 1919. [Google Scholar]
Huang, H.; Carande, B.; Tang, R.; Oiler, J. A Micro Seismometer Based on Molecular Electronic Transducer Technology for Planetary Exploration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 4524–4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sun, Z.; Agafonov, V.; Egorov, E. The influence of the boundary condition on anodes for solution of convection–diffusion equation with the application to a four-electrode electrochemical cell. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2011, 661, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
B&K Vibration Exciter: Type 4808. Available online: https://www.bksv.com/en/products/shakers-and-exciters/measurement-exciters/permanent-magnet-vibration-exciter-type-4808 (accessed on 15 October 2015).

Figure 1. (a) Overall views and cross-section views of the proposed device with four flow channels and sensing units inside them. (b) The simplified schematic of the liquid part in the proposed device.

Figure 2. Sensing mechanism illustrations and schematics of fluid flowing mechanism in response to acceleration along x-axis. Blue arrows represent the direction of liquid flow due to the convection caused by the external vibration while white arrows represent the direction of the membrane vibration.

i_{A}, i_{B}, i_{C}

, and

i_{D}

represent the cathode currents in sensing unit A, B, C, D, respectively.

i_{A}, i_{B}, i_{C}

, and

i_{D}

represent the cathode currents in sensing unit A, B, C, D, respectively.

Figure 3. Sensing mechanism illustrations and schematics of fluid flowing mechanism in response to acceleration along y-axis. Blue arrows represent the direction of liquid flow due to the convection caused by the external vibration while white arrows represent the direction of the membrane vibration.

i_{A}, i_{B}, i_{C}

, and

i_{D}

represent the cathode currents in sensing unit A, B, C, D, respectively.

i_{A}, i_{B}, i_{C}

, and

i_{D}

represent the cathode currents in sensing unit A, B, C, D, respectively.

Figure 4. Sensing mechanism illustrations and schematics of fluid flowing mechanism in response to acceleration along z-axis. Blue arrows represent the direction of liquid flow due to the convection caused by the external vibration while white arrows represent the direction of the membrane vibration.

i_{A}, i_{B}, i_{C}

, and

i_{D}

represent the cathode currents in sensing unit A, B, C, D, respectively.

i_{A}, i_{B}, i_{C}

, and

i_{D}

represent the cathode currents in sensing unit A, B, C, D, respectively.

Figure 5. (a) The fabrication progress of the electrodes in sensing units, including thermal oxidation, Pt sputtering, lift-off and deep reaction ion etching. (b) The electrode fabricated by MEMS technology with a lot of flow holes. (c) The sensing unit composed by electrodes and flow channels. (d) The acrylic glass housing with separation plate and flow channels. (e) The assembled device.

Figure 6. Independent output voltages along x, y, and z axes in response to the input vibration at 30 Hz along x (a), y (b), and z axes (c), where huge differences between the input axial outputs and the others proved that when the vibration along an axis input, the crosstalk caused by the other axis can be ignored.

Figure 7. The schematic of the home-developed framework.

Figure 8. The comparisons of the monitoring velocity based on the decoupling mechanism and the actual input velocity in response to the vibration at the direction of 45-degree angle with the x axis in x-y plane (a), at a 45 degree angle with the y axis in y-z plane (b), and at a 45-degree angle with the x axis in x-z plane (c), respectively. The closed value between the monitoring results and the actual input proved the feasibility of the monolithic structure and the decoupling mechanism.

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, L.; Sun, Z.; Li, G.; Chen, D.; Wang, J.; Chen, J. A Monolithic Electrochemical Micro Seismic Sensor Capable of Monitoring Three-Dimensional Vibrations. Sensors 2018, 18, 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041047

AMA Style

Chen L, Sun Z, Li G, Chen D, Wang J, Chen J. A Monolithic Electrochemical Micro Seismic Sensor Capable of Monitoring Three-Dimensional Vibrations. Sensors. 2018; 18(4):1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Lianhong, Zhenyuan Sun, Guanglei Li, Deyong Chen, Junbo Wang, and Jian Chen. 2018. "A Monolithic Electrochemical Micro Seismic Sensor Capable of Monitoring Three-Dimensional Vibrations" Sensors 18, no. 4: 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041047

APA Style

Chen, L., Sun, Z., Li, G., Chen, D., Wang, J., & Chen, J. (2018). A Monolithic Electrochemical Micro Seismic Sensor Capable of Monitoring Three-Dimensional Vibrations. Sensors, 18(4), 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

A Monolithic Electrochemical Micro Seismic Sensor Capable of Monitoring Three-Dimensional Vibrations

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Structure and Operating Principle

3. Fabrication

4. Results

5. Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI