Open AccessArticle

Identification of Cyclic Dipeptides from Escherichia coli as New Antimicrobial Agents against Ralstonia Solanacearum

Shihao Song

^1,2,†,

Shuna Fu

^1,2,3,†,

Xiuyun Sun

^1,2,3,†,

Peng Li

⁴,

Ji’en Wu

⁵,

Tingyan Dong

^1,2,

Fei He

³ and

Yinyue Deng

^1,2,3,*

State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Guangdong Innovative Research Team of Sociomicrobiology, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Integrative Microbiology Research Centre, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

⁴

School of Biological and Science Technology, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China

⁵

Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 3, Singapore 117543, Singapore

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

^†

These authors have contributed equally to this work.

Molecules 2018, 23(1), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010214

Submission received: 11 December 2017 / Revised: 15 January 2018 / Accepted: 18 January 2018 / Published: 19 January 2018

(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Download

Browse Figures

Figure 1
Isolation and identification of antagonistic bacteria. (a) The disease index of plant with treatment of the antagonistic bacteria of Pantoea GZ-33, Escherichia GZ-34, and Dickeya GZ-39 against R. solanacearum. R. solanacearum and the antagonistic bacteria were used at 1:0, 1:1, 1:2.5, and 1:5 (v/v). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test); (b) Analysis of phylogenic tree of E. coli GZ-34 based on 16S rDNA sequence. The 16S rDNA gene sequence was submitted to the NCBI website and is available with the supplied GenBank accession number MF374346. "> Figure 2
The inhibitory effect of E. coli GZ-34 on the cell growth of R. solanacearum in soil (a) and in plant (b). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test). "> Figure 3
Influence of E. coli GZ-34 on R. solanacearum cell proliferation in the plant stem. After infection with R. solanacearum, the plant stem streamed bacterial milky liquid into sterile water without treatment with E. coli GZ-34 (a); while there was no milky liquid (b) when the plant was treated with E. coli GZ-34. Microscopy observation showed R. solanacearum cells proliferated in the plant stem in the absence of the biocontrol agent (c); but there was no detectable cells or signal in the plant in the presence of the biocontrol agent (d). Arrows pointed to R. solanacearum cells. "> Figure 4
Structural characterization of fraction 1. (a) ESI-MS spectra of fraction 1; (b) 1H-NMR spectra of fraction 1; (c) 13C-NMR spectra of fraction 1; (d) Structure of fraction 1 was identified as cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile). "> Figure 5
Structural characterization of fraction 2. (a) ESI-MS spectra of fraction 2; (b) 1H-NMR spectral of fraction 2; (c) 13C-NMR spectra of fraction 2; (d) The structure of fraction 2 was identified as cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe). "> Figure 6
Influence of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) on R. solanacearum. The disease index of the plant infected by R. solanacearum with treatment of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) (a) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) (b); antimicrobial activity of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) (c) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) (d) against R. solanacearum were measured. Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test). "> Figure 7
Effect of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) on the spore formation of M. grisea. Growth curve (a) and spore formation (b) of M. grisea in the presence of different final concentrations of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) as indicated. Microscopic analysis of spore formation of M. grisea with addition of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) at a final concentration of 0 (c); 50 μM (d); 100 μM (e); and 250 μM (f). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test). ">

Versions Notes

Abstract

Ralstonia solanacearum is a causative agent of bacterial wilt in many important crops throughout the world. How to control bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum is a major problem in agriculture. In this study, we aim to isolate the biocontrol agents that have high efficacy in the control of bacterial wilt. Three new bacterial strains with high antimicrobial activity against R. solanacearum GMI1000 were isolated and identified. Our results demonstrated that these bacteria could remarkably inhibit the disease index of host plant infected by R. solanacearum. It was indicated that strain GZ-34 (CCTCC No. M 2016353) showed an excellent protective effect to tomato under greenhouse conditions. Strain GZ-34 was characterized as Escherichia coli based on morphology, biochemistry, and 16S rRNA analysis. We identified that the main antimicrobial compounds produced by E. coli GZ-34 were cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis. The two active compounds also interfered with the expression levels of some pathogenicity-contributors of R. solanacearum. Furthermore, cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) effectively inhibited spore formation of Magnaporthe grisea, which is a vital pathogenesis process of the fungal pathogen, suggesting cyclic dipeptides from E. coli are promising potential antimicrobial agents with broad-spectrum activity to kill pathogens or interfere with their pathogenesis.

Keywords:

bacterial wilt; Ralstonia solanacearum; biocontrol agent; antimicrobial activity; cyclic dipeptides

1. Introduction

Bacterial wilt is a systemic, infective, and destructive soil-borne disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, commonly known as “plant blast”. It is an important plant disease in tropical, subtropical, and warm regions [1]. R. solanacearum has an unusually wide host range, infecting more than 200 species belonging to more than 54 botanical families, including economically-important crops [2,3,4]. It represents a heterogeneous group subdivided into five races based on host range, five biovars based on physiological and biochemical characteristics [5,6], and four phylotypes roughly corresponding to geographic origin [7,8]. It can survive in soil for many years and can spread through water, rhizosphere contact, and farming [9]. It usually parasitizes the vascular tissue of plants, and mainly invades from the root or stem of the host plant [10]. The fast proliferation and propagation of pathogen cells causes plant duct expansion and ultimately leads to whole plant wilting and death [11].

There are still no effective strategies to control the plant diseases caused by R. solanacearum. Bacterial wilt continues to be one of the most serious problems for field-grown crops in many regions around the world [12,13]. At present, the major prevention and cure method for bacterial wilt is chemical control, but chemical pesticides cannot effectively prevent the occurrence of the disease. The other sequela of long-term usage of chemical pesticides are the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria and serious environmental pollution [14]. Alternatively, screening of bacterial wilt-resistant cultivars is considered a promising approach [15]. However, it is difficult to develop resistant cultivars against R. solanacearum in many crops, reducing the effectiveness of this strategy.

Biological control is one effective method to control plant disease due to its advantages of limiting the production of drug-resistant bacterial pathogen [16]. It is the use of biocontrol agents themselves or their active substances in the prevention and control of plant diseases [17]. It is a way to adapt to the trend of “green agriculture”. Many biocontrol agents have been isolated and tested for their activity against bacterial wilt, including Rhizophagus irregularis [18], Pseudomonas fluorescens [19], Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [20], and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [21]. In this study, we isolated and identified three new bacterial species with high activity against R. solanacearum. Two antimicrobial compounds, cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe), were identified to be produced by the biocontrol agent E. coli GZ-34 as main active substances against R. solanacearum. We also revealed that cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) has antifungal activity as it could effectively inhibit spore formation of Magnaporthe grisea [22,23,24]. Our findings demonstrate that cyclic dipeptides from E. coli might be developed as new potential antimicrobial agents against both bacterial pathogens and fungal pathogens.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation of New Antagonistic Bacteria against R. solanacearum

To isolate new and effective biocontrol agents against R. solanacearum, we screened 30 soil samples collected from the different provinces in China. Among approximately 40,000 colonies, there were 56 isolates showing a high antagonistic activity against R. solanacearum. After analyzing the 16S rDNA sequences of these antagonistic bacterial strains, three bacterial species were identified as new biocontrol agents against R. solanacearum: Pantoea (GZ-33, CCTCC No. M 2016352) (Supplementary Figure S1a,d and Supplementary Table S1), Escherichia (GZ-34, CCTCC No. M 2016353) (Figure 1b, Supplementary Figure S1b, and Supplementary Table S1), and Dickeya (GZ-39, CCTCC No. M 2016354) (Supplementary Figure S1c,e and Table S1). In combination with analysis of 16S rDNA sequences, biochemical and physiological properties, strain GZ-34 was finally determined as E. coli (Figure 1 and Table 1).

2.2. E. coli GZ-34 Shows Effective Protection to Tomato from R. solanacearum Infection

To test the effective protection of the new antagonistic bacteria in host plant from R. solanacearum, we took Pantoea GZ-33, Escherichia GZ-34, and Dickeya GZ-39 as potential biocontrol agents to treat tomato plants. It was shown that treatment with the new antagonistic bacteria obviously inhibited wilt symptoms in tomato plants and increased the survival rate of the plants. In the absence of the antagonistic bacteria, wilt symptoms appeared in tomato from the 10th day after inoculation with R. solanacearum. Treatment with the antagonistic bacteria GZ-33, GZ-34, and GZ-39 (1:5, v/v) not only delayed wilt development but also reduced the disease index to 30.67, 16.67, and 28.67, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2 and Figure 1a). The relative control effects on R. solanacearum were 67.38%, 82.27%, and 69.50%, respectively. The bacterial strain GZ-34 was used for further investigation as it displayed an excellent antagonistic activity against R. solanacearum.

2.3. E. coli GZ-34 Remarkably Inhibits the Cell Growth of R. solanacearum in Soil and Plants

To further study the protective effect of E. coli GZ-34 on tomato plant, we measured the Colony-Forming Units (CFU) value of R. solanacearum in both soil and plants in the absence and presence of E. coli GZ-34. It was revealed that R. solanacearum cell numbers were strongly inhibited in the presence of E. coli GZ-34 (Figure 2). The CFU of R. solanacearum in soil decreased from 51.7 × 10⁷ to 1.7 × 10⁷ after treatment with 5 mL of E. coli GZ-34 culture (Figure 2a). A similar result was also observed in tomato roots and stems, the CFU was reduced by 96.75% and 99.87%, respectively, after addition of 5 mL E. coli GZ-34 culture (Figure 2b). It was also found that the stem of the tomato infected by R. solanacearum without treatment of E. coli GZ-34 streamed milky liquid into the sterile water (Figure 3a). This liquid represented the bacterial ooze exuding from the cut ends of colonized vascular bundles. There was no milky liquid from the plant stem when it was treated with E. coli GZ-34 (Figure 3b). Microscopy observation also supported similar results (Figure 3c,d).

2.4. Structural Characterization of Antimicrobial Compounds Isolated from E. coli GZ-34

To determine the chemical structures of antimicrobial compounds from E. coli GZ-34, the active components were isolated and purified from 70 L culture supernatant. Two fractions showed a strong antimicrobial activity against R. solanacearum. Approximately 43.1 mg and 80.6 mg of the two fractions were obtained by HPLC separation. The purity of fractions 1 and 2 were 95% and 97%, respectively. Fraction 1 was identified as a dipeptide based on the presence of both the characteristic ¹³C-NMR chemical shifts for the amide carbonyl groups at δ_C 167.7-172.6 and the typical ¹H-NMR signals for amino acids. The presence of a proline moiety of fraction 1 was deduced from the presence of CH₂ multiplets in the spectra at δ_H 3.60-3.53 (1H, m), 3.52-3.49 (1H, m), 2.06-2.02 (1H, m), 1.98-1.91(1H, m), 2.35-2.32 (1H, m), 2.00-1.92 (1H, m). The ¹H-NMR spectrum showed a γ-methyl doublet at δ_H 0.95 (3H,d, J = 6.9 HZ, Me(13)), and a terminal Me triplet at δ_H 1.07 (3H, t, J = 7.1 HZ, Me(12)), indicating the presence of an anteiso branched chain. In addition, the signals at δ_H 4.22 (1H, t, J = 7.1 HZ, HC(9)), 2.20-2.16 (1H, m, HC(10)), and 1.49-1.43 (m, 1H of CH₂(11)), 1.37-1.31 (m, 1H of CH₂(11)) allowed to propose an Ile moiety for this compound. Furthermore, high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis of the fraction 1 revealed a molecular ion [M + H]⁺ with an m/z of 211.1543, suggesting a molecular formula of C₁₁H₁₈N₂O₂. ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR previously reported data for fraction 1 are in agreement with the obtained data [25], which indicate that fraction 1 is cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) (Figure 4, Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplementary Table S2).

The identification of fraction 2 as a dipeptide was straight forward based on the presence of both the characteristic ¹³C-NMR chemical shifts for the amide carbonyl groups at δ_C 166.9-171.1 and the typical ¹H-NMR signals of amino acids. The presence of a proline moiety in fraction 2 was deduced by the presence of CH₂ multiplets in the spectra at δ_H 3.56-3.48 (1H, m), 3.39-3.33 (1H, m), 1.84-1.75 (2H, m), 1.24-1.15 (1H, m), and 2.12-2.04 (1H, m). The ¹H-NMR spectra of fraction 2 displayed signals of methylene benzylic protonsgroups (H-10) attached to monosubstituted benzene rings (δ_H 3.14-3.18). These data suggested a phenylalanine moiety for these compounds. High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis of fraction 2 revealed a molecular ion [M + H]⁺ with an m/z of 245.1060, suggesting a molecular formula of C₁₄H₁₆N₂O₂. The previously-reported ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR data for fraction 2 are in agreement with the obtained data [22,26,27], which indicate that fraction 2 is cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) (Figure 5, Supplementary Figure S4 and Supplementary Table S2).

2.5. Antimicrobial Compounds Isolated from E. coli GZ-34 Interfere with Cell Growth and Expression Levels of Virulence Contributors of R. solanacearum

The purified antimicrobial compounds from E. coli GZ-34 obviously inhibited wilt symptoms in tomato plants and increased the survival rate of the plants (Figure 6a,b). To fully learn the inhibitory effect of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) on R. solanacearum, the MIC values of the two antimicrobial compounds were measured and determined as 1000 μM (Figure 6c,d). We continued to study whether the two compounds affect the virulence contributors in R. solanacearum. Transcriptional expression levels of the genes related to extracellular polysaccharides, motility, T3SS, TTE, T4SS pili, chemotaxis, and the global regulator were tested in the presence of the compounds at 100 μM using the primers listed in Table S3. It was revealed that exogenous addition of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) downregulated the expression levels of hrpB, pilQ and cellulase encoding gene. HrpB is a master regulator to be involved in regulation of T3SS, chemotaxis and biosynthesis of various low molecular weight compounds. Addition of cyclo-(l-Pro-l-Phe) also decreased many other gene expressions, such as phcA, epsF, fliT, pilQ, and cheW. PhcA controls extracellular polysaccharides, cellulose, and AHL quorum sensing system.

2.6. Cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) Inhibits Spore Formation in M. Grisea

To determine whether the biocontrol agent E. coli GZ-34 has antifungal activity, we selected several important fungal pathogens and found that the ethyl acetate extract of E. coli GZ-34 could inhibit spore formation in M. grisea, which is the causal agent of rice blast. The subsequent study revealed that the active compound was cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) from E. coli GZ-34 (Figure 7). The spore formation ratio of M. grisea decreased from 100% to 70.45% 29.49%, and 6.44% in the presence of 50 μM, 100 μM, and 250 μM of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe), respectively, suggesting that cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) is a key component responsible for the inhibitory activity of E. coli GZ-34 on the spore formation of M. grisea. Interestingly, we found that the ethyl acetate extract of E. coli GZ-34 could also inhibit both the growth and sexual integration of Sporisorium scitamineum (Supplementary Figure S5), suggesting that E. coli GZ-34 has a broad-spectrum antifungal activity. However, the two compounds only showed a slight effect on S. scitamineum.

3. Discussion

Biological control shows an obvious advantage over traditional methods, such as chemical control and the development of resistant cultivars. Many microorganisms have been identified for their antimicrobial activity against plant pathogens. In addition, phage was also extensively explored to control plant pathogens [28]. However, limitations of phage therapy, such as phage adsorption blocked by pathogenic bacteria extracellular polysaccharide, and the various degrees of susceptibility among many bacterial strains, inhibit the wide application of this method. In this study, we have isolated 56 biocontrol agents with high antagonistic activity against R. solanacearum. Our results showed that there are three new antagonistic bacterial species identified as Pantoea, Escherichia, and Dickeya. These new biocontrol agents display effective antimicrobial activity, and could protect plants from infection by R. solanacearum (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 and Figure 6). Our study provides one more evidence to apply biocontrol agents to control bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum, which is the causative agent of bacterial wilt in many important crops worldwide.

Characterization of the isolated biocontrol agents showed that E. coli GZ-34 had a high antimicrobial activity against R. solanacearum. Pot experiments demonstrated that the application of E. coli GZ-34 could reduce disease index of plant to 16.7% (Figure 1). Lugtenberg et al. [29] reported that competitive root tip colonization by Pseudomonas strains can play an important role in the control of soil-borne crop diseases caused by fungi. Inadequate colonization is often the limiting factor for biological control, but E. coli GZ-34 showed a good efficacy in disease suppression in the greenhouse. Another advantage of E. coli GZ-34 is the broad-spectrum activity against pathogens. The ethyl acetate extract of E. coli GZ-34 inhibited both the growth and sexual integration of S. scitamineum, which is an important fungal pathogen of sugarcane (Supplementary Figure S5) [30]. Cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) produced by E. coli GZ-34 could effectively reduce spore formation of M. grisea (Figure 7). M. grisea is the causal agent of rice blast, and spore formation is an important process for its pathogenesis. These results demonstrate that E. coli GZ-34 is a promising potential biocontrol agent against both bacterial and fungal pathogens.

Several types of cyclic dipeptides have been identified for their antimicrobial activities [31,32,33,34], indicating that they would be potential for antibiotic design. Some dipeptides were also reported to reduce virulence-factor production in bacterial pathogens [33,35,36]. Our study demonstrate the vital role of cyclic dipeptide in control of bacterial pathogens. Both cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) showed an antibacterial activity (Figure 6). Cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) also showed a strong antifungal activity against M. grisea to inhibit the spore formation (Figure 7). Interestingly, cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) may interfere with the production of some virulence contributors in R. solanacearum (Table S4). These findings suggest that cyclic dipeptides could be developed as novel antimicrobial compounds not only to inhibit the cell growth of pathogens, but also to interfere with the virulence-regulating systems in pathogens.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial and Fungal Growth Conditions and MIC Assays

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table S1. R. solanacearum GMI1000(ATCCBAA-1114) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and maintained at 28 °C in 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride medium (TTC medium) consisting of 1% tryptone, 0.1% casamino acids, 5% glucose, and 0.005% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride. The GMI1000(egfp) strain harboring the expression construct pBBR1-2-eGFP was constructed in this study. Luria−Bertani (LB) medium (1 liter contains 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, and 10 g NaCl, pH 7.0) was used to isolate biocontrol agents. Magnaporthe grisea Guy11(ATCC201236) was cultured in rice bran culture medium (20 g rice bran, 2 g yeast extract, and 11 g agar per 1 liter). Sporisorium scitamineum was cultured in YePSA medium (10 g yeast extract, 20 g peptone, 20 g sugar, and 20 g agar per liter) [30]. The antibiotic kanamycin (100 μg/mL) was used when necessary. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial compounds in which bacterial growth in the well was not measurable by determining the turbidity at 600 nm, following the method from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [37].

4.2. Isolation of Antagonistic Bacteria against R. solanacearum

The soil samples (10 g) were dissolved in 90 mL of sterilized water, and the suspensions were serially diluted and spread on King’s B agar [38]. After incubating at 30 °C for two days, single bacterial colonies were selected and streaked onto a new LB plate. Antagonistic activities were evaluated by measuring the diameter of inhibition zones of antagonistic bacteria in the bioassay plate of R. solanacearum (10⁶ CFU/mL) after incubation at 28 °C for three days.

4.3. Characterization of Antagonistic Bacteria against R. solanacearum

Biochemical and physiological properties of bacterial antagonists were determined by analyzing the Gram reaction, oxidase activity, starch hydrolysis, arginine dihydrolase, V-P detection, nitrate reduction, and growth at different temperatures according to standard methods [39]. They were also characterized by partial nucleotide sequencing of 16S rDNA gene using PCR with 27-f (AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and 1492-r (GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT) primers [40]. Nucleotide sequences were aligned using ClustalW available in the molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) 5.2 program (Molecular Biology and Evolution, New York, NY, USA) [41]. The 16S rDNA gene sequence was submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI) and is available with the supplied GenBank accession number MF374346. The three potential biocontrol agents were also submitted to the China Center for Culture Collection (CCTCC). The collection numbers re provided in Table S1.

4.4. Construction of GMI1000(eGFP) Strain

The eGFP coding region was amplified using the primers of egfp-F and egfp-R and PET-28a-eGFP as a template. The PCR product was digested with XhoI and HindIII and ligated into the same enzyme sites of pBBR1-2 for generating the construct pBBR1-2-eGFP. The construct was verified by DNA sequencing before it was introduced into GMI1000 by electroporation. The GMI1000 transconjugants were selected on TTC plates containing kanamycin.

4.5. Analysis of Efficacy against Tomato Bacterial Wilt

Efficacy of antagonistic bacteria against tomato bacterial wilt was proceeded in greenhouse AIRKINS (28 °C, 16 h (light) plus 8 h (dark)). A mixture of field soil, sand and compost (1.25:1.25:0.5) was prepared and autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min. The plants were inoculated with 5 mL of R. solanacearum GMI1000(eGFP) culture at an OD₆₀₀ = 3.0 supplemented with biocontrol agents at 1:0, 1:1, 1:2.5, and 1:5 (v/v), respectively. The biocontrol agents were also grown to OD₆₀₀ = 3.0. TTC medium and LB medium were used in the blank control group. Biocontrol agent cells were grown in LB medium and GMI1000 (eGFP) cells were grown in TTC medium.

Tomato seeds (Jinfeng 1) were treated by 2% NaClO for 3 min and 75% ethanol for 2 min. The seeds were rinsed with sterile water three times before being planted for 30 d. Each treatment had 25 replicates. The plants were scored for disease index (DI) on a scale of 0–4 (Table 2) [42]:

Disease index (DI) = \frac{\sum (The number of diseased plants in each grade \times grade)}{Total number of plants investigated \times The highest disease index} \times 100 %

Control efficacy (%) = \frac{DI in GMI 1000 group - DI in the antagonist treated group}{DI in GMI 1000 group} \times 100 %

Data were analyzed for significance using analysis of variance followed by Ducan’s least-significant-difference test (p = 0.05), using the SAS software program. All experiments were performed at least three times.

4.6. Analysis of R. solanacearum Cell Numbers in Soil and in Plants

One gram of soil, plant root, and stem were collected and milled in 9 mL of sterilized water for 20 min, respectively. The suspension was then diluted and spread on TTC plates. eGFP-expressing colonies (GFP-CFU) were enumerated using an epifluorescence binocular microscope (M165 FC, Leica, Leica Microsystems, Germany) at low magnification (40×), whereas colonies on plates were counted without magnification under normal light. The microscopic analysis of R. solanacearum cells in plant stems were prepared using two methods. First, the plant stems were thinly sliced and placed in water, and the bacterial cells were flowed to accumulate in the bottom [43]. Second, the thinnest stem slice was picked up and placed on a glass slides, and was covered for a fluorescence microscope assay (DMi8, Leica, Leica Microsystems, Germany).

4.7. Analysis of Antimicrobial Compounds

E. coli GZ-34 cells were cultured in LB medium overnight and the supernatant was extracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. Following evaporation of the ethyl acetate, the residue was dissolved in methanol and subjected to HPLC analysis on a C18 reverse phase column (XBridge, 10 μm, 19 mm × 250 mm, Waters) and eluted with methanol-water (from 10:90 to 100:0 v/v) at a flow rate of 7 mL/min for 30 minutes. Elution was collected for the test of antimicrobial activity. The active fraction 1 was detected and purified by HPLC using a semi-preparative C18 reverse phase column (Gemini-NX, 50 μm, 10.0 mm × 250 mm, Phenomenex) and eluted with methanol-water (10:90 v/v) at a flow rate of 3 mL/min. The active fraction 2 was detected and purified by HPLC using a semi-preparative C18 reverse phase column (Gemini-NX, 50 μm, 10.0 mm × 250 mm, Phenomenex) and eluted with methanol-water (33:67 v/v) at a flow rate of 3 mL/min. Peaks were monitored using a UV detector at 210 nm and were collected and assayed. The purities of fractions 1 and 2 were 95% and 97%, respectively.

The ¹H, ¹³C, and DEPT135 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra in CD₃OD solution were obtained using a Bruker AV-500 (Bruker Instrument, Inc., Zurich, Switzerland) spectrometer operating at 500 MHz for ¹H or 125 MHz for ¹³C. High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry was performed on a Waters Q-Tof Premier high-resolution mass spectrometer (Waters, USA, MA).

4.8. Microscopic Analysis and Quantification of Spore Formation in M. grisea

M. grisea is a typical heterothallic ascomycete and the causal agent of rice blast, one of the most destructive diseases of rice worldwide. Spore formation is important for their infection and transmission [44,45]. For testing the effect on spore formation in M. grisea, cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) was diluted in methanol and added at the final concentrations as indicated. M. grisea was cultured in rice bran culture medium at 28 °C for five days. Three milliliters of sterile water was used to scrape the mycelium with a sterile coated rod. The cultures were incubated at 28 °C for five days under 8-h light plus 16-h dark conditions. Spores was washed using 5 mL of sterile water and quantified using a phase contrast microscope (DMi8, Leica, Germany). Imaging was achieved using a Leica DMI8 fluorescence microscope with DIC 100× and a Leica DFC 450C camera interphased with LAS V4.8 software.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: Isolation and characterization of antagonistic bacteria, Figure S2: Effect of antagonistic bacteria on tomato infected by R. solanacearum, Figure S3: DEPT135 spectra of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile), Figure S4: DEPT135 spectra of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe), Figure S5: Effect of the ethyl acetate extract of GZ-34 on the sexual integration of S. scitamineum, Table S1: Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study, Table S2: ¹H (500 MHz) and ¹³C (125 MHz) NMR data of fraction 1 and fraction 2 (δ in ppm),Table S3: Primers used in this study, Table S4: Transcriptional expression levels of virulence-related genes in R. solanacearum after treatment with antimicrobial compounds from E. coli GZ-34.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Pearl River Nova Program of Guangzhou (no. 201506010067), the China National Natural Science Foundation (No. 31571969), the China National Key Project for Basic Research (973 Project, 2015CB150600), the Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 2014A030306015), and the Introduction of Innovative R and D Team Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2013S034), China.

Author Contributions

Y.D. and S.S. designed the research; S.S., S.F., X.S., and T.D. performed the research; S.S., S.F., P.L., J.W., F.H., and Y.D. analyzed the data; and S.S., S.F., and Y.D. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

Kleman, A. The relationship of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance on a tetrazolium medium. Phytopathology 1954, 44, 683–685. [Google Scholar]
Wicker, E.; Grassart, L.; Coransonbeaudu, R.; Mian, D.; Guilbaud, C.; Fegan, M.; Prior, P. Ralstonia solanacearum strains from Martinique (French West Indies) exhibiting a new pathogenic potential. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6790–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Peeters, N.; Guidot, A.; Vailleau, F.; Valls, M. Ralstonia solanacearum, a widespread bacterial plant pathogen in the post-genomic era. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Lopes, C.A.; Rossato, M.; Boiteux, L.S. The host status of coffee (coffea arabica) to Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype I isolates. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2015, 40, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Goto, M. Fundamentals of bacterial plant pathology; Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1992; pp. 110–155. ISBN 9780323140447. [Google Scholar]
Prior, P.; Ailloud, F.; Dalsing, B.L.; Remenant, B.; Sanchez, B.; Allen, C. Genomic and proteomic evidence supporting the division of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum into three species. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ravelomanantsoa, S.; Robène, I.; Chiroleu, F.; Guérin, F.; Poussier, S.; Pruvost, O.; Prior, P. A novel multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis typing scheme for african phylotype III strains of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. PeerJ 2016, 4, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ailloud, F.; Lowe, T.M.; Robène, I.; Cruveiller, S.; Allen, C.; Prior, P. In planta comparative transcriptomics of host-adapted strains of Ralstonia solanacearum. PeerJ 2016, 4, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Huang, J.; Yan, L.; Lei, Y.; Jiang, H.; Ren, X.; Liao, B. Expressed sequence tags in cultivated peanut (arachis hypogaea): Discovery of genes in seed development and response to Ralstonia solanacearum challenge. J. Plant Res. 2012, 125, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Perrier, A.; Peyraud, R.; Rengel, D.; Barlet, X.; Lucasson, E.; Gouzy, J.; Peeters, N.; Genin, S.; Guidot, A. Enhancedin plantafitness through adaptive mutations in efpr, a dual regulator of virulence and metabolic functions in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1006044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kazuhiro, N.; Caitilyn, A. A pectinase-deficient Ralstonia solanacearum strain induces reduced and delayed structural defences in tomato xylem. J. Phytopathol. 2009, 157, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hayward, A.C. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt cause by Pseudomona solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1991, 29, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hayward, A.C. Ralstonia solanacearum. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology; Lederberg, J., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000; Volume 4, pp. 32–42. ISBN 9780122268021. [Google Scholar]
Fujiwara, A.; Fujisawa, M.; Hamasaki, R.; Kawasaki, T.; Fujie, M.; Yamada, T. Biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum by treatment with lytic bacteriophages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lacombe, S.; Rougon-Cardoso, A.; Sherwood, E.; Peeters, N.; Dahlbeck, D.; van Esse, H.P.; Smoker, M.; Rallapalli, G.; Thomma, B.P.; Staskawicz, B. Interfamily transfer of a plant pattern-recognition receptor confers broad-spectrum bacterial resistance. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wagner, W.C. Sustainable agriculture: How to sustain a production system in a changing environment. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pierre, U. Sustainable agriculture and chemical control: Opponents or components of the same strategy. Crop. Prot. 2000, 19, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chave, M.; Crozilhac, P.; Deberdt, P.; Plouznikoff, K.; Declerck, S. Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 41833 transitorily reduces tomato bacterial wilt incidence caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, under in vitro conditions. Mycorrhiza 2017, 27, 719–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Raza, W.; Ling, N.; Liu, D.; Wei, Z.; Huang, Q.; Shen, Q. Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens WR-1 restrict the growth and virulence traits of Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Raza, W.; Wei, Z.; Ling, N.; Huang, Q.; Shen, Q. Effect of organic fertilizers prepared from organic waste materials on the production of antibacterial volatile organic compounds by two biocontrol Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 227, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elhalag, K.M.; Messiha, N.A.; Emara, H.M.; Abdallah, S.A. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia against Ralstonia solanacearum under different application conditions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 1629–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kumar, S.N.; Sreekala, S.R.; Chandrasekaran, D.; Nambisan, B.; Anto, R.J. Biocontrol of aspergillus species on peanut kernels by antifungal diketopiperazine producing Bacillus cereus associated with entomopathogenic nematode. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nishanth, K.S.; Mohandas, C.; Siji, J.V.; Rajasekharan, K.N.; Nambisan, B. Identification of antimicrobial compound, diketopiperazines, from a Bacillus sp. N strain associated with a rhabditid entomopathogenic nematode against major plant pathogenic fungi. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 914–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Musetti, R.; Polizzotto, R.; Vecchione, A.; Borselli, S.; Zulini, L.; D’Ambrosio, M.; di Toppi, L.S.; Pertot, I. Antifungal activity of diketopiperazines extracted from Alternaria alternata against Plasmopara viticola: An ultrastructural study. Micron 2007, 38, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yang, B.; Dong, J.; Zhou, X.; Yang, X.; Lee, K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y. Proline-containing dipeptides from a marine sponge of a Callyspongia species. Helvetica Chim. Acta 2010, 92, 1112–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Furtado, N.A.; Pupo, M.T.; Carvalho, I.; Campo, V.L.; Duarte, M.C.T.; Bastos, J.K. Diketopiperazines produced by an Aspergillus fumigatus brazilian strain. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2005, 16, 1448–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Giessen, T.; Vontesmar, A.; Marahiel, M. Insights into the generation of structural diversity in a tRNA-dependent pathway for highly modified bioactive cyclic dipeptides. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 828–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Balogh, B.; Jones, J.B.; Iriarte, F.B.; Momol, M.T. Phage therapy for plant disease control. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2010, 11, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lugtenberg, B.J.J.; Weger, L.A.D.; Bennett, J.W. Microbial stimulation of plant growth and protection from disease. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1991, 2, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yan, M.; Zhu, G.; Lin, S.; Xian, X.; Chang, C.; Xi, P.; Shen, W.; Huang, W.; Cai, E.; Jiang, Z. The Mating-type Locus b of the Sugarcane Smut Sporisorium scitamineum is essential for mating, filamentous growth and pathogenicity. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 86, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Prasad, C. Bioactive cyclic dipeptides. Peptides 1995, 16, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dinsmore, C.J.; Beshore, D.C. Recent advances in the synthesis of diketopiperazines. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3297–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huang, R.; Zhou, X.; Xu, T.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y. Diketopiperazines from marine organisms. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huang, R.; Yan, T.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, X.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y. Diketopiperazines from the marine sponge Axinella sp. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2014, 50, 191–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Campbell, J.; Lin, Q.; Geske, G.D.; Blackwell, H.E. New and unexpected insights into the modulation of LuxR-type quorum sensing by cyclic dipeptides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sauguet, L.; Moutiez, M.; Li, Y.; Belin, P.; Seguin, J.; Du, M.L.; Thai, R.; Masson, C.; Fonvielle, M.; Pernodet, J.L. Cyclodipeptide synthases, a family of class-I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-like enzymes involved in non-ribosomal peptide synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 4475–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Andrews, J.M. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J. Antimicrob. Chem. 2001, 48, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
King, B.D.; Elder, J.D.; Proctor, D.F.; Dripps, R.D. Reflex circulatory responses to tracheal intubation performed under topical anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1954, 15, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schaad, A.; Moffett, J.; Jacob, J. The role-based access control system of a European bank: A case study and discussion. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, Chantilly, VA, USA, 3–4 May 2001; Volume 172, pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Eden, M.J.; Furley, P.A.; Mcgregor, D.F.M.; Milliken, W.; Ratter, J.A. Effect of forest clearance and burning on soil properties in northern Roraima, Braz. For. Ecol. Manag. 1991, 38, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tamura, S.; Oshima, T.; Yoshihara, K.; Kanazawa, A.; Yamada, T.; Inagaki, D.; Sato, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Shiozawa, M.; Morinaga, S. Clinical significance of STC1 gene expression in patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Kempe, J. Biological control of bacterial wilt of potatoes: Attempts to induce resistance by treating tubers with bacteria. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Champoiseau, P.G.; Momol, T.M. Bacterial wilt of tomato. Ralstonia solanacearum 2008, 12. [Google Scholar]
Wang, Z.Y.; Thornton, C.R.; Kkershaw, M.J.; Debao, L.; Talbot, N.J. The glyoxylate cycle is required for temporal regulation of virulence by the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 1601–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, Z.Y.; Jenkinson, J.M.; Holcombe, L.J.; Soanes, D.M.; Veneault-Fourrey, C.; Bhambra, G.K.; Talbot, N.J. The molecular biology of appressorium turgor generation by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Sample Availability: Samples are available from the authors.

Figure 1. Isolation and identification of antagonistic bacteria. (a) The disease index of plant with treatment of the antagonistic bacteria of Pantoea GZ-33, Escherichia GZ-34, and Dickeya GZ-39 against R. solanacearum. R. solanacearum and the antagonistic bacteria were used at 1:0, 1:1, 1:2.5, and 1:5 (v/v). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test); (b) Analysis of phylogenic tree of E. coli GZ-34 based on 16S rDNA sequence. The 16S rDNA gene sequence was submitted to the NCBI website and is available with the supplied GenBank accession number MF374346.

Figure 2. The inhibitory effect of E. coli GZ-34 on the cell growth of R. solanacearum in soil (a) and in plant (b). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test).

Figure 3. Influence of E. coli GZ-34 on R. solanacearum cell proliferation in the plant stem. After infection with R. solanacearum, the plant stem streamed bacterial milky liquid into sterile water without treatment with E. coli GZ-34 (a); while there was no milky liquid (b) when the plant was treated with E. coli GZ-34. Microscopy observation showed R. solanacearum cells proliferated in the plant stem in the absence of the biocontrol agent (c); but there was no detectable cells or signal in the plant in the presence of the biocontrol agent (d). Arrows pointed to R. solanacearum cells.

Figure 4. Structural characterization of fraction 1. (a) ESI-MS spectra of fraction 1; (b) ¹H-NMR spectra of fraction 1; (c) ¹³C-NMR spectra of fraction 1; (d) Structure of fraction 1 was identified as cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile).

Figure 5. Structural characterization of fraction 2. (a) ESI-MS spectra of fraction 2; (b) ¹H-NMR spectral of fraction 2; (c) ¹³C-NMR spectra of fraction 2; (d) The structure of fraction 2 was identified as cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe).

Figure 6. Influence of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) on R. solanacearum. The disease index of the plant infected by R. solanacearum with treatment of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) (a) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) (b); antimicrobial activity of cyclo(l-Pro-d-Ile) (c) and cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) (d) against R. solanacearum were measured. Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test).

Figure 7. Effect of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) on the spore formation of M. grisea. Growth curve (a) and spore formation (b) of M. grisea in the presence of different final concentrations of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) as indicated. Microscopic analysis of spore formation of M. grisea with addition of cyclo(l-Pro-l-Phe) at a final concentration of 0 (c); 50 μM (d); 100 μM (e); and 250 μM (f). Data are means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 (unpaired t-test).

Table 1. Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of E. coli GZ-34.

Test	Result	Test	Result
Cell morphology	Long rod	Gram stain	-
Oxidase	-	Contact enzyme	+
Citrate	-	V-P determination	-
Hydrogen sulfide	-	Lysine decarboxylase	-
Ornithine decarboxylase	-	Arginine dihydrolase	-
Nitrate	+	Starch hydrolysis	-
Urease	-	Lecithinase	-
Indole test	+	Cellobiose	-
Arabinose	-	Lactose	-
Sorbitol	+	Adonitol	-
Glucose	+	Maltose	+
Xylose	+	Trehalose	+
Mannitol	+	ONPG	-
Malonate	-	Methyl red	+

Note: + denotes Positive, - denotes Negative.

Table 2. Grading criteria of severity of R. solanacearum.

Grade	Disease Description
DI-0	No visible symptoms
DI-1	Up to 25% of leaves wilted
DI-2	25–50% of leaves wilted
DI-3	50–75% of leaves wilted
DI-4	75–100% of leaves wilted, the plants always died

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, S.; Fu, S.; Sun, X.; Li, P.; Wu, J.; Dong, T.; He, F.; Deng, Y. Identification of Cyclic Dipeptides from Escherichia coli as New Antimicrobial Agents against Ralstonia Solanacearum. Molecules 2018, 23, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010214

AMA Style

Song S, Fu S, Sun X, Li P, Wu J, Dong T, He F, Deng Y. Identification of Cyclic Dipeptides from Escherichia coli as New Antimicrobial Agents against Ralstonia Solanacearum. Molecules. 2018; 23(1):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Shihao, Shuna Fu, Xiuyun Sun, Peng Li, Ji’en Wu, Tingyan Dong, Fei He, and Yinyue Deng. 2018. "Identification of Cyclic Dipeptides from Escherichia coli as New Antimicrobial Agents against Ralstonia Solanacearum" Molecules 23, no. 1: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010214

APA Style

Song, S., Fu, S., Sun, X., Li, P., Wu, J., Dong, T., He, F., & Deng, Y. (2018). Identification of Cyclic Dipeptides from Escherichia coli as New Antimicrobial Agents against Ralstonia Solanacearum. Molecules, 23(1), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010214

Article Menu