Placental Sonomorphologic Appearance and Fetomaternal Outcome in Fontan Circulation
<p>Overview of women with Fontan circulation and resulting pregnancies, who presented at the study center between 2018 to 2023.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Transabdominal ultrasounds in 2D grayscale. Development of placental sonomorphologic appearance of cases with Fontan circulation (n = 6). Case 1 (A: 25 + 5; B: 32 + 1), case 2 (A: 29 + 4; B: 36 + 3); case 3 (A: 20 + 5; B: 30 + 5); case 4 (A: 23 + 6; B: 25 + 0); case 5 (A: 22 + 1; B: 32 + 1); case 6 (A: 24 + 0; B: 34 + 6). Gestational age (week + day).</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Macroscopic and microscopic placental appearance in cases with Fontan circulation (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and control (<b>C</b>). Hematoxylin-eosin staining with magnification 40× (column 3) and 80× (column 4). 3A–C (1) fresh placentas, fetal surface; 3A–C (2) fresh placentas, maternal surface; 3A–C (3 + 4) representative histologic images of corresponding placental specimens (Hematoxylin-eosin staining, magnification 40× and 80×). 3A, 1–4: Case 4, 27 + 5: small, globular shape, circumvallate membranes, and extensive subchorionic fibrin deposition; subchorionic fibrin (3A, 3, upper part) and mainly terminal villi can be observed. 3B, 1–4: Case 6, 38 + 1: few scattered areas of calcification; syncytial knots. 3C, 1–4: Healthy control; normal macroscopic and microscopic appearance at term after uneventful pregnancy.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Estimated fetal weight measurements of cases with Fontan circulation (n = 6). Reference curves of 5th (lower red line), 50th (black line), and 95th percentile (upper red line) [<a href="#B27-jcm-13-05193" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-jcm-13-05193" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Umbilical artery pulsatility indices of cases with Fontan circulation (n = 6). Reference curves of 5th (lower red line), 50th (black line), and 95th percentile (upper red line) [<a href="#B29-jcm-13-05193" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Maternal Characteristics, Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes
3.2. Placental Findings
3.3. Fetal Growth Assessment and Doppler Studies
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Rychik, J.; Atz, A.M.; Celermajer, D.S.; Deal, B.J.; Gatzoulis, M.A.; Gewillig, M.H.; Hsia, T.-Y.; Hsu, D.T.; Kovacs, A.H.; McCrindle, B.W.; et al. Evaluation and Management of the Child and Adult with Fontan Circulation: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019, 140, e234–e284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandberg, M.; Fomina, T.; Macsali, F.; Greve, G.; Estensen, M.E.; Øyen, N.; Leirgul, E. Time trends and birth rates in women with congenital heart disease; a nationwide cohort study from Norway 1994–2014. Int. J. Cardiol. Congenit. Heart Dis. 2024, 16, 100507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobhani, N.C.; Corbetta-Rastelli, C.M.; Agarwal, A.; D’Alton, M.E.; Friedman, A.M.; Wen, T. Delivery Trends and Obstetric Outcomes in Patients with Fontan Circulation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2023, 5, 100921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia Ropero, A.; Baskar, S.; Roos Hesselink, J.W.; Girnius, A.; Zentner, D.; Swan, L.; Ladouceur, M.; Brown, N.; Veldtman, G.R. Pregnancy in Women with a Fontan Circulation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2018, 11, e004575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Drenthen, W.; Boersma, E.; Balci, A.; Moons, P.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Mulder, B.J.M.; Vliegen, H.W.; Van Dijk, A.P.J.; Voors, A.A.; Yap, S.C.; et al. Predictors of Pregnancy Complications in Women with Congenital Heart Disease. Eur. Heart J. 2010, 31, 2124–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wald, R.M.; Silversides, C.K.; Kingdom, J.; Toi, A.; Lau, C.S.; Mason, J.; Colman, J.M.; Sermer, M.; Siu, S.C. Maternal Cardiac Output and Fetal Doppler Predict Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Heart Disease. JAHA 2015, 4, e002414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silversides, C.K.; Grewal, J.; Mason, J.; Sermer, M.; Kiess, M.; Rychel, V.; Wald, R.M.; Colman, J.M.; Siu, S.C. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Heart Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Hagen, I.M.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Donvito, V.; Liptai, C.; Morissens, M.; Murphy, D.J.; Galian, L.; Bazargani, N.M.; Cornette, J.; Hall, R.; et al. Incidence and Predictors of Obstetric and Fetal Complications in Women with Structural Heart Disease. Heart 2017, 103, 1610–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wedlund, F.; Von Wowern, E.; Hlebowicz, J. Increased Cesarean Section Rate and Premature Birth According to Modified WHO Maternal Cardiovascular Risk in Pregnant Women with Congenital Heart Disease. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0294323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gouton, M.; Nizard, J.; Patel, M.; Sassolas, F.; Jimenez, M.; Radojevic, J.; Mathiron, A.; Amedro, P.; Barre, E.; Labombarda, F.; et al. Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Pregnancy with Fontan Circulation: A Multicentric Observational Study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 187, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonner, S.J.; Asghar, O.; Roberts, A.; Vause, S.; Clarke, B.; Keavney, B. Cardiovascular, Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in Women with Previous Fontan Repair. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017, 219, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Girnius, A.; Zentner, D.; Valente, A.M.; Pieper, P.G.; Economy, K.E.; Ladouceur, M.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Warshak, C.; Partington, S.L.; Gao, Z.; et al. Bleeding and Thrombotic Risk in Pregnant Women with Fontan Physiology. Heart 2021, 107, 1390–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cauldwell, M.; Von Klemperer, K.; Uebing, A.; Swan, L.; Steer, P.J.; Gatzoulis, M.; Johnson, M.R. Why Is Post-Partum Haemorrhage More Common in Women with Congenital Heart Disease? Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 218, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cauldwell, M.; Von Klemperer, K.; Uebing, A.; Swan, L.; Steer, P.J.; Babu-Narayan, S.V.; Gatzoulis, M.A.; Johnson, M.R. A Cohort Study of Women with a Fontan Circulation Undergoing Preconception Counselling. Heart 2016, 102, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ordoñez, M.V.; Biglino, G.; Caputo, M.; Curtis, S.L. Pregnancy in the FONTAN Palliation: Physiology, Management and New Insights from Bioengineering. J. Congenit. Heart Dis. 2021, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moroney, E.; Posma, E.; Dennis, A.; d’Udekem, Y.; Cordina, R.; Zentner, D. Pregnancy in a Woman with a Fontan Circulation: A Review. Obstet. Med. 2018, 11, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Regitz-Zagrosek, V.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Bauersachs, J.; Blomström-Lundqvist, C.; Cífková, R.; De Bonis, M.; Iung, B.; Johnson, M.R.; Kintscher, U.; Kranke, P.; et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 3165–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siu, S.C.; Sermer, M.; Colman, J.M.; Alvarez, A.N.; Mercier, L.-A.; Morton, B.C.; Kells, C.M.; Bergin, M.L.; Kiess, M.C.; Marcotte, F.; et al. Prospective Multicenter Study of Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Heart Disease. Circulation 2001, 104, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siegmund, A.S.; Pieper, P.G.; Bilardo, C.M.; Gordijn, S.J.; Khong, T.Y.; Gyselaers, W.; Van Veldhuisen, D.J.; Dickinson, M.G. Cardiovascular Determinants of Impaired Placental Function in Women with Cardiac Dysfunction. Am. Heart J. 2022, 245, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Härtel, J.A.; Müller, N.; Herberg, U.; Breuer, J.; Bizjak, D.A.; Bloch, W.; Grau, M. Altered Hemorheology in Fontan Patients in Normoxia and After Acute Hypoxic Exercise. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Easterling, T. Pulmonary Hypertension in Pregnancy: Treatment with Pulmonary Vasodilators. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 93, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khong, T.Y.; Mooney, E.E.; Ariel, I.; Balmus, N.C.M.; Boyd, T.K.; Brundler, M.-A.; Derricott, H.; Evans, M.J.; Faye-Petersen, O.M.; Gillan, J.E.; et al. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2016, 140, 698–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kehl, S.; Dötsch, J.; Hecher, K.; Schlembach, D.; Schmitz, D.; Stepan, H.; Gembruch, U. Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 2017, 77, 1157–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaulitz, R.; Ziemer, G.; Luhmer, I.; Kallfelz, H.-C. Modified Fontan Operation in Functionally Univentricular Hearts: Preoperative Risk Factors and Intermediate Results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1996, 112, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jauniaux, E.; Zosmer, N.; D’Antonio, F.; Hussein, A.M. Placental Lakes vs Lacunae: Spot the Differences. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2024, 63, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almog, B.; Shehata, F.; Aljabri, S.; Levin, I.; Shalom-Paz, E.; Shrim, A. Placenta Weight Percentile Curves for Singleton and Twins Deliveries. Placenta 2011, 32, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stirnemann, J.; Villar, J.; Salomon, L.J.; Ohuma, E.; Ruyan, P.; Altman, D.G.; Nosten, F.; Craik, R.; Munim, S.; Cheikh Ismail, L.; et al. International Estimated Fetal Weight Standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: International Estimated Fetal Weight Standards. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadlock, F.P.; Harrist, R.B.; Martinez-Poyer, J. In Utero Analysis of Fetal Growth: A Sonographic Weight Standard. Radiology 1991, 181, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebbing, C.; Rasmussen, S.; Kiserud, T. Middle Cerebral Artery Blood Flow Velocities and Pulsatility Index and the Cerebroplacental Pulsatility Ratio: Longitudinal Reference Ranges and Terms for Serial Measurements. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 30, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putman, R.; Goldstein, S.A.; Boyd, B.; Dotters-Katz, S.; Small, M.; Addae-Konadu, K.L. Sonographic Evaluation of the Placenta in Fontan Patients: A Case Series. J. Ultrasound Med. 2023, 42, 1361–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ordoñez, M.V.; Biglino, G.; Caputo, M.; Kelly, B.; Mohan, A.; Trinder, J.; Curtis, S.L. Case of Placental Insufficiency and Premature Delivery in a Fontan Pregnancy: Physiological Insights and Considerations on Risk Stratification. Open Heart 2021, 8, e001211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phillips, A.L.; Cetta, F.; Kerr, S.E.; Cheek, E.H.; Rose, C.H.; Bonnichsen, C.R.; Phillips, S.D. The Placenta: A Site of End-Organ Damage after Fontan Operation. A Case Series. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019, 289, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Melchiorre, K.; Giorgione, V.; Thilaganathan, B. The Placenta and Preeclampsia: Villain or Victim? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 226, S954–S962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thilaganathan, B. Maternal Cardiac Dysfunction Precedes Development of Preeclampsia. Hypertension 2020, 76, 321–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gyselaers, W. Origins of Abnormal Placentation: Why Maternal Veins Must Not Be Forgotten. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 228, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, F.M.; Quade, B.J.; Carreon, C.K.; Schefter, Z.J.; Moses, A.; Lachtrupp, C.L.; Markley, J.C.; Gauvreau, K.; Valente, A.M.; Economy, K.E.; et al. Placental Findings in Pregnancies Complicated by Maternal Cardiovascular Disease. JACC Adv. 2022, 1, 100008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rychik, J.; Goff, D.; McKay, E.; Mott, A.; Tian, Z.; Licht, D.J.; Gaynor, J.W. Characterization of the Placenta in the Newborn with Congenital Heart Disease: Distinctions Based on Type of Cardiac Malformation. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2018, 39, 1165–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yokouchi-Konishi, T.; Ohta-Ogo, K.; Kamiya, C.A.; Shionoiri, T.; Nakanishi, A.; Iwanaga, N.; Ohuchi, H.; Kurosaki, K.; Ichikawa, H.; Noguchi, T.; et al. Clinicopathologic Study of Placentas from Women with a Fontan Circulation. Circ. J. 2021, 86, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahlmann, F.; Fittschen, M.; Reinhard, I.; Wellek, S.; Steiner, E. Reference Values for Blood Flow Velocity in the Uterine Artery in Normal Pregnancies from 18 Weeks to 42 Weeks of Gestation Calculated by Automatic Doppler Waveform Analysis. Ultraschall der Med. - Eur. J. Ultrasound 2012, 33, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, O.; Figueras, F.; Fernández, S.; Bennasar, M.; Martínez, J.M.; Puerto, B.; Gratacós, E. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 32, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Case No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Congenital heart disease | Double inlet LV with L-transposition of the great vessels | TA type Ib, pulmonary stenosis | PA/IVS | TA type Ib | Dextrocardia, single inlet LV with TGA position, single AV valve, asplenia, right atrial and abdominal isomerism | TA type Ib, PA, restrictive VSD |
Type of repair | Modified Fontan | Modified Fontan | Modified Fontan | Modified Fontan | Modified Fontan | Modified Fontan |
Comorbidities | - | - | Esophageal varices gradeI, s/p thrombosis of both femoral veins, arrhythmia (life vest) | s/p occlusion and recanalization of IVC, s/p pacemaker implantation | FALD, s/p TIA | FALD, trigonocephaly |
mWHO classification | III | III | III | III | IV | III |
Additional investigations during pregnancy | - | - | EGD in week 21 | - | - | - |
SpO2, % (bP/lowest iP/bD) | UNK */93/93 | 96/88/90 | 95/90/88 | 96/96/95 | 97/93/92 | 97/96/96 |
NT-pro-BNP, pg/mL (bP/highest iP/bD) | UNK */150/52 | 67/339 (week 36)/66 | 862/924 (week 31)/1676 | 87/80 (week 21)/21 | 166/155/240 | 69/71/68 |
Medication bP | Metoprolol, ASA | Captopril, ASA | Rivaroxaban (until week 6), bisoprolol | Phenprocoumon (until week 5), metoprolol | Apixaban (until week 6), metoprolol | Phenprocoumon (until week 5) |
Medication iP | ASA | Intermediate LMWH, ASA (until week 30) | Prophylactic LMWH | Prophylactic LMWH, metoprolol | Prophylactic LMWH, metoprolol | Prophylactic LMWH |
Preconception counseling | - | - | - | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Gravida/Para | I/0 | I/0 | I/0 | V/0 | II/0 | V/0 |
Obstetric findings | - | dGDM, breech | preeclampsia | Vaginal bleeding, dGDM | - | - |
Indication for delivery | FGR | FGR | Preeclampsia | PPROM, preterm labor | FGR | PPROM, FGR |
Mode of delivery | Elective CS | Elective CS | Elective CS | SVD | Elective CS | IVD |
Type of anesthesia | Spinal | Spinal | Spinal | - | Spinal | Epidural |
GA at delivery, week + day | 32 + 6 | 36 + 4 | 34 + 6 | 27 + 5 | 36 + 0 | 38 + 1 |
Complications during delivery | PPH, suspected AIP | Placenta adhaerens | - | - | - | Placenta adhaerens |
Blood loss (mL) and transfusion | 1200/2 PRBC | 800 | 400 | 300 | 300 | 500/2 PRBC |
ICU stay pp | 1 night | - | 1 night | - | - | 1 night |
Inpatient stay for delivery, days (total/pp) | 16/12 | 11/8 | 10/8 | 34/6 | 7/7 | 6/5 |
Birthweight, gram (percentile) | 1685 (25%) | 2190 (6%) | 1970 (12%) | 930 (36%) | 2190 g (8%) | 2690 (5%) |
Apgar score, 1/5/10 min | 9/10/10 | 10/10/10 | 8/9/9 | 7/9/9 | 9/10/10 | 7/8/10 |
Umbilical-artery pH/BD (mmol/L) | 7.34/4.0 | 7.27/3.70 | 7.38/UNK | 7.38/1.10 | 7.35/2.30 | 7.14/9.70 |
NICU stay, days | 11 | 8 | 10 | 67 | - | - |
Breastfeeding | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Maternal follow-up results | NAD | FALD (14 months pp) | NAD, NT-pro-BNP decreased to 900 pg/mL | NAD | TIA (3 months pp) | No FU data |
Neonatal findings and follow-up results | NAD | NAD | NAD | PDA | No FU data | Trigonocephaly, no FU data |
Case No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ultrasound morphology (see Figure 2) | ||||||
- First trimester | No data | Normal size and echogenicity | Normal size and echogenicity except for some marginal lakes | No data | Normal size and echogenicity | Normal size and echogenicity |
- Second trimester | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes distributed throughout the whole placenta (centrolobular, subchorionic and marginal), partially with central maternal clots (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes distributed throughout the whole placenta (centrolobular, subchorionic and marginal), (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes (subchorionic and marginal), (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes (subchorionic and marginal), (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; some lakes (centrolobular, subchorionic and marginal), scattered intraplacental calcifications | Normal size and echogenicity |
- Third trimester | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes distributed throughout the whole placenta (centrolobular, subchorionic), (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes distributed throughout the whole placenta (centrolobular, subchorionic and marginal), (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes (centrolobular, subchorionic and marginal), (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; huge lakes (subchorionic and marginal), (jelly-like appearance) | Thickened placental shape; extensive lakes (centrolobular, subchorionic and marginal), scattered intraplacental calcifications (jelly-like appearance) | Normal echogenicity; only a few small centrolobular lakes with peripheral echogenicity |
Macroscopic findings (see Figure 3 and Figure S2) | ||||||
- Placental weight, g (percentile range) [26] | 383 (10–25th) | 400 (<3rd) | 360 (<3rd) | 227 (3–10th) | 383 (10–25th) | 295 (<3rd) |
- Umbilical cord abnormalities | - | Marginal insertion, small vessel caliber, congested blood | - | Marginal insertion, small vessel caliber, congested blood | - | - |
- Placental shape | Fragmented parenchyma | Thick shape, rugged parenchyma | Large parenchymal lacunae | Small, thick shape, edematous areas | Regular | Regular |
- Abnormalities of membranes | - | circumvallate | - | circumvallate | - | - |
- Subchorionic fibrin deposition | - | - | yes | yes, extensive (25–33% of organ) | yes, extensive | yes |
- Subchorionic hematoma | yes | yes | yes | - | - | - |
- Signs of infarction | - | - | - | - | focal | - |
Microscopic findings (see Figure 3) | ||||||
- Intervillous fibrin deposition | yes | yes | yes (5–10% of parenchyma) | yes | - | yes (<5% of parenchyma) |
- Villous fibrosis | yes | yes | - | - | - | - |
- Villous atrophy | - | yes | yes | - | - | - |
- Villous hypoplasia | - | yes | - | - | - | - |
- Syncytial knots | yes | - | - | - | - | - |
- Parenchymal hematoma | yes | yes | - | - | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jost, E.; Gembruch, U.; Schneider, M.; Gieselmann, A.; La Rosée, K.; Momcilovic, D.; Vokuhl, C.; Kosian, P.; Ayub, T.H.; Merz, W.M. Placental Sonomorphologic Appearance and Fetomaternal Outcome in Fontan Circulation. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5193. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175193
Jost E, Gembruch U, Schneider M, Gieselmann A, La Rosée K, Momcilovic D, Vokuhl C, Kosian P, Ayub TH, Merz WM. Placental Sonomorphologic Appearance and Fetomaternal Outcome in Fontan Circulation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(17):5193. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175193
Chicago/Turabian StyleJost, Elena, Ulrich Gembruch, Martin Schneider, Andrea Gieselmann, Karl La Rosée, Diana Momcilovic, Christian Vokuhl, Philipp Kosian, Tiyasha H. Ayub, and Waltraut M. Merz. 2024. "Placental Sonomorphologic Appearance and Fetomaternal Outcome in Fontan Circulation" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 17: 5193. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175193
APA StyleJost, E., Gembruch, U., Schneider, M., Gieselmann, A., La Rosée, K., Momcilovic, D., Vokuhl, C., Kosian, P., Ayub, T. H., & Merz, W. M. (2024). Placental Sonomorphologic Appearance and Fetomaternal Outcome in Fontan Circulation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(17), 5193. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175193