[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Article in Journal
Endemic Goiter and Iodine Prophylaxis in Calabria, a Region of Southern Italy: Past and Present
Previous Article in Journal
Barriers and Facilitators of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Renal Transplant Recipients, Family Members and Healthcare Professionals—A Focus Group Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Curcumin, Hormesis and the Nervous System
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/nu11102426
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Curcumin, Gut Microbiota, and Neuroprotection

by
Francesco Di Meo
1,2,
Sabrina Margarucci
3,
Umberto Galderisi
4,
Stefania Crispi
1,2,* and
Gianfranco Peluso
3,*
1
Institute of Biosciences and BioResources-UOS Naples CNR, Via P. Castellino, 80100 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Complesso Universitario Monte Sant’Angelo via Cinthia, 80100 Naples, Italy
3
Institute of Research on Terrestrial Ecosystems, 05010 Porano TR, Italy
4
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Santa Maria di Costantinopoli, 80100 Naples, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2019, 11(10), 2426; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102426
Submission received: 31 August 2019 / Revised: 29 September 2019 / Accepted: 4 October 2019 / Published: 11 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Curcumin and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Graphical abstract
"> Figure 1
<p>Reductive and conjugative metabolism of curcumin. Glucuronidation and sulfation are the predominating pathways of conjugation. Curcumin is also reduced by endogenous reductase systems in a stepwise manner and subsequently, curcumin metabolites are glucuronidated and sulfurated.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Schematic illustration of the interactions between curcumin and gut microbiota. The administration of curcumin considerably changed the ratio between beneficial and pathogenic bacteria in a gut microbiota community, favoring the growth of beneficial bacteria and limiting the growth of pathogenic ones.</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Curcumin, a nontoxic, naturally occurring polyphenol, has been recently proposed for the management of neurodegenerative and neurological diseases. However, a discrepancy exists between the well-documented pharmacological activities that curcumin seems to possess in vivo and its poor aqueous solubility, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetic profiles that should limit any therapeutic effect. Thus, it is possible that curcumin could exert direct regulative effects primarily in the gastrointestinal tract, where high concentrations of curcumin are present after oral administration. Indeed, a new working hypothesis that could explain the neuroprotective role of curcumin despite its limited availability is that curcumin acts indirectly on the central nervous system by influencing the “microbiota–gut–brain axis”, a complex bidirectional system in which the microbiome and its composition represent a factor which preserves and determines brain “health”. Interestingly, curcumin and its metabolites might provide benefit by restoring dysbiosis of gut microbiome. Conversely, curcumin is subject to bacterial enzymatic modifications, forming pharmacologically more active metabolites than curcumin. These mutual interactions allow to keep proper individual physiologic functions and play a key role in neuroprotection.

Graphical Abstract">
Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over the last decades, the interest in herbal medicines has greatly increased since they can exert preventive effects against chronic and degenerative diseases including cancer. In addition, these molecules play an important role in neuroprotection by modulating different cellular functions. Different studies have shown that curcumin, like others dietary polyphenols, is able to counteract the effects of toxic damage in different tissues [1,2,3].
Polyphenols are a large class of compounds (curcumin, lignans, lignins, stilbenes, flavonoids, coumarins, cinnamic acid, benzoic acid, etc.) which possess at least one aromatic ring structure with one or more hydroxyl groups. They are present in most vegetables and secondary metabolites and derive from the shikimic acid pathway. Contrasting findings on the bioavailability of polyphenols created doubts about their usefulness as beneficial antioxidant compounds. Currently, there are findings showing that polyphenols can exert their biological effects following chemical modifications performed by gut microbiota. Indeed, enzymes of the gut microbiota can perform deglycosylation, dihydroxylation, and ademethylation of polyphenols that result in small catabolic products, which may be easily absorbed during intestinal transit. These catabolites may fall in two classes: some have higher biological activities compared with “parental” compound, and others lose biological activity [4].
Among polyphenols, curcumin has received great attention by researchers in the last years. Curcumin is normally found in the turmeric of Curcuma longa Linn. This plant belongs to the Zingiberaceae family and it is native from South Asia. Turmeric has been used in Asia from ancient times in traditional medicine and nowadays it is widely used in food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries [5].
Turmeric contains essential oils such as zingiberene [6] and coloring agents that are known as curcuminoids [7]. Curcumin is a polyphenol that represents the most important curcuminoid isolated from the rhizome of the plants. It has been used for centuries as a herbal remedy for the treatment of several diseases in East Asia [8,9,10] due to its safety and intrinsic nontoxicity to humans, even at high doses [11].
The general interest in its therapeutic efficacy arises from the different biological and pharmacological effects. Curcumin possesses antioxidant [12,13] and anti-inflammatory properties [14,15], and it has shown to exert beneficial effects against several types of cancers [16,17,18].
It should also be highlighted that an increasing number of clinical trials based on curcumin administration have been published or are currently in progress, therefore demonstrating the expanding interest of the scientific community on the therapeutic potential of curcumin [8,19].
However, the pharmacological potential of curcumin is widely restricted because of its poor water solubility, chemical instability, and rapid metabolism. In addition, curcumin bioavailability is very low after oral administration [20,21]. In this regard, numerous attempts have been made to increase its efficacy and bioavailability. To overcome solubility problems, different curcumin formulations using nanocarriers have been tested [22,23,24]. Other strategies developed to increase curcumin bioavailability are based on combined administration of curcumin with other molecules. For example, the co-administration of curcumin with piperine, an alkaloid of black pepper and long pepper, significantly enhances curcumin bioavailability since piperine prevents curcumin metabolism through the inhibition of the glucuronidation processes [25,26].
The puzzling between the poor bioavailability and the large variety of pharmacological activities of curcumin can be solved by taking into account the reciprocal interactions between curcumin and the gut microbiota.
Gut microbiota is one of the most densely and dynamic populated microbial ecosystems that contribute to individual health. Gut microbiota composition changes with age and it is strictly related to diet. Different unbalanced diets determine alterations in the gut microbiota composition, resulting in modification of gut permeability and in gut low-grade inflammation [27].
Like other dietary polyphenols, curcumin bioactivity is related not only to the absorption rate, but also to its metabolism that is due to the digestion from intestinal microbes. Biological activity of the derivative metabolites may differ from the native curcumin. In addition, specific biological properties often depend on bioactive metabolites produced by gut microbiota digestion [28]. In this regard, it is worthy to note that curcumin, after administration, accumulates in the gut where, after microbial digestion, it can be transformed into biologically active metabolites [29,30,31].
In this review, we discuss the curcumin–gut microbiota interplay that allows transforming dietary curcumin into bioactive derivatives and how these molecules can exert neuroprotective functions.

2. Curcumin Metabolism

The bioavailability of curcumin, as with other polyphenols, is generally poor and after oral dosing, its blood levels are extremely low.
The oral bioavailability of curcumin is low due to a relatively low intestinal absorption and the rapid metabolism in the liver, followed by elimination through the gall bladder. An oral dose of 0.1 g/kg administered to mice yielded a peak plasma concentration of free curcumin that was only 2.25 μg/mL [32]. In a clinical trial with an oral dose of 3.6 g of curcumin, a plasma level as low as 11.1 nmol L−1 was detected an hour after oral dosing [33]. Also, after ingestion of high doses of curcumin, 8 g per day via oral administration, the plasmatic level of free curcumin was negligible [34].
Curcumin is used in different dosage depending on the disease. Recent in vitro studies report that curcumin is effective in reducing oxidative stress (OS) and in preventing neurodegeneration when used at a concentration ranging from 5–50 μM [35,36] and at a dose from 50 to 200 mg/Kg/day in vivo [37,38,39]. In clinical trials, curcumin is effective on oxidative stress and inflammation at a dosage from 90 to 2000 mg/day [40,41,42], while in neurodegenerative diseases, prevention is evident at a dosage of 500–2000 mg [43].
Turmeric contains about 2%–9% of curcuminoids. Commercial turmeric extracts contain approximately 70%–75% curcumin, 20% demethoxycurcumin, and 5% bisdemethoxycurcumin. Chemically, curcumin is a β-diketone α- β-unsaturated ferulic acid. Curcumin shows a keto–enol tautomerism, and the balance between the two forms depends on the polarity and pH of the solvent with the keto and enol forms existing in given proportions. Once dissolved, the enol form predominates (Figure 1). Curcumin is soluble in ethanol, acetic acid, dichloromethane, chloroform, methanol, ethyl acetate, dimethyl sulfoxide, and acetone, while it is insoluble in water [44].
The bioavailability of curcumin has been studied extensively in mouse and humans. After oral administration of high doses, curcumin is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with peak blood levels rapidly reached within one hour after dosing [45]. In rats, after oral administration, plasma curcumin is mainly found in the form of glucuronide conjugates, while just a small amount of the unmodified form is detected. In humans, after curcumin oral administration, glucuronide conjugates and sulfate conjugates are detected in blood, while intact curcumin is barely detected [46].
Ingested curcumin first passes through the stomach, where the absorption of polyphenols is practically absent. Due to its resistance to low pH, curcumin reaches the large intestine without any chemical or structural modifications. In the large intestine, curcumin may be modified by phase I enzymes, a class of enzymes that introduces reactive and polar groups into their substrates. Phase I reactions often produce active metabolites. One of the most common enzymes of this group is cytochrome P450 that catalyzes a substrate hydroxylation. Unexpectedly, curcumin appears not to be metabolized by cytochrome P450, because no products of demethylation or hydroxylation were detected after incubation of curcumin with rat liver microsomes [47]. The phase I metabolism of curcumin includes the successive reduction of the four double bonds. The enzymes responsible for the metabolic reduction have been found to reside in the cytosol of the enterocytes and include the alcohol dehydrogenases [48]. It has been demonstrated that phase I metabolism yielded three metabolites, namely, tetrahydrocurcumin (M1), hexahydrocurcumin (M2), and octahydrocurcumin (M3). Then, curcumin and the phase I metabolites were subject to conjugation via phase II metabolism to yield their corresponding glucuronide and sulfate O-conjugated metabolites.
The result of these reactions is the increase of molecular weight and the production of less active metabolites than their substrates. One of the most important enzymes of this group is the glutathione S-transferase. In vitro and in vivo, curcumin and its reductive metabolites appear to be easily conjugated [32]. Among the reported conjugates, monoglucuronides, monosulfates, and mixed glucuronide/sulfates are included. Glucuronidation is the predominating pathway of conjugation, and the glucuronide of curcumin is usually found as the major metabolite of curcumin in body fluids, organs, and cells [32].
Commercial curcumin also contains demethoxycurcumin and bisdemethoxycurcumin, and these molecules undergo reductive metabolism very similar to curcumin, with the hexahydro product as the major metabolite and much smaller amounts of the octa-, tetra-, and dihydro products.

3. Biotransformation of Curcumin by Gut Microbiota

The transformation of curcumin does not occur only by enzymes produced by the enterocytes or by hepatocytes, but also by enzymes produced by the gut microbiota. Gut microbiota can be described as a biological reactor because of its own formidable metabolic functions, like the transformation of numerous compounds that reach the colon. This activity is made possible through the capacity of microorganisms for producing a huge and varied range of enzymes. In particular, curcumin intestinal transformations include several steps and different classes of microbial enzymes.
Thus, the composition of the microbiota will cause different biotransformation of dietary curcumin.
Accordingly, the beneficial effects for consumers depend not only on the polyphenols taken from the diet, but also on the type of microbial population of the individual.
Several enteric bacteria capable of modifying curcumin have been identified.
Curcumin can be modified in the colon tract by a specific microorganism, Escherichia coli. The enzyme NADPH-dependent curcumin/dihydrocurcumin reductase (CurA) converts curcumin first into the intermediate, dihhydrocurcumin, and then in the final product, tetrahydrocurcumin, with a two-step reduction that is NADPH-dependent. In the first step of reaction, dihhydrocurcumin is generated from curcumin by reductive destruction of the chromophoric diarylheptatrienone chain. NADPH is an indispensable cofactor for the reduction of curcumin in dihydrocurcumin by CurA. In the second step, dihydrocurcumin is converted in tetrahydrocurcumin with the same mechanism [49].
CurA showed sequence similarity with some enzymes of the medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily, which contains many different families including the alcohol dehydrogenases family, implicated in curcumin reduction.
Again, the firmicute Blautia sp. (MRG-PMF1), another human intestinal bacteria strain, is involved in curcumin metabolism. This bacterium produces two derivatives, demethylcurcumin and bisdemethylcurcumin by demethylation reaction [50]. Other bacteria capable of modifying curcumin have been identified. Escherichia fergusonii (ATCC 35469) and two E. coli strains (ATCC 8739 and DH10B) produce dihydrocurcumin, tetrahydrocurcumin, and ferulic acid [51]. Other microorganisms such as Bifidobacteria longum BB536, Bifidobacteria pseudocatenulaum G4, Escherichia coli K-12, Enterococcus faecalis JCM 5803, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus casei are all biologically relevant bacterial strains capable of degrading curcumin [52].
It has been reported that microbial metabolism of curcumin by Pichia anomala or by a bacterial strain of Bacillus megaterium DCMB-002 yielded new metabolites through different metabolic processes including hydroxylation, demethylation, reduction, and demethoxylation.
Recently, new curcumin metabolites produced by fecal bacteria have been identified. An analysis performed by using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time of flight mass identified a total of 23 metabolites and discovered different novel human gut microbiota curcumin metabolic pathways, by demethylation, reduction, hydroxylation, and acetylation, or the combination of these [53].
Finally, bacteria from colon may deconjugate glucuronide and sulfate O-conjugated inactive metabolites produced by phase II enzymes and reconvert them to the corresponding phase I active metabolites [48].
Interestingly, there is evidence that curcumin metabolites display a similar or superior potency to curcumin [35]. Indeed, tetrahydrocurcumin possesses superiority over curcumin as a free-radical quencher and it was shown to have therapeutic effects in neurodegenerative diseases. These effects could be due, at least in part, to the inhibition of prominent cytokines’ release, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), or by inhibition of NF-κB activation.

4. Curcumin Effects on Gut Microbiota

Human mucosal surfaces are connected with a diverse microbial community composed primarily by bacteria, but also by viruses, fungi, archaea, and protozoa [54]. The gastrointestinal tract is inhabited by a complex and abundant microbial community, with 100 trillion bacteria, about 10–100 times more than the quantity of eukaryotic cells [55].
In the intestine, curcumin, after oral or intraperitoneal administration, can exert a regulative effect on the gut microbiota community, affecting microbial richness, diversity, and composition., This effect should be involved in curcumin pharmacological activity [56] (Figure 2).
The administration of curcumin considerably changed the ratio between beneficial and pathogenic bacteria by increasing the abundance of Bifidobacteria, Lactobacilli, and reducing the loads of Prevotellaceae, Coriobacterales, Enterobacteria, and Enterococci [57].
Oral administration of curcumin tends to decrease the microbial richness and diversity in mice [58] and reduce the abundance of several representative bacterial families in gut microbial communities, such as Prevotellaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Rikenellaceae, often associated to the onset of systemic diseases [56,59,60].
This study reported that curcumin administration induced significant weight loss in ovariectomized rats, increasing the number of species of seven different bacterial genus: Serratia, Anaerotruncus, Shewanella, Pseudomonas, Papillibacter, Exiguobacterium, and Helicobacter. This study suggests that curcumin can partially reverse changes in the composition of gut microbiota in rats caused by estrogen deficiency induced by ovariectomy [61].
A new pilot work evaluating the effects of curcumin on gut microbiota showed that in the placebo group, there was an overall reduction of bacterial species up to 15%. On the contrary, curcumin-treated subjects showed an increase of bacterial species up of 69%. Subjects responsive to the treatment had uniform increases in Clostridium spp., Bacteroides spp., Citrobacter spp., Cronobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus spp., Klebsiella spp., Parabacteroides spp., and Pseudomonas spp., as well as reduced relative abundance in several Blautia spp. and most Ruminococcus spp. [62].
Thus, curcumin can change the composition of the microbiota, regulating not only the bacterial populations of the gut, but also the ability of intestinal bacterial strains to produce more active compounds from curcumin itself.

5. The Direct Neuroprotective Role of Curcumin and Curcumin Metabolites Produced by Enteric Bacteria

Among the different biological effects exerted by curcumin, the antioxidant one is considered the most interesting in terms of prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by progressive loss of function of a specific population of neurons that determines neural deficit and cognitive impairment. The mechanisms responsible of neurodegeneration have not yet been completely elucidated; however oxidative stress and inflammation are considered the main effectors [63,64,65].
Oxidative stress is generated in the cell when there is imbalance between the amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced and the cellular defense mechanisms that neutralize them.
High levels of ROS irreversibly damage all the cells, but neuronal cells are particularly sensitive also to relatively low levels of ROS. ROS, in fact, are the main factor determining brain ageing and they are involved in the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases [66,67].
Curcumin exerts a neuroprotective role by directly or indirectly scavenging free radical species. In fact, curcumin increases significantly the Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity [68]. SOD, one of major antioxidant enzymes, is able to dismutate superoxide into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen.
Curcumin also shows indirect antioxidant action by elevating catalase plasma activity [69]. Catalases, a class of enzymes able to catalyze decomposition of hydrogen peroxide to water and molecular oxygen, belong to the antioxidant defense system of the cell and protect the cell from oxidative damage by reactive oxygen species.
Different studies indicated that curcumin favors brain health by modulating specific pathways such as: the PI3K/Akt (Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Protein Kinase B) pathway, AMP (AMP-activated protein) kinase pathway, MAPK (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase)/Akt pathways [70,71,72] and Akt/Nrf2 (Nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2) pathway [70].
AMPK regulates energy metabolism and plays an important role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. This pathway, once activated, protects neuronal damage by decreasing ROS species—ER-associated (Endoplasmic Reticulum) [73].
In neurons, MAPK/Akt and PI3K/Akt represent the major oxidative stress-sensitive signal transduction pathways that regulate cell growth and cell death [74].
Finally, Nrf2 is a key regulator of antioxidant defense during oxidative stress. Activation of Nrf2 upregulates in the neurons defensive antioxidant mechanisms through upregulation of the genes involved in ROS metabolism [75]. When phosphorylated, Akt facilitates Nrf2 nuclear translocation, positively promoting its function [70].
Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule that shows a key role in inflammation. In physiological conditions, NO has an anti-inflammatory effect. Several studies in humans indicated that curcumin supplementation improves vascular endothelial function in healthy people by increasing NO bioavailability and reducing oxidative stress [41,76].
Thus, curcumin neuroprotective activity seems to be related to the ability of the natural compound to inhibit, directly or indirectly, OS in neurons.
Again, tetrahydrocurcumin is the most studied bacterium-modified curcumin derivative in neuroprotection. It is known that tetrahydrocurcumin reduces oxidative stress and the number of apoptotic neurons, activates autophagy, and inhibits the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway after traumatic brain injury [77]. This metabolite was reported to be protective in vitro against Aβ-oligomer-induced toxicity [78], to modulate in vivo the neuroinflammation, to reduce the level of ROS triggered by β-amyloid fibers, to decrease the mitochondrial membrane potential, and to inhibit caspase activation [79]. In brain injury, tetrahydrocurcumin avoids neuronal cell apoptosis and improves neurobehavioral function by upregulating the Nrf2 pathway [39].
Tetrahydrocurcumin treatment has been reported to be effective also in Parkinson’s disease (PD). A study carried out in a mouse model of PD showed that tetrahydrocurcumin was able to increase dopamine levels and to inhibit the activity of monoamine oxidase, the enzyme that determines the increase of neuronal OS levels through the degradation of neurotransmitters [80,81]. While these results clearly indicate that tetrahydrocurcumin may prevent neurodegeneration [78,82], little is known about the neuroprotective efficacy of others curcumin by-products, such as bisdemethoxycurcumin and demethoxycurcumin and octahydrocurcumin.
Demethoxycurcumin has been reported to exert neuroprotective effects in neuronal cells by glutathione increase and ROS decrease [83,84].
Octahydrocurcumin also represents a very promising antioxidant molecule able to enhance the expression of antioxidant protein through Nrf2 pathway activation [85].
Bisdemethoxycurcumin was reported to show the highest affinity for Aβ-containing plaques in cortical Alzheimer’s Disease brain tissue in comparison with other curcuminoids [86]. Indeed, several in vitro and in vivo experiments suggest that curcumin can also operate by preventing the formation of extra- or intracellular aggregates present in many neurodegenerative disorders.
For prevention and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, curcumin has been shown to effectively maintain the normal structure and function of cerebral vessels, mitochondria, and synapses, thus reducing risk factors for a variety of chronic diseases and decreasing the risk of Alzheimer’s disease onset [43].
The effect of curcumin on Alzheimer’s disease is related to the modulation of multiple signaling pathways, to its anti-amyloid and metal iron-chelating properties, antioxidation, and its anti-inflammatory activities [87,88].
However, further studies are needed to identify other curcumin metabolites therapeutically active in neuroprotection.

6. Curcumin and Gut Microbiota

As detailed before, the paradox of poor bioavailability of curcumin and the wide range of health effects of curcumin can be explained by considering the reciprocal influence existing between curcumin and gut microbiota. Curcumin in the gut favors the growth of beneficial bacteria strains such as Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli, with reduction of pathogenic strains [56,89]. In addition, curcumin treatment has been found to decrease the microbial richness and diversity, with a specific reduction of species found as cancer-related [90].
Several studies reported that curcumin actively reduces intestinal inflammation by modulating different molecular pathways. Thus, it is possible that curcumin, by modulating the homeostasis of the gut–brain axis, could also determine neuroprotective beneficial [91].
Indeed, dysbiosis is able to induce neuroinflammation, leading to an increased amyloidogenesis or to Lewy bodies accumulation, and to augment specific micro-RNA, down-regulating the triggering receptor expressed in microglial/myeloid cells-2 (TREM2)-mediated amyloid phagocytosis, to reduce, in case of a decrease in butyrate-producing bacteria within the microbiome, the availability of butyrate, an important metabolite known to promote neuron survival [92,93,94].
In particular, gut dysbiosis has been postulated to trigger the onset of some neurodegenerative diseases [95]. Several reports suggest that compromised gut microbiota dysbiosis may represent an important co-factor in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [96,97]. In fact, different bacterial species are able to produce or aggravate the production of Aβ plaques. Gut dysbiosis, priming the innate immune system by microbiota, determines a neuroinflammatory response that causes misfolding of neuronal amyloid-β and α-synuclein [98].
Gastrointestinal dysfunctions, can be considered as early biomarkers in PD since they are consistently associated with the disease and may precede the classical motor manifestations by decades [99]. In addition, these dysfunctions make the etiology of PD more complicated. It is known that in PD patients, the impairment of the epithelial barrier has been associated with a decrease of Prevotellaceae. These strains are the main producers of mucin, a protein that protects the epithelium from pathogens [100].
More interestingly, in PD patients, there is a decrease of butyrate, a histone deacetylase inhibitor which protects dopaminergic neurons from degeneration by upregulating the neurotrophic factors, such as BDNF (Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor) and GDNF (Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor) [101].
Studies in humans and in Huntington Disease (HD) animal models also reveal gastrointestinal dysfunctions, which may contribute to the worsening of the disease. The consistent loss of body weight—the most important non-neurological complication of HD and a direct consequence of gastrointestinal defects—has been associated with an impaired gut mobility and malabsorption [102]. Gut microbiota could have a role in HD since presymptomatic HD subjects display serum metabolomic shifts that suggest changes in gut microbial-derived metabolites [103].
Efforts to modulate gut microbiome in cases of neurodegeneration are limited and involve the use of antibiotics, fecal microbiota transplant, prebiotic/probiotic supplementation, and dietary interventions. In this context, curcumin can represent a potential therapeutic option against neurodegeneration since it exerts beneficial effects on gut microbiome, without any apparent toxicity, restoring the dysbiosis within patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases and maintaining a proper microbiota–gut–brain axis.
These suggestions may be promising to unravel new therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative diseases. It is known that neurodegeneration determines an imbalance in gut microbiota metabolism that results in changes of endocrine signaling in the host [104]. Further analysis on the microbiota composition and administration of specific curcumin neuroactive metabolites will be helpful in the identification of novel targeted treatments active in neuroprotection.

7. Conclusions

Curcumin represents one the most studied herbal remedies. It is generally considered the main component of turmeric responsible for the different pharmacological activities. However, curcumin is characterized by low systemic bioavailability and rapid metabolism. To address its pharmacological and therapeutic advantages, it is fundamental to consider curcumin interplay with gut microbiota that might pave the way to fill the gap between the low bioavailability and the wide health effects.
In fact, gut microbiota impact on curcumin metabolism, providing active metabolites. On the other hand, curcumin can influence gut microbiota composition, allowing the growth of strains needed to maintain correct host physiologic functions. This is the case of neurodegenerative diseases in which often a gut dysbiosis precedes the onset of the clinical signs.
Curcumin metabolism can be different among individuals, since everyone has his/her own microbiota compositions. Thus, the beneficial effects can be different due to the individual different bacterial content. Analysis of gut microbiota changes in health and diseases in the presence of curcumin will allow to identify bacterial strains in curcumin conversion.
The results summarized in the review suggest that curcumin alone can exert a neuroprotective function by affecting different neuropathological pathways. The role of microbiota in enhancing these positive effects could be related both to the production of metabolites more active and with better pharmacokinetics and to the modification of microbiota composition, with a prevalence of the healthy gut bacteria, like Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli.
Additional studies, especially in humans will be necessary to unravel in depth the modification of microbiota composition achieved by curcumin. This will lead to an understanding of strategies needed for delivering health benefits by microbiota modulation and represents the first step to considering novel therapeutic applications of curcumin, gut microbiota-based.
Modification of microbiota and its metabolites will provide a new consideration for novel therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative diseases.

Author Contributions

All authors actively participated to the review design, preparation, and organization. They also extensively discussed about the topics presented, giving a positive criticism to the work.

Funding

This research was funded by PO FESR 2014–2020—Regione Campania, Asse 1—obiettivo specifico 1.2, Progetto “Sviluppo di nanotecnologie Orientate alla Rigenerazione e Ricostruzione tissutale, Implantologia e Sensoristica in Odontoiatria/oculistica (SORRISO)”. Grant Number: pdt1-000410; POR CAMPANIA FESR 2014/2020 DECRETO N. 651 - ALBITECH: Tecnologie abilitanti per la sintesi eco-sostenibile di nuovi materiali per la restaurativa.

Acknowledgments

FDM PhD fellowship in Biology is supported by MIUR project PON “Dottorati Innovativi con caratterizzazione industriale” 2017–2018. This work was supported by Regione Campania Research and Innovation project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Del Rio, D.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A.; Spencer, J.P.; Tognolini, M.; Borges, G.; Crozier, A. Dietary (poly) phenolics in human health: Structures, bioavailability, and evidence of protective effects against chronic diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 1818–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Di Meo, F.; Aversano, R.; Diretto, G.; Demurtas, O.; Villano, C.; Cozzolino, S.; Filosa, S.; Carputo, D.; Crispi, S. Anti-cancer activity of grape seed semi-polar extracts in human mesothelioma cell lines. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 61, 103515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. van Duynhoven, J.; Vaughan, E.E.; Jacobs, D.M.; Kemperman, R.A.; van Velzen, E.J.; Gross, G.; Roger, L.C.; Possemiers, S.; Smilde, A.K.; Doré, J.; et al. Metabolic fate of polyphenols in the human superorganism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4531–4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ayati, Z.; Ramezani, M.; Amiri, M.S.; Moghadam, A.T.; Rahimi, H.; Abdollahzade, A.; Sahebkar, A.; Emami, S.A. Ethnobotany, phytochemistry and traditional uses of curcuma spp. and pharmacological profile of two important species (C. longa and C. zedoaria): A review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 871–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qin, N.Y.; Yang, F.Q.; Wang, Y.T.; Li, S.P. Quantitative determination of eight components in rhizome (Jianghuang) and tuberous root (Yujin) of Curcuma longa using pressurized liquid extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2007, 43, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ruby, A.J.; Kuttan, G.; Babu, K.D.; Rajasekharan, K.N.; Kuttan, R. Anti-tumour and antioxidant activity of natural curcuminoids. Cancer Lett. 1995, 94, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hatcher, H.; Planalp, R.; Cho, J.; Torti, F.M.; Torti, S.V. Curcumin: From ancient medicine to current clinical trials. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 1631–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prasad, S.; Gupta, S.C.; Tyagi, A.K.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin, a component of golden spice: From bedside to bench and back. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nelson, K.M.; Dahlin, J.L.; Bisson, J.; Graham, J.; Pauli, G.F.; Walters, M.A. The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Curcumin. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 1620–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lao, C.D.; Ruffin, M.T.; Normolle, D.; Heath, D.D.; Murray, S.I.; Bailey, J.M.; Boggs, M.E.; Crowell, J.; Rock, C.L.; Brenner, D.E. Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2006, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mansuri, M.L.; Parihar, P.; Solanki, I.; Parihar, M.S. Flavonoids in modulation of cell survival signalling pathways. Genes Nutr. 2014, 9, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Esatbeyoglu, T.; Huebbe, P.; Ernst, I.M.; Chin, D.; Wagner, A.E.; Rimbach, G. Curcumin—from molecule to biological function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2012, 51, 5308–5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jacob, J.N.; Badyal, D.K.; Bala, S.; Toloue, M. Evaluation of the in vivo anti-inflammatory and analgesic and in vitro anti-cancer activities of curcumin and its derivatives. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gupta, S.; Sung, B.; Kim, J.; Prasad, S.; Li, S.; Aggarwal, B. Multitargeting by turmeric, the golden spice: From kitchen to clinic. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 1510–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tong, W.; Wang, Q.; Sun, D.; Suo, J. Curcumin suppresses colon cancer cell invasion via AMPK-induced inhibition of NF-κB, uPA activator and MMP9. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 4139–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Di Meo, F.; Filosa, S.; Madonna, M.; Giello, G.; Di Pardo, A.; Maglione, V.; Baldi, A.; Crispi, S. Curcumin C3 complex®/Bioperine® has antineoplastic activity in mesothelioma: An in vitro and in vivo analysis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shehzad, A.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.S. Curcumin in various cancers. Biofactors 2013, 39, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Irving, G.R.; Iwuji, C.O.; Morgan, B.; Berry, D.P.; Steward, W.P.; Thomas, A.; Brown, K.; Howells, L.M. Combining curcumin (C3-complex, Sabinsa) with standard care FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with inoperable colorectal cancer (CUFOX): Study protocol for a randomised control trial. Trials 2015, 16, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aggarwal, B.B.; Sung, B. Pharmacological basis for the role of curcumin in chronic diseases: An age-old spice with modern targets. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, A.; Ahuja, A.; Ali, J.; Baboota, S. Conundrum and Therapeutic Potential of Curcumin in Drug Delivery. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 2010, 27, 279–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mayol, L.; Serri, C.; Menale, C.; Crispi, S.; Piccolo, M.T.; Mita, L.; Giarra, S.; Forte, M.; Saija, A.; Biondi, M.; et al. Curcumin loaded PLGA-poloxamer blend nanoparticles induce cell cycle arrest in mesothelioma cells. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 93, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mirzaei, H.; Shakeri, A.; Rashidi, B.; Jalili, A.; Banikazemi, Z.; Sahebkar, A. Phytosomal curcumin: A review of pharmacokinetic, experimental and clinical studies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 85, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Serri, C.; Argirò, M.; Piras, L.; Mita, D.G.; Saija, A.; Mita, L.; Forte, M.; Giarra, S.; Biondi, M.; Crispi, S.; et al. Nano-precipitated curcumin loaded particles: Effect of carrier size and drug complexation with (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin on their biological performances. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 520, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shoba, G.; Joy, D.; Joseph, T.; Majeed, M.; Rajendran, R.; Srinivas, P.S. Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vecchione, R.; Quagliariello, V.; Calabria, D.; Calcagno, V.; De Luca, E.; Iaffaioli, R.V.; Netti, P.A. Curcumin bioavailability from oil in water nano-emulsions: In vitro and in vivo study on the dimensional, compositional and interactional dependence. J. Control Release. 2016, 233, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Hamady, M.; Yatsunenko, T.; Cantarel, B.L.; Duncan, A.; Ley, R.E.; Sogin, M.L.; Jones, W.J.; Roe, B.A.; Affourtit, J.P.; et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009, 457, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carmody, R.N.; Turnbaugh, P.J. Host-microbial interactions in the metabolism of therapeutic and diet-derived xenobiotics. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 4173–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manach, C.; Williamson, G.; Morand, C.; Scalbert, A.; Remesy, C. Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 230S–242S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Strong, T.V.; Tagle, D.A.; Valdes, J.M.; Elmer, L.W.; Boehm, K.; Swaroop, M.; Kaatz, K.W.; Collins, F.S.; Albin, R.L. Widespread expression of the human and rat Huntington’s disease gene in brain and nonneural tissues. Nat. Genet. 1993, 5, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Williamson, G.; Clifford, M. Role of the small intestine, colon and microbiota in determining the metabolic fate of polyphenols. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 139, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pan, M.H.; Huang, T.M.; Lin, J.K. Biotransformation of curcumin through reduction and glucuronidation in mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1999, 27, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Sharma, R.A.; Euden, S.A.; Platton, S.L.; Cooke, D.N.; Shafayat, A.; Hewitt, H.R.; Marczylo, T.H.; Morgan, B.; Hemingway, D.; Plummer, S.M.; et al. Phase I clinical trial of oral curcumin: Biomarkers of systemic activity and compliance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 6847–6854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dhillon, N.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Newman, R.A.; Wolff, R.A.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Abbruzzese, J.L.; Ng, C.S.; Badmaev, V.; Kurzrock, R. Phase II trial of curcumin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4491–4499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Edwards, R.L.; Luis, P.B.; Varuzza, P.V.; Joseph, A.I.; Presley, S.H.; Chaturvedi, R.; Schneider, C. The anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin is mediated by its oxidative metabolites. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 21243–21252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wang, X.; Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, Y.; Han, F.; Zheng, Z.; Hu, D. Curcumin pretreatment prevents hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress through enhanced mitochondrial function and deactivation of Akt/Erk signaling pathways in rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 443, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Da Silva Morrone, M.; Schnorr, C.E.; Behr, G.A.; Gasparotto, J.; Bortolin, R.C.; Moresco, K.S.; Bittencourt, L.; Zanotto-Filho, A.; Gelain, D.P.; Moreira, J.C. Oral administration of curcumin relieves behavioral alterations and oxidative stress in the frontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum of ovariectomized Wistar rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 32, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maithilikarpagaselvi, N.; Sridhar, M.G.; Swaminathan, R.P.; Zachariah, B. Curcumin prevents inflammatory response, oxidative stress and insulin resistance in high fructose fed male Wistar rats: Potential role of serine kinases. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2016, 244, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wei, G.; Chen, B.; Lin, Q.; Li, Y.; Luo, L.; He, H.; Fu, H. Tetrahydrocurcumin Provides Neuroprotection in Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury and the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway as a Potential Mechanism. Neuroimmunomodulation 2017, 24, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takahashi, M.; Suzuki, K.; Kim, H.K.; Otsuka, Y.; Imaizumi, A.; Miyashita, M.; Sakamoto, S. Effects of curcumin supplementation on exercise-induced oxidative stress in humans. Int. J. Sports Med. 2014, 35, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Santos-Parker, J.R.; Strahler, T.R.; Bassett, C.J.; Bispham, N.Z.; Chonchol, M.B.; Seals, D.R. Curcumin supplementation improves vascular endothelial function in healthy middle-aged and older adults by increasing nitric oxide bioavailability and reducing oxidative stress. Aging (Albany NY) 2017, 9, 187–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Sukardi, R.; Sastroasmoro, S.; Siregar, N.C.; Djer, M.M.; Suyatna, F.D.; Sadikin, M.; Ibrahim, N.; Rahayuningsih, S.E.; Witarto, A.B. The role of curcumin as an inhibitor of oxidative stress caused by ischaemia re-perfusion injury in tetralogy of Fallot patients undergoing corrective surgery. Cardiol. Young 2016, 26, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, M.; Du, Z.Y.; Zheng, X.; Li, D.L.; Zhou, R.P.; Zhang, K. Use of curcumin in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Purpura, M.; Lowery, R.P.; Wilson, J.M.; Mannan, H.; Münch, G.; Razmovski-Naumovski, V. Analysis of different innovative formulations of curcumin for improved relative oral bioavailability in human subjects. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, W.; Zhai, Y.; Heng, X.; Che, F.Y.; Chen, W.; Sun, D.; Zhai, G. Oral bioavailability of curcumin: Problems and advancements. J. Drug Target. 2016, 24, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsuda, T. Curcumin as a functional food-derived factor: Degradation products, metabolites, bioactivity, and future perspectives. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hoehle, S.I.; Pfeiffer, E.; Sólyom, A.M.; Metzler, M. Metabolism of curcuminoids in tissue slices and subcellular fractions from rat liver. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Metzler, M.; Pfeiffer, E.; Schulz, S.I.; Dempe, J. Curcumin uptake and metabolism. Biofactors 2013, 39, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hassaninasab, A.; Hashimoto, Y.; Tomita-Yokotani, K.; Kobayashi, M. Discovery of the curcumin metabolic pathway involving a unique enzyme in an intestinal microorganism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6615–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Burapan, S.; Kim, M.; Han, J. Curcuminoid demethylation as an alternative metabolism by human intestinal microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3305–3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tan, S.; Rupasinghe, T.W.; Tull, D.L.; Boughton, B.; Oliver, C.; McSweeny, C.; Gras, S.L.; Augustin, M.A. Degradation of curcuminoids by in vitro pure culture fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 11005–11015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jazayeri, S.D. Survival of Bifidobacteria and other selected intestinal bacteria in TPY medium supplemented with Curcumin as assessed in vitro. Int. J. Probiotics Prebiotics 2009, 4, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lou, Y.; Zheng, J.; Hu, H.; Lee, J.; Zeng, S. Application of ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to identify curcumin metabolites produced by human intestinal bacteria. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2015, 985, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sekirov, I.; Russell, S.L.; Antunes, L.C.; Finlay, B.B. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 859–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Shen, L.; Liu, L.; Ji, H.F. Regulative effects of curcumin spice administration on gut microbiota and its pharmacological implications. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 61, 1361780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zam, W. Gut microbiota as a prospective therapeutic target for curcumin: A review of mutual influence. J. Nutr. Metab. 2018, 2018, 1367984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Feng, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, P.; Gao, C.; Tao, J.; Ge, Z.; Zhu, D.; Bi, Y. Modulation of gut microbiota contributes to curcumin-mediated attenuation of hepatic steatosis in rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861, 1801–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Le Chatelier, E.; Nielsen, T.; Qin, J.; Prifti, E.; Hildebrand, F.; Falony, G.; Almeida, M.; Arumugam, M.; Batto, J.M.; Kennedy, S.; et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 2013, 500, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cotillard, A.; Kennedy, S.P.; Kong, L.C.; Prifti, E.; Pons, N.; Le Chatelier, E.; Almeida, M.; Quinquis, B.; Levenez, F.; Galleron, N.; et al. Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness. Nature 2013, 500, 585–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Xiang, L.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, G.G.; Hu, J. Effect of curcumin on the diversity of gut microbiota in ovariectomized rats. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Peterson, C.T.; Vaughn, A.R.; Sharma, V.; Chopra, D.; Mills, P.J.; Peterson, S.N.; Sivamani, R.K. Effects of turmeric and curcumin dietary supplementation on human gut microbiota: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. J. Evid. Based Integr. Med. 2018, 23, 2515690X18790725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bors, W.; Heller, W.; Michel, C.; Saran, M. Flavonoids as antioxidants: Determination of radical-scavenging efficiencies. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 186, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Amić, D.; Davidović-Amić, D.; Beslo, D.; Rastija, V.; Lucić, B.; Trinajstić, N. SAR and QSAR of the antioxidant activity of flavonoids. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 827–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Smolensky, D.; Rhodes, D.; McVey, D.S.; Fawver, Z.; Perumal, R.; Herald, T.; Noronha, L. High-polyphenol sorghum bran extract inhibits cancer cell growth through ROS induction, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Campos, P.B.; Paulsen, B.S.; Rehen, S.K. Accelerating neuronal aging in in vitro model brain disorders: A focus on reactive oxygen species. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gu, F.; Chauhan, V.; Chauhan, A. Glutathione redox imbalance in brain disorders. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2015, 18, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Samarghandian, S.; Azimi-Nezhad, M.; Farkhondeh, T.; Samini, F. Anti-oxidative effects of curcumin on immobilization-induced oxidative stress in rat brain, liver and kidney. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 87, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. DiSilvestro, R.A.; Joseph, E.; Zhao, S.; Bomser, J. Diverse effects of a low dose supplement of lipidated curcumin in healthy middle aged people. Nutr. J. 2012, 11, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Li, L.; Wu, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y. Neuroprotection by curcumin in ischemic brain injury involves the Akt/Nrf2 pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Y.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Fu, Q.; Ma, S. Curcumin attenuates glutamate neurotoxicity in the hippocampus by suppression of ER stress-associated TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation in a manner dependent on AMPK. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2015, 286, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fu, Z.; Yang, J.; Wei, Y.; Li, J. Effects of piceatannol and pterostilbene against β-amyloid-induced apoptosis on the PI3K/Akt/Bad signaling pathway in PC12 cells. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wu, N.; Zheng, B.; Shaywitz, A.; Dagon, Y.; Tower, C.; Bellinger, G.; Shen, C.H.; Wen, J.; Asara, J.; McGraw, T.E.; et al. AMPK-dependent degradation of TXNIP upon energy stress leads to enhanced glucose uptake via GLUT1. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dudek, H.; Datta, S.R.; Franke, T.F.; Birnbaum, M.J.; Yao, R.; Cooper, G.M.; Segal, R.A.; Kaplan, D.R.; Greenberg, M.E. Regulation of neuronal survival by the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt. Science 1997, 275, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shah, Z.A.; Li, R.C.; Thimmulappa, R.K.; Kensler, T.W.; Yamamoto, M.; Biswal, S.; Doré, S. Role of reactive oxygen species in modulation of Nrf2 following ischemic reperfusion injury. Neuroscience 2007, 147, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Maiti, P.; Dunbar, G.L. Use of curcumin, a natural polyphenol for targeting molecular pathways in treating age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gao, Y.; Zhuang, Z.; Gao, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ye, Z.; Li, L.; Tang, C.; Zhou, M.; Han, X.; et al. Tetrahydrocurcumin reduces oxidative stress-induced apoptosis via the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway by modulating autophagy in rats after traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 887–899. [Google Scholar]
  78. Mishra, S.; Mishra, M.; Seth, P.; Sharma, S. Tetrahydrocurcumin confers protection against amyloid beta induced toxicity. Neuroreport 2011, 22, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Begum, A.N.; Jones, M.R.; Lim, G.P.; Morihara, T.; Kim, P.; Heath, D.D.; Rock, C.L.; Pruitt, M.A.; Yang, F.; Hudspeth, B.; et al. Curcumin structure-function, bioavailability, and efficacy in models of neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 326, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rajeswari, A.; Sabesan, M. Inhibition of monoamine oxidase-B by the polyphenolic compound, curcumin and its metabolite tetrahydrocurcumin, in a model of Parkinson’s disease induced by MPTP neurodegeneration in mice. Inflammopharmacology 2008, 16, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Singh, C.; Bortolato, M.; Bali, N.; Godar, S.; Scott, A.; Chen, K.; Thompson, R.; Shih, J. Cognitive abnormalities and hippocampal alterations in monoamine oxidase A and B knockout mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 12816–12821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Wu, J.C.; Tsai, M.L.; Lai, C.S.; Wang, Y.J.; Ho, C.T.; Pan, M.H. Chemopreventative effects of tetrahydrocurcumin on human diseases. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zeng, Y.; Qiu, F.; Liu, Y.; Qu, G.; Yao, X. Isolation and identification of phase 1 metabolites of demethoxycurcumin in rats. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2007, 35, 1564–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Khanna, S.; Park, H.A.; Sen, C.K.; Golakoti, T.; Sengupta, K.; Venkateswarlu, S.; Roy, S. Neuroprotective and antiinflammatory properties of a novel demethylated curcuminoid. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 449–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Luo, D.D.; Chen, J.F.; Liu, J.J.; Xie, J.H.; Zhang, Z.B.; Gu, J.Y.; Zhuo, J.Y.; Huang, S.; Su, Z.R.; Sun, Z.H. Tetrahydrocurcumin and octahydrocurcumin, the primary and final hydrogenated metabolites of curcumin, possess superior hepatic-protective effect against acetaminophen-induced liver injury: Role of CYP2E1 and Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 123, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Veldman, E.R.; Jia, Z.; Halldin, C.; Svedberg, M.M. Amyloid binding properties of curcumin analogues in Alzheimer’s disease postmortem brain tissue. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 630, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pinkaew, D.; Changtam, C.; Tocharus, C.; Thummayot, S.; Suksamrarn, A.; Tocharus, J. Di-O-demethylcurcumin protects SK-N-SH cells against mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum-mediated apoptotic cell death induced by Aβ25-35. Neurochem. Int. 2015, 80, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wu, A.; Noble, E.E.; Tyagi, E.; Ying, Z.; Zhuang, Y.; Gomez-Pinilla, F. Curcumin boosts DHA in the brain: Implications for the prevention of anxiety disorders. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1852, 951–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. McFadden, R.M.; Larmonier, C.B.; Shehab, K.W.; Midura-Kiela, M.; Ramalingam, R.; Harrison, C.A.; Besselsen, D.G.; Chase, J.H.; Caporaso, J.G.; Jobin, C.; et al. The Role of Curcumin in Modulating Colonic Microbiota During Colitis and Colon Cancer Prevention. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 2483–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rashmi, R.; Santhosh Kumar, T.R.; Karunagaran, D. Human colon cancer cells differ in their sensitivity to curcumin-induced apoptosis and heat shock protects them by inhibiting the release of apoptosis-inducing factor and caspases. FEBS Lett. 2003, 538, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Di Meo, F.; Donato, S.; Di Pardo, A.; Maglione, V.; Filosa, S.; Crispi, S. New Therapeutic Drugs from Bioactive Natural Molecules: The Role of Gut Microbiota Metabolism in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhao, Y.; Lukiw, W.J. Microbiome-generated amyloid and potential impact on amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). J. Nat. Sci. 2015, 1, e138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Fang, Z.; Lu, W.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Qian, L.; Wang, Q.; Chen, W. Probiotics modulate the gut microbiota composition and immune responses in patients with atopic dermatitis: A pilot study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Alexandrov, P.; Zhao, Y.; Jones, B.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Lukiw, W. Expression of the phagocytosis-essential protein TREM2 is down-regulated by an aluminum-induced miRNA-34a in a murine microglial cell line. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013, 128, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Ilieva, H.; Maragakis, N.J. Motoneuron disease: Basic science. Adv. Neurobiol. 2017, 15, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Harach, T.; Marungruang, N.; Duthilleul, N.; Cheatham, V.; Mc Coy, K.D.; Frisoni, G.; Neher, J.J.; Fåk, F.; Jucker, M.; Lasser, T.; et al. Reduction of Abeta amyloid pathology in APPPS1 transgenic mice in the absence of gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wu, J.H.; Guo, Z.; Kumar, S.; Lapuerta, P. Incidence of serious upper and lower gastrointestinal events in older adults with and without Alzheimer’s disease. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2011, 59, 2053–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Friedland, R.P. Mechanisms of molecular mimicry involving the microbiota in neurodegeneration. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2015, 45, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Poirier, A.A.; Aubé, B.; Côté, M.; Morin, N.; Di Paolo, T.; Soulet, D. Gastrointestinal dysfunctions in Parkinson’s disease: Symptoms and treatments. Parkinsons Dis. 2016, 2016, 6762528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Scheperjans, F.; Aho, V.; Pereira, P.A.; Koskinen, K.; Paulin, L.; Pekkonen, E.; Haapaniemi, E.; Kaakkola, S.; Eerola-Rautio, J.; Pohja, M.; et al. Gut microbiota are related to Parkinson’s disease and clinical phenotype. Mov. Disord. 2015, 30, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, X.; Chen, P.S.; Dallas, S.; Wilson, B.; Block, M.L.; Wang, C.C.; Kinyamu, H.; Lu, N.; Gao, X.; Leng, Y.; et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors up-regulate astrocyte GDNF and BDNF gene transcription and protect dopaminergic neurons. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008, 11, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. van der Burg, J.M.; Winqvist, A.; Aziz, N.A.; Maat-Schieman, M.L.; Roos, R.A.; Bates, G.P.; Brundin, P.; Björkqvist, M.; Wierup, N. Gastrointestinal dysfunction contributes to weight loss in Huntington’s disease mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011, 44, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Rosas, H.D.; Doros, G.; Bhasin, S.; Thomas, B.; Gevorkian, S.; Malarick, K.; Matson, W.; Hersch, S.M. A systems-level “misunderstanding”: The plasma metabolome in Huntington’s disease. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2015, 2, 756–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Muegge, B.; Kuczynski, J.; Knights, D.; Clemente, J.; Gonzalez, A.; Fontana, L.; Henrissat, B.; Knight, R.; Gordon, J. Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans. Science 2011, 332, 970–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nutrients 11 02426 g001 550
Figure 1. Reductive and conjugative metabolism of curcumin. Glucuronidation and sulfation are the predominating pathways of conjugation. Curcumin is also reduced by endogenous reductase systems in a stepwise manner and subsequently, curcumin metabolites are glucuronidated and sulfurated.
Figure 1. Reductive and conjugative metabolism of curcumin. Glucuronidation and sulfation are the predominating pathways of conjugation. Curcumin is also reduced by endogenous reductase systems in a stepwise manner and subsequently, curcumin metabolites are glucuronidated and sulfurated.
Nutrients 11 02426 g001
Nutrients 11 02426 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the interactions between curcumin and gut microbiota. The administration of curcumin considerably changed the ratio between beneficial and pathogenic bacteria in a gut microbiota community, favoring the growth of beneficial bacteria and limiting the growth of pathogenic ones.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the interactions between curcumin and gut microbiota. The administration of curcumin considerably changed the ratio between beneficial and pathogenic bacteria in a gut microbiota community, favoring the growth of beneficial bacteria and limiting the growth of pathogenic ones.
Nutrients 11 02426 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Meo, F.; Margarucci, S.; Galderisi, U.; Crispi, S.; Peluso, G. Curcumin, Gut Microbiota, and Neuroprotection. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102426

AMA Style

Di Meo F, Margarucci S, Galderisi U, Crispi S, Peluso G. Curcumin, Gut Microbiota, and Neuroprotection. Nutrients. 2019; 11(10):2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Meo, Francesco, Sabrina Margarucci, Umberto Galderisi, Stefania Crispi, and Gianfranco Peluso. 2019. "Curcumin, Gut Microbiota, and Neuroprotection" Nutrients 11, no. 10: 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102426

APA Style

Di Meo, F., Margarucci, S., Galderisi, U., Crispi, S., & Peluso, G. (2019). Curcumin, Gut Microbiota, and Neuroprotection. Nutrients, 11(10), 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop